Ullrich, Nicole J.

Abstract BACKGROUND Treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPGs remain challenging as most existing data are retrospective and have not included standardized visual outcomes. In this study, we prospectively enrolled newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs and performed standardized neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for monitoring and treatment. METHODS Children with NF1-OPG on MRI who were evaluated by both a study ophthalmologist and neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert within 1 month of radiologic diagnosis were eligible for enrollment. All subjects attempted quantitative visual acuity using Teller acuity cards (TAC) as well as ATS-HOTV testing. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert provided reasons for obtaining the MRI as well as initiating treatment, if applicable. Descriptive statistics calculated the success rate of acquiring TAC and reasons to obtain the MRI. RESULTS Two-hundred fifty subjects from 22 institutions were enrolled and had at least one visit beyond baseline (Median age 3.1 years, range 0.1–16.8; 53% female). TAC was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=195, 78%) and at least one eye in (N=206, 82%). ATS-HOTV was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=97, 39%) and at least one eye in (N=98, 39%). The two most common reasons to obtain an MRI were screening due to a diagnosis of NF1 (N=99, 39%) and ophthalmologic concern (N=81, 32%). At enrollment, continued observation occurred in a majority of subjects (N=221, 88%) while treatment with chemotherapy was initiated in only 11% (N=29). Twenty-nine (11%) subjects initially observed transitioned to treatment after enrollment (range: 2.5–25 months) thus far. DISCUSSION We present a prospective multicenter study of children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. The ability to acquire quantitative visual acuity was higher than anticipated. The frequency of NF1-OPGs requiring treatment is lower than previously reported. Regression models of clinical and MRI features that prompted immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation will be discussed.

Abstract BACKGROUND NF1-OPGs are amorphous tumors involving either single or multiple locations (optic nerve, chiasm, tract) along the anterior visual pathway (AVP). In this prospective study, we investigated how volumetric MRI measures of the AVP as well as other clinical variables are associated with treatment decisions in children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. METHODS Children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPG whose MRI included a T1-weighted volumetric sequence without significant artifact at their enrollment visit were eligible for inclusion. All subjects underwent a quantitative ophthalmic exam to determine if visual acuity (VA) was normal. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert determined whether the subject would be observed or undergo treatment at that baseline visit. Volumetric MRI analysis was automatically performed using a deep learning network that measured AVP volume (mm3). Non-parametric group comparisons and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the impact of age at enrollment, sex, NF1 inheritance type, AVP volume, and VA on the decision for immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation. RESULTS One-hundred twenty-three subjects met inclusion criteria. Subjects assigned to observation (N=112, 44% female) and subjects immediately treated with chemotherapy (N=11, 80% female) at enrollment were of similar age (2.7 and 2.8 years, respectively) and inheritance (p > 0.05). Abnormal VA was present more often in the treatment group (46%) compared to the observation group (17%, p <0.001). AVP volume was significantly greater in the treatment group (4,181.1mm3) compared to the observation group (1,819.8mm3, p <0.001). AVP volume, sex, and VA reached significance in univariable regression, however, in the multivariable regression model only the AVP volume (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with treatment initiation. DISCUSSION Children with greater NF1-OPG AVP volumes are treated more often compared with those with lower volumes. Volumetric measures of NF1-OPGs are a valuable metric in understanding treatment patterns and are positioned to help inform clinical decision making.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a genetic syndrome characterized by a wide variety of tumor and non-tumor manifestations. Bone-related issues, such as scoliosis, tibial dysplasia, and low bone mineral density, are a significant source of morbidity for this population with limited treatment options. Some of the challenges to developing such treatments include the lack of consensus regarding the optimal methods to assess bone health in neurofibromatosis type 1 and limited data regarding the natural history of these manifestations. In this review, the Functional Committee of the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis International Collaboration: (1) presents the available techniques for measuring overall bone health and metabolism in persons with neurofibromatosis type 1, (2) reviews data for use of each of these measures in the neurofibromatosis type 1 population, and (3) describes the strengths and limitations for each method as they might be used in clinical trials targeting neurofibromatosis type 1 bone manifestations. The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis International Collaboration supports the development of a prospective, longitudinal natural history study focusing on the bone-related manifestations and relevant biomarkers of neurofibromatosis type 1. In addition, we suggest that the neurofibromatosis type 1 research community consider adding the less burdensome measurements of bone health as exploratory endpoints in ongoing or planned clinical trials for other neurofibromatosis type 1 manifestations to expand knowledge in the field.

