Hayman, S. R.

e19513 Background: The outcome of patients with MM relapsing after ASCT used early in the disease course or after failure of initial therapy, is not well defined. We undertook this study to understand treatment approaches for patients relapsing after single ASCT. Methods: Patients relapsing after single ASCT were identified from a prospectively maintained database and relevant clinical data were extracted from medical records. Relapse and treatment responses were according to IMWG Uniform Response Criteria. Patients relapsing between Jan 2000 and 2008 were included in order to capture a recent cohort contemporaneous to availability of novel drugs. Results: We studied 487 patients who had relapsed following a single ASCT, of whom 351 (72%) had an early SCT (≤ 12 mos from diagnosis). The median estimated follow up for all patients was 27 mos, 50 mos and 69 mos from relapse, SCT and diagnosis respectively. The median overall survival (OS) from the time of relapse was 30 mos for the early SCT group and 21 months for the late SCT group. The median time to relapse following transplant was 15 mos (3–119) among early SCT group and 12 mos (3–76) among the late SCT group. Longer time to relapse as well as longer time from relapse to initiation of therapy were independent predictors of better outcome. Among the early group, nearly a third of the patients achieved a PR or better to first salvage therapy (Table), with another third achieving stable disease and 25% of patients did not have response data. The median progression free survival for the first salvage regimen was 8 mos; 18 mos for those with PR or better and 5 mos for those with SD as the best response. Data on the regimen 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 were available for 211, 133, 84, 53 and 28 patients respectively. As expected, the response rates and the response duration decreased with increasing number of relapses. Conclusions: Patients relapsing after ASCT can obtain prolonged response duration with the currently available treatments. Those with a durable response to transplant and those not requiring initiation of therapy for long periods after disease relapse have favorable disease biology and have prolonged survival after relapse. The natural history of the disease provides a valuable benchmark for evaluation of newer treatment approaches. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

10088 Background: The ability of the immune system to recover its components after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is known to predict survival in patients with different types of neoplasms. Also, our previous work showed that polyclonal immunoglobulin can be used to improve T cell diversity and, consequently, T cell function in animal models. The aim of this retrospective study was to understand if the recovery of the polyclonal compartment of immunoglobulin in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at day 100 (± 40d) after ASCT is a predictor factor for survival in MM patients who were subject to ASCT. Methods: From294 patients with IgG-MM subject to ASCT at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN since October, 1993 until June, 2004, 143 patients were studied. The rational to select this group of patients was the fact that they had levels of serum IgM collected at day 100 ± 40 after ASCT recorded. Progression free survival (PFS) was assessed from the day of the transplant. PFS was studied using Kaplan-Meier curves and the univariate and multivariate analysis were done using age-adjusted proportional Cox. The prognostic variables in the multivariate model were: recovered of IgM at day 100, B2 microglobulin, age, conditioning regimen and disease status at the time of transplant. Results: There were 59 females in the study. The median age of the cohort was 58 y (33–75). The median follow up of the study was 26 mo (range, 2-111). PFS was significantly higher in the group who recovered normal serum levels of IgM at D100 compared to the pts who did not. This corresponds to a survival that is 1.5 longer in the group of patients who recovered normal levels of IgM at day100 after ASCT versus the patients who did not (median: 34 to 23 mo, respectively; p=0.05). By univariate analysis, those who did not recover normal serum levels polyclonal immunoglobulin by day 100 after ASCT had a risk of relapse 65% higher than the risk of the patients who recovered. Multivariate analysis suggests that recover the normal levels of polyclonal immunoglobulin after ASCT is an independent prognostic factor for PFS for MM patients after ASCT. Conclusions: These results suggest that polyclonal immunoglobulin is a major factor promoting immunity after ASCT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

