Madan, Sumit

Background HPN217 is a B Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-targeting tri-specific T cell engager (TCE). HPN217 contains three binding domains including anti-BCMA for MM cell binding, anti-albumin for half-life extension, and anti-CD3 for T cell engagement and activation. HPN217 is a small (~50 kDa) globular protein, designed to increase the therapeutic window by minimizing off-target toxicities and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). HPN217 is under investigation in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Methods This study is designed to assess the safety, pharmacology and early clinical activity of HPN217 using fixed and step-dose (prime dose followed by target doses) regimens in dose escalation cohorts along with expansion of selected regimens for further evaluation. Pts with RRMM who have received at least 3 prior therapies including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and CD38-targeted therapy are eligible. Prior exposure to a BCMA-targeting agent is permitted. Primary objectives include evaluation of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and determination of the Recommended Phase 2 Dose(s) (RP2D). Secondary objectives include preliminary efficacy. HPN217 is administered IV once weekly or once every 2 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) are graded by CTCAE 5.0, and ASTCT for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and ICANS. Clinical activity is assessed per IMWG Response Criteria. Results Dose escalation has been completed. 97 pts were enrolled across 15 dose escalation cohorts and expansion of 3 regimens with the highest target dose levels from dose escalation (12mg weekly; 24mg every 2 weeks; 24mg weekly for 1 cycle followed by 24mg every 2 weeks). As of 26 June 2023, across all cohorts, 94 pts were treated and had received a median (range) of 6 (2-19) prior lines of treatment (62% penta-exposed, 17% BCMA-targeted therapy, 68% prior transplantation). Median age was 70 (38-85) years. 36 pts (38%) remain on treatment. The most common (≥25%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across all cohorts and in the 12mg and 24mg cohorts are summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of reversible transaminitis (Gr 3, n=1; Gr 4, n=1) in 2 pts at 2.86 mg fixed dose during dose escalation informed the choice of 2.15 mg as priming dose in the highest step dose cohorts; a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not been reached in step dose cohorts. All CRS events were grade 1-2 except one event of grade 3 CRS at 24 mg. Grade 1 ICANS was reported in 2 pts. Responses were observed at doses ≥ 2.15 mg. Among the 12mg and 24mg cohorts, 55% (22/40) of efficacy-evaluable pts currently have had a confirmed response (PR or better) including 2 pts with prior BCMA directed CAR-T cell therapy; disease assessments for recently enrolled patients are pending. Among pts with a response, 73% (16/22) have had a confirmed response of VGPR or better. Across all dose levels, the median time on treatment for pts with a confirmed response was 40 weeks (range 8.3-114 weeks), including 9 patients on treatment for over 12 months, with data maturing to include longer follow-up on patients recently enrolled. HPN217 exhibited linear and dose proportional PK across all dose groups with a median half-life of 68 hours (range 26-197 hours). Transient cytokine increases were higher with the initial/priming dose compared to subsequent/target doses. Conclusions Dose escalation of HPN217, a novel half-life extended BCMA-targeting T-cell engager, has been completed; the MTD was not reached in step dose cohorts. The 12mg and 24mg target doses are well tolerated with manageable adverse event profiles similar to those at lower dose levels and are associated with robust and durable clinical responses. Additional follow up of recently enrolled pts in 12 mg and 24 mg cohorts will inform the choice of the RP2D(s), and complete data on all pts enrolled will be presented. NCT04184050

