Jacobson, Robert M.

Objectives: We evaluated agreement between human papillomavirus (HPV) tests performed on self-collected vaginal and clinician-collected cervical specimens to advance HPV self-collection as a cervical cancer screening option in our health care system. Methods: This diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at an academic medical center. Participants were 25–65 years old with upcoming colposcopy appointments. One cohort (n = 79) self-collected a vaginal specimen in the clinic immediately before a clinician-collected cervical specimen. The second cohort (n = 115) self-collected a vaginal specimen at home, mailed it in, and had a clinician-collected cervical specimen in the clinic. Paired specimens were evaluated for total (TPA), positive (PPA), and negative (NPA) percentage agreement. Extreme temperature stability studies were also conducted. Results: Compared with clinician-collected cervical specimens, in-clinic self-collected vaginal specimens showed a TPA, PPA, and NPA of 98%, 100%, and 97% for HPV16; 99%, 100%, and 99% for HPV18; 86%, 94%, and 79% for high-risk other (HRO) HPV. The TPA, PPA, and NPA for at-home self-collected vaginal specimens compared with clinician-collected cervical specimens were 94%, 79%, and 96% for HPV16; 95%, 43%, and 98% for HPV18; 89%, 80%, and 93% for HRO. Vaginal specimens showed prolonged stability and were unaffected by extreme temperatures. Conclusions: In general, in-clinic and at-home self-collected vaginal HPV specimens for HPV screening demonstrate high agreement with clinician-collected cervical specimens, with the exception of low PPA in the at-home self-collected vaginal HPV18 subgroup. Our findings support the use of HPV self-collection as a practical option to expand access to cervical cancer screening.

Vaccine hesitancy refers to the delay in accepting or refusing vaccines despite the availability of vaccination services. Well-conducted studies and trials reviewed in this article support methods both to prevent and manage vaccine hesitancy. Clinicians should know which vaccines their patients are due to receive and should use every encounter to address this issue. Research shows clinicians' recommendations increase vaccine uptake. Recommendations that patients perceive as stronger have a greater effect in increasing vaccine uptake. Using presumptive language to phrase the recommendation is more effective than presenting the vaccine conversationally as an option for the patient. When the patient counters the strong recommendation with hesitancy, the clinician should engage the patient with motivational interviewing, perhaps using a four-step process called the "Four A's".

Background While rural health guidelines have often cautioned against digital interventions due to infrastructure and literacy barriers, this study introduces an SMS-based conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) that overcomes these limitations to promote HPV vaccination. Objective To evaluate an SMS-based CAI using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)’s presumptive and CASE (Corroborate, About Me, Science and Explain) frameworks to promote HPV vaccination among rural parent-adolescent dyads by: (1) testing its usability; (2) assessing the feasibility of co-design with clinicians and parent-adolescents; (3) identifying adoption barriers and (4) examining communication preferences across behavioural profiles. Methods We developed a CAI simulator using the presumptive approach and the structured CASE method to address 11 common concerns about the HPV vaccine. A multimethod usability study with 13 rural parent-adolescent dyads (n=26) included in-depth interviews and the System Usability Scale. Results The CAI achieved excellent usability (mean SUS 85.2, ~96th percentile). A previously undocumented behavioural profile—vaccine-unaware—was identified, distinct from hesitancy, and best addressed through empathetic, exploratory dialogue. Key adoption barriers included integration with existing preventive care routines and endorsement by trusted local providers. Conclusions Contrary to the assumption that rural residents resist digital tools, participants engaged readily when content was credible, locally endorsed and accessible via SMS. Findings highlight the conditional effectiveness of the CDC’s presumptive style in CAIs—well-suited for vaccine-compliant users but less effective for sceptical or unaware groups, who, we argue, would respond better to conversational, empathetic tones.

Background Measles remains a public health threat in the United States with over 50,000 cases being reported from 1989 through 1991 with continued smaller outbreaks. Measles vaccine failure is in part to blame for these large-scale outbreaks. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes are important determinants of immune response to measles virus and vaccine. To examine the influence that HLA polymorphisms may have on measles vaccine antibody response, we compared the distribution of HLA-DRB1 alleles between measles vaccine nonresponders and hyper-responders. Methods We determined the seroprevalence of measles antibody in 881 school children immunized with measles-mumps-rubella-II at age 15 months using a whole virus IgG EIA. We performed class II HLA-DR typing by PCR with sequence specific primers (PCR-SSP) on 81 nonresponders (IgG seronegative) and 65 hyper-responders (from the upper 10th percentile of IgG levels of all subjects). We then compared the distribution of alleles between nonresponders and hyper-responders. Results The distribution of HLA-DRB1 alleles among nonresponders compared to hyper-responders was significantly different ( p = 0.014). Nonresponders were significantly less likely to carry the HLA-DRB1*13 alleles than were hyper-responders (7.4% vs 16.2%; p = 0.02). Nonresponders also had an excess of HLA-DRB1*07 alleles (15.4% vs 6.2%; p = 0.015). Conclusions The absence of HLA-DRB1*13 alleles is associated with measles vaccine nonresponse. The absence of this allele has also been associated with susceptibility to other infectious diseases. The role of this gene in the immunogenetic response to infectious diseases requires further study.

This economic evaluation estimates the implementation costs and cost per additional patient receiving the vaccine associated with each of the intervention strategies for increasing rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in primary care practices.

ImportanceUptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination varies by characteristics, exposing some children to higher HPV cancer risks than others.ObjectiveTo examine whether the effectiveness of a multilevel intervention on HPV vaccination differed by race and ethnicity, rurality, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) in children ages 11 to 12 years.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial was conducted from April 2018 to August 2022 among children at 6 Mayo Clinic primary care practices in Minnesota to improve HPV vaccination. This secondary analysis was performed from March to June 2024.InterventionA multilevel intervention that included parent reminder/recall letters, which alerted parents of children due or past due for vaccination, and health care professional audit/feedback reports, which alerted health care professionals of their own vaccination rates.Main Outcome and MeasureVaccine initiation (first dose of the 2-dose HPV vaccine) and vaccine completion (second dose) were the primary study outcomes. In this secondary analysis, the effect of the intervention on HPV vaccine initiation and completion by race and ethnicity, rurality, and ADI quartiles (Qs) was assessed.ResultsA total of 6232 children aged 11 to 12 years (3285 [52.7%] male; 3481 [55.9%] aged 11 years and 2751 [44.1%] aged 12 years) were included in the analysis. Of the study participants, 304 (4.9%) were Asian, 561 (9.0%) Black, 146 (2.3%) Hispanic, 4501 (72.2%) White, and 720 (11.6%) other, including American Indian or Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Other Pacific Islander, Samoan, unable to provide, unknown, chose not to disclose, or other unspecified. A total of 5434 participants (87.2%) were urban residents, and 2794 (44.8%) resided in ADI Q2 areas. With usual care, HPV vaccine initiation and completion rates were significantly lower with each increasing ADI quartile (initiation: Cochran-Armitage test for trend [SE], −0.02 [0.01]; P < .001; completion: Cochran-Armitage test for trend [SE], −0.05 [0.01]; P < .001) but did not differ by children’s race and ethnicity or rurality. With the intervention, vaccine initiation increased significantly for most children (range of rates, 9.2% [95% CI, 5.2%-13.3%] to 24.0% [95% CI, 7.5%-40.6%]) except those with Black race, in rural settings, and in ADI Q4 (highest area deprivation); vaccine completion increased significantly for most children (range of rates, 19.4% [95% CI, 5.5%-33.3%] to 31.2% [95% CI, 12.1%-50.3%]) except for those in ADI Q4.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial, a multilevel intervention was associated with increased HPV vaccination for most children but had limited effect for those residing in areas of highest deprivation. Future research should explore other intervention strategies that would effectively promote HPV vaccination among families in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas to reduce HPV vaccination disparities.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03501992

Background: Cervical cancer screening with a self-collected vaginal specimen for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in May 2024, offering a potential solution to declining screening rates. Objective: We aimed to assess acceptability of clinic-based vaginal specimen self-collection for HPV testing and to evaluate associations between participants’ sociodemographics and their likelihood of choosing self-collection for future screening and the overall acceptability of using the Evalyn® brush device. We also evaluated associations between specific acceptability constructs and reported likelihood to use the device in the future and overall acceptability. Methods: Following self-collection of a vaginal specimen, participants completed an electronic survey that measured constructs from the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Associations were assessed using logistic regressions. The study was conducted at a colposcopy clinic in the Gynecology department of a midwestern academic medical center in the United States from November 2022 through July 2023. Results: Participants ( n = 81) reported high likelihood (98% likely or very likely) of choosing in-home self-collection for future screening and unanimity on overall acceptability (100% acceptable or completely acceptable) of using the device. More affirmative responses to measures on instruction understandability, ease of device use, understanding the device is used for cervical cancer screening, and perceiving self-collection improves screening rates were associated with a higher likelihood to choose self-collection for future screenings and overall acceptability of the device (all p values <0.05). Conclusion: Vaginal specimen self-collection for HPV testing was well-received in the studied population, with high acceptability and likelihood of uptake. Implementation efforts should provide user-friendly instructions and emphasize the benefits of self-collection for cervical cancer screening, particularly among people less likely to engage with clinician-collected speculum-based screening.

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo examine the outcomes of a clinical sample of young patients with restrictive eating disorders who received Family‐Based Treatment for Primary Care (FBT‐PC).MethodsParticipants were 134 youth (mean age = 15.7 years) and their caregiver(s). Participants and caregivers completed measures of eating disorder symptomatology, quality of life, and caregiver self‐efficacy.ResultsOf the 134 patients who received at least one session of FBT‐PC, 55.9% completed treatment, 20.1% were followed until they began a higher level of care, and 23.8% were non‐completers. Weekly measures for the full sample were evaluated using intention‐to‐treat analyses. Patient‐reported scores on the ED‐15 improved by −0.1 (SE = 0.02, F (1,133)= 26.4, p < 0.0001) per week, and caregivers' ratings of patient symptoms also improved by 0.85 (SE = 0.2, F (1,133)=13.1, p = 0.0003) per week. Patient's BMI percentile increased by 1.25 points per week (SE = 0.14, F (1,133) = 83.9, p < 0.0001). For patients who completed FBT‐PC, eating disorder symptoms, per patient‐ (M = −1.43, p < 0.0001) and caregiver‐report (M = −1.33 p < 0.0001) decreased significantly from baseline to end of treatment. Patient's quality of life increased significantly from baseline to end of treatment (M = 21.6, p < 0.0001) and caregivers showed significant increases in self‐efficacy (M = 3.41, p < 0.0001, d = 0.856). At the end of treatment, 62.5% of patients with complete data met criteria for full research remission, and 44.6% met criteria for full clinical remission.DiscussionFindings provide preliminary support for FBT‐PC as an effective treatment for youth with restrictive eating disorders. Additional research is needed to replicate these findings in other primary care settings and to understand the durability of treatment effects.