Back to Authors

Mi, Xiaojuan

Mayo Clinic

Duke University

Citations 3

Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Communication Tools and Presentation Formats on Patient Perceptions and Preferences
Wang, Tracy Y , Mi, Xiaojuan, Robinson, Jennifer G. , Roger, Véronique L. , Goldberg, Anne C. , Návar, Ann Marie , Virani, Salim S. , Wilson, Peter W.F. , Peterson, Eric D.

JAMA Cardiology | November 12, 2018 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1192

10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3680 Get It

Statin Use and Adverse Effects Among Adults >75 Years of Age: Insights From the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) Registry
Wang, Tracy Y., Mi, Xiaojuan, Louie, Michael J. , Lee, L. Veronica, Goldberg, Anne C. , Roger, Véronique L. , Robinson, Jennifer G. , Nanna, Michael G. , Návar, Ann Marie , Virani, Salim S. , Peterson, Eric D.

Journal of the American Heart Association | May 8, 2018 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.118.008546 Get It

Background Current statin use and symptoms among older adults in routine community practice have not been well characterized since the release of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline. Methods and Results We compared statin use and dosing between adults >75 and ≤75 years old who were eligible for primary or secondary prevention statin use without considering guideline‐recommended age criteria. The patients were treated at 138 US practices in the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) registry in 2015. Patient surveys also evaluated reported symptoms while taking statins. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the association between older age and statin use and dosing. Among 6717 people enrolled, 1704 (25%) were >75 years old. For primary prevention, use of any statin or high‐dose statin did not vary by age group: any statin, 62.6% in those >75 years old versus 63.1% in those ≤75 years old ( P =0.83); high‐dose statin, 10.2% versus 12.3% in the same groups ( P =0.14). For secondary prevention, older patients were slightly less likely to receive any statin (80.1% versus 84.2% [ P =0.003]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.66–1.01 [ P =0.06]), but were much less likely to receive a high‐intensity statin (23.5% versus 36.2% [ P <0.0001]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.65 [ P =0.0001]). Among current statin users, older patients were slightly less likely to report any symptoms (41.3% versus 46.6%; P =0.003) or myalgias (27.3% versus 33.3%; P <0.001). Conclusions Overall use of statins was similar for primary prevention in those aged >75 years versus younger patients, yet older patients were less likely to receive high‐intensity statins for secondary prevention. Statins appear to be similarly tolerated in older and younger adults.
Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Versus Defibrillator Therapy Alone
Masoudi, Frederick A. , Mi, Xiaojuan, Curtis, Lesley H. , Curtis, Jeptha P. , Fonarow, Gregg C. , Hammill, Stephen C., Heidenreich, Paul A. , Piccini, Jonathan P. , Qualls, Laura G., Hernandez, Adrian F. , Peterson, Pamela N. , Al‐Khatib, Sana M. , Qualls, Laura G. , Hernandez, Adrian

Annals of Internal Medicine | May 5, 2014 | Volume: 160 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 603-611

10.7326/m13-1879 Get It