Seetharam, ­Mahesh

Abstract Background: Based on preclinical data showing addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to gemcitabine is synergistic, ribociclib was evaluated in combination with gemcitabine to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Methods: In this single arm multicohort phase I trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of Ribociclib plus Gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received Gemcitabine intravenously on days 1 and 8 followed by Ribociclib days 8–14, with treatment repeated every 3 weeks. Results: The study enrolled 43 patients between October 2017 and September 2019. The escalation phase (19 patients) determined the MTD and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) to be ribociclib 800mg daily and gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 for the expansion phase (24 patients). One patient experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Eleven patients experienced Grade 3 adverse events (AE), the most common being neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. No partial or complete responses were observed. 15/22 (68%) of efficacy evaluable patients who received the MTD achieved best response of stable disease. Conclusions: The addition of Ribociclib to Gemcitabine was tolerated well and yielded stability of tumors in both cohorts. Ribociclib and gemcitabine could have synergistic activity in certain tumor types, and our data provides support for the combination. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03237390

Abstract Background: The prognosis of patients with MM with CNS mets is poor. E6201 is an intravenous (IV) MEK inhibitor with activity against BRAF V600-mutated MM cell lines, including MAPK resistance alteration. A previous phase I trial demonstrated activity of E6201 in BRAF V600E mutated MM with a Maximal Tolerated Dose of 320mg/m2 given IV once a week x 3 weeks q 28 days. 2/23 (8.7%) of patients had a PR, 8/23 (34.8%) had SD. Two patients with MM and brain mets achieved near-CR which led to preclinical studies that demonstrated E6201 is unaffected by P-gp and BCRP transport and achieved higher brain to blood concentration (266%).In this trial, patients with BRAF mutation + MM with brain mets, single agent E6201 given at 320mg/m2 twice weekly x 3 weeks q 28 days was determined to be safe. One patient had CNS SD and a PR in lung mets, and a second patient achieved CNS stable disease and CR in a leg melanotic lesion. The drug was well-tolerated with one reversible AE thrombocytopenia (Gr 2). The final review showed intracranial response of SD in 2/4 (50%) patients and systemic SD in 3/4 (75%) patients. Methods: We are currently accruing to the dose escalation cohort of E6201 with dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily orally (n=up to 22 evaluable patients). E6201 is administered IV at 320mg/m2 twice weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days. Patients must have stage IV melanoma with BRAF mutation with at least one active lesion in the brain. Prior local therapy is allowed if done at least 3 weeks prior to cycle 1. Participants must be on a stable dose of steroids for at least 7 days and have an ECOG <!–=2. The study allows one prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. The primary objectives are to determine the MTD of E6201 when combined with dabrafenib and the response rate of brain mets. The secondary objectives include duration of response, extracranial response, progression free survival, overall survival, and impact of BRAF mutation subtype and safety of the combination. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05388877 References:1.Gampa G, et al. Brain distribution of a novel MEK inhibitor E6201: implications in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. 2018. Drug Metab Dispos.2.Tibes R et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of E6201 in patients with advanced solid tumors, including melanoma: results of a phase I study. 2018. Brit J of Cancer. 3.Babiker Gm et al, E6201, an intravenous MEK1 inhibitor, achieves an exceptional response in BRAF V600E mutated metastatic malignant melanoma with brain metastases. 2018. Inv New Drugs4.Gampa G, Kim M, Cook-Rostie N, Laramy JK, Sarkaria JN, Paradiso L, DePalatis L, Elmquist WF. Brain distribution of a novel MEK inhibitor E6201: Implications in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. 2018. Drug Met Disp.–> Citation Format: Mahesh Seetharam, Roxana Dronca, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek, Garth Nelson, Matthew Block, Skylar Starling, Amber Baskin, Renee Bradshaw, Courtney Nelson, Kylee Andrews, Alisha Birgin, Cristina Watson, Yiyi Yan, Daruka Mahadevan, Svetomir Markovic, Tom Myers, Linda Paradiso, Hani Babiker. Phase 1 trial of MEK1 inhibitor E6201 plus dabrafenib in patients (pts) with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM) with central nervous system (CNS) metastases (mets) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT157.

