Back to Authors

Elliott, Michelle

0000-0002-7366-9886

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 18

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Subtype‐Specific Prognostic Value of NGS in the Setting of Intensive Chemotherapy
Bolarinwa, Abiola , Al‐Kali, Aref , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Saliba, Antoine N. , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Matin, A, Elliott, Michelle A. , Litzow, Mark R. , Hogan, William J. , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Pardanani, Animesh , Foran, James M. , Punwani, Nathan , Palmer, Jeanne , Sproat, Lisa Z., Reichard, Kaaren K., He, Rong , Viswanatha, David S., Zepeda‐Mendoza, Cinthya , Gangat, Naseema , Begna, Kebede H. , Tefferi, Ayalew , Saliba, Antoine N. , Alkhateeb, Hassan B , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Saliba, Antoine N , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Elliott, Michelle , Litzow, Mark R. , Hogan, William J , Shah, Mithun V , Patnaik, Mrinal , Pardanani, Animesh , Foran, James M , Badar, Talha , Murthy, Hemant S , Chen, Dong , He, Rong , Zepeda-Mendoza, Cinthya J , Gangat, Naseema , Tefferi, Ayalew , Saliba, Antoine N , Bolarinwa, Abiola B , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Shah, Meera , Badar, Talha , Murthy, Hemant S. , Chen, Dong , Reichard, Kaaren K.

American Journal of Hematology | July 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajh.70443 Get It

ABSTRACT We examined the prognostic value of routine NGS data in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive (7 + 3 backbone) induction, specified by AML subtype. A contemporary (2015–2025) series of 545 Mayo Clinic patients (median age 56 years, females 44%) was considered. Median follow‐up was 49 months with 341 (63%) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (AHSCT) recorded. AML subtypes included core‐binding factor (CBF; N = 72; 13%), primary non‐CBF ( N = 403; 74%), post‐myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or post‐myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN; N = 28; 5%), post‐MPN ( N = 15; 3%), and therapy‐related (t‐AML; N = 27; 5%). Corresponding complete remission rates, with/without count recovery (CR/CRi), were 89%, 76%, 64%, 27%, and 78% ( p < 0.01) and 5‐year transplant‐censored survival rates 68%, 57%, 21%, 0%, and 55% ( p < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, the prognostic value of specific mutations was mostly limited to primary non‐CBF AML where adverse karyotype (OR 1.9; p = 0.04) predicted inferior and FLT3 ‐ITD (OR 0.4; p < 0.01) or NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (OR 0.1; p < 0.01) superior CR/CRi while KRAS MUT (HR 8.8; p < 0.01), TP53 MUT (HR 5.4; p < 0.01), and TET2 MUT (HR 2.3; p = 0.01) predicted inferior and NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (HR 0.3; p = 0.01) superior survival. Prognostication in intensively‐treated AML should start with subtype specification and recognition of the limited value of NGS in non‐primary AML. Post‐MPN AML is particularly associated with dismal outcomes and should be prognostically distinguished from post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN AML. In primary non‐CBF AML, in addition to previously established risk factors, the favorable impact of FLT3 ‐ITD on achieving CR/CRi and the unfavorable impact of KRAS MUT and TET2 MUT on transplant‐censored survival were noted and require confirmation from additional studies.
Mayo Genetic Risk Models for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Venetoclax + Hypomethylating Agent
Gangat, Naseema , Elbeih, Azeem, Ghosoun, Nour, McCullough, Kristen , Aperna, Fnu, Johnson, Isla McKerrow , Abdelmagid, Maymona, Al‐Kali, Aref , Begna, Kebede H. , Elliott, Michelle A. , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Matin, Aasiya , Litzow, Mark R. , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Pardanani, Animesh , Badar, Talha , Foran, James M. , Palmer, Jeanne , Sproat, Lisa, Khera, Nandita , Yi, Cecilia Y. Arana , Yates, Samuel J. , Sneider, Abigail , Dworkin, Emily , Patel, Anand , Bazinet, Alexandre , Kadia, Tapan M. , Tefferi, Ayalew , Johnson, Isla M, Begna, Kebede , Elliott, Michelle , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Saliba, Antoine N , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Litzow, Mark R. , Shah, Mithun V , Patnaik, Mrinal , Pardanani, Animesh , Badar, Talha , Murthy, Hemant S , Arana Yi, Cecilia Y , Patel, Anand , Bazinet, Alexandre , Senapati, Jayastu , Bataller, Alex , DiNardo, Courtney , Kadia, Tapan M , Tefferi, Ayalew , McCullough, Kristen B , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Saliba, Antoine N. , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Hogan, William J. , Shah, Meera , Murthy, Hemant S. , Yi, Cecilia Arana , Senapati, Jayastu , DiNardo, Courtney D.

