Noseworthy, Peter A

Abstract Introduction Transsubclavian venous implantation of the Aveir leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP) has not been previously reported. Methods and Results Three cases of transsubclavian implantation of the Aveir LCP are reported. Two cases were postbilateral orthotopic lung transplant, without appropriate femoral or jugular access due to recent ECMO cannulation and jugular central venous catheters. In one case, there was strong patient preference for same‐day discharge. Stability testing confirmed adequate fixation and electrical testing confirmed stable parameters in all cases. All patients tolerated the procedure well without significant immediate complications. Conclusions We demonstrate the feasibility of transsubclavian implantation of the Aveir LCP.

Background Recent studies have indicated high rates of future major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC), but there is no well‐established tool for risk stratification. This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of several artificial intelligence‐augmented ECG (AI‐ECG) algorithms in patients with TC. Methods and Results This study examined consecutive patients in the prospective and observational Mayo Clinic Takotsubo syndrome registry. Several previously validated AI‐ECG algorithms were used for the estimation of ECG‐ age, probability of low ejection fraction, and probability of atrial fibrillation. Multivariable models were constructed to evaluate the association of AI‐ECG and other clinical characteristics with major adverse cardiac events, defined as cardiovascular death, recurrence of TC, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and stroke. In the final analysis, 305 patients with TC were studied over a median follow‐up of 4.8 years. Patients with future major adverse cardiac events were more likely to be older, have a history of hypertension, congestive heart failure, worse renal function, as well as high‐risk AI‐ECG findings compared with those without. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that the presence of 2 or 3 high‐risk findings detected by AI‐ECG remained a significant predictor of major adverse cardiac events in patients with TC after adjustment by conventional risk factors (hazard ratio, 4.419 [95% CI, 1.833–10.66], P =0.001). Conclusions The combined use of AI‐ECG algorithms derived from a single 12‐lead ECG might detect subtle underlying patterns associated with worse outcomes in patients with TC. This approach might be beneficial for stratifying high‐risk patients with TC.

Abstract Aims Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, data on incident AFMR are scarce. We aimed to study the incidence, risk factors, and clinical significance of AFMR in AF or sinus rhythm (SR). Methods and results Adults with new diagnosis of AF and adults in SR were identified. Patients with >mild MR at baseline, primary mitral disease, cardiomyopathy, left-sided valve disease, previous cardiac surgery, or with no follow-up echocardiogram were excluded. Diastolic dysfunction (DD) was indicated by ≥2/4 abnormal diastolic function parameters [mitral medial e′, mitral medial E/e′, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, left atrial volume index (LAVI)]. Overall, 1747 patients with AF and 29 623 in SR were included. Incidence rate of >mild AFMR was 2.6 per 100 person-year in new-onset AF and 0.7 per 100 person-year in SR, P < 0.001. AF remained associated with AFMR in a propensity score-matched analysis based on age, sex, and comorbidities between AF and SR [hazard ratio: 3.80 (95% confidence interval 3.04–4.76)]. Independent risk factors associated with incident AFMR were age ≥65 years, female sex, LAVI, and DD in both AF and SR, in addition to rate (vs. rhythm) control in AF. Incident AFMR was independently associated with all-cause death in both groups (both P < 0.001). Conclusions AF conferred a three-fold increase in the risk of incident AFMR. DD, older age, left atrial size, and female sex were independent risk factors in both SR and AF, while rhythm control was protective. AFMR was universally associated with worse mortality.

Background: Recognition of the causes of early mortality after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is essential for the improvement of patient safety. This study sought to determine the causes of early mortality (≤90 days) after AF ablation. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of AF ablation from January 1, 2013, to December 1, 2021 at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville). Causes of death were identified through a comprehensive chart review of the electronic health record from within the Mayo Clinic system and outside records when available. Results: A total of 6723 patients were included in the study. The 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 0.22% (n=15). Among all 90-day deaths, majority of the deaths (73.3%) did not have a direct relationship with the procedure. Sudden death was the most common cause of early death (20%), followed by peri-procedural stroke (13%), respiratory failure (13%), atrioesophageal fistula (13%), infection (7%), heart failure (7%), and traumatic brain injury (7%). The 90-day mortality rate directly due to AF ablation procedural complications was 0.06% (n=4). Conclusions: AF ablation procedure has a 90-day mortality of 0.22%, and the most common cause of early mortality was sudden death. The majority (73.3%) of early mortality was not directly associated with a procedural complication, and the mortality rate due to complications associated with the AF ablation procedure was low at 0.06%. Further studies are required to investigate causes and risk factors associated with sudden death in this patient population.

AF is the most common clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia associated with multiple comorbidities, cardiovascular complications (e.g. stroke) and increased mortality. As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to transform the practice of medicine, this review article highlights specific applications of AI for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of AF. Routinely used digital devices and diagnostic technology have been significantly enhanced by these AI algorithms, increasing the potential for large-scale population-based screening and improved diagnostic assessments. These technologies have similarly impacted the treatment pathway of AF, identifying patients who may benefit from specific therapeutic interventions. While the application of AI to the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway of AF has been tremendously successful, the pitfalls and limitations of these algorithms must be thoroughly considered. Overall, the multifaceted applications of AI for AF are a hallmark of this emerging era of medicine.

