Background— A significant proportion of patients requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) have undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Reoperative heart surgery is associated with increased risk. Data on relative utilization and comparative outcomes of transcatheter (TAVR) versus surgical AVR (SAVR) in patients with prior CABG are limited. Methods and Results— We queried the 2012 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample databases to identify isolated AVR hospitalizations in adults with prior CABG. In-hospital outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR were compared using propensity-matched analysis. Of 147 395 AVRs, 15 055 (10.2%) were in patients with prior CABG. The number of TAVRs in patients with prior CABG increased from 1615 in 2012 to 4400 in 2014, whereas the number of SAVRs decreased from 2285 to 1895 ( P trend <0.001). There were 3880 records in each group in the matched cohort. Compared with SAVR, TAVR was associated with similar in-hospital mortality (2.3% versus 2.4%; P =0.71) but lower incidence of myocardial infarction (1.5% versus 3.4%; P <0.001), stroke (1.4% versus 2.7%; P <0.001), bleeding complications (10.6% versus 24.6%; P <0.001), and acute kidney injury (16.2% versus 19.3%; P <0.001). Requirement for prior permanent pacemaker was higher in the TAVR cohort, whereas the incidence of vascular complications and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis was similar in the 2 groups. Average length of stay was shorter in patients undergoing TAVR. Conclusions— TAVR is being increasingly used as the preferred modality of AVR in patients with prior CABG. Compared with SAVR, TAVR is associated with similar in-hospital mortality but lower rates of in-hospital complications in this important subset of patients.
Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Background Participation in cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) is an essential component of care for patients with coronary artery disease. However, little is known about its benefit on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus ( DM ) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of CR in this high‐risk group of patients. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with DM who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in Olmsted County (Minnesota) between 1994 and 2010, assessing the impact of CR participation on clinical outcomes. CR participation was significantly lower in patients with DM (38%, 263/700) compared with those who did not have DM (45%, 1071/2379; P =0.004). Using propensity score adjustment, we found that in patients with DM , CR participation was associated with significantly reduced all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.80; P =0.002) and composite end point of mortality, myocardial infarction, or revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.98; P =0.037), during a median follow‐up of 8.1 years. In patients without DM , CR participation was associated with a significant reduction in all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.82; P <0.001) and cardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–0.95; P =0.024). Conclusions CR participation after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with lower all‐cause mortality rates in patients with DM , to a similar degree as for those without DM . However, CR participation was lower in patients with DM , suggesting the need to identify and correct the barriers to CR participation for this higher‐risk group of patients.
Performing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery Is Not a License for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Instead of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting—Reply
Background Low body mass index ( BMI ) and serum creatinine are surrogate markers of frailty and sarcopenia. Their relationship with cause‐specific mortality in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is not well studied. Methods and Results We determined long‐term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in 9394 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from 2000 to 2011. BMI and serum creatinine were divided into 4 categories. During a median follow‐up of 4.2 years (interquartile range 1.8–7.3 years), 3243 patients (33.4%) died. In the multivariable model, compared with patients with normal BMI , patients with low BMI had significantly increased all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [ HR ] 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.7), which was related to both cardiovascular causes (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–1.8) and noncardiovascular causes (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.06–1.9). Compared with normal BMI , significant reduction was noted in patients who were overweight and obese in terms of cardiovascular mortality (overweight: HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67–0.88; obese: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.93) and noncardiovascular mortality (overweight: HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.97; obese: HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.95). In a multivariable model, in patients with normal BMI , low creatinine (≤0.70 mg/dL) was significantly associated with increased all‐cause mortality (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.5) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4–3.8) compared with patients with normal creatinine (0.71–1.0 mg/dL); however, this was not observed in other BMI categories. Conclusions We identified a new subgroup of patients with low serum creatinine and normal BMI that was associated with increased all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Low BMI was associated with increased cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. Nutritional support, resistance training, and weight‐gain strategies may have potential roles for these patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Another Report of Familial Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection—Reply