Widemann, Brigitte C.

TPS2695 Background: The SMARCB1/A4 gene products are core subunits of the SWItch/Sucrose Non Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex. Tumors with defects in SWI/SNF are histologically distinct aggressive cancers occurring in children and young adults. SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors, particularly malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), poorly differentiated chordoma (PDC), epithelioid sarcoma (ES), and renal medullary carcinoma (RMC), have immune cell infiltrates and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Responses to immune checkpoint inhibition (CI) have been observed in SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors; however, responses are not durable. T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) is a novel inhibitory receptor expressed on multiple immune cells. TIGIT inhibits T and NK cells by binding to its ligand poliovirus receptor (PVR) and Nectin2 on both tumor and antigen-presenting cells. Utilizing RNAseq data, SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors demonstrate high expression of PVR and Nectin2. Tiragolumab is an antibody to the TIGIT receptor. The combination of tiragolumab and atezolizumab has shown promising activity in early phase studies, and phase 3 studies are ongoing in multiple adult indications. Thus, there is rationale that the addition of tiragolumab to CI may also enhance response rates in patients with SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors. Methods: This is a phase 1/2 trial of tiragolumab monotherapy (300 mg if ≤ 15 kg; 420 mg if > 15 kg to ≤ 40 kg; 600 mg if > 40 kg or ≥ 18 years) and in combination with atezolizumab (15 mg/kg [max 1200 mg]) if < 18 yrs or 1200 mg if ≥ 18 years) administered IV on Day 1 of 21-day cycles in patients > 12 months of age with SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors. Part A evaluating the safety of tiragolumab monotherapy in patients < 18 years based on cycle 1 dose limiting toxicities is complete. Part B estimates the antitumor activity of tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab in 6 histology-specific cohorts (RMC, MRT, ATRT, PDC, ES, and other SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors) and is now open to all eligible age groups. Each cohort is conducted using a 6+4 Simon’s two stage design. Enrollment for each cohort is as follows: Part A 6/6, Part B RMC 1/6, MRT 1/6, ATRT 4/6, PDC 2/6, ES 3/6, other 6/6. Radiographic imaging central response assessment for the first stage of the “other” cohort is ongoing. Cycle 1 toxicities of the combination therapy are monitored in Part B patients < 12 yrs using a Bayesian Optimal INterval (BOIN) design with a target toxicity of 17%. Secondary objectives are to characterize the pharmacokinetics/anti-drug antibody development and to estimate progression free survival, overall survival, and duration of response. Enrollment is open at all Pediatric Early Phase Clinical Trial Network sites. Data cutoff: Jan 10, 2025. Clinical trial information: NCT05286801 .

Abstract Purpose: Early detection of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)–associated peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNST) informs clinical decision-making, enabling early definitive treatment and potentially averting deadly outcomes. In this study, we describe a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentomic approach that distinguishes nonmalignant, premalignant, and malignant forms of PNST in the cancer predisposition syndrome, NF1. Experimental Design: cfDNA was isolated from plasma samples of a novel cohort of 101 patients with NF1 and 21 healthy controls and underwent whole-genome sequencing. We investigated diagnosis-specific signatures of copy-number alterations with in silico size selection as well as fragment profiles. Fragmentomics were analyzed using complementary feature types: bin-wise fragment size ratios, end motifs, and fragment non-negative matrix factorization signatures. Results: The novel cohort of patients with NF1 validated that our previous cfDNA copy-number alteration–based approach identifies malignant PNST (MPNST) but cannot distinguish between benign and premalignant states. Fragmentomic methods were able to differentiate premalignant states including atypical neurofibromas (AN). Fragmentomics also adjudicated AN cases suspicious for MPNST, correctly diagnosing samples noninvasively, which could have informed clinical management. Conclusions: Novel cfDNA fragmentomic signatures distinguish AN from benign plexiform neurofibromas and MPNST, enabling more precise clinical diagnosis and management. This study pioneers the early detection of malignant and premalignant PNST in NF1 and provides a blueprint for decentralizing noninvasive cancer surveillance in hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes.

