Wilson, Peter W.F.

Abstract With aging, somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) can give rise to clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), a premalignant state associated with diverse age-related diseases. Here we report the largest multi-ancestry genome-wide analysis of CHIP to date (N = 1,018,305), including individuals of African (N = 85,978), Admixed American (N = 191,371), East Asian (N = 13,532), European (N = 694,015), and South Asian (N = 13,193) ancestry. Multi-ancestry meta-analyses identified 72 genome-wide significant loci, including 44 novel associations implicating genes such as AFF1 , ATF7IP , ATP8B4 , BCL2 , CEBPA , CYRIA , DNM2 , ELF1 , NKX2-3 , PIK3CB , PRDM16 , RPN1 , TERC , and TRIM4 . Notably, variants at MECOM and PHF20L1 showed opposite allelic effects between DNMT3A - and non- DNMT3A -driven CHIP, highlighting driver-specific germline influences. Implicated loci converge on pathways regulating telomere maintenance, cell-cycle control, hematopoietic transcription, DNA damage response and immune signaling. These findings support a model in which germline variation both expands the HSPC pool and biases clonal selection in a driver-dependent manner, providing a mechanistic basis for inter-individual heterogeneity in CHIP. Phenome-wide association analyses further linked CHIP to hematologic, neoplastic, and circulatory traits, with enrichment across hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cell types. Together, this work expands the genomic and phenomic landscape of CHIP and reveals germline–somatic interactions that shape clonal evolution during aging.

Background: Prior ATPIII lipid guidelines recommended statin therapy for patients with clinical ASCVD to achieve low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets, while the 2013 ACC/AHA lipid guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy for all ASCVD patients. How closely these recommendations are followed in routine clinical practice is unknown. Methods: We evaluated statin use, intensity, and LDL-C values in 1,483 patients with ASCVD (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease) enrolled and seen serially at 62 geographically dispersed US cardiology and primary care clinics in the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) Registry between May - September 2015. Factors associated with high intensity statin use (atorvastatin ≥40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥20 mg daily) and LDL-C <70 mg/dL were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 1,483 ASCVD patients, 86.2% were on a statin, but only 31.4% were on a high-intensity statin. Overall, 64.0% had an LDL-C <100 mg/dL, but only 29.0% had an LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Factors associated with high-intensity statin use in multivariable regression were younger age (OR 0.74 per 10 year increase, p<0.001, 95% CI 0.66-0.83), male sex (OR 1.69, p<0.001, 95% CI, 1.32-2.16), cerebrovascular disease (OR 1.55, p=0.008, 95% CI 1.12-2.13), coronary heart disease (OR 2.42, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.67-3.50), and being seen by a cardiologist (OR 1.35, p =0.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.81). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of LDL-C<70 were male sex (OR 1.55, p=0.001, 95% CI 1.20-2.01), white (OR 1.62, p=0.03, 95% CI 1.04-2.5-, diabetes (OR 1.64, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.29-2.09) and being seen by a cardiologist (OR 1.94, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.41-2.67). Discussion: Substantial gaps in care remain for secondary prevention of ASCVD despite simplified recommendations. While the majority of patients with ASCVD in community practice are on a statin, only one-third are on high intensity statins and over two-thirds have LDL ≥70 mg/dL.

Introduction: Statin dose guidelines for PAD patients are based on coronary artery disease and stroke data. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of statin dose (based on 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines) on PAD outcomes of amputation and mortality. Methods: Patients with PAD in the Veterans Affairs database were identified from 2003-2014. The exposure was highest statin dose usage (none, low-moderate and high intensity) around diagnosis of PAD (within 1 year). The outcomes were risk of incident amputation (below knee or above knee) and mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years. The effect of statin dose on the two outcomes was also analyzed using Cox proportional hazards modeling to adjust for covariates. Results: In 208,275 patients with PAD [Males: 98.1%; Mean age: 67.4 yrs (SD 9.9)], 17,643 amputations and 99,951 deaths occurred in a median follow up of 5.2 years. Almost a quarter (27.7%) of patients were not on a statin while 30.4% were on simvastatin 80 mg (no longer recommended due to drug toxicity). The risk of incident amputation declined significantly at the high intensity statin dose as seen in Table 1. In Cox models adjusting for age, gender, race, comorbidities, cholesterol levels and creatinine, the high intensity statins were associated with lower amputation risk and mortality as compared to no statin [HR 0.67; 95% CI (0.63, 0.72) and HR 0.71; 95% CI (0.68, 0.73), respectively]. Low-moderate-dose statins also had significant but smaller reductions in risk of amputation and mortality [HR amputation 0.78 (0.75, 0.82), HR death 0.78 (0.77, 0.80)]. Conclusion: This is one of the largest population based studies to examine the effect of statins on long-term PAD outcomes and the first to explore the dose-dependent effect of statins on amputation and mortality. High intensity statins are associated with a significant reduction in limb loss and mortality in PAD patients followed by a smaller risk reduction by low-moderate intensity statins as compared to no statin therapy.