e19513 Background: The outcome of patients with MM relapsing after ASCT used early in the disease course or after failure of initial therapy, is not well defined. We undertook this study to understand treatment approaches for patients relapsing after single ASCT. Methods: Patients relapsing after single ASCT were identified from a prospectively maintained database and relevant clinical data were extracted from medical records. Relapse and treatment responses were according to IMWG Uniform Response Criteria. Patients relapsing between Jan 2000 and 2008 were included in order to capture a recent cohort contemporaneous to availability of novel drugs. Results: We studied 487 patients who had relapsed following a single ASCT, of whom 351 (72%) had an early SCT (≤ 12 mos from diagnosis). The median estimated follow up for all patients was 27 mos, 50 mos and 69 mos from relapse, SCT and diagnosis respectively. The median overall survival (OS) from the time of relapse was 30 mos for the early SCT group and 21 months for the late SCT group. The median time to relapse following transplant was 15 mos (3–119) among early SCT group and 12 mos (3–76) among the late SCT group. Longer time to relapse as well as longer time from relapse to initiation of therapy were independent predictors of better outcome. Among the early group, nearly a third of the patients achieved a PR or better to first salvage therapy (Table), with another third achieving stable disease and 25% of patients did not have response data. The median progression free survival for the first salvage regimen was 8 mos; 18 mos for those with PR or better and 5 mos for those with SD as the best response. Data on the regimen 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 were available for 211, 133, 84, 53 and 28 patients respectively. As expected, the response rates and the response duration decreased with increasing number of relapses. Conclusions: Patients relapsing after ASCT can obtain prolonged response duration with the currently available treatments. Those with a durable response to transplant and those not requiring initiation of therapy for long periods after disease relapse have favorable disease biology and have prolonged survival after relapse. The natural history of the disease provides a valuable benchmark for evaluation of newer treatment approaches. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Abstract 4867 Introduction Both multiple myeloma (MM) and (AL) amyloidosis are clonal plasma cell proliferative disorders. While AL rarely “progresses” to MM, probably due to the shorter survival of AL patients, patients with MM have been reported to develop overt AL at a higher frequency. We conducted this study to identify and describe the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment patterns and response, and outcome among patients diagnosed with AL following an initial diagnosis of MM. Patients and Methods Of the 354 patients identified from a prospectively maintained database who carried a diagnosis of both MM and AL during the interval between January 1990 and December 2008, 44 patients had a histologic diagnosis of AL, at least 6 months after the diagnosis of MM. The organ involvement and treatment response (organ and hematologic) for AL as well as MM response to treatment were assessed according to conventional criteria. Results The median age at diagnosis of MM and AL was 63 years (range, 42-82) and 68 years (range, 45-86), respectively; 27 (61%) were males. The median time to AL diagnosis after MM diagnosis was 41 months (range, 7.6-134). The estimated median follow up from diagnosis of MM and AL is 15.5 years and 10 years, respectively and 39 (89%) patients have died. The median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of MM and AL was 68.6 months and 9.1 months, respectively. At the time of AL diagnosis, 33 (75%) patients had developed typical features suggestive of AL [heart failure (12), paresthesias (11), nephrotic range proteinuria (9), elevated alkaline phosphatase and hepatomegaly (2), fatigue (7), weight loss (5), macroglossia (4) and periorbital ecchymoses (1)]; while others developed atypical features (3) (7%) or had an incidental finding of AL (8) (18%) [autopsy (2), unexplained cytopenia (2), mild proteinuria (1) and no symptoms (3)]. Cumulatively, amyloid deposits were revealed by biopsy of: bone marrow (23) (52%), subcutaneous abdominal fat (17) (39%), organ (10) (23%) and carpal tunnel tissue (6) (14%). Organ involvement, treatment response and hematologic status of MM at AL diagnosis were assessed for the evaluable patients. None, 1 and >1 organ involvement occurred in 5 (11%), 28 (64%) and 9 (20%) patients, respectively at AL diagnosis or follow up; while AL as the cause of neuropathy was questionable in 2. The organs involved were: heart (14, including 8 with >1 organ involvement), nerves (11), kidney (10), soft tissue (6), lung (5), GI (1) and liver (1). The hematologic status of MM at AL diagnosis included SD (22), progression (10), PR (3), VGPR (3) and not evaluable (6). The subsequent hematologic and organ response did not differ significantly among those who had a treatment change or started (20) (45%) compared with those who did not have a treatment change (20) (45%) at AL diagnosis [excluding those lost to follow up (2) or diagnosed at autopsy (2)]; although more patients (8/10) who had biochemically