Aronow, Wilbert S.

Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are common arrhythmia encountered in patients with and without structural heart disease. Although often benign and asymptomatic, they may also cause palpitations, exercise intolerance, presyncope, and reduced quality of life, and in some patients can contribute to PVC-induced cardiomyopathy or trigger malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Their clinical significance depends on symptom burden, PVC frequency, ventricular function, and the presence of underlying myocardial disease. Diagnostic evaluation includes electrocardiography, ambulatory rhythm monitoring, echocardiography, exercise testing, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for tissue characterization and risk stratification. Management ranges from reassurance and lifestyle modification to pharmacologic therapy and catheter ablation. Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers remain common first-line options, whereas antiarrhythmic drugs may be considered in carefully selected patients. Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for symptomatic PVCs, high PVC burden, and PVC-induced cardiomyopathy, with high procedural success rates and favorable effects on arrhythmic burden and ventricular function. Novel approaches, including electrocardiographic imaging-guided planning, pulsed field ablation, stereotactic radioablation, neuromodulation, and renal denervation, may further expand future therapeutic options. This review summarizes the pathophysiology, clinical implications, diagnostic evaluation, and contemporary management of PVCs, with emphasis on medical therapy, catheter ablation, and emerging treatments.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies have become an integral part of modern cancer care, delivering durable responses in patients with otherwise refractory hematologic malignancies. As their use has expanded, it has become increasingly clear that these immune-based treatments exert important effects on the cardiovascular system. Rather than reflecting isolated cardiac injury, CAR-associated cardiovascular complications arise from a broader inflammatory process in which immune activation, cytokine release, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial stress are closely interconnected. Pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-6, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ play central roles in shaping these responses, particularly during cytokine release syndrome. From a clinical perspective, cardiovascular manifestations often include hypotension, arrhythmias, and transient reductions in left ventricular function, with more severe presentations occurring in patients who develop high-grade inflammatory toxicity. At the same time, advances in immune engineering are reshaping how these platforms are viewed, extending their relevance beyond toxicity alone. Preclinical studies now suggest that CAR-based approaches may be adapted to modulate cardiac fibrosis and promote myocardial repair, highlighting a potential shift from purely oncologic applications toward broader cardiovascular benefit. Placing these developments within a cardio-oncology framework emphasizes the need for careful cardiovascular assessment, longitudinal monitoring, and close collaboration between specialties.

The therapeutic landscape of hematologic malignancies has undergone a paradigm shift with the increasing incorporation of targeted therapies, including inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling. While VEGF-directed agents have historically been developed and deployed in solid tumors, their application in hematologic cancers—particularly multiple myeloma, select leukemias, and rare lymphomas—has expanded in investigational and clinical settings. VEGF is fundamental to angiogenesis, maintenance of endothelial integrity, and regulation of vascular tone. As a result, therapeutic inhibition of VEGF signaling is associated with a characteristic spectrum of cardiovascular adverse effects. These include hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, heart failure, thromboembolic complications, and renal injury, all of which present important clinical challenges in patients with hematologic malignancies. This population frequently has additional vulnerability due to factors such as cytopenias, preexisting renal impairment, and prior exposure to cardiotoxic anticancer therapies. This review aims to provide a cardio-oncology–oriented overview of VEGF biology, the range of VEGF-targeted agents used in hematologic cancers, and the underlying mechanisms driving their cardiovascular toxicities.

Advances in cancer therapeutics have substantially improved survival across multiple malignancies but have concurrently increased the burden of cancer therapy–related cardiovascular toxicity, establishing cardio-oncology as an essential discipline situated at the interface of oncology and cardiovascular medicine. Despite growing incorporation of cardiac imaging and circulating cardiac biomarkers into surveillance strategies, current approaches remain limited by modest specificity, heterogeneous risk profiles, and inconsistent translation into effective cardioprotective interventions. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the biological mechanisms underlying cancer therapy–related cardiovascular toxicity and critically evaluates the current role and limitations of established cardiac biomarkers, including high-sensitivity cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides, in risk stratification and early injury detection. We further examine why many cardioprotective clinical trials have yielded neutral or modest results, highlighting signal dilution arising from low-risk populations, endpoint heterogeneity, and timing mismatches between injury biology and intervention. This review advances a precision cardio-oncology framework by integrating tumor-derived liquid biopsy platforms—such as circulating tumor DNA, tissue-specific cell-free DNA, and extracellular vesicles—with cardiac biomarkers to provide a biologically contextualized assessment of cardiovascular risk. Tumor-derived biomarkers may reflect treatment intensity, systemic inflammatory burden, and cardiotoxic susceptibility, thereby enhancing the interpretation of cardiac biomarker signals and refining patient selection for targeted cardioprotective strategies.

