Lebow, Jocelyn

Context Adolescence is a critical period for bone development. Due to an elevated risk for low body mass index (BMI) and/or low energy availability, certain adolescent athletes are at increased risk of bone stress injury (BSI) and eating disorders (EDs). Despite this risk, the incidence of EDs in patients with BSI is unclear. Objective To compare the incidence of a premorbid drop in BMI percentile in a sample of adolescent athletes diagnosed with a BSI between 2005 and 2016. We also evaluated the relative risk of developing an ED for this sample, compared with a sex-matched, age-matched (±6 months), and time-matched (±2 years) sample of active adolescents with knee pain. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Data collected through the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Patients or Other Participants One hundred eighty-seven adolescent (aged 13–18) athletes with BSI and 187 active adolescents with knee pain. Main Outcome Measure(s) Conditional logistic regression was used to assess whether premorbid weight loss was a risk factor for BSI. A stratified log-rank test was used to evaluate the association between ED diagnosis and case-control status up to 5 years postinjury. Results Patients with a BSI had 1.53 times the odds of premorbid BMI percentile drop compared with controls (95% CI = 0.83, 2.12; P = .17). A total of 14 patients with a BSI had ED diagnoses after injury compared with 8 controls ( P = .13). Patients from weight-based or aesthetic sports had 1.93 times the odds of a BSI compared with controls (95% CI = 1.23, 3.02; P = .0040). The Kaplan-Meier estimates indicate that the case group had a greater risk of ED diagnosis. Conclusions Results suggest a trend toward a greater drop in BMI percentile and increased frequency of ED diagnoses in the BSI group compared with controls. The documented co-occurrence of weight loss, stress fractures, and EDs in adolescent athletes should inform guidelines for screening and treatment of adolescent athletes with BSIs.

ABSTRACTBackgroundMetabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable approach to treating obesity, yet recurrent weight gain occurs in a subset of patients. Primary care often serves as a routine point of contact for patients following MBS and is a potential gateway for addressing and/or preventing recurrent weight gain.MethodsAlthough guidelines for the management of recurrent weight gain after MBS exist, this narrative review was undertaken to clarify the role of the primary care providers in enhancing long‐term outcomes and preventing weight gain after MBS.FindingsRegular follow‐up in primary care provides an opportunity to identify challenges related to weight management and overall health outcomes, which may include concerns related to nutrition, mental or physical well‐being, body image, motivation, and behavior change, for example. The availability of multidisciplinary providers within primary care settings, including behavioral health specialists, dietitians, and physical therapists, is an important strength of this setting in addressing potential post‐MBS concerns such as recurrent weight gain.ConclusionThis review outlines clinical considerations for managing recurrent weight gain post‐MBS in primary care and includes recommendations for both primary care providers and specialty clinicians working in primary care to deliver care effectively and mitigate weight stigma post‐MBS.

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo examine the outcomes of a clinical sample of young patients with restrictive eating disorders who received Family‐Based Treatment for Primary Care (FBT‐PC).MethodsParticipants were 134 youth (mean age = 15.7 years) and their caregiver(s). Participants and caregivers completed measures of eating disorder symptomatology, quality of life, and caregiver self‐efficacy.ResultsOf the 134 patients who received at least one session of FBT‐PC, 55.9% completed treatment, 20.1% were followed until they began a higher level of care, and 23.8% were non‐completers. Weekly measures for the full sample were evaluated using intention‐to‐treat analyses. Patient‐reported scores on the ED‐15 improved by −0.1 (SE = 0.02, F (1,133)= 26.4, p < 0.0001) per week, and caregivers' ratings of patient symptoms also improved by 0.85 (SE = 0.2, F (1,133)=13.1, p = 0.0003) per week. Patient's BMI percentile increased by 1.25 points per week (SE = 0.14, F (1,133) = 83.9, p < 0.0001). For patients who completed FBT‐PC, eating disorder symptoms, per patient‐ (M = −1.43, p < 0.0001) and caregiver‐report (M = −1.33 p < 0.0001) decreased significantly from baseline to end of treatment. Patient's quality of life increased significantly from baseline to end of treatment (M = 21.6, p < 0.0001) and caregivers showed significant increases in self‐efficacy (M = 3.41, p < 0.0001, d = 0.856). At the end of treatment, 62.5% of patients with complete data met criteria for full research remission, and 44.6% met criteria for full clinical remission.DiscussionFindings provide preliminary support for FBT‐PC as an effective treatment for youth with restrictive eating disorders. Additional research is needed to replicate these findings in other primary care settings and to understand the durability of treatment effects.