11508 Background: Trabectedin(T) is a marine-derived minor groove DNA binding compound that alters transcription factor activity. Preclinical data suggests that T suppresses the oncogenic driver of ES, EWS::FLI1. This suppression requires a threshold concentration of T and is potentiated by low doses of Irinotecan(I). Preliminary clinical activity and reversal of the EWS::FLI1 transcriptome was seen in patients (pts) in the phase I portion of SARC037. Here we report the phase II results of T with I at the recommended dose in pts with relapsed/refractory ES. Methods: In this open-label multicenter study, T was given at 1 mg/m2 as a 1-h infusion on day(D)1 with I at 25 mg/m2 intravenously on D2 and D4 of a 21D cycle. Key eligibility criteria were EWS::FLI1 fusion transcript, age ≥6 years, ECOG ≤2, adequate organ function, and willing to have a research biopsy if safely accessible. The primary objective was to determine the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by RECIST v1.1. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. This study used a Simon two-stage design that required 4 or more responses (CR or PR) at the final analysis to establish treatment activity. Results: 18 pts enrolled from 12/2022-12/2023 across 6 sites, 8F/10M, median age 21y (9-43). Pts had a median of 3 (1-7) prior therapy lines, including I in 67% of pts. Of 16 pts evaluable for response at the cutoff date, 5 pts had a PR, and 2 pts had SD. Two pts have evaluations pending and two pts were removed for toxicity before the first evaluation. Median time to response was 2.6 months(m), 6-month PFS was 37.7% (95% CI 18.3%, 77.7%), and all responses were sustained at the time of data cutoff at 10.4+, 7.5+, 5.5+, 5.0+ and 4.6+ m. There were no G5 AEs. Most pts had molecular profiling, translocation testing, as well as ctDNA collection, quantitation, and analysis. A subset of pts had pre- and post-treatment biopsies for RNA sequencing and evaluation of the impact of drug exposure on the EWS::FLI1 transcriptome. Conclusions: T+I exhibited anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with ES and met its prespecified ORR with 5 PRs in 16 evaluable patients, all of which are ongoing at data cutoff. There were no unexpected safety signals. The combination of T given as a 1h infusion and low-dose I demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit and is worthy of further study in ES pts. Analysis of biological correlates is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04067115 .

TPS10066 Background: The SMARCB1/A4 gene products are core subunits of the SWItch/Sucrose Non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex. Tumors with defects in SWI/SNF are histologically distinct aggressive cancers occurring in children and young adults. SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors, particularly rhabdoid tumors, poorly differentiated chordoma, epithelioid sarcoma, and medullary renal cell carcinoma, have immune cell infiltrates and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Response to immune checkpoint inhibition (CI) has been observed in SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors; however, responses are not durable. T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) is a novel inhibitory receptor expressed on multiple immune cells. TIGIT inhibits T and NK cells by binding to its ligand poliovirus receptor (PVR) and Nectin2 on tumor cells and antigen-presenting cells. Utilizing RNAseq data, SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors demonstrate high expression of PVR and Nectin2. Tiragolumab is an antibody to the TIGIT receptor. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, tiragolumab with atezolizumab increased survival compared to atezolizumab alone. Thus, data suggest that SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors are susceptible to CI; however, monotherapy is unlikely to achieve durable responses; the addition of tiragolumab may enhance response rates. Methods: This is a phase 1/2 trial of tiragolumab monotherapy and in combination with atezolizumab in patients ≥ 12 months of age with SMARCB1/A4 deficient tumors administered IV on Day 1 of 21-day cycles. Part A will evaluate the safety of tiragolumab monotherapy (300 mg if ≤ 15 kg; 420 mg if >15 to ≤ 40 kg; 600 mg if > 40 kg or ≥ 18 yrs) based on cycle 1 DLTs in up to 6 evaluable patients <18 yrs of age. Part B will estimate the antitumor activity of tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab (15 mg/kg [max 1200 mg]) if < 18 yrs or 1200 mg if ≥ 18 yrs) in 6 histology-specific cohorts (renal medullary carcinoma, malignant rhabdoid tumor, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor, poorly differentiated carcinoma, epithelioid sarcoma, and other) Each cohort will be conducted using a 6+4 Simon’s two stage design. Up to 13 patients may enroll in each cohort allowing for inevaluable patients (maximum n=78). Enrollment of patients ≥ 18 yrs on Part B may occur concurrently with enrollment of patients < 18 yrs on Part A. If the pediatric dose of tiragolumab is deemed safe, patients <18 yrs old may be enrolled on Part B. Cycle 1 toxicities of the combination therapy will be monitored in Part B using a Bayesian Optimal Interval Design in patients < 12 yrs of age. The secondary objectives are to characterize pharmacokinetics/anti-drug antibody and estimating progression free survival, overall survival, and duration of response. Enrollment is open for all Pediatric Early Phase Clinical Trial Network sites. Clinical trial information: NCT05286801 .

Abstract Plexiform Neurofibromas (PN) are a common manifestation of the genetic disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). These benign nerve sheath tumors often cause significant morbidity, with treatment options limited historically to surgery. There have been tremendous advances over the past two decades in our understanding of PN, and the recent regulatory approvals of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib are reshaping the landscape for PN management. At present, there is no agreed upon PN definition, diagnostic evaluation, surveillance strategy, or clear indications for when to initiate treatment and selection of treatment modality. In this review, we address these questions via consensus recommendations from a panel of multidisciplinary NF1 experts.