Background: A recent subanalysis of the EAST-AFNET 4 (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) suggests a stronger benefit of early rhythm control (ERC) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high comorbidity burden when compared to patients with a lower comorbidity burden. Methods: We identified 109 739 patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in a large United States deidentified administrative claims database (OptumLabs) and 11 625 patients in the population-based UKB (UK Biobank). ERC was defined as atrial fibrillation ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy within the first year after atrial fibrillation diagnosis. Patients were classified as (1) ERC and high comorbidity burden (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥4); (2) ERC and lower comorbidity burden (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 2–3); (3) no ERC and high comorbidity burden; and (4) no ERC and lower comorbidity burden. Patients without an elevated comorbidity burden (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 0–1) were excluded. Propensity score overlap weighting and cox proportional hazards regression were used to balance patients and compare groups for the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, or hospitalization with the diagnoses heart failure or myocardial infarction as well as for a primary composite safety outcome of death, stroke, and serious adverse events related to ERC. Results: In both cohorts, ERC was associated with a reduced risk for the primary composite outcome in patients with a high comorbidity burden (OptumLabs: hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI 0.72–0.95]; P =0.006; UKB: hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63–0.94]; P =0.009). In patients with a lower comorbidity burden, the difference in outcomes was not significant (OptumLabs: hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.54–1.57]; P =0.767; UKB: hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.83–1.06]; P =0.310). The comorbidity burden interacted with ERC in the UKB (interaction- P =0.027) but not in OptumLabs (interaction- P =0.720). ERC was not associated with an increased risk for the primary safety outcome. Conclusions: ERC is safe and may be more favorable in a population-based sample of patients with high a comorbidity burden (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥4).

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the strongest risk factors for ischemic stroke, which is a leading cause of disability and death. Given the aging population, increasing prevalence of AF risk factors, and improved survival in those with cardiovascular disease, the number of individuals affected by AF will continue increasing over time. While multiple proven stroke prevention therapies exist, important questions remain about the optimal approach to stroke prevention at the population and individual patient levels. Our report summarizes the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute virtual workshop focused on identifying key research opportunities related to stroke prevention in AF. The workshop reviewed major knowledge gaps and identified targeted research opportunities to advance stroke prevention in AF in the following areas: (1) improving risk stratification tools for stroke and intracranial hemorrhage; (2) addressing challenges with oral anticoagulants; and (3) delineating the optimal roles of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and surgical left atrial appendage closure/excision. This report aims to promote innovative, impactful research that will lead to more personalized, effective use of stroke prevention strategies in people with AF.

Abstract Aims An artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) is a promising tool to detect patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before developing symptoms. However, functional, structural, or haemodynamic components reflected in AI-ECG responsible for its detection are unknown. Methods and results The AI-ECG model that was developed at Mayo Clinic using a convolutional neural network to identify patients with moderate–severe AS was applied. In patients used as the testing group, the correlation between the AI-ECG probability of AS and echocardiographic parameters was investigated. This study included 102 926 patients (63.0 ± 16.3 years, 52% male), and 28 464 (27.7%) were identified as AS positive by AI-ECG. Older age, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and heart failure were more common in the positive AI-ECG group than in the negative group (P < 0.001). The AI-ECG was correlated with aortic valve area (ρ = −0.48, R2 = 0.20), peak velocity (ρ = 0.22, R2 = 0.08), and mean pressure gradient (ρ = 0.35, R2 = 0.08). The AI-ECG also correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (ρ = 0.36, R2 = 0.13), E/e′ (ρ = 0.36, R2 = 0.12), and left atrium volume index (ρ = 0.42, R2 = 0.12). Neither LV ejection fraction nor stroke volume index had a significant correlation with the AI-ECG. Age correlated with the AI-ECG (ρ = 0.46, R2 = 0.22) and its correlation with echocardiography parameters was similar to that of the AI-ECG. Conclusion A combination of AS severity, diastolic dysfunction, and LV hypertrophy is reflected in the AI-ECG to detect AS. There seems to be a gradation of the cardiac anatomical/functional features in the model and its identification process of AS is multifactorial.

Despite the global COVID-19 pandemic, during the past 2 years, there have been numerous advances in our understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms and diagnosis and in new therapies. We increased our understanding of risk factors and mechanisms of atrial arrhythmias, the prediction of atrial arrhythmias, response to treatment, and outcomes using machine learning and artificial intelligence. There have been new technologies and techniques for atrial fibrillation ablation, including pulsed field ablation. There have been new randomized trials in atrial fibrillation ablation, giving insight about rhythm control, and long-term outcomes. There have been advances in our understanding of treatment of inherited disorders such as catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. We have gained new insights into the recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of various conditions such as myocarditis and inherited cardiomyopathic disorders. Novel computational approaches may help predict occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and localize arrhythmias to guide ablation. There are further advances in our understanding of noninvasive radiotherapy. We have increased our understanding of the role of His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing to maintain synchronous ventricular activation. There have also been significant advances in the defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy, remote monitoring, and infection prevention. There have been advances in our understanding of the pathways and mechanisms involved in atrial and ventricular arrhythmogenesis.