Background: Spinal conditions, such as scoliosis and spinal tumors, are prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite the recognized importance of their early detection and treatment, there remain knowledge gaps in how to approach these manifestations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the experience of a multidisciplinary committee of experts to establish consensus-based best practice guidelines (BPGs) for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric patients with NF1. Methods: Using the results of a prior systematic review, 10 key questions that required further assessment were first identified. A committee of 20 experts across medical specialties was then chosen based on their clinical experience with spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 9 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 neuro-oncologists/oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 pulmonologist, and 1 clinical geneticist. An initial online survey on current practices and opinions was conducted, followed by 2 additional surveys via a formal consensus-based modified Delphi method. The final survey involved voting on agreement or disagreement with 35 recommendations. Items reaching consensus (≥70% agreement or disagreement) were included in the final BPGs. Results: Consensus was reached for 30 total recommendations on the management of spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 11 recommendations on screening and surveillance, 16 on surgical intervention, and 3 on medical therapy. Five recommendations did not achieve consensus and were excluded from the BPGs. Conclusion: We present a set of consensus-based BPGs comprised of 30 recommendations for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric NF1.

Abstract Plexiform Neurofibromas (PN) are a common manifestation of the genetic disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). These benign nerve sheath tumors often cause significant morbidity, with treatment options limited historically to surgery. There have been tremendous advances over the past two decades in our understanding of PN, and the recent regulatory approvals of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib are reshaping the landscape for PN management. At present, there is no agreed upon PN definition, diagnostic evaluation, surveillance strategy, or clear indications for when to initiate treatment and selection of treatment modality. In this review, we address these questions via consensus recommendations from a panel of multidisciplinary NF1 experts.

AbstractWhile the COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the expansion of telemedicine into nearly every specialty of medicine, few articles have summarized current practices and recommendations for integrating virtual care in the practice of neuro-oncology. This article identifies current telemedicine practice, provides practical guidance for conducting telemedicine visits, and generates recommendations for integrating virtual care into neuro-oncology practice. Practical aspects of telemedicine are summarized including when to use and not use telemedicine, how to conduct a virtual visit, who to include in the virtual encounter, unique aspects of telehealth in neuro-oncology, and emerging innovations.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Because treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPG remain challenging, we sought to establish evidence-based guidelines. We prospectively enrolled children with newly-diagnosed NF1-OPGs, and gathered standardized clinical neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments. METHODS Only children with NF1 and newly diagnosed OPGs, confirmed by central review, were eligible. Indications for obtaining the initial MRI, as well as factors associated with the decision to treat with chemotherapy or observe without treatment, were obtained. Quantitative visual acuity (VA), other ophthalmic features, and imaging were captured at standard time points. Goal enrollment is 250 subjects. RESULTS One-hundred thirty-three children (52% female) from 20 institutions met inclusion criteria, and were included in this preliminary analysis. Eighty-six percent of subjects were able to perform quantitative VA testing at enrollment. The most common reasons for the diagnostic MRI included screening related to NF1 diagnosis (36.8%), ophthalmologic concerns (29.3%), and non-ophthalmologic concerns (24.8%), such as headache. To date, twenty subjects have initiated treatment with chemotherapy, twelve (9%) at the time of the initial OPG diagnosis. Median age at OPG diagnosis was 3.1 years. Age and sex distribution were similar in subjects immediately entering the observation and treatment arms (median age 3.0 versus 3.5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION Most children with NF1-OPGs are observed at time of their initial OPG diagnosis, rather than treated. Importantly, a large proportion of children are able to complete quantitative VA testing at enrollment. Once enrollment is complete, these data will help to establish evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of NF1-OPGs.