American Journal of Hematology | December 13, 2024 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 260-271

10.1002/ajh.27564 Get It

ABSTRACT Patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND‐AML) derive variable survival benefit from venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven‐HMA) therapy. The primary objective in the current study was to develop genetic risk models that are predictive of survival and are applicable at the time of diagnosis and after establishing treatment response. Among 400 ND‐AML patients treated with Ven‐HMA at the Mayo Clinic, 247 (62%) achieved complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery. Multivariable analysis–derived hazard ratios (HR), including 1.8 for European LeukemiaNet (ELN) adverse karyotype, 4.7 for KMT2Ar , 1.7 for TP53 MUT , 2.6 for KRAS MUT , and 2.1 for IDH2 WT were applied to develop an HR‐weighted risk model: low, intermediate, and high; respective median survival censored for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) (3‐year survival) were “not reached” (67%), 19.1 (33%), and 7.1 months (0%). In patients achieving CR/CRi, adverse karyotype, KMT2Ar , KRAS MUT , IDH2 WT predicted inferior survival, allowing for a complementary response‐stratified risk model. The model was externally validated and was shown to be superior to the ELN 2024 risk model (AIC 179 vs. 195 and AUC 0.77 vs. 0.69). Survival was inferior with failure to achieve CR/CRi or not receiving ASCT; 3‐year survival for high‐risk with or without ASCT was 42% versus 0% ( p < 0.01); intermediate 72% versus 43% ( p = 0.06); and low‐risk 88% versus 78% ( p = 0.53). The Mayo genetic risk models offer pre‐treatment and response‐based prognostic tools for ND‐AML treated with Ven‐HMA. The current study underscores the prognostically indispensable role of achieving CR/CRi and ASCT.
Aspirin therapy is associated with a lower risk of pregnancy loss in both JAK2‐ and CALR‐mutated essential thrombocythemia—A Mayo Clinic study of 200 pregnancies
Gangat, Naseema , Singh, Amritpal , Ilyas, Rimal, Loscocco, Giuseppe Gaetano , Elliott, Michelle A. , Begna, Kebede H. , Pardanani, Animesh , Tefferi, Ayalew , Elliott, Michelle , Begna, Kebede , Loscocco, Giuseppe Gaetano , Ilyas, Rimal

American Journal of Hematology | June 13, 2024 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1862-1869

10.1002/ajh.27416 Get It

AbstractTwo‐hundred pregnancies involving 100 women with essential thrombocythemia (ET) were accessed from Mayo Clinic databases (1990–2023). Median platelet count displayed a decline during pregnancy, nadiring at 48% of baseline, in the third trimester: 704–369 × 109/L. Live birth rate was 72%. Of 53 (27%) unintentional pregnancy losses, 48 (24%) occurred in the first trimester. Other fetal complications included preterm birth 3%, intrauterine growth retardation 3%, and stillbirth 1%. Maternal complications included major hemorrhage (7%), preeclampsia (6%), thrombosis (1%), and placental abruption (0.5%). Antepartum management included no specific therapy in 52 (26%), aspirin alone in 112 (56%), aspirin combined with cytoreductive drugs or systemic anticoagulants in 23 (12%), and other permutations in the remaining. Postpartum systemic anticoagulation was documented in 29 (15%) pregnancies. Unintentional first‐trimester loss was predicted by prior fetal loss (43% vs. 18%; p < .01), diabetes mellitus (DM; 67% vs. 23%; p = .02), and absence of aspirin therapy (45% vs. 14%; p < .01); the salutary effect of aspirin therapy was independent of the other two risk factors and apparent in both high (presence of ≥1 risk factor; 33% vs. 61%; p = .07) and low (absence of both risk factors; 10% vs. 34%; p < .01) risk scenarios. The benefit of aspirin therapy, in preventing first‐trimester loss, was significant in both JAK2‐mutated (18% vs. 50%; p < .01) and CALR‐mutated (8% vs. 43%; p < .01) cases. Aspirin use was also associated with a lower risk of venous thrombosis (0% vs. 3%; p = .03). By contrast, the use of systemic anticoagulation, antepartum or postpartum, did not influence fetal or maternal complication rates. CALR mutation and DM predicted maternal hemorrhage (13% vs. 4%; p = .05) and preeclampsia (33% vs. 5%; p = .03), respectively. The current study demonstrates the protective role of aspirin in preventing first‐trimester loss in ET, independent of driver mutation status or other risk factors.
Reappraisal of mast cell leukemia based on a single institution review of 16 cases: Mast cell morphology determines clinical outcome
Pardanani, Animesh , Tefferi, Ayalew , Al‐Kali, Aref , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Begna, Kebede H. , Elliott, Michelle A. , Khera, Nandita , Palmer, Jeanne , Gangat, Naseema , Kelemen, Katalin, Reichard, Kaaren K. , Patnaik, Mrinal , Begna, Kebede , Elliott, Michelle , Gangat, Naseema , Orazi, Attilio , Chen, Dong , Hogan, William J. , Orazi, Attilio , Chen, Dong

American Journal of Hematology | September 9, 2023 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajh.27089 Get It

Bortezomib and daratumumab in refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia
McGlothlin, John , Abeykoon, Jithma P. , Al‐Hattab, Eyad, Ashrani, Aneel A. , Elliott, Michelle A. , Hook, C. Christopher , Pardanani, Animesh , Pruthi, Rajiv K. , Sridharan, Meera , Wolanskyj, Alexandra P., Rouse, Rachelle, Elliott, Michelle , Pruthi, Rajiv, Wolanskyj, Alexandra, Sridharan, Meera , Go, Ronald S.

