Gogineni, Kamalika

Background While rural health guidelines have often cautioned against digital interventions due to infrastructure and literacy barriers, this study introduces an SMS-based conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) that overcomes these limitations to promote HPV vaccination. Objective To evaluate an SMS-based CAI using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)’s presumptive and CASE (Corroborate, About Me, Science and Explain) frameworks to promote HPV vaccination among rural parent-adolescent dyads by: (1) testing its usability; (2) assessing the feasibility of co-design with clinicians and parent-adolescents; (3) identifying adoption barriers and (4) examining communication preferences across behavioural profiles. Methods We developed a CAI simulator using the presumptive approach and the structured CASE method to address 11 common concerns about the HPV vaccine. A multimethod usability study with 13 rural parent-adolescent dyads (n=26) included in-depth interviews and the System Usability Scale. Results The CAI achieved excellent usability (mean SUS 85.2, ~96th percentile). A previously undocumented behavioural profile—vaccine-unaware—was identified, distinct from hesitancy, and best addressed through empathetic, exploratory dialogue. Key adoption barriers included integration with existing preventive care routines and endorsement by trusted local providers. Conclusions Contrary to the assumption that rural residents resist digital tools, participants engaged readily when content was credible, locally endorsed and accessible via SMS. Findings highlight the conditional effectiveness of the CDC’s presumptive style in CAIs—well-suited for vaccine-compliant users but less effective for sceptical or unaware groups, who, we argue, would respond better to conversational, empathetic tones.

AbstractBackgroundIn preclinical studies whole gut transit (WGT) in mice is a gold‐standard “leading‐edge” approach that measures the time between orogastric gavage of carmine red and defecation of the first carmine red pellet. Transit studies in humans are performed during the active day because GI motility and transit are suppressed during the night. Since mice are nocturnal, WGT studies traditionally done during the day occur during their rest phase. How circadian rhythm affects WGT in mice is not known.MethodsWe used an automated approach for high temporal resolution uninterrupted testing of mouse WGT and activity. We housed wild‐type Bl6/C57 mice under the standard 12 h light–dark cycles. At 8 weeks, we performed carmine red orogastric gavage and assessed WGT during Light (rest) conditions. Then, we exposed mice to a reverse 12 h light–dark cycle for 2 weeks and tested them in the Dark (active) under red light conditions. Timelapse videos were analyzed to quantify activity and to timestamp all pellets, and multiple parameters were analyzed.Key ResultWhen complementary light cycle reversal experiments were performed, we found a significant increase in mouse activity when mice were tested during their Dark (active) phase, compared to their Light (rest) phase. In mice tested in the Active phase compared to the Rest phase, we found a significant acceleration in WGT, increased rate and total number of pellets produced, and more pellet clustering. These data show that the mice tested in the Active phase have important differences in activity that correlate with multiple alterations in gastrointestinal transit.Conclusion & InferencesDuring the Active phase mice have faster WGT, produce more pellets, and cluster their output compared to testing in the Rest phase. Like in humans, circadian rhythm is an important consideration for transit studies in mice, and a simple reverse light cycle approach facilitates further studies on the role of circadian rhythm in GI motility.