Bruce, Alison J.

Abstract Objectives Oral extraintestinal manifestations (OEIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may impact IBD treatment. The aims of this study were to: (1) determine which OEIMs are most prevalent among patients with IBD, (2) investigate the presence of a temporal association between GI luminal disease activity and OEIMs, and (3) determine how often changes in therapeutic management of IBD are needed in the presence of OEIMs. Study Design A retrospective cohort study was performed for adult patients with IBD evaluated between January 2017 and November 2021 with at least 1 oral complaint. Demographic data were collected from the charts of these patients. Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous measures and Fisher’s Exact test for categorical measures were used. Results A total of 116 patients with IBD who had presented with at least 1 oral finding during the study time period were identified. Aphthous ulcers were the most common oral presentation in both Crohn’s disease (CD) (85.1%) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (75.0%). OEIMs were associated with CD activity in the small intestine (P = .004) and colon (P < .001). UC pancolitis was associated with OEIMs (P = .002). In 32.7% of patients, OEIMs led to either an increase in dose or frequency of IBD therapy. In an additional 16.4% of patients, new systemic agents were started because of the OEIMs. Conclusions This study provides evidence that patients with IBD may develop OEIMs synchronous with IBD flares and may require escalation of IBD therapy when OEIMs occur.

ABSTRACTBackgroundCellulite is a localized skin condition that affects many women, particularly after puberty. It results from a complex interplay of several factors that lead to the characteristic dimpled appearance of the skin. Cellulite may cause psychological stress and negatively impact quality of life. Additionally, body skin laxity may further exacerbate cosmetic concerns in these patients. Consequently, multiple therapeutic options, including topical treatments, have been explored to address both cellulite and skin laxity.ObjectivesTo review the pathophysiology of cellulite and skin laxity, as well as topical skincare options for their management.MethodsA literature search from 2000 to 2024 was conducted using the databases PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and Google Scholar, with the key terms “cellulite,” “cellulite management,” “cellulite topical treatment,” “skin sagging,” “skin laxity,” and “loose skin.” The search included clinical trials, observational studies, book chapters, and review articles in English and Spanish.ResultsThe pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying cellulite involve a combination of histological, hormonal, genetic, and lifestyle factors. Several topical agents, including retinoids and methylxanthines, have shown potential in improving the cosmetic appearance of cellulite and may contribute to localized fat reduction. Emerging botanical extracts hold promise as topical treatments for cellulite and skin tightening.ConclusionsCellulite and skin laxity are prevalent cosmetic concerns with multifactorial and complex pathophysiologic origins. Topical treatments for cellulite and skin tightening require further investigation. Although some studies have demonstrated positive outcomes with skincare products and topicals, robust evidence and studies with extended follow‐up are still lacking. Additional research is necessary to evaluate the long‐term efficacy of topical treatments as standalone therapies for cellulite and skin tightening.

Abstract: Background: Allergic contact dermatitis is a common, pruritic, debilitating skin disease, affecting at least 20% of the population. Objective: To prospectively validate a computer vision algorithm across all Fitzpatrick skin types. Methods: Each participant was exposed to 10 allergens. The reference criterion was obtained 5 days after initial patch placement by a board-certified dermatologist. The algorithm processed photographs of the test site obtained on Day 5. Human performance in reading the photographs was also evaluated. Results: A total of 206 evaluable participants [mean age 39 years, 66% (136/206) female, and 47% with Fitzpatrick skin types IV–VI] completed testing. Forty-two percent (87/206) of participants experienced 1 or more allergic reaction resulting in a total of 132 allergic reactions. The model provided high discrimination (AUROC 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82–0.90) and specificity (93%, 95% CI: 92%–94%) but with lower sensitivity (58%, 95% CI: 49%–67%). Human performance interpreting the photographs ranged from providing similar performance to the algorithm to providing superior performance when combined across readers. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusions: The combination of a smartphone capture of patch testing sites with deep learning yielded high discrimination across a diverse sample.

Alopecia is prevalent among females, categorised as either scarring or non-scarring, depending on the potential for hair follicle regeneration. Various aetiologic factors are implicated in non-scarring alopecia, including genetic predisposition, loss of immune privilege, oxidative damage, and hormonal fluctuations. Telogen effluvium, alopecia areata, and female pattern hair loss are the main causes of non-scarring alopecia in females of all ages. This review covers the aetiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of the most common non-scarring alopecias in females.