Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma subtype and is clinically aggressive. Relatives of DLBCL patients are at elevated risk for DLBCL. In small genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in which all NHL subtypes were combined, no conclusive loci for DLBCL have been previously identified in individuals of European background, whereas a recent study conducted in East Asia identified a locus at 3q27. Methods: To identify genetic susceptibility loci for DLBCL, we conducted a meta-analysis of three new GWAS and one prior scan, totaling 3,857 DLBCL cases and 7,666 controls of European ancestry. Imputation was used to combine all the data using the 1000 Genomes Project release v3 and IMPUTE2. Based on these findings, we selected 6 promising SNPs for genotyping in an additional 202 cases and 3,431 controls, which were then included in a second meta-analysis. SNPTEST was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs), using the additive model and adjusting for age, gender and significant eigenvectors. Results: In our multi-stage analysis, five independent SNPs in four loci achieved genome-wide significance marked by rs116446171 at 6p25.3 (EXOC2; OR=2.33, P=1.60x10-20), rs13255292 and rs4733601 at 8q24.21 (PVT1; OR=1.23, P=4.86x10-12 and OR=1.18, P=1.63x10-8, respectively), rs2523607 at 6p21.33 (HLA-B; OR=1.34, 3.35x10-9) and rs2681416 at 3q13.33 (CD86; OR=1.20, P=6.04x10-9). The two 8q24.21 SNPs displayed minimal linkage disequilibrium (r2=0.03) and conditional analysis supported their independence. We did not observe a notable signal for a locus previously reported for DLBCL on 3q27 in East Asia, rs6773854 (OR=1.06, P=0.81). We estimated that common SNPs, including but not limited to the loci discovered in this study, explain approximately 16% of the variance for DLBCL risk overall. Discussion: The susceptibility locus at 6p25.3 maps near a plausible DLBCL candidate gene, EXOC2 (exocyst complex component 2), which interacts with Ral proteins, and disruption of the Ral-exocyst regulatory node impacts cellular and developmental processes associated with malignant transformation and progression. The two 8q24.21 variants are approximately 1Mb telomeric to the 8q24 region linked with multiple cancers including CLL. Both variants are positioned in close proximity to PVT1, which is a non-coding RNA implicated in the MYC activation, and MYC is known to be deregulated in some DLBCLs. The locus at 3q13.33 maps to CD86 (B7-2), a B-7 family member that along with CD80 (B7-1) is essential in cognate interactions between T- and B-lymphocytes; both play key roles in immunodeficiency, autoimmune diseases, and in anti-tumor immunity. Finally, we had multiple signals in the HLA region, the strongest of which was at 6p21.33 near HLA-B. HLA-B encodes the HLA class I heavy chain paralogue, which heterodimerizes with a light chain (β2 microglobulin) and plays a central role in presenting intracellularly processed self or foreign antigens to CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Class I molecules have been extensively linked to the risk of a variety of immune-mediated diseases and cancers including DLBCL. Conclusions: These data provide substantial new evidence for genetic susceptibility to this B-cell malignancy, and point towards pathways involved in immune recognition and immune function in the pathogenesis of DLBCL. Citation Format: James R. Cerhan, Sonja I. Berndt, Joseph Vijai, Hervé Ghesquières, James McKay, Sophia S. Wang, Zhaoming Wang, Meredith Yeager, Alexandra Nieters, David Cox, Alain Monnereau, Christopher Flowers, Anneclaire J. De Roos, Angela R. Brooks-Wilson, Qing Lan, Gianluca Severi, Mads Melbye, Rebecca D. Jackson, Lauren R. Teras, Mark Purdue, Claire Vajdic, Demetrius Albanes, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Simon Crouch, Yawei Zhang, Paolo Vineis, Susan L. Slager, Karin E. Smedby, Gilles Salles, Christine F. Skibola, Nathaniel Rothman, Stephen J. Chanock, on behalf of the NHL GWAS Project. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-272. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-LB-272