AbstractObjectivesAdolescents with functional abdominal pain (FAP) often experience pain and other gastrointestinal symptoms in the context of eating, which may place them at risk for eating disorders. This study compared disordered eating and its sequalae in adolescents with FAP to those with chronic headache.MethodsParticipants in this retrospective chart review study were 270 adolescents and young adults (mean age 15.9; standard deviation [SD] = 1.63; 60% female) attending an intensive, interdisciplinary pain treatment program, including 135 youth with FAP and an age‐ and gender‐matched control group with a primary pain diagnosis of chronic headache. Information was extracted related to eating‐ and weight‐related symptoms.ResultsIndependent t‐tests and χ2 analyses found that compared with adolescents with chronic headache, patients with FAP showed significantly more eating pathology as reflected by scores on the Eating Attitudes Test—26 (EAT‐26) (p < 0.001), endorsement of pain‐related restrictive eating (p < 0.01), eating disorder history (p < 0.001), and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) diagnoses (p < 0.001). Compared to those with chronic headache, significantly more patients with FAP had lost 10 pounds or more (p < 0.01) and a higher proportion were underweight (p < 0.001). Among all participants, a history of exclusion diets used to manage symptoms significantly increased the risk for ARFID (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this study highlight the increased risk of eating‐related concerns among youth with FAP, as well as the judicious use of exclusion diets to manage symptoms in these patients.

The striking rise in adolescent eating disorders since the severe acute respiratory coronavirus syndrome 2 pandemic has amplified demands for specialty eating disorders services and contributed to protracted delays in care. In the context of these delays, patients are at risk for increased weight loss, medical instability, escalating disease progression and poor prognosis. Primary care providers (PCPs) are frequently the first point of contact for young patients with eating disorders and are often left to bridge the gap while families struggle to establish specialty care. Yet, beyond case detection and medical comanagement, there are no evidence-based guidelines that can assist PCPs to prepare families for treatment, halt disease progression, and begin the lengthy process of weight and nutritional restoration in efforts to reduce medical complications and support a favorable prognosis. We present the case of a 13-year-old girl with a restrictive eating disorder to illustrate how PCPs can use intervention principles and strategies derived from evidence-based eating disorder treatment to successfully manage adolescent patients until they can access specialty treatment. We offer concrete guidelines for decision-making, as well as suggested behavioral and medical interventions for the PCP. With evidence-based tools, PCPs are well-positioned to support young patients with restrictive eating disorders and their family members as they begin the process of recovery from an eating disorder.

AbstractObjectiveThe goal of the current study is to advance efforts to increase the quality of care for childhood anxiety disorder (CADs) through (1) detailing the content of community‐based treatment sessions, (2) exploring the validity of therapist surveys, (3) examining the influence of setting differences, and (4) testing the effects of a technology‐based training on use of nonexposure strategies.MethodsThirteen therapists were randomly assigned to technology‐based training in the use of exposure therapy or treatment as usual (TAU) for CADs. Therapeutic techniques were coded from 125 community‐based treatment sessions.ResultsConsistent with survey responses community therapists spent the majority of session time reviewing symptoms (34% of session time), implementing nonexposure cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; 36%), and rarely engaged in exposure (3%). An integrated behavioral health setting was associated with greater endorsement of exposure on survey, p < 0.05, although this difference was not significant in session recordings, p = 0.14. Multilevel models indicated that technology‐based training that has been shown to increase exposure, also decreased use of nonexposure CBT techniques (2% vs. 29%, p < 0.001).ConclusionThe study supports the validity of survey‐based findings that community‐based care for CADs consists of non‐exposure CBT techniques. Efforts should be invested in dissemination of within‐session exposure.