Abstract Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death, yet its genetic determinants are not fully elucidated. We report a multi-ethnic genome-wide association study of CAD involving nearly a quarter of a million cases, incorporating the largest cohorts to date of Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics from the Million Veteran Program with existing studies including CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, UK Biobank, and Biobank Japan. We verify substantial and nearly equivalent heritability of CAD across multiple ancestral groups, discover 107 novel loci including the first nine on the X-chromosome, identify the first eight genome-wide significant loci among Blacks and Hispanics, and demonstrate that two common haplotypes are largely responsible for the risk stratification at the well-known 9p21 locus in most populations except those of African origin where both haplotypes are virtually absent. We identify 15 loci for angiographically derived burden of coronary atherosclerosis, which robustly overlap with the strongest and earliest loci reported to date for clinical CAD. Phenome-wide association analyses of novel loci and externally validated polygenic risk scores (PRS) augment signals from the insulin resistance cluster of risk factors and consequences, extend previously established pleiotropic associations of loci with traditional risk factors to include smoking and family history, and confirm a substantially reduced transferability of existing PRS to Blacks. Downstream integrative genomic analyses reinforce the critical role of endothelial, fibroblast, and smooth muscle cells within the coronary vessel wall in CAD susceptibility. Our study highlights the value of a multi-ethnic design in efficiently characterizing the genetic architecture of CAD across all human populations.

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an important cause of cardiovascular mortality; however, its genetic determinants remain incompletely defined. In total, 10 previously identified risk loci explain a small fraction of AAA heritability. Methods: We performed a genome-wide association study in the Million Veteran Program testing ≈18 million DNA sequence variants with AAA (7642 cases and 172 172 controls) in veterans of European ancestry with independent replication in up to 4972 cases and 99 858 controls. We then used mendelian randomization to examine the causal effects of blood pressure on AAA. We examined the association of AAA risk variants with aneurysms in the lower extremity, cerebral, and iliac arterial beds, and derived a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) to identify a subset of the population at greater risk for disease. Results: Through a genome-wide association study, we identified 14 novel loci, bringing the total number of known significant AAA loci to 24. In our mendelian randomization analysis, we demonstrate that a genetic increase of 10 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure (odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.24–1.66]; P =1.6×10 −6 ), as opposed to systolic blood pressure (odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.97–1.15]; P =0.2), likely has a causal relationship with AAA development. We observed that 19 of 24 AAA risk variants associate with aneurysms in at least 1 other vascular territory. A 29-variant PRS was strongly associated with AAA (odds ratio PRS , 1.26 [95% CI, 1.18–1.36]; P PRS =2.7×10 −11 per SD increase in PRS), independent of family history and smoking risk factors (odds ratio PRS+family history+smoking , 1.24 [95% CI, 1.14–1.35]; P PRS =1.27×10 −6 ). Using this PRS, we identified a subset of the population with AAA prevalence greater than that observed in screening trials informing current guidelines. Conclusions: We identify novel AAA genetic associations with therapeutic implications and identify a subset of the population at significantly increased genetic risk of AAA independent of family history. Our data suggest that extending current screening guidelines to include testing to identify those with high polygenic AAA risk, once the cost of genotyping becomes comparable with that of screening ultrasound, would significantly increase the yield of current screening at reasonable cost.