progressive MM belonged to the former group. The best hematologic response to treatment(s) after AL diagnosis (28) (64%) was: SD (17), PR (3), VGPR (6), CR (1), and progression (1); and not evaluable in others. The organ response (excluding patients with carpal tunnel surgery) to treatment(s) (18) (41%) was: progression (11), stable (4) and organ improvement (3). More patients with an improved (2/3) and stable (1/4) organ response had hematologic PR or better than those with progression (0/11) of organ disease. Five (11%) patients were alive at last follow up; and had either isolated kidney (3) and soft tissue (macroglossia) (1) or no organ involvement (1). All patients with an organ improvement, and 2/5 patients alive, had received PBSCT after AL diagnosis. Fewer patients with >1 organ involvement (1/9) underwent PBSCT compared with those without organ involvement (2/5); and achieved (0) PR versus (3) VGPR (to any treatment), respectively. Only 1/8 patient with an incidental discovery of AL developed symptomatic (cardiac) AL after 108 months of MM diagnosis and died; the remaining are either alive (1) or died from MM and its complications (3), infection (1), or were diagnosed at autopsy (2). Conclusion The recognition of AL (especially cardiac and multiorgan involvement) is critical in MM patients in order to determine prognosis and influence treatment. A high index of suspicion is required for the prompt recognition of AL to ensure timely institution of therapy with a goal of achieving hematologic and organ response. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 534 Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of amyloid derived from immunoglobulin light chains in various organs. Cardiac involvement can lead to a variety of manifestations including congestive heart failure (CHF), conduction disturbances, and arrhythmias, including sudden death. Patients (pts) with cardiac involvement, especially in the presence of CHF, have a poor prognosis. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (SCT) is increasingly being used for AL and has been associated with high rates of hematologic and organ responses. However, cardiac involvement due to AL is also associated with higher rates of complications following SCT; and those with advanced cardiac involvement are rarely considered for SCT. As such, our study does not represent the full spectrum of pts with cardiac involvement due to AL, but only those who are considered transplant eligible. Patients and methods: Of the 382 pts with AL who underwent SCT at our institution between May 1996 and September 2008, 194 had documented cardiac involvement. Six pts who underwent heart transplantation were excluded; and188 (49%) pts were considered for this study. Groups were compared using Fisher's exact test or t-test, and survival was calculated using Kaplan Meier method. Survival curves were compared using log rank test. Results: The median (range) age of pts at the time of SCT was 57.3 years (31-71); 122 (64%) were males. The median (range) duration from AL diagnosis to SCT was 3.6 mos (1-75). The estimated median follow up for the entire cohort was 44 mos (95% CI; 38-54) and 39 mos (95% CI; 32-51) from AL diagnosis and SCT, respectively. The estimated median overall survival (OS) for the cohort was 77 mos (95% CI; 38-86) and 69 mos (95% CI; 33-80) from AL diagnosis and SCT, respectively, and 107 (57%) pts were alive at the time of analysis. One, 2 or 3 organs were involved in 32 (17%), 106 (57%) and 50 (26%) pts, respectively. At the time of SCT, the median (range) septal thickness was 14 mm (9-25), and the median (range) EF was 63% (28-84). The cTnT/NT-ProBNP stage was availabel for 100 pts (6, 51 and 43 pts in stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Melphalan 200/m2 (85 pts) or Mel/TBI (10 pts) was used for conditioning in 51% pts, whereas the other half had reduced doses of melphalan (100-160 mg/m2). Thirty-one (16.5%) pts had died within 100 days of SCT. A hematologic response was obtained in 129 (69%) pts. A decrease in septal thickness was seen in 88 (47%) pts, with the median (range) decrease being 2mm (1-8). An increase in EF was seen in 85 (45%) pts and the median (range) increase was 6% (1-29). A conventional cardiac response (septal decrease > 2 mm or EF increase '20%) was seen in 62 (33%) pts. A decrease in NT-ProBNP was seen in 31 pts (90 with availabel values). The impact of hematologic or organ response on the OS from SCT was assessed only for those surviving beyond 100 days (landmark analysis). The median OS for those with a hematologic response (149 evaluable) was not reached (NR) compared with 22 mos for those with no response (P < 0.001) (fig B). The median OS for those