10010 Background: Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) including MET, VEGFR2, RET, and AXL. Preclinical and clinical data support these RTKs as potential therapeutic targets; Safety, tolerability, and responses were demonstrated in a COG phase 1 trial. We conducted a multi-center open label phase 2 trial to determine the activity of cabozantinib in select pediatric solid tumors (NCT02867592). Methods: Patients age 2-30 years old with selected relapsed or refractory cancer that was measurable (RECISTv.1.1) were eligible. Using a Simon minimax design, patients were enrolled to six strata: Osteosarcoma (OS), Ewing sarcoma (EWS), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS), Wilms tumor (WT), and rare tumor (a non-statistical stratum including tumors of specific histologies or molecular features). Cabozantinib (40 mg/m2/day) was administered on a continuous schedule (1 cycle = 28 days). For the OS stratum, activity was determined based on objective response rate (ORR, complete response (CR) + Partial response (PR)) or disease control success defined as at least stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months. For all other strata, the primary endpoint was ORR. Pharmacokinetics were performed in patients < 19 years. Results: Between May 2017- Oct 2020, 109 patients enrolled (105 eligible, 104 evaluable for response and toxicity). Median age was 15.8 (range 5.6-27.1) years; 55 were male. In the OS stratum, 10/29 (34%) patients had central review confirmed disease control ≥ 4 months (2 PR, 8 SD), exceeding the protocol-defined criteria for activity of cabozantinib in OS. Median duration of therapy was 3 cycles (range 1-28+). In EWS, RMS, NRSTS, and WT strata (n = 13 evaluable patients each) no PR or CR were observed. In the rare tumor stratum (n = 23), 1/4 patients with renal cell carcinoma, 1/1 patients with RET fusion positive papillary thyroid cancer had a PR, and 1 patient with medullary thyroid cancer had a delayed PR. SD ≥ 6 cycles was seen in patients with EWS (n = 2), NRSTS (n = 5), WT (n = 3), and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1). At data cutoff (12/31/2020), 430 treatment cycles were administered; two patients remain on therapy. Cycle 1 and later cycle dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were seen in 20 (19%) and 39 (38%) patients, respectively. Common DLT were elevated liver enzymes, bilirubin, and lipase, hyponatremia, weight loss, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, wound dehiscence, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and pneumothorax. Day 1 pharmacokinetics (mean ± SD, n = 16) demonstrated a maximum plasma concentration of 556 ± 376 ng/ml, half-life 106 ± 102 hours, and area under the curve (AUC0-24h) 8093 ± 4368 ng•h/mL. Conclusions: Cabozantinib is active in patients with relapsed refractory OS and deserves further study in this disease. PRs were also seen in select carcinomas. Activity is limited in other sarcomas and WT. Clinical trial information: NCT02867592.

Purpose. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Combining Hsp90 inhibitors to enhance endoplasmic reticulum stress with mTOR inhibition results in dramatic MPNST shrinkage in a genetically engineered MPNST mouse model. Ganetespib is an injectable potent small molecule inhibitor of Hsp90. Sirolimus is an oral mTOR inhibitor. We sought to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended dose of ganetespib and sirolimus in patients with refractory sarcomas and assess clinical benefits in patients with unresectable/refractory MPNSTs. Patients and Methods. In this multi-institutional, open-label, phase 1/2 study of ganetespib and sirolimus, patients ≥16 years with histologically confirmed refractory sarcoma (phase 1) or MPNST (phase 2) were eligible. A conventional 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used for phase 1. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures were evaluated. Primary objectives of phase 2 were to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of this combination in MPNSTs. Patient-reported outcomes assessed pain. Results. Twenty patients were enrolled (10 per phase). Toxicities were manageable; most frequent non-DLTs were diarrhea, elevated liver transaminases, and fatigue. The recommended dose of ganetespib was 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 with sirolimus 4 mg orally once daily with day 1 loading dose of 12 mg. In phase 1, one patient with leiomyosarcoma achieved a sustained partial response. In phase 2, no responses were observed. The median number of cycles treated was 2 (1–4). Patients did not meet the criteria for clinical benefit as defined per protocol. Pain ratings decreased or were stable. Conclusion. Despite promising preclinical rationale and tolerability of the combination therapy, no responses were observed, and the study did not meet parameters for further evaluation in MPNSTs. This trial was registered with (NCT02008877).

Purpose. There are no known effective medical treatments for refractory MPNST. Inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor in MPNST results in upregulation of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling and angiogenesis, which contributes to disease progression. We conducted a phase II study for patients (pts) with refractory MPNST combining everolimus (10 mg PO once daily) with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) (complete response, partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥ 4 months). Patients and Methods. Patients ≥18 years old with chemotherapy refractory sporadic or NF1 MPNST were eligible. Tumor response was assessed after every 2 cycles (the WHO criteria). A two-stage design targeting a 25% CBR was used: if ≥ 1/15 pts in stage 1 responded, enrollment would be expanded by 10 pts, and if ≥ 4/25 patients had clinical benefit, the combination would be considered active. Results. Twenty-five pts, 17 with NF1 and 8 with sporadic MPNST, enrolled. One of 15 pts in stage 1 had clinical benefit. Of 10 additional pts enrolled, 2 had clinical benefit. The median number of completed cycles was 3 (range 1–16). Adverse events were similar to those known for this combination. Conclusion. With a CBR of 12% (3/25), the combination of everolimus and bevacizumab did not reach the study’s target response rate and is not considered active in refractory MPNST.