507 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263) is an oral Bcl-2 homology-3 mimetic that binds with high affinity to pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins, resulting in apoptosis. Sorafenib, an oral multi kinase inhibitor inhibits tumor angiogenesis and also promotes apoptosis. The efficacy of either agent alone is limited; however, preclinical studies demonstrate synergy with the combination of navitoclax and sorafenib. Methods: In this phase 1 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study (NCT01364051), we evaluated the combination of navitoclax and sorafenib in a dose escalation cohort of patients with refractory solid tumors, with an expansion cohort in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study agents were provided by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at National Cancer Institute under CRADA. Navitoclax and sorafenib were administered continuously on days 1 through 21 of 21-day cycles. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined using the continual reassessment method. Results: Ten patients were enrolled in the dose escalation cohort and 15 patients with HCC were enrolled in the expansion cohort. Two dose levels were tested, dose level 1 (navitoclax 150 mg daily plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily) and dose level 2 (navitoclax 200 mg daily plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily). At dose level 1, one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) [grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation] was observed among 6 patients treated at this dose level. In a cohort of 3 patients treated at dose level 2, two DLTs were observed (grade 3 hypertension, and grade 3 rash), hence dose level 1 was identified as the MTD. Among all patients, the most common grade 3 toxicity was thrombocytopenia (5 patients, 20%): there were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities (Table). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range 1-36 cycles) and all patients were off study treatment at data cut off. Six patients in the expansion cohort had stable disease, 5 had progressive disease and 4 with unavailable data. There were no partial or complete responses. Drug-drug interaction between navitoclax and sorafenib was not observed. The combination of navitoclax and sorafenib did not increase induction of apoptosis compared with navitoclax alone. Conclusions: Navitoclax plus sorafenib resulted in manageable, but not ideal toxicities for continuous oral administration which precluded dose escalation. The lack of clinical benefit in the HCC expansion cohort does not support further development of this combination for the treatment of advanced HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01364051 . [Table: see text]

PURPOSE Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive subtype of soft-tissue sarcoma with frequent metastatic relapse after curative surgery. Chemotherapy provides limited benefit for advanced disease. Multiomics profiling studies have identified homologous recombination deficiency in uLMS. In preclinical studies where olaparib and temozolomide provided modest activity, the combination was highly effective for inhibiting uLMS tumor growth. PATIENTS AND METHODS NCI Protocol 10250 is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study evaluating olaparib and temozolomide in advanced uLMS. Patients with progression on ≥1 prior line received temozolomide 75 mg/m2 orally once daily with olaparib 200 mg orally twice a day both on days 1-7 in 21-day cycles. The primary end point was the best objective response rate (ORR) within 6 months. A one-stage binomial design was used. If ≥5 of 22 responded, the treatment would be considered promising (93% power; α = .06). All patients underwent paired biopsies that were evaluated with whole-exome sequencing (WES)/RNAseq and a RAD51 foci formation assay. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were evaluable. The median age was 55 years, and 59% had received three or more prior lines. Best ORR within 6 months was 23% (5 of 22). The overall ORR was 27% (6 of 22). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 months to not estimable). Hematologic toxicity was common (grade 3/4 neutropenia: 75%; thrombocytopenia: 32%) but manageable with dose modification. Five of 16 (31%) of tumors contained a deleterious homologous recombination gene alteration by WES, and 9 of 18 (50%) were homologous recombination-deficient by the RAD51 assay. In an exploratory analysis, mPFS was prolonged for patients with homologous recombination-deficient versus homologous recombination-proficient tumors (11.2 v 5.4 months, P = .05) by RAD51. CONCLUSION Olaparib and temozolomide met the prespecified primary end point and provided meaningful clinical benefit in patients with advanced, pretreated uLMS.

11531 Background: Conventional chondrosarcoma (cCS) is the 2nd most common primary bone tumor and is resistant to chemotherapy and radiation. IDH1/2 mutations (m) occur in 50% of cCS. Both IDHm and wild-type (wt) cCS harbor epigenetic dysregulation. In preclinical models of IDHm and wt cCS, combination treatment with HDAC and DNMT inhibitors (i) suppressed growth in vitro and in vivo by reversing the hypermethylated state and inducing tumor suppressors, interferon response genes and apoptosis (Sheikh T, Schwartz G. Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20). Methods: NCI 10330 is a single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study evaluating the HDACi belinostat (B) with the DNMTi SGI-110 (S) or ASTX727 (A). A replaced S due to drug availability (pts were replaced). Pts had advanced cCS, ECOG PS ≤ 2 and could be treatment naïve. Progression was required for grade 1 cCS. Pts received B 1000mg/m2 IV + S 45mg/m2 SC both days 1-5 or B (same dosing) + A (cedazuridine 100mg/decitabine 35mg) PO both days 1-5, in 28-day cycles. 1° endpoint was objective response. A Simon 2-stage design was used. If ≥ 2/13 responses occurred in stage 1, the study would proceed to full accrual. Design had 85% power with α = 0.05 to test ORR 8% vs 28%. 2° endpoints included safety, PFS and OS. A safety lead-in was performed. Paired biopsies were collected. Results: Stage 1 is complete. 19 pts were treated: 6 on B+S and 13 on B+A. Median age was 50 and 67 years, respectively. All pts had prior surgery. 17% (B+S) and 38% (B+A) had prior radiation. 33% (B+S) and 55% (B+A) were IDHm. 67% (B+S) and 75% (B+A) were histologic grade ≥ 2. There were no objective responses. Best response (at 8 weeks) was stable disease (SD) in 4/6 pts (67%) on B+S and 6/10 pts (60%) on B+A. mPFS was 4.2 mos (95% CI 1.97-NR) for B+S and 3.8 mos (95% CI 2.17-NR) for B+A. mOS has not been reached. For B+A, mPFS for IDHm vs wt pts was 4.7 and 3.1 mos, respectively (p=0.21). One pt with IDHm grade 2 cCS who progressed on FT-2102 (IDH1i) remains on B+A > 1 year. There were no DLTs during either safety lead-in. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 17% (B+S) and 69% (B+A). For B+A, the most common grade 3/4 TRAE was neutropenia (54%) and the most common all-grade TRAEs were nausea (69%), leukopenia (61%), neutropenia (54%), anemia (46%) and fatigue (46%). Paired tumor biopsies are being evaluated with whole exome sequencing, RNAseq, methylation array and multiplex IHC with results forthcoming. Conclusions: Combination HDACi + DNMTi was well-tolerated in advanced cCS. There were no objective responses; however, a subset of pts experienced prolonged SD with a trend towards improved mPFS in IDHm pts. Correlative work is ongoing with a focus on differential effects on IDHm tumors and whether modulation of the immune microenvironment might support combinations with immunotherapy. Support: UM1CA186689. Clinical trial information: NCT04340843 .