8022 Background: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard approach for eligible patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). The median time to relapse after early ASCT is 2–3 yrs and overall survival (OS) is 4–5 yrs. Though various risk factors have been identified for early relapse, the outcome of this group of pts is not clearly described. With the advent of newer therapies, it is important to understand the natural history of MM in these pts to design treatment strategies. Methods: A total of 432 pts with MM, undergoing ASCT within 12 months (mos) of diagnosis, with a minimum follow up of 12 mos were studied. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database and clinical records. Pts were divided into 2 groups: early relapse (relapse <12 mos from ASCT) and late relapse (either relapsed >12 mos after ASCT or disease free at last follow up). Results: There were 94 pts (22%) in the early relapse group and among the late relapse group (N=338), 171 had relapsed beyond 12 mos and 167 were disease free at last follow up. The median time to ASCT was similar in all groups. The early relapse group had a significantly shorter median OS from diagnosis (23.9 vs. 82.2 months; P < 0.001) and from transplant (17.6 mos vs. not reached; P < 0.001). The median OS from relapse was 7.9 mos in this group compared to 39.6 months for the rest. In univariate analysis, elevated CRP, high BM plasma cell%, labeling index (PCLI) >1%, abnormal cytogenetics, presence of circulating PCs at harvest and lack of CR from ASCT predicted for early relapse. In multivariate analysis, an elevated PCLI (RR=2.9; P=0.002) and failure to achieve CR (RR 2.7; P=0.002) was associated with early relapse. Conclusions: Pts who relapse within 12 mos of an ASCT have a very short survival and should be offered trials evaluating novel therapies and combinations. Survival figures from this study represent the benchmark for the comparison of novel approaches in this population. Pts with poor prognostic factors have a short PFS after ASCT and should be considered for alternative approaches. Inability to achieve CR appears to predict shorter PFS and clinical trials evaluating maintenance therapy should be offered in these pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Background:Venetoclax is a B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL‐2) inhibitor that has shown activity as a single agent and in combination with other therapies in patients with multiple myeloma, particularly those harboring t(11;14) associated with high BCL‐2 expression. Although early clinical trial data is encouraging (monotherapy response rate of 21% and 40% amongst t(11;14) and a response rate of 97% when used in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone), data on outcomes in patients treated outside of clinical trial setting are sparse.Aims:We aimed to identify the efficacy of venetoclax in patients with multiple myeloma treated outside clinical trial.Methods:We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with multiple myeloma treated with venetoclax between December 2016 and February of 2019 at the Mayo Clinic outside of a clinical trial setting.Results:A total of 29 patients that were treated with venetoclax for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma were identified. Characteristics of the cohort are reported in Table 1. Two thirds of the cohort had t(11;14) detected on cytogenetic studies and 48% (n = 14) had presence of high risk abnormalities. Median number of prior therapies was 6 (range 1–15) and 21% (n = 6) of patients had received ≥10 prior lines of therapy. Eighty three percent (n = 24) of patients had received prior autologous transplant and 76% (n = 22) were penta refractory or exposed. Median time from diagnosis of myeloma to initiation of venetoclax therapy was 5.3 years (range 0.8–23.6 years).Venetoclax used as monotherapy or a doublet in combination with dexamethasone in 59% (n = 17) of patients and a triplet or quadruplet in 41% (n = 12) given at 800 mg (55%) or 400 mg (35%) daily. Triplet and quadruplet regimens combined venetoclax with a variety of proteasome inhibitors or daratumumab. One patient had a quadruplet of venetoclax, carfilzomib, pomalidomide and dexamethasone. 93% (n = 27) patients were refractory to at least on proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug. Dose titration and escalation was used in 31% (n = 9) of patients. None of the patients experienced tumor lysis syndrome. At last follow‐up 55% (n = 16) of patients remain on venetoclax therapy. Overall response rate in the 24 patients evaluable for response was 46% (21% CR, 8% VGPR, 17% PR). Patients with t(11;14) had a numerically higher response rate than those without (50% vs 33%, p = 0.64). Patients with high risk cytogenetic abnormalities were less likely to respond (ORR 69% for standard risk vs 18% for high risk, p = 0.019). Median time to response was 2.6 months (range 1.1–6.9 months). Median duration of response was 5.2 months (range 2.2–12.9 months). After a median follow‐up time of 7.2 months for the cohort, the median PFS and OS are 5.8 and 14.6 months, respectively, Figure 1A/B. High risk cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with a shorter PFS (median PFS 3 months vs 14 months for standard risk, p = 0.002). The outcomes with venetoclax monotherapy and combination therapies are reported separately in the Table.Summary/Conclusion:Venetoclax is an effective oral agent in relapsed and/or refractory myeloma and can produce deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate its role earlier in the disease and its effectiveness in combination with other anti‐myeloma therapies.image

