Jiménez‐Navarro, Manuel F.

Background Participation in cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) is an essential component of care for patients with coronary artery disease. However, little is known about its benefit on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus ( DM ) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of CR in this high‐risk group of patients. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with DM who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in Olmsted County (Minnesota) between 1994 and 2010, assessing the impact of CR participation on clinical outcomes. CR participation was significantly lower in patients with DM (38%, 263/700) compared with those who did not have DM (45%, 1071/2379; P =0.004). Using propensity score adjustment, we found that in patients with DM , CR participation was associated with significantly reduced all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.80; P =0.002) and composite end point of mortality, myocardial infarction, or revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.98; P =0.037), during a median follow‐up of 8.1 years. In patients without DM , CR participation was associated with a significant reduction in all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.82; P <0.001) and cardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–0.95; P =0.024). Conclusions CR participation after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with lower all‐cause mortality rates in patients with DM , to a similar degree as for those without DM . However, CR participation was lower in patients with DM , suggesting the need to identify and correct the barriers to CR participation for this higher‐risk group of patients.

Objective There is a paucity of data on the impact of complete revascularisation (CR) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with diabetes with multivessel coronary disease. In this study, we assess the impact of CR, using a relatively simple anatomical definition, on long-term outcomes (median follow-up 7.9 years) in patients with diabetes, and compare with patients without diabetes. Methods 5350 patients with multivessel disease (coronary stenoses ≥70% in ≥2 major epicardial arteries) who underwent PCI between January 1997 and June 2011 were included. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to diabetes and CR status (absence of residual coronary stenosis in major, predominantly proximal, epicardial segments according to Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) classification). Results Patients with diabetes and patients with incomplete revascularisation (IR) had more adverse clinical and angiographic characteristics. IR was frequent in patients with diabetes, and was marginally more common than in patients without diabetes (47% vs 44%, p<0.001). Patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes had higher mortality rates after IR than after CR (HR 1.56 (95% CI (1.39 to 1.85), p<0.001 for patients with diabetes and 1.70 (95% CI (1.50 to 1.92), p<0.001) in patients without diabetes). However, the absolute risk was higher for patients with diabetes (5-year mortality: IR 35.8%, CR 21.2%) than in patients without diabetes (5-year mortality: IR 22.2%, CR 14.1%). In a multivariable model, IR and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of total mortality. This effect was present in the bare metal stent and drug-eluting stent eras and in patients with stable disease and acute coronary syndromes. Conclusions CR is associated with lower long-term mortality in patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes. However the difference was significantly greater in patients with diabetes compared with patients without diabetes.