Spiess, Philippe E.

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare malignancy with limited therapeutic options in advanced and recurrent diseases. Advanced PSCC is typically managed with multimodal therapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation followed by surgery; however, durable responses remain uncommon, and outcomes after recurrence are poor. Cancer vaccines represent a promising immunotherapeutic strategy, as these treatments induce tumor-specific immunity and heightened immune surveillance against penile cancer cells. While therapeutic cancer vaccines have not yet demonstrated consistent clinical efficacy as monotherapy in PSCC, their integration with complementary immune-modulating approaches, particularly immune checkpoint blockade, represents a rational strategy to enhance antitumor immunity. This review summarizes the rationale for vaccine development in PSCC, with emphasis on HPV-derived antigens, neoantigens, and emerging tumor-associated targets. We examine major vaccine platforms, including viral-vector, peptide-based, nucleic acid, and dendritic cell-based approaches. We also discuss how spatial transcriptomics, single-cell RNA sequencing, artificial intelligence-assisted antigen prediction, and nanotechnology-enhanced delivery systems may support future personalized vaccine development. Overall, therapeutic vaccines remain investigational in PSCC but may become relevant within biomarker-driven, combination-based immunotherapy strategies.

Objectives To compare survival and oncological outcomes of cisplatin‐ineligible patients (Cis‐I) and cisplatin‐eligible (Cis‐E) patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing immediate radical cystectomy (IRC), as IRC is currently considered the standard‐of‐care for Cis‐I patients with MIBC. Patients and Methods Data from patients with clinical (c)T2–4cN0–1M0 MIBC undergoing IRC, between 2006 and 2021, were retrospectively analysed from four tertiary care centres in the United States. Overall, recurrence‐free and event‐free survival were described using the Kaplan–Meier method and tested using the log‐rank test. For context, we compared survival outcomes against those in Cis‐E patients with MIBC undergoing IRC from the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)‐8710 trial. Results Overall, 379 Cis‐I and 125 Cis‐E patients with cT2–4cN0–1M0 MIBC who underwent IRC were included. Cis‐I patients included 44.8% cT3/4 vs 60% cT3/4 in the Cis‐E group. Overall, 83.3% of Cis‐I and 79.2% of Cis‐E patients died during follow‐up. The median event‐free and overall survival were 12.1 and 14.5 months for the Cis‐I group and 28.8 and 60.1 months for the Cis‐E group ( P < 0.001). [Correction added on 10 October 2025, after first online publication: The preceding sentence has been revised in this version.] Limitations include retrospective comparison of contemporary multi‐institutional data with that of a randomised control trial. Conclusions The Cis‐I patients with MIBC undergoing IRC fared poorly, with a median overall survival of 14.5 (95% confidence interval 11.1–17.9) months, mostly due to non‐cancer‐related deaths. These results provide a benchmark for clinical trials exploring novel agents or alternative chemotherapy regimens in Cis‐I patients with MIBC.

Objectives To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) using a large, well‐curated multi‐institutional database. Patients and Methods This study was a multi‐institutional retrospective analysis conducted by the UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN), combining data from 2276 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at seven high‐volume tertiary care centres in the United States. The UCAN data were analysed to evaluate the impact of response to NAC on survival outcomes in patients with UTUC. Results A total of 378 patients in the UCAN database underwent NAC. On final surgical pathology, 101 patients (26.8%) had ≤ypT1N0 disease and were defined as NAC treatment responders. Patients who responded to NAC had significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) compared to non‐responders. At 5 years post‐surgery, 81.5% of responders were alive compared to 59.8% of non‐responders. The median OS and PFS times among non‐responders were 7.0 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6–9.7) and 6.0 years (95% CI 4.6–9.3) respectively, while the median OS and PFS were not reached among responders. Limitations of this study include its retrospective design, heterogeneity in chemotherapy regimens, and the absence of clearly defined patient selection criteria for treatment. Conclusion These data suggest that NAC can play a pivotal role in the treatment of well‐selected UTUC patients who respond positively. Non‐responders had clearly inferior outcomes. More work is needed to find predictors of response which can improve patient selection.

Bladder cancer, the sixth most common cancer in the United States, is most commonly of the urothelial carcinoma histologic subtype. The clinical spectrum of bladder cancer is divided into 3 categories that differ in prognosis, management, and therapeutic aims: (1) non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC); (2) muscle invasive, nonmetastatic disease; and (3) metastatic bladder cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer, including changes in the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours: Urinary and Male Genital Tumours and how the NCCN Guidelines aligned with these updates; new and emerging treatment options for bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)–unresponsive NMIBC; and updates to systemic therapy recommendations for advanced or metastatic disease.

Objective To investigate the optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles needed to achieve a pathological response in patients with clinically lymph node‐positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa) who received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection. Patients and Methods We included 388 patients who received three or four cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine or (dose‐dense) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), followed by consolidative RC for cTanyN1–3M0 BCa. We compared pathological complete (pCR = ypT0N0) and objective response (pOR = yp ≤T1N0) between treatment groups. Predictors of pCR and/or pOR were assessed using uni‐ and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary endpoints were overall (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS). We evaluated the association between the number of induction chemotherapy cycles administered and survival outcomes on multivariable Cox regression. Results Overall, 101 and 287 patients received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy, respectively. Of these, 72 (19%) and 128 (33%) achieved pCR and pOR response, respectively. The pCR (20%, 18%) and pOR (40%, 31%) rates did not differ significantly between patients receiving three or four cycles ( P > 0.05). The number of cycles was not associated with pCR or pOR on multivariable logistic regression analyses. The 2‐year OS estimates were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.74) and 63% (95% CI 0.58–0.7) for patients receiving three or four cycles, respectively. Receiving three vs four cycles was not associated with OS and CSS on uni‐ or multivariable Cox regression analyses. Conclusion Pathological response and survival outcomes did not differ between administering three or four induction chemotherapy cycles in patients with cN+ BCa. A fewer cycles (minimum three) may be oncologically sufficient in patients with cN+ BCa, while decreasing the wait for definitive local therapy in those patients who end up without a response to chemotherapy. This warrants further validation.

Abstract Introduction This study investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advance penile squamous cell carcinoma for which current evidence is lacking. Methods Included patients had locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma with clinical lymph node metastasis treated with at least 1 dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to planned consolidative lymphadenectomy. Objective response rates were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival, estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Treatment-related adverse events were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Results A total of 209 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced and clinically node-positive penile squamous cell carcinoma. The study population consisted of 7% of patients with stage II disease, 48% with stage III, and 45% with stage IV. Grade 2 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 35 (17%) patients, and no treatment-related mortality was observed. Of the patients, 201 (97%) completed planned consolidative lymphadenectomy. During follow-up, 106 (52.7%) patients expired, with a median overall survival of 37.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.8 to 50.1 months) and median progression-free survival of 26.0 months (95% CI = 11.7 to 40.2 months). Objective response rate was 57.2%, with 87 (43.2%) having partial response and 28 (13.9%) having a complete response. Patients with objective response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a longer median overall survival (73.0 vs 17.0 months, P &lt; .01) compared with those who did not. The lymph node pathologic complete response rate was 24.8% in the cohort. Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with lymphadenectomy for locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma is well tolerated and active to reduce the disease