Abstract Background: Nulliparity is an established endometrial cancer risk factor, but whether this association is related to infertility is unclear. Although there are many underlying causes of infertility, few studies have assessed risk relationships according to specific causes. Despite concerns that most treatments induce ovulation and that the endometrium is highly hormonally-responsive, previous studies have provided conflicting results on treatment associations. Methods: To address these issues, we conducted a pooled analysis of 8,151 cases and12,471 controls from 2 cohort and 12 case-control studies conducted in 1982 to 2009 (N. America, Europe, Australia, Asia). All studies provided self-reported infertility, causes and treatments, except for 1 study that relied on data from national registries. Study-specific exposures and covariate data were harmonized across studies. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for study, age, interview year, race, parity, oral contraceptive and menopausal hormone use, and body mass index. If data were not reported for a particular variable, that study was excluded from the variable-specific analysis. Results: Nulliparous women had an elevated endometrial cancer risk compared with parous women (adjusted OR=1.73; 95% CI: 1.58-1.90).Women with self-reported infertility also had an increased risk (adjusted OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.13-1.32) compared with those without infertility issues, even after adjusting for parity; the strongest associations was seen among studies that defined infertility as unsuccessfully trying to conceive for 2+ years (adjusted OR=1.31; 95% CI: 1.07-1.60). Infertility was associated with similar risks among nulliparous (1.22; 1.10-1.48) and parous (1.22; 1.12-1.34) women, although there was no increased risk associated with infertility among those who had given birth to 3+ children. Two infertility causes associated with risk elevation were endometriosis (adjusted OR=2.08; 95% CI: 1.46-2.95 compared with women no infertility problems) and anovulation (adjusted OR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.16-1.70). Based on relatively small numbers, none of the individual treatments (in vitro fertilization, selective estrogen response modulators, gonatropins, progestins, estrogens) were substantially related to risk. Conclusion: Based on mainly self-reported infertility data, we found that parity and infertility independently contribute to endometrial cancer risk, with parity seemingly being the predominant risk predictor. Understanding residual endometrial cancer relationships related to causes of infertility and infertility treatment may benefit from documented medical information on causes of infertility and treatment parameters. Citation Format: Hannah P. Yang, Linda S. Cook, Elisabete Weiderpass, Hans-Olov Adami, Kristin E. Anderson, Hui Cai, James R. Cerhan, Tess Clendenen, Ashley S. Felix, Christine Friedenreich, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Marc T. Goodman, Xiaolin Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Lingeng Lu, Anthony M. Magliocco, Susan E. McCann, Kristen B. Moysich, Sara H. Olson, Malcolm C. Pike, Silvia Polidoro, Fulvio Ricceri, Harvey Risch, Carlotta Sacerdote, V. Wendy Setiawan, Xiao Ou Shu, Amanda B. Spurdle, Britton Trabert, Penelope M. Webb, Nicolas Wentzensen, Yong-Bing Xiang, Youming Xu, Herbert Yu, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Louise A. Brinton. Infertility and risk of incident endometrial carcinoma: a pooled analysis from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2167. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2167

Abstract Background: With over 13 million cancer survivors in the United States today, second cancers are of rapidly growing importance. However, data on nontreatment risk factors for second cancers are sparse. We explored the feasibility of pooling data from cohort studies of cancer incidence to investigate second cancer etiology. Methods: We combined data from five prospective studies including more than 800,000 individuals. We compared study designs and populations; evaluated availability of and ability to harmonize risk factor data; compared incidence and survival for common first primary malignancies and incidence of second primary malignancies; and estimated sample size requirements. Results: Overall, 96,513 incident, first primary malignancies were diagnosed during 1985 to 2009. Incidence rates and survival following the first primary varied among the cohorts, but most of the heterogeneity could be explained by characteristics of the study populations (age, sex, smoking, and screening rates). A total of 7,890 second primary cancers (excluding original primary site) were identified, yielding sufficient statistical power (≥80%) for detecting modest associations with risk of all second cancers among survivors of common first primary malignancies (e.g., colorectal cancer); however, there were insufficient events for studying survivors of rarer cancers or identifying risk factors for specific second cancers. Conclusions: Pooling data from cohort studies to investigate nontreatment risk factors for second primary cancers seems feasible but there are important methodologic issues—some of which are barriers to specific research questions—that require special attention. Impact: Increased understanding of nontreatment risk factors for second cancers will provide valuable prevention and surveillance information. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(8); 1598–608. ©2014 AACR.

Background and objective Survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is limited and few prognostic factors are known. We conducted a two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify germline variants associated with survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods We analysed overall survival in relation to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among 1005 patients from two large GWAS datasets, PanScan I and ChinaPC. Cox proportional hazards regression was used in an additive genetic model with adjustment for age, sex, clinical stage and the top four principal components of population stratification. The first stage included 642 cases of European ancestry (PanScan), from which the top SNPs (p≤10 −5 ) were advanced to a joint analysis with 363 additional patients from China (ChinaPC). Results In the first stage of cases of European descent, the top-ranked loci were at chromosomes 11p15.4, 18p11.21 and 1p36.13, tagged by rs12362504 (p=1.63×10 −7 ), rs981621 (p=1.65×10 −7 ) and rs16861827 (p=3.75×10 −7 ), respectively. 131 SNPs with p≤10 −5 were advanced to a joint analysis with cases from the ChinaPC study. In the joint analysis, the top-ranked SNP was rs10500715 (minor allele frequency, 0.37; p=1.72×10 −7 ) on chromosome 11p15.4, which is intronic to the SET binding factor 2 (SBF2) gene. The HR (95% CI) for death was 0.74 (0.66 to 0.84) in PanScan I, 0.79 (0.65 to 0.97) in ChinaPC and 0.76 (0.68 to 0.84) in the joint analysis. Conclusions Germline genetic variation in the SBF2 locus was associated with overall survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma of European and Asian ancestry. This association should be investigated in additional large patient cohorts.