Hashash, Jana G.

Introduction Targeted immunomodulators (eg, advanced therapies) effectively achieve symptomatic remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, ~25%–50% of patients with IBD achieving symptomatic remission with an advanced therapy may have continued endoscopically/radiologically active bowel inflammation, and it is uncertain whether changing alternative advanced therapies in asymptomatic patients with IBD will reduce bowel inflammation and achieve durable deep remission. Methods and analysis The QUality Outcomes Treating IBD to Target (QUOTIENT) study is an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of switching to an alternative advanced therapy targeting endoscopic/radiological remission (treat-to-target) versus continuing the initial, or index, advanced therapy, in asymptomatic patients with IBD with moderate-to-severe endoscopic/radiological bowel inflammation. Enrolment is planned for ~250 participants in Canada/USA, randomised 1:1 to switching to alternative advanced therapy or continuing index advanced therapy, and then followed 104 weeks within routine clinical practice. Patient-reported outcomes measure efficacy and quality of life/treatment burden/safety. Primary endpoint is the time from randomisation to treatment failure. Ethics and dissemination The study is conducted in compliance with the protocol, ICH Good Clinical Practice, applicable regulatory requirements and appropriate review boards/independent ethics committees (approval numbers: Pro00077486; Pro00061437; STUDY00002062; 22-004171; i22-01269; IRB22-0890; IRB_00154397; 2000032384; SHIRB#2022.095-2; STUDY00007146; MMC#2024-18; REB#125290; 17784; Pro00142214; 20240660-01H), with documented written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific presentations, and publicly available Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) websites, including lay summaries. The Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation Education, Support, and Advocacy Department, and our patient advocacy stakeholder, will develop educational and marketing resources to communicate findings to a broad audience (>250 000 patients/caregivers/healthcare professionals). Trial registration number NCT05230173 .

Abstract Objectives Oral extraintestinal manifestations (OEIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may impact IBD treatment. The aims of this study were to: (1) determine which OEIMs are most prevalent among patients with IBD, (2) investigate the presence of a temporal association between GI luminal disease activity and OEIMs, and (3) determine how often changes in therapeutic management of IBD are needed in the presence of OEIMs. Study Design A retrospective cohort study was performed for adult patients with IBD evaluated between January 2017 and November 2021 with at least 1 oral complaint. Demographic data were collected from the charts of these patients. Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous measures and Fisher’s Exact test for categorical measures were used. Results A total of 116 patients with IBD who had presented with at least 1 oral finding during the study time period were identified. Aphthous ulcers were the most common oral presentation in both Crohn’s disease (CD) (85.1%) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (75.0%). OEIMs were associated with CD activity in the small intestine (P = .004) and colon (P < .001). UC pancolitis was associated with OEIMs (P = .002). In 32.7% of patients, OEIMs led to either an increase in dose or frequency of IBD therapy. In an additional 16.4% of patients, new systemic agents were started because of the OEIMs. Conclusions This study provides evidence that patients with IBD may develop OEIMs synchronous with IBD flares and may require escalation of IBD therapy when OEIMs occur.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to establish the clinical utility of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-supported, model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) approach (precision-guided dosing [PGD]) by assessing the impact of pharmacokinetic (clearance [CL]) and clinical laboratory parameters on adalimumab (ADA) dosage adjustments during maintenance therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: In the EMPOWER study, blood was collected at any time post-ADA injection. Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing was conducted in an accredited lab. Inputs for the PGD test included ADA concentrations, antibodies to ADA, albumin levels, and the current dosing regimen. CL was calculated using nonlinear mixed-effect models. Results were reported to health care providers (HCPs) within 3 days. HCPs’ treatment decisions were recorded and classified as treatment reduction, continuation, intensification, or ADA discontinuation. The physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity was collected. Relationships between drug concentrations, CL, disease activity, and physician decision-making were assessed using logistic regression. Results: A total of 213 cases were assessed by 21 HCPs. ADA treatment was intensified in 24% and discontinued in 13% of cases. An ADA concentration ≤ 10 μg/mL was associated with a 23.7-fold and 3.0-fold higher likelihood of therapy intensification and PGA > 0, respectively, compared to concentrations > 10 μg/mL. An ADA concentration < 5 μg/mL was associated with a 3.3-fold higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation. CL ≥ 0.318 L/day was associated with a 10.4-fold higher likelihood of therapy intensification. Higher CL (>0.8 L/day) was associated with a 3.5-fold and 4.2-fold higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation and PGA > 0, respectively. Conclusions: PGD enables earlier and precise optimization of ADA dosing by predicting trough levels at any time during the therapy cycle. Optimized dosing to achieve target ADA concentrations and low clearance is crucial to mitigate therapy discontinuation and active disease in IBD patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of infections. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) followed predictable seasonal patterns, which have been recently disrupted. This study aimed to investigate whether severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (CoV-2) infection is associated with an increased risk of RSV infection in patients with IBD compared with those without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX database to identify patients aged 18 years and older with IBD and SARS-CoV-2 infection (IBD-SARS-CoV-2 cohort) during the 2022 and 2023 RSV seasons. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare patients with IBD but no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (IBD non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort). RESULTS: In the 2022 IBD-SARS-CoV-2 cohort (mean age: 53.7 ± 17.6 years; 59% female; 77% White), the RSV infection risk was 0.47%, higher than 0.19% in the matched IBD non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5–3.6). The risk was highest 30–60 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection (aOR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.7–4.9), particularly in those aged 60 years and older (aOR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3–4.5). The use of systemic corticosteroids (aOR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1–4.6) or immune-modifying therapies (aOR: 3.9; 95% CI: 2–7.1) was associated with higher RSV infection risk. Similar trends were observed during the 2023 RSV season, with no significant differences in RSV-related hospitalizations. DISCUSSION: Adults with IBD have a higher risk of RSV infection after SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly those receiving steroids or immune therapies. SARS-CoV-2 infection may have contributed to the recent RSV infection surge in this population, warranting further research.