with a conventional cardiac response was NR compared with 69 mos for those with no response (p=0.003) (fig A). The median OS for those with any decrease in NT-ProBNP was NR compared with 26 mos for those without any decrease (P<0.001). The best cutoff for NT-ProBNP decrease to predict pts being alive at 2 years was 55%, with all such pts alive at the time of analysis. A baseline troponin of <0.02 ng/ml or NT-ProBNP <5000 pg/ml best predicted the possibility of being alive at 1-year post SCT. Transient worsening of echocardiogram as well as cardiac biomarkers were seen in some pts who eventually improved. Eighty-one pts (43%) have died after SCT due to cardiac (37 pts) and non-cardiac (27 pts) causes; while the cause of death was not known in others. Conclusion: SCT is an effective approach in pts with cardiac involvement due to AL, with hematologic and cardiac responses seen in over two-thirds and one-thirds of the pts, respectively. Improved survival is associated with hematologic and organ responses. Cardiac biomarker improvement may be used as a measure of organ improvement and correlates with outcome. This finding will need to be confirmed in a larger group of pts, as well as with other therapies for AL. Disclosures: Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 370 Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by the deposition of amyloid derived from immunoglobulin light chains in various organs. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a commonly used and effective treatment for AL. For patients (pts) undergoing this procedure, a proportion of pts receive treatment similar to induction therapy employed in pts with myeloma undergoing SCT. However, the significance of induction therapy and its impact on the overall survival (OS) in AL is unknown. We conducted this study to ascertain the role of pre-SCT therapy on the post-transplant outcomes in AL. Patients and methods: 435 pts with AL who underwent SCT at our institution between March 1996 and May 2010 form the study group. Groups were compared using Fisher's exact test or t-test, and survival was calculated using Kaplan Meier method. Survival curves were compared using log rank test. Result: The median (range) age of pts at the time of SCT was 57.4 years (26-75); 260 (60%) were males. The median (range) duration from AL diagnosis to SCT was 4 mos (1-87), and 284 (65%) pts were alive at the time of analysis. Melphalan 200/m2 (271 pts) or Mel/TBI (17 pts) was used for conditioning in 66% pts, whereas the remaining one-third had reduced doses of melphalan (100-160 mg/m2). The median OS for pts that received pre-SCT therapy (N=286) compared with those who did not (N=149) was 94.7 and 96.5 months, respectively (P=0.6) (Fig 1). Among the group of pts who underwent pre-SCT therapy and were evaluable for response, the median OS for those with a hematologic response (N=42) and no hematologic response (N=42) was 82.1 and 51 months (P=0.2), respectively (Fig 2). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates no difference in the OS of AL patients who received a pre-SCT therapy compared with those who received a SCT after their diagnosis of AL. In patients receiving pre-SCT therapy, there was a trend towards reduced OS among those with no hematologic response to pre-transplant therapy, but this difference was not significant. Disclosure: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 1964 Background: Thalidomide (thal), lenalidomide (len) and pomalidomide (pom) have been shown to have considerable efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed as well as relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). They are often used as initial therapy in patients proceeding to stem cell transplant (SCT), and based on the initial response, are usually considered for salvage therapy during their disease course. However, the retreatment efficacy of these compounds is unknown. We conducted this study to ascertain the degree of response that can be obtained by retreatment with immunomodulatory compounds. Patients and Method: 410 patients with newly diagnosed MM who received either thalidomide-dexamethasone or lenalidomide-dexamethasone were studied. Of these, 183 patients received thalidomide, lenalidomide or pomalidomide (with or without dexamethasone) as one of the salvage regimens following relapse, and form the study group. We included all patients who received the repeat immunomodulatory therapy as salvage treatment at any time during the MM disease course. Results: The median (range) age of the MM patient group was 60 (29-80) years; 117 (64%) were male. Thalidomide and lenalidomide were used as initial therapy in 106 (58%) and 77 (42%) patients, respectively. Patients