Staedtke, Verena

Background: Spinal conditions, such as scoliosis and spinal tumors, are prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite the recognized importance of their early detection and treatment, there remain knowledge gaps in how to approach these manifestations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the experience of a multidisciplinary committee of experts to establish consensus-based best practice guidelines (BPGs) for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric patients with NF1. Methods: Using the results of a prior systematic review, 10 key questions that required further assessment were first identified. A committee of 20 experts across medical specialties was then chosen based on their clinical experience with spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 9 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 neuro-oncologists/oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 pulmonologist, and 1 clinical geneticist. An initial online survey on current practices and opinions was conducted, followed by 2 additional surveys via a formal consensus-based modified Delphi method. The final survey involved voting on agreement or disagreement with 35 recommendations. Items reaching consensus (≥70% agreement or disagreement) were included in the final BPGs. Results: Consensus was reached for 30 total recommendations on the management of spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 11 recommendations on screening and surveillance, 16 on surgical intervention, and 3 on medical therapy. Five recommendations did not achieve consensus and were excluded from the BPGs. Conclusion: We present a set of consensus-based BPGs comprised of 30 recommendations for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric NF1.

Abstract Plexiform Neurofibromas (PN) are a common manifestation of the genetic disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). These benign nerve sheath tumors often cause significant morbidity, with treatment options limited historically to surgery. There have been tremendous advances over the past two decades in our understanding of PN, and the recent regulatory approvals of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib are reshaping the landscape for PN management. At present, there is no agreed upon PN definition, diagnostic evaluation, surveillance strategy, or clear indications for when to initiate treatment and selection of treatment modality. In this review, we address these questions via consensus recommendations from a panel of multidisciplinary NF1 experts.

Abstract Localized hypertrophic neuropathy is a rare Schwann cell proliferation that usually affects single nerves from the extremities, and it is of unclear etiology in its pure form. RASopathies are a defined group of genetic diseases with overlapping clinical features, usually secondary to germline mutations in genes encoding either components or regulators of the RAS/MAPK pathway. Herein, we report an 11-year-old boy presenting with café au lait spots and right leg length discrepancy. A fascicular nerve biopsy of the tibial nerve demonstrated a Schwann cell proliferation with prominent onion-bulb formation, satisfying criteria for localized hypertrophic neuropathy. Molecular genetic analysis demonstrated identical KRAS mutations (c38_40dupGCG) in the peripheral nerve lesion and melanocytes from café au lait spots, but not in blood, supporting a diagnosis of a KRAS-mediated rasopathy with mosaicism. Immunohistochemical staining in the peripheral nerve lesion demonstrated strong pERK staining consistent with downstream MAPK pathway activation. This report suggests that at least a subset of localized hypertrophic neuropathies are bonafide, well-differentiated Schwann cell neoplasms developing through oncogenic RAS signaling, which provides new insights into the controversial entity historically known as localized hypertrophic neuropathy.