Background:Previous literature has established “long‐term survivors” as patients who survive greater than 10 years from diagnosis of active multiple myeloma (MM). With the rapid discovery and evolving use of novel therapeutic agents, a greater proportion of patients are reaching this milestone. Although these patients share in their extended survival, they also constitute a heterogeneous group in terms of treatments and outcomes.Aims:The aim of this study is to examine a large cohort of long‐term survivors with protracted follow‐up as an attempt to identify a subset of patients within ten‐year survivors who have longstanding disease remission, and examine the predictors of their especially exceptional prognosis.Methods:All patients with active MM evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between January 1, 1999 and July 1, 2008 were included in the study. Patients with MGUS, smoldering MM, and solitary plasmacytoma were excluded. The overall survival (OS) was calculated from time of symptomatic disease requiring treatment. Patients with greater than 10 year survival from diagnosis were then divided into three cohorts based upon treatment and remission status: Cohort 1 included patients off therapy ≥ 5 years and in sustained remission, Cohort 2 included patients on maintenance therapy ≥ 5 years and in sustained remission, and Cohort 3 included patients who had relapsed within the past 5 years. Differences between the groups were compared using Wilcoxon, Chi‐square, and Fisher's exact test as applicable. “Early” stem cell transplant was defined as patients who received a stem cell transplant within one year of diagnosis.Results:During the time frame of the study, 2,125 patients were identified who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for active MM. Three‐hundred ninety nine (19%) had survived at least 10 years from diagnosis. Among these patients, based on the available data regarding remission and ongoing treatment status, 332 patients were categorized into three cohorts, seen in Table 1. Sixty patients (18% of long‐term survivors) comprised Cohort 1, 48 patients (14% of long‐term survivors) comprised Cohort 2, and 224 patients (68% of long‐term survivors) comprised Cohort 3. Sex difference was statistically significant between the groups, with more females constituting Cohorts 1 and 2 (p = 0.03). Within Cohort 1, 77% of patients underwent an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The median progression free survival following ASCT in this cohort was not reached (95% CI 15–NR, p < 0.001). In addition, patients in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were more likely to undergo an early ASCT as compared to patients in Cohort 3 (p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in high or intermediate risk FISH/cytogenetics at diagnosis, ISS at diagnosis, or induction therapies used at diagnosis among the three groups.Summary/Conclusion:Our study identified a small subset (3% of all patients diagnosed with active MM) of long‐term survivors who are off of therapy and remain in sustained longstanding remission. Female sex, progression free survival following ASCT, and receiving an early ASCT were factors that portended a positive prognosis amongst long term survivors.image

Objectives To define whether the high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay in patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) improves risk prediction. Background Cardiac involvement is the major cause of death in patients with AL amyloidosis. Risk stratification is facilitated by cardiac biomarkers such as cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Methods Stored serum from patients with newly diagnosed AL was used to measure hs-cTnT, cTnT, and NT-proBNP. Survival modelling was performed. Results The direct numeric result from hs-cTnT measurement cannot merely be substituted for a cTnT measurement in the Mayo AL staging system. The performance of the receiver operator curve derived an hs-cTnT cut-point of 54 ng/L which improves on the value of 35 ng/L validated with the prior iteration of the assay. An alternate staging option using hs-cTnT alone—using the two thresholds 14 ng/L and 54 ng/L—performs as well as either the original Mayo AL staging system or other systems incorporating hs-cTnT. On multivariate analysis, an hs-cTnT alone staging system was independent of period of diagnosis, type of therapy, and NT-proBNP value, the last of which dropped out of the model. Alternate models were explored, but none performed better than the original system or the new hs-cTnT system. Thus, hs-cTnT can be used alone for the staging of disease prognosis. Conclusions A survival model based on hs-cTnT improves the prognostic staging of patients with AL amyloidosis, relegating NT-proBNP to a measure of cardiac response.

AbstractPrimary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is a fatal plasma cell disorder. Pilot data suggest survival is better in patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), but the selection process makes the apparent benefit suspect. We have reported that circulating cardiac biomarkers are the best predictors of survival outside of the transplantation setting. We now test whether cardiac troponins (cTnT and cTnI) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are prognostic in transplant recipients. In 98 patients with AL undergoing PBSCT, serum cardiac biomarkers were measured (cTnT, 98 patients; cTnI, 65 patients; and NT-proBNP, 63 patients). Elevated levels of cTnT, cTnI, and NT-proBNP were present in 14%, 43%, and 48% of patients, respectively. At 20 months median follow-up, median survival has not been reached for patients with values below the thresholds; in patients with values above the thresholds, median survival is 26.1 months, 66.1 months, and 66.1 months, respectively. Our previously reported risk systems incorporating these markers were also prognostic, notably the cTnT/NT-proBNP staging. Using this system, 49%, 38%, and 13% of patients were in stage I, stage II, and stage III, respectively. Determining levels of circulating biomarkers may be the most powerful tool for staging patients with AL undergoing PBSCT.

AbstractPrimary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is a plasma cell dyscrasia resulting in multisystem failure and death. High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) has been associated with higher response rates and seemingly higher overall survival than standard chemotherapy. Selection bias, however, confounds interpretation of these results. We performed a case-match-control study comparing overall survival of 63 AL patients undergoing transplantation with 63 patients not undergoing transplantation. Matching criteria included age, sex, time to presentation, left ventricular ejection fraction, serum creatinine, septal thickness, nerve involvement, 24-hour urine protein, and serum alkaline phosphatase. According to design, there was no difference between the groups with respect to sex (57% males), age (median, 53 years), left ventricular ejection fraction (65%), number of patients with peripheral nerve involvement (17%), cardiac interventricular septal wall thickness (12 mm), serum creatinine (1.1 mg/dL [97.24 μmol/L]), and bone marrow plasmacytosis (8%). Sixty-six patients have died (16 cases and 50 controls). For PBSCT and control groups, respectively, the 1-, 2-, and 4-year overall survival rates are 89% and 71%; 81% and 55%; and 71% and 41%. Outside a randomized clinical trial, these results present the strongest data supporting the role of PBSCT in selected patients with AL.