received a median of 2 treatments (range, 1–6) prior to salvage therapy; bortezomib was used as one of the salvage treatment (prior to the repeat immunomodulatory therapy) in 41 (22%) patients. An autologous stem cell transplant was performed in 118 (64%) patients after the initial immunomodulatory therapy. Almost one half (89; 49%) of the patients went off the first line therapy to undergo a SCT; whereas drug toxicity (26; 14%) and disease progression (21; 11%) were other causes requiring a treatment change. The compound used for salvage therapy was thalidomide, lenalidomide or pomalidomide in 40 (22%), 129 (70%) and 14 (8%) patients, respectively. The responses to salvage therapy based on the initial therapy and the salvage regimen are as shown in Table 1. Overall, 67 (37%) patients achieved a partial response or better and 73 (40%) patients achieved less than a partial response (stable and progressive disease) to repeat immunomodulatory therapy, while the remaining 43 (23%) had non evaluable disease response. Conclusions: Retreatment with an immunomodulatory therapy, especially a different compound, was associated with excellent response rates. Lowest response rates were seen in patients retreated with thalidomide after having received lenalidomide as their initial therapy after the diagnosis of MM. This information is valuable in deciding on the choice of repeat therapy with immunomodulatory compounds in patients with relapsed disease. Disclosures: Dispenzieri: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: BT062 (Biotest AG, Dreieich, Germany) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprising a CD138-binding chimerized antibody and the cytotoxic maytansinoid, DM4. It is designed to target and kill CD138-positive cancer cells. CD138 (Syndecan-1) is highly expressed on a number of solid tumors and hematological malignancies and is one of the most reliable markers for multiple myeloma (MM) cells. BT062 was previously evaluated as a monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory MM and found to have an acceptable tolerability profile with preliminary evidence of activity (Heffner et al, Blood. 2012; 120: Abstract 4042). Phase I/IIa testing was initiated with BT062 in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and low-dose dexamethasone (dex). The combination was well tolerated at BT062 doses up to 100 mg/m², defined to be the recommended Phase 2 dose (RPTD), and induced meaningful responses, including in patients previously treated with both Len and bortezomib (Bort) (Kelly et al, Blood. 2014; 124: Abstract 4736). Based on these promising results, further investigation of BT062 in combination with pomalidomide (Pom) and dex was initiated in patients with prior Len and Bort exposure, a patient population known to have a poor outcome. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and activity of BT062 (on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 4-week cycle) used in combination with dex (20-40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and Len (25 mg, daily on days 1-21) or Pom (4 mg, daily on days 1-21) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Methods: This is a prospective, open label, multicenter Phase I/IIa study. The RPTD of BT062 in combination with Len/dex was defined to be 100 mg/m², and 38 patients were treated with BT062/Len/dex at the BT062 RPTD. An additional 17 patients were treated with BT062/Pom/dex at the BT062 RPTD. Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed/refractory MM were eligible to participate. Prior treatment with Len, Pom, and/or dexamethasone (any dose) was allowed. To qualify for treatment with BT062/Len/dex at the BT062 RPTD, patients must have received at least one but no more than six prior therapies.To qualify for treatment with BT062/Pom/dex, patients must have received at least two prior therapies, including both Len and Bort, and progressed on or within 60 days of completion of their last therapy, with no limit on number of prior therapies. Patients with clinical response (or no evidence of disease progression) without unacceptable toxicities were eligible to receive additional treatment cycles. