Back to Authors

Cooper, Lawton S

0000-0002-9704-8777

Mayo Clinic

Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (P.D.-N., L.S.C.).

Citations 2

Research Opportunities in Stroke Prevention for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Virtual Workshop
Go, Alan S. , Al‐Khatib, Sana M. , Desvigne‐Nickens, Patrice , Bansal, Nisha , Bushnell, Cheryl , Fang, Margaret C. , Freeman, James V. , Gage, Brian F. , Hanke, Thorsten , Singer, Daniel E. , Thomas, Kevin L. , Hills, Mellanie True , Turakhia, Mintu P. , Zieman, Susan J., Cooper, Lawton S. , Benjamin, Emelia J. , Bushnell, Cheryl D , Lopes, Renato D , Noseworthy, Peter A , Reddy, Vivek Y , Singer, Daniel E , Thomas, Kevin L , True Hills, Mellanie , Turakhia, Mintu P , Cooper, Lawton S , Benjamin, Emelia J , Freeman, James V , Al-Khatib, Sana M. , Hylek, Elaine M. , Lópes, Renato D. , Noseworthy, Peter A. , Reddy, Vivek Y.

Stroke | February 27, 2023 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/strokeaha.121.038273 Get It

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the strongest risk factors for ischemic stroke, which is a leading cause of disability and death. Given the aging population, increasing prevalence of AF risk factors, and improved survival in those with cardiovascular disease, the number of individuals affected by AF will continue increasing over time. While multiple proven stroke prevention therapies exist, important questions remain about the optimal approach to stroke prevention at the population and individual patient levels. Our report summarizes the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute virtual workshop focused on identifying key research opportunities related to stroke prevention in AF. The workshop reviewed major knowledge gaps and identified targeted research opportunities to advance stroke prevention in AF in the following areas: (1) improving risk stratification tools for stroke and intracranial hemorrhage; (2) addressing challenges with oral anticoagulants; and (3) delineating the optimal roles of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and surgical left atrial appendage closure/excision. This report aims to promote innovative, impactful research that will lead to more personalized, effective use of stroke prevention strategies in people with AF.
Presenting Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Disease Evaluation: Association With Noninvasive Test Results and Clinical Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial
Lowenstern, Angela , Alexander, Karen P. , Pagidipati, Neha J. , Hill, C. Larry , Pellikka, Patricia A. , Cooper, Lawton S. , Hoffmann, Udo , Mark, Daniel B. , Douglas, Pamela S. , Mark, Daniel B , Douglas, Pamela S , Pellikka, Patricia A , Cooper, Lawton S , Alexander, Karen P , Alhanti, Brooke

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | April 4, 2022 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circoutcomes.121.008298 Get It

Background: Patients evaluated for coronary artery disease have a range of symptoms and underlying risk. The relationships between patient-described symptoms, clinician conclusions, and subsequent clinical management and outcomes remain incompletely described. Methods: In this secondary analysis, we examined the association between 4 types of presenting symptoms (substernal/left-sided chest pain, other chest/neck/arm pain, dyspnea, and other symptoms) and patient risk, noninvasive test results, clinical management, and outcomes for stable outpatients randomized in the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate differences in noninvasive test result, all-cause death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalization and cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction by symptom type. Results: Among 9996 patients, most presented with chest pain (47.2% substernal, 29.2% other), followed by dyspnea (14.9%), and other symptoms (8.7%). Patients with dyspnea were older (median age 63 versus 60, P ≤0.02) with higher baseline risk (78.2% with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease >7.5% versus 67.6%, P ≤0.02). Using patients with substernal chest pain as a reference, there was no difference in noninvasive test positivity across symptom groups (all P >0.05), but test-positive patients with dyspnea (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51–0.85]) or other symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47–0.90]) were less likely to be referred for cardiac catheterization. While symptom type alone was not associated with outcomes, symptom presentation with chest pain or dyspnea did modify the association between a positive noninvasive test and clinical outcome (interaction P =0.025 for both all-cause death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalization and cardiovascular death/MI). Conclusions: Among low-risk outpatients evaluated for coronary artery disease, typicality of symptoms was not closely associated with higher baseline risk but was related to differences in processes of care and the prognostic value of a positive test. Adverse events were not associated with clinician risk estimates or symptoms alone. These unexpected findings highlight the limitation of relying solely on symptom presentation or clinician risk estimation to evaluate patients for suspected coronary artery disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01174550.