Abstract Background The STRIDE-II recommendations highlighted the importance of targeting objective measures of disease control, including endoscopic healing, in patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Risankizumab (RZB), an interleukin-23 specific inhibitor, showed improvement in the outcomes of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement compared to placebo in pts with moderately-to-severely active UC.2 Visualizing the changes of endoscopic scores from induction and maintenance may provide insight into pt disease course during treatment. Thus, this analysis sought to provide an overview of change in endoscopic scores of pts enrolled in UC clinical studies. Methods Using individual pt data from the Phase 2b/3 studies of RZB in UC, changes in Mayo endoscopic scores in induction and maintenance were assessed. For induction, pts received either intravenous (IV) placebo (PBO) or RZB for 12 weeks (wks). Pts from the Phase 2b and Phase 3 INSPIRE studies who had a clinical response to induction treatment were rerandomized into the maintenance study [COMMAND] and received subcutaneous PBO (withdrawal), RZB 180 mg, or RZB 360 mg every 8 wks for 52 wks. To be eligible for INSPIRE, pts had to have a baseline (BL) Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or 2 confirmed by central review. For this analysis, endoscopic scores are reported for induction BL and wk 12 and maintenance BL and wk 52 for each treatment. "Endoscopic improvement" was defined as a score of 1 or 0 at the time of follow-up. Results Among pts with a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 at induction BL, 28% achieved endoscopic improvement after 12-wk treatment with RZB 1200 mg; 57% of pts with a BL score of 2 showed endoscopic improvement (Fig. 1). In contrast, among PBO-treated pts with a score of 3 or 2 at BL, 11% and 18%, respectively, achieved endoscopic improvement after induction. Most PBO-treated pts (63%) had no score change at wk 12. During the maintenance study, 29%–35% of pts in the RZB treatment groups had an endoscopic score of 2 or 3 at maintenance BL. (Fig. 2). For those with a BL score of 3, most pts receiving RZB 360 mg achieved endoscopic improvement (62%); similarly, 65% of those with a BL score of 2 showed endoscopic improvement at wk 52. Trends were similar for RZB 180 mg with ≥80% of pts with a BL score of 1 or 0 maintained a 1 or 0 through wk 52. Among PBO-treated pts, ≥60% maintained a score of 3 or 2 from maintenance BL to wk 52; approximately one third of pts’ scores improved to 1 or 0. Conclusion This analysis showed that RZB treatment improved endoscopic outcomes from wk 0 to wk 12 of induction and wk 0 to wk 52 of maintenance. These findings may help inform treatment expectations and shared decision-making for pts with UC initiating RZB treatment. References 1.Turner D, et al. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(5):1570-1583. 2.Louis E, et al. JAMA. 2024;332(11):881-897.