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4. Clinical response was assessed by the investigator according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results: Sixty-four patients have received BT062 in combination with dex and Len or Pom in this ongoing study. The combinations have been generally well tolerated, with approximately 90% of adverse events (AEs) reported CTC grade 1 or 2. The most common AEs reported are diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea. Forty-seven patients have received BT062 with Len/Dex (3 at 80 mg/m², 38 at 100 mg/m², 6 at 120 mg/m²), with 8 patients still on treatment. Among these 47 patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.4 months. Forty-three patients completed at least two treatment cycles and were evaluable for response. Of these patients 33 achieved a partial response (PR) or better, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 77% and a median duration of response (DOR) of 21.0 months. Thirteen of the evaluable BT062/Len/dex-treated patients had prior exposure to both Len and Bort and progressed on or within 60 days of their last therapy. ORR was 54% among these patients, including 1 complete response (CR), 4 very good partial responses (VGPR) and 2 PRs. Seventeen patients were treated with BT062/Pom/dex, all had prior exposure to both Len and Bort and progressed on or within 60 days of their last therapy. ORR was 79%, with 4 VGPR and 7 PR among the 14 patients evaluable for efficacy. Median PFS has not been reached after 7.5 months median follow up, with 7 patients still on treatment. Updated safety and activity data will be presented. Conclusion: BT062 has been found to be well tolerated when used in combination with Len/dex or Pom/dex, with encouraging activity even in patients with Len- and Bort-pretreated disease progressing on or within 60 days of completion of their last therapy. Disclosures Kelly: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria. Somlo:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Heffner:Millennium: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Madan:Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Barmaki-Rad:Biotest AG: Employment. Rühle:Biotest AG: Employment. Herrmann:Biotest AG: Employment. Wartenberg-Demand:Biotest AG: Employment. Haeder:Biotest AG: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Knowledge of the molecular interactions of biological and chemical entities and their involvement in biological processes or clinical phenotypes is important for data interpretation. Unfortunately, this knowledge is mostly embedded in the literature in such a way that it is unavailable for automated data analysis procedures. Biological expression language (BEL) is a syntax representation allowing for the structured representation of a broad range of biological relationships. It is used in various situations to extract such knowledge and transform it into BEL networks. To support the tedious and time-intensive extraction work of curators with automated methods, we developed the BEL track within the framework of BioCreative Challenges. Within the BEL track, we provide training data and an evaluation environment to encourage the text mining community to tackle the automatic extraction of complex BEL relationships. In 2017 BioCreative VI, the 2015 BEL track was repeated with new test data. Although only minor improvements in text snippet retrieval for given statements were achieved during this second BEL task iteration, a significant increase of BEL statement extraction performance from provided sentences could be seen. The best performing system reached a 32% F-score for the extraction of complete BEL statements and with the given named entities this increased to 49%. This time, besides rule-based systems, new methods involving hierarchical sequence labeling and neural networks were applied for BEL statement extraction.

Abstract High-dose melphalan (HDM) plus stem cell transplantation is an effective treatment for light-chain amyloidosis (AL), but is associated with high treatment-related mortality in patients with cardiac involvement. We studied 187 patients with cardiac involvement with AL who underwent HDM between 1996 and 2008. The median age was 57 years and the median time from diagnosis to HDM was 3.6 months. Half of the patients received reduced-dose melphalan (100-160 mg/m2). The median overall survival (OS) was 66 months, 54 months from diagnosis and HDM, respectively, and 91 patients (49%) were alive at the last follow-up 52 months (median) from HDM. Thirty patients (16%) died within 100 days of transplantation; only low serum albumin predicted early deaths. Overall, hematologic response (HR) and cardiac responses were seen in 66% and 41% of patients, respectively. The median OS for patients with and without HR was not reached and 22 months, respectively (P < .01); and for those with any decrease and no decrease in N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide was not reached and 26 months, respectively (P < .01). In multivariate analysis of baseline factors, only reduced-dose melphalan predicted shorter OS. HDM is feasible in patients with cardiac amyloidosis, and achievement of HR and organ response is associated with improved survival.