Back to Authors

Chambergo‐Michilot, Diego

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3904-7514

Mayo Clinic

Universidad Científica del Sur

Citations 2

Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with primary cardiac angiosarcoma: A systematic review
Chambergo‐Michilot, Diego , Sterner, Rosalie M. , Brañez‐Condorena, Ana , Guerra-Canchari, Pedro , Stulak, John M., De la Cruz-Ku, Gabriel , Brañez-Condorena, Ana , Ku, Gabriel De la Cruz

Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research | April 18, 2023 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-8

10.34172/jcvtr.2023.30531 Get It

Primary cardiac angiosarcomas (PCA) are highly aggressive malignant heart tumors. Previous reports have shown a poor prognosis regardless of management, and no consensus or guidelines exist. It is necessary to clarify this information since patients with PCA have a short survival. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes. We systematically searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We intended to include cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, and case series that reported clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with PCA. As a methodological approach, we used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohorts. We included six studies (five case series, one cohort). The mean/median age ranged from 39 to 48.9 years. Male sex was predominant. The most frequent manifestations were dyspnea (range: 50%-80%), pericardial effusion (29% & 56%), and chest pain (10%-39%). The mean tumor size ranged from 5.8 to 7.2 cm, with the majority of these localized in the right atrium (70-100%). The most common locations of metastasis were the lung (20%-55.6%), liver (10%-22.2%), and bone (10%-20%). Resection (22.9%-94%), and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant or adjuvant (30%-100%) were the most commonly used methods of treatment. Mortality ranged from 64.7% to 100%. PCA often presents late in its course and usually results in poor prognosis. We strongly recommend performing multi-institutional prospective cohorts to better study disease course and treatments to develop consensus, algorithms, and guidelines for this type of sarcoma.
Factors associated with COVID‐19 in people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Chambergo‐Michilot, Diego , Barros‐Sevillano, Shamir , Rivera‐Torrejón, Oscar , Ku, Gabriel De la Cruz , Custodio, Nilton , De la Cruz-Ku, Gabriel A, De la Cruz-Ku, Gabriel

European Journal of Neurology | May 13, 2021 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 3467-3477

10.1111/ene.14912 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThere is debate as to whether there is an increased risk of COVID‐19 infection in people with Parkinson's disease (PD), possibly due to associated factors. This study aimed to systematically review the factors associated with COVID‐19 in people with PD.MethodsA search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2020 (updated until 1 April 2021). Observational studies that analyzed factors associated with COVID‐19 in people with PD were selected and revised.ResultsThe authors included six studies (four case‐controlled studies and two cross‐sectional studies) in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses. The authors found that the following factors were associated with COVID‐19 in people with PD: obesity (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.07–2.99, I2: 0%), any pulmonary disease (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.17–3.15, I2: 0%), COVID‐19 contact (OR: 41.77, 95% CI: 4.77 – 365.56, I2: 0%), vitamin D supplementation (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30–0.83, I2: 0%), hospitalization (OR: 11.78, 95% CI: 6.27–22.12, I2: 0%), and death (OR: 11.23, 95% CI: 3.92–32.18, I2: 0%). The authors did not find any significant association between COVID‐19 and hypertension, diabetes, cardiopathy, cancer, any cognitive problem, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal or hepatic disease, smoking, and tremor.ConclusionsMeta‐analyses were limited by the number of events and some methodological limitations. Despite this, the authors assessed the available evidence, and the results may be useful for future health policies.