11507 Background: Single agent or combination chemotherapy, typically Dox- or gemcitabine-based, are standard 1st- and 2nd-line therapies in patients (pts) with metastatic LMS; however, objective response rates (ORR), progression-free, and overall survival (PFS/OS) remain inadequate. Lurbi (PharmaMar S.A. / Jazz Pharmaceuticals) binds to DNA inhibiting transcription and inducing double strand breaks leading to apoptosis and delaying S/G2 progression. In a prior pilot study, we showed Lurbi+Dox is well-tolerated, with signs of activity, particularly in LMS. We designed this phase 1b to optimize dosing to lead into a randomized (1:1) phase 2 trial of Dox+/-Lurbi in anthracycline-naïve LMS. Herein we provide updated efficacy and tolerability data for this Phase 1b cohort. Methods: Pts > 18 yrs with locally advanced/metastatic, unresectable non-GIST STS (Phase 1b only) w/o prior anthracycline or Lurbi/trabectedin, ECOG PS < 3, RECIST 1.1 measurable, and normal organ function were eligible. The phase 1b followed a 3+3 design. Dosing included fixed Lurbi (3.2 mg/m2 d1) with two Dox dose levels (DL; DL1: 25 mg/m2 d1; DL2 25 mg/m2 d1+8). All pts received GCSF prophylaxis. Tumor assessments were every 2 cycles. DL1 was chosen as RP2D and the phase 2 trial began accrual in Aug 2022 aiming to enroll 50 LMS pts randomized 1:1 (stratified by uterine LMS [uLMS]] v. other LMS) with PFS as primary endpoint. Pts progressing on Dox are allowed to cross to Lurbi monotherapy. Results: 10 patients were enrolled in Phase 1b. Histologies included 5 LMS (4 uLMS) and 1 each of myxofibrosarcoma (myxFS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), and solitary fibrous tumor (SFT). With a median follow-up of 344 days, 5/10 pts remain on treatment with median PFS of 357 days (95%CI 175-ND). 6 pts demonstrated partial response (PR; 5 confirmed), 3 with stable disease (SD), and 1 with progressive disease (PD, Table). Median time to PR was 81 days (range 46-207). Duration of response was over 132 days in all responders with 3 still on treatment. Treatment-related AEs were typical for Dox/Lurbi, including nausea, fatigue, and reversible LFT elevations/cytopenias. Updated safety and response data will be provided at the time of the meeting. Conclusions: Lurbi+Dox is well-tolerated with efficacy in STS including 6/10 pts achieving PR, 9/10 pts staying on treatment for >120d, and 6/10 pts >200d. The randomized phase 2 study is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT05099666 . [Table: see text]