Background Current treatment guidelines strongly recommend statin therapy for secondary prevention. However, it remains unclear whether patients’ perceptions of cardiovascular risk, beliefs on cholesterol, or the intensity of prescribed statin therapy differs for patients with coronary artery disease ( CAD ) versus cerebrovascular disease (Ce VD ) versus both CAD and Ce VD ( CAD &Ce VD ). Methods and Results The PALM (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management) registry collected data on statin use, intensity, and core laboratory low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels for 3232 secondary prevention patients treated at 133 US clinics. Among individuals with Ce VD only (n=403), CAD only (n=2202), and Ce VD & CAD (n=627), no significant differences were observed in patient‐perceived cardiovascular disease risk, beliefs on cholesterol lowering, or perceived effectiveness and safety of statin therapy. However, patients with Ce VD only were less likely to receive any statin therapy (76.2% versus 86.2%; adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.45–0.91), or guideline‐recommended statin intensity (34.6% versus 50.4%; adjusted odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.81) than those with CAD only. Individuals with Ce VD only were also less likely to achieve low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/ dL (59.2% versus 69.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.99) than individuals with CAD alone. There were no significant differences in the use of any statin therapy or guideline‐recommended statin intensity between individuals with CAD &Ce VD and those with CAD only. Conclusions Despite lack of significant differences in patient‐perceived cardiovascular risk or statin beliefs, patients with Ce VD were significantly less likely to receive higher intensity statin or achieve low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/ dL than those with CAD only.

Background: Female patients have historically received less aggressive lipid management than male patients. Contemporary care patterns and the potential causes for these differences are unknown. Methods and Results: Examining the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management Registry—a nationwide registry of outpatients with or at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease—we compared the use of statin therapy, guideline-recommended statin dosing, and reasons for undertreatment. We specifically analyzed sex differences in statin treatment and guideline-recommended statin dosing using multivariable logistic regression. Among 5693 participants (43% women) eligible for 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Guideline–recommended statin treatment, women were less likely than men to be prescribed any statin therapy (67.0% versus 78.4%; P <0.001) or to receive a statin at the guideline-recommended intensity (36.7% versus 45.2%; P <0.001). Women were more likely to report having previously never been offered statin therapy (18.6% versus 13.5%; P <0.001), declined statin therapy (3.6% versus 2.0%; P <0.001), or discontinued their statin (10.9% versus 6.1%; P <0.001). Women were also less likely than men to believe statins were safe (47.9% versus 55.2%; P <0.001) or effective (68.0% versus 73.2%; P <0.001) and more likely to report discontinuing their statin because of a side effect (7.9% versus 3.6%; P <0.001). Sex differences in both overall and guideline-recommended intensity statin use persisted after adjustment for demographics, socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, patient beliefs, and provider characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61–0.81; P <0.001; and odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73–0.92; P <0.01, respectively). Sex differences were consistent across primary and secondary prevention indications for statin treatment. Conclusions: Women eligible for statin therapy were less likely than men to be treated with any statin or guideline-recommended statin intensity. A combination of women being offered statin therapy less frequently, while declining and discontinuing treatment more frequently, accounted for these sex differences in statin use.

Background The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults recommended testing low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL ‐C) to identify untreated patients with LDL ‐C ≥190 mg/dL, assess lipid‐lowering therapy adherence, and consider nonstatin therapy. We sought to determine whether clinician lipid testing practices were consistent with these guidelines. Methods and Results The PALM (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management) registry enrolled primary and secondary prevention patients from 140 US cardiology, endocrinology, and primary care offices in 2015 and captured demographic data, lipid treatment history, and the highest LDL ‐C level in the past 2 years. Core laboratory lipid levels were drawn at enrollment. Among 7627 patients, 2787 (36.5%) had no LDL ‐C levels measured in the 2 years before enrollment. Patients without chart‐documented LDL ‐C levels were more often women, nonwhite, uninsured, and non–college graduates (all P <0.01). Patients without prior lipid testing were less likely to receive statin treatment (72.6% versus 76.0%; P =0.0034), a high‐intensity statin (21.5% versus 24.3%; P =0.016), nonstatin lipid‐lowering therapy (24.8% versus 27.3%; P =0.037), and had higher core laboratory LDL ‐C levels at enrollment (median 97 versus 92 mg/dL; P <0.0001) than patients with prior LDL ‐C testing. Of 166 individuals with core laboratory LDL ‐C levels ≥190 mg/dL, 36.1% had no LDL ‐C measurement in the prior 2 years, and 57.2% were not on a statin at the time of enrollment. Conclusions In routine clinical practice, LDL ‐C testing is associated with higher‐intensity lipid‐lowering treatment and lower achieved LDL ‐C levels.