Lebow, Jocelyn R

ABSTRACTBackgroundMetabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable approach to treating obesity, yet recurrent weight gain occurs in a subset of patients. Primary care often serves as a routine point of contact for patients following MBS and is a potential gateway for addressing and/or preventing recurrent weight gain.MethodsAlthough guidelines for the management of recurrent weight gain after MBS exist, this narrative review was undertaken to clarify the role of the primary care providers in enhancing long‐term outcomes and preventing weight gain after MBS.FindingsRegular follow‐up in primary care provides an opportunity to identify challenges related to weight management and overall health outcomes, which may include concerns related to nutrition, mental or physical well‐being, body image, motivation, and behavior change, for example. The availability of multidisciplinary providers within primary care settings, including behavioral health specialists, dietitians, and physical therapists, is an important strength of this setting in addressing potential post‐MBS concerns such as recurrent weight gain.ConclusionThis review outlines clinical considerations for managing recurrent weight gain post‐MBS in primary care and includes recommendations for both primary care providers and specialty clinicians working in primary care to deliver care effectively and mitigate weight stigma post‐MBS.

AbstractObjectiveThe goal of the current study is to advance efforts to increase the quality of care for childhood anxiety disorder (CADs) through (1) detailing the content of community‐based treatment sessions, (2) exploring the validity of therapist surveys, (3) examining the influence of setting differences, and (4) testing the effects of a technology‐based training on use of nonexposure strategies.MethodsThirteen therapists were randomly assigned to technology‐based training in the use of exposure therapy or treatment as usual (TAU) for CADs. Therapeutic techniques were coded from 125 community‐based treatment sessions.ResultsConsistent with survey responses community therapists spent the majority of session time reviewing symptoms (34% of session time), implementing nonexposure cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; 36%), and rarely engaged in exposure (3%). An integrated behavioral health setting was associated with greater endorsement of exposure on survey, p < 0.05, although this difference was not significant in session recordings, p = 0.14. Multilevel models indicated that technology‐based training that has been shown to increase exposure, also decreased use of nonexposure CBT techniques (2% vs. 29%, p < 0.001).ConclusionThe study supports the validity of survey‐based findings that community‐based care for CADs consists of non‐exposure CBT techniques. Efforts should be invested in dissemination of within‐session exposure.

ABSTRACT: Objective: To examine the medical assessment and triage of pediatric patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) initially seen in primary care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all pediatric patients with AN who had eating/weight concerns and initially identified symptoms in primary care in a single health care system between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Information on presenting concern, medical assessment/laboratory tests, clinical diagnoses, treatment recommendations, and referrals were abstracted from the medical record. Results: Forty-one (mean age = 13.7 years; SD = 2.2) pediatric patients with AN had eating/weight concerns and initially identified symptoms in a primary care. Overall, only 5% (n = 2/41) of patients received an AN diagnosis during the index visit; a minority were assessed for electrolyte disturbance (n = 20), electrocardiogram abnormality (n = 18), hypothermia (n = 13), binge/purge behaviors (n = 13), orthostatic hypotension (n = 2), or dehydration (n = 1), and only 56% (n = 23) received triage consistent with practice recommendations. Although 61% (n = 25) met criteria for inpatient admission, inpatient hospitalization was recommended for only 2 patients. Patients who received triage consistent with practice recommendations received AN diagnosis and treatment significantly earlier than those who did not (p < 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Findings suggest that pediatric patients with AN may not be receiving medical assessment and triage per practice recommendations in the primary care setting. Understanding barriers to evidence-based care for pediatric eating disorders may inform provider education and system-wide changes to enhance outcomes in these patients.