Agrawal, Siddharth

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies have become an integral part of modern cancer care, delivering durable responses in patients with otherwise refractory hematologic malignancies. As their use has expanded, it has become increasingly clear that these immune-based treatments exert important effects on the cardiovascular system. Rather than reflecting isolated cardiac injury, CAR-associated cardiovascular complications arise from a broader inflammatory process in which immune activation, cytokine release, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial stress are closely interconnected. Pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-6, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ play central roles in shaping these responses, particularly during cytokine release syndrome. From a clinical perspective, cardiovascular manifestations often include hypotension, arrhythmias, and transient reductions in left ventricular function, with more severe presentations occurring in patients who develop high-grade inflammatory toxicity. At the same time, advances in immune engineering are reshaping how these platforms are viewed, extending their relevance beyond toxicity alone. Preclinical studies now suggest that CAR-based approaches may be adapted to modulate cardiac fibrosis and promote myocardial repair, highlighting a potential shift from purely oncologic applications toward broader cardiovascular benefit. Placing these developments within a cardio-oncology framework emphasizes the need for careful cardiovascular assessment, longitudinal monitoring, and close collaboration between specialties.

The therapeutic landscape of hematologic malignancies has undergone a paradigm shift with the increasing incorporation of targeted therapies, including inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling. While VEGF-directed agents have historically been developed and deployed in solid tumors, their application in hematologic cancers—particularly multiple myeloma, select leukemias, and rare lymphomas—has expanded in investigational and clinical settings. VEGF is fundamental to angiogenesis, maintenance of endothelial integrity, and regulation of vascular tone. As a result, therapeutic inhibition of VEGF signaling is associated with a characteristic spectrum of cardiovascular adverse effects. These include hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, heart failure, thromboembolic complications, and renal injury, all of which present important clinical challenges in patients with hematologic malignancies. This population frequently has additional vulnerability due to factors such as cytopenias, preexisting renal impairment, and prior exposure to cardiotoxic anticancer therapies. This review aims to provide a cardio-oncology–oriented overview of VEGF biology, the range of VEGF-targeted agents used in hematologic cancers, and the underlying mechanisms driving their cardiovascular toxicities.

Background and Objectives: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has the sixth-highest malignancy-related mortality in the United States (US). However, inequalities exist in access to advanced care in specific patient populations. We aim to study the racial disparities in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in NHL patients. Materials and Methods: Using ICD-10 codes, patients with NHL were identified from the US National Inpatient Sample 2016–2019 database. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and MACCE outcomes were studied, and results were stratified based on the patient’s race. Results: Of the 777,740 patients with a diagnosis of NHL, 74.22% (577,215) were White, 9.15% (71,180) were Black, 9.39% (73,000) were Hispanic, 3.33% (25,935) were Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.36% (2855) were Native American, and 3.54% (27,555) belonged to other races. When compared to White patients, all-cause mortality (ACM) was significantly higher in Black patients (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17–1.38, p < 0.001) and in Asian/Pacific Islander patients (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12–1.45, p < 0.001). Sudden cardiac death was found to have a higher aOR in all racial sub-groups as compared to White patients; however, it was statistically significant in Black patients only (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.52–2.16, p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation (AF) risk was significantly lower in patients who were Black, Hispanic, and of other races compared to White patients. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was noted to have a statistically significantly lower aOR in Black patients (0.70, 95% CI 0.60–0.81, p < 0.001), Hispanic patients (0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.80, p < 0.001), and patients of other races (0.57, 95% CI 0.43–0.75, p < 0.001) as compared to White patients. Conclusions: Racial disparities are found in MACCEs among NHL patients, which is likely multifactorial, highlighting the need for healthcare strategies stratified by race to mitigate the increased risk of MACCEs. Further research involving possible epigenomic influences and social determinants of health contributing to poorer outcomes in Black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients with NHL is imperative.