Pediatric heart failure is a heterogeneous, high-risk clinical syndrome that differs fundamentally from adult heart failure in its etiologies, pathophysiology, and therapeutic responses. Although its absolute prevalence is lower, children experience disproportionate morbidity and mortality, with up to 40% of patients with symptomatic cardiomyopathy progressing to death or transplantation within 2 years of diagnosis. Congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathies, and genetic or metabolic disorders dominate the etiologic spectrum, while developmental differences in myocardial signaling, neurohormonal activation, and ventricular remodeling limit direct extrapolation of adult guideline-directed medical therapy. Evidence supporting pharmacologic treatment remains limited, and most therapies are symptom-modifying rather than outcome-modifying, particularly in single-ventricle physiology. Advances in mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation have substantially improved survival, yet pose unique anatomic, physiological, and ethical challenges in children. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence across medical, device-based, and transplant therapies, highlights lesion- and age-specific considerations, and identifies critical research gaps needed to advance outcomes in pediatric heart failure.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) is a leading, severe, and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with malignancy. Low–molecular-weight heparin has historically been the standard of care; however, direct oral anticoagulants, particularly direct factor Xa inhibitors, have emerged as effective alternatives. These agents offer the convenience of oral administration, predictable pharmacokinetics, elimination of routine laboratory monitoring, and improved adherence. Despite the expanding role of direct oral anticoagulants in CA-VTE management, concerns regarding bleeding risk—particularly in patients with gastrointestinal and genitourinary malignancies—remain central to clinical decision-making. In this narrative review, we evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of apixaban for the treatment and prophylaxis of CA-VTE. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials, including CARAVAGGIO and AMPLIFY, demonstrates that apixaban has noninferior efficacy compared with low–molecular-weight heparin and conventional anticoagulation strategies, with comparable or lower rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism. In addition, apixaban appears to have a favorable safety profile, with no statistically significant increase in major bleeding in selected cancer populations, including those without active gastrointestinal lesions. Apixaban’s pharmacokinetic properties, including limited renal clearance and stable drug exposure, further enhance its clinical utility in oncologic populations. However, evidence supporting apixaban use across all cancer subtypes remains limited and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for additional comparative and real-world studies.

Hypertension remains the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, yet blood pressure control rates remain suboptimal despite the availability of effective therapies. Contemporary guidelines increasingly recommend early use of combination therapy, recognizing that most patients require multiple agents to achieve target blood pressure. Widaplik, a recently Food and Drug Administration-approved fixed-dose, single-pill triple combination of telmisartan, amlodipine, and indapamide, represents the first triple therapy approved for initial treatment of hypertension in adults likely to need multidrug therapy. This review summarizes the pharmacologic rationale for low-dose triple therapy, highlighting complementary mechanisms targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, vascular resistance, and sodium retention. We examine evidence from pivotal phase 3 trials demonstrating rapid, sustained blood pressure reductions, higher control rates compared with dual therapy, and favorable tolerability. We also discuss safety considerations, practical limitations, and gaps in evidence, including long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Widaplik represents a paradigm shift toward simplified, early combination therapy aimed at improving hypertension control and reducing cardiovascular risk.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is increasingly recognized as a central mechanism underlying myocardial ischemia, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. The coronary microcirculation plays a critical role in regulating myocardial perfusion through tightly coordinated myogenic, metabolic, and endothelial pathways. Disruption of these mechanisms results in impaired vasodilatory capacity, abnormal coronary flow reserve, and microvascular ischemia. This review summarizes the anatomy and physiology of coronary microcirculation and examines the pathophysiologic mechanisms driving CMD, including endothelial dysfunction, structural remodeling, inflammation, and neurohormonal dysregulation. Contemporary diagnostic strategies are reviewed, with emphasis on invasive coronary function testing and advanced noninvasive imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The clinical implications of CMD across diverse disease states, including ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries, heart failure, and cardiomyopathies, are discussed. Finally, current therapeutic approaches, prognostic considerations, and emerging research directions aimed at improving diagnosis and targeted treatment of CMD are highlighted.

Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is a dynamic vasomotor disorder characterized by transient, intense constriction of epicardial coronary arteries, leading to myocardial ischemia in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. CAS plays a central role in vasospastic angina, ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries, malignant arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. Its pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving endothelial dysfunction, vascular smooth muscle hyperreactivity, inflammation, oxidative stress, autonomic imbalance, and genetic susceptibility, with notable ethnic and sex-related differences. Diagnosis relies on integration of clinical features, electrocardiographic changes, and invasive coronary provocation testing using acetylcholine or ergonovine, supported by advanced imaging and functional assessment when microvascular involvement is suspected. Management is centered on calcium channel blockers and nitrates, aggressive risk factor modification, particularly smoking cessation, and individualized strategies for refractory or high-risk patients. Improved recognition and standardized diagnostic pathways are essential to optimize outcomes and reduce life-threatening complications associated with CAS.

Shock is a life-threatening state of circulatory failure characterized by inadequate tissue oxygen delivery and cellular hypoxia. Lactate has emerged as a central biomarker in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of shock, yet its interpretation is complex and context dependent. Although traditionally viewed as a marker of anaerobic metabolism and tissue hypoperfusion, hyperlactatemia in distributive shock, particularly sepsis, frequently reflects multifactorial mechanisms, including increased aerobic glycolysis, adrenergic stimulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired hepatic clearance. This review examines the pathophysiology and classification of shock, the biochemical basis of lactate production and clearance, and the prognostic significance of both static lactate levels and lactate kinetics. We synthesize evidence supporting lactate as a robust prognostic marker while highlighting limitations of lactate-targeted resuscitation strategies. Emerging data favor multimodal approaches integrating lactate trends with complementary perfusion markers such as capillary refill time and central venous oxygen saturation. Lactate should be interpreted as one component of a comprehensive physiological assessment rather than an isolated therapeutic target.