9093 Background: Pembrolizumab interrupts PD-1/-L1 interaction and is efficacious in many cancers. However, resistance invariably emerges in the majority of patients. Potential mechanisms include activation of compensatory pathways. The inhibition of sonic hedgehog signaling (sHH) was previously shown to induce intra-tumoral (IT) infiltration by CD4+, CD8+ and HLA-DR class II cells. Our preclinical data showed sHH inhibitor enhanced IT penetration by monoclonal antibodies and induced PD-L1 expression. We conducted a phase I study using a novel sequential pulse dosing of sonedegib followed by pembrolizumab in aST with an expansion cohort to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), tolerability and preliminary efficacy. Methods: The dose escalation utilized a 3+3 design to determine the MTD and proceeded to expansion cohort upon determination of the MTD. Patients enrolled to each dose level were observed for dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the 1st cycle. The expansion cohort consisted of NSCLC and head/neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) previously treated by anti-PD1/-L1. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was determined following the review of the toxicity profile of the combination from all cycles. The study treatment consisted of sonidegib oral daily from day 1 to 8 and pembrolizumab I.V. 200 mg on day 8 on an every 3-week cycle. The sonidegib dose levels explored were 400, 600 and 800 mg. Archival tumor and blood specimens were collected for correlative studies. Adverse events (AEs) were categorized and graded per CTCAE v5.0, and tumor response by RECIST v1.1. Results: The study enrolled a total of 33 patients and 29 received treatment (13 in escalation and 16 in expansion), including patients with NSCLC, HNSCC, skin cancer, gastric cancer and melanoma. The enrollment to the NSCLC cohort is complete and HNSCC continues. No DLT was encountered during dose escalation and the MTD was not reached. The highest planned dose level was selected to proceed to expansion (sonidegib 800mg days 1-8 in combination with pembrolizumab I.V. 200 mg on day 8 on an every 3-week cycle). The expansion cohort proceeded to enroll 15 patients evaluable for AEs (10 NSCLC and 5 HSNCC). Grade 3 and above treatment-related AEs across all patients were hyperglycemia, fatigue, dyspepsia, abdominal pain. The mature efficacy data will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: The study successfully determined the RP2D of sonidegib when dosed sequentially with pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors. The AE profile of the combination is similar to that for respective agents given individually. The efficacy data among anti-PD1/-PDL1-treated NSCLC will be reported at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04007744 .

The treatment of sarcoma necessitates a collaborative approach, given its rarity and complex management. At a single institution, multidisciplinary teams of specialists determine and execute treatment plans involving surgical, radiation, and medical management. Treatment guidelines for systemic therapies in advanced or nonresectable soft tissue sarcoma have advanced in recent years as new immunotherapies and targeted therapies become available. Collaboration between institutions is necessary to facilitate accrual to clinical trials. Here, we describe the success of the Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership (MWSTP) in creating a network encompassing large academic centers and local community sites. We propose a new model utilizing online platforms to expand the reach of clinical expertise for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Abstract Sarcomas are rare heterogenous mesenchymal tumors with over 75 different subtypes, with varying biology and outcomes, with no clear inciting factor in the vast majority. The germline genetic susceptibility to sarcoma is not very well characterized. Identification of any underlying germline predisposition can have important implications for treatment of patients and screening recommendations for family members. To determine the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in patients with sarcomas, we undertook the Interrogating Cancer Etiology Using Proactive Genetic Testing (INTERCEPT) study, a prospective multi-site study of germline sequencing using a &gt;80-gene next-generation sequencing platform. The study was done at the three Mayo Clinic Cancer Centers between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. Patients were not selected based on stage, family cancer history, ethnicity, or age. Family cascade testing was offered at no charge. Results: 115 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma were included in the study. The median age was 60 years, 58.5% were male, 81% were White. The anatomical location of the primary tumor included extremities (33.0%), retroperitoneum (18.2%), trunk (12.2%), head and neck (7.8%). Family history of cancer was present in 63% of the study population. Ten patients (8.7%) had a PGV. Thirty percent of the patients with PGV had stage IV sarcoma (3/10), and 70% (7/10) had earlier stage sarcoma (stages I-III). Among patients who were found to have a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 40% (22/55) had stage IV sarcoma and 60% (33/55) had earlier stage disease. Of the 10 patients with PGV, high to medium penetrance gene abnormalities were identified in 8 patients (80%) involving TP53 (3), BRCA1 (1), SDHA (1), ATM (2) and heterozygous deletion of NBN (1) genes. Of these PGV, gene deletions were observed in 6/10 while missense variants comprised the remaining 4. The vast majority of the PGV (70%) would not have been identified using the current guidelines utilizing the 2018 or 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) or American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Conclusion: In this prospective, multi-site study comprising over 100 patients with diverse sarcomas, unselected germline testing identified a PGV in 1 in 11 patients (8.7%) with the majority of these not being detected using current standard of care guidelines for genetic testing. Because of the rarity of sarcomas, in addition to limited effective treatment options for advanced disease, large scale germline testing in sarcomas represents a potentially impactful strategy to assess therapeutic options and for assessment of familial risk. Citation Format: Isaak Ailts, Michael A. Golafshar, Katie L. Kunze, Margaret Klint, Kathleen Barrus, Samuel Nussbaum, Edward Esplin, Brandie Leach, Sarah Young, Niloy Jewel Samadder, Mahesh Seetharam. Germline cancer susceptibility gene testing in unselected patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a multi-center prospective study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr P056.