American Journal of Hematology | July 7, 2023 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajh.27025 Get It

A dynamic 3‐factor survival model for acute myeloid leukemia that accounts for response to induction chemotherapy
Tefferi, Ayalew , Gangat, Naseema , Al‐Kali, Aref , Shah, Meera , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Elliott, Michelle A. , Litzow, Mark R. , Hook, C. Christopher , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Viswanatha, David S., Chen, Dong , Pardanani, Animesh , Kadia, Tapan M. , Sasaki, Koji , Begna, Kebede H. , Shah, Mithun V , Patnaik, Mrinal , Elliott, Michelle , Litzow, Mark R. , Hook, Christopher C., Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Viswanatha, David, Chen, Dong , Pardanani, Animesh , DiNardo, Courtney , Kadia, Tapan M , Ravandi, Farhad , Begna, Kebede , Sasaki, Koji , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Hogan, William J. , Ketterling, Rhett P. , DiNardo, Courtney D.

American Journal of Hematology | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1127-1134

10.1002/ajh.26630 Get It

AbstractThe current study was approached with the assumption that response to induction chemotherapy, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), overshadows pre‐treatment risk variables in predicting survival and therefore be used as an anchor for a simplified risk model. We considered 759 intensively‐treated patients with AML, not promyelocytic: median age 60 years; primary 66%, secondary 25%, and therapy‐related 9%; European LeukemiaNet cytogenetic risk category favorable 8%, intermediate 61%, and adverse 31%. Complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery was achieved in 608 (80%) patients. After a median follow‐up of 22 months, 503 deaths, 272 relapses, and 257 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (AHSCTs) were recorded. Multivariable analysis identified failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 3.8, 95% CI 3.1–4.8), adverse karyotype (2.2, 1.8–2.8), and age >55 years (2.1, 1.6–2.7) as main risk factors for survival. HR‐weighted scoring resulted in four‐tiered risk stratification: low (0 points; N = 183), intermediate‐1 (1 point; N = 331), intermediate‐2 (2 points; N = 117), and high (≥3 points; N = 128), with respective median survival (5‐year rate) not reached (68%), 34 (37%), 13 (20%), and 5 (5%) months (p < .001). FLT3‐ITD mutation was associated with inferior survival in intermediate‐1 (p = .004) and TP53 in intermediate‐2 (p = .06) and high (p = .02) risk disease; the latter was fully accounted for by the close association between TP53 mutation and complex/monosomal karyotype while the observations regarding FLT3‐ITD were not affected by treatment with midostaurin. AHSCT had a favorable impact on survival, most apparent in intermediate‐1 (p < .001), intermediate‐2 (p = .03), and high (p = .01) risk disease. The proposed 3‐factor survival model offers a novel prototype that is amenable to further enhancement by molecular information and was validated in an external cohort of 1032 intensively‐treated AML patients.
Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: 2022 update on diagnosis, genomic landscape, prognosis, and management
Szuber, Natasha , Elliott, Michelle A. , Tefferi, Ayalew , Elliott, Michelle , Szuber, Natasha

American Journal of Hematology | January 28, 2022 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 491-505

10.1002/ajh.26481 Get It

Abstract Disease Overview Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare, often aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) defined by persistent mature neutrophilic leukocytosis, bone marrow granulocyte hyperplasia, and frequent hepatosplenomegaly. The 2013 seminal discovery of oncogenic driver mutations in colony‐stimulating factor 3 receptor ( CSF3R ) in the majority of patients with CNL not only established its molecular pathogenesis but provided a diagnostic biomarker and rationale for pharmacological targeting. Diagnosis In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized activating CSF3R mutations as a central diagnostic feature of CNL. Other criteria include leukocytosis of ≥25 × 10 9 /L comprising >80% neutrophils with <10% circulating precursors and rare blasts, and absence of dysplasia or monocytosis, while not fulfilling criteria for other MPN. Management There is currently no standard of care for management of CNL, due in large part to the rarity of disease and dearth of formal clinical trials. Most commonly used therapeutic agents include conventional oral chemotherapy (e.g., hydroxyurea), interferon, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, while hematopoietic stem cell transplant remains the only potentially curative modality. Disease Updates Increasingly comprehensive genetic profiling in CNL, including new data on clonal evolution, has disclosed a complex genomic landscape with additional mutations and combinations thereof driving disease progression and drug resistance. Although accurate prognostic stratification and therapeutic decision‐making remain challenging in CNL, emerging data on molecular biomarkers and the addition of newer agents, such as JAK inhibitors, to the therapeutic arsenal, are paving the way toward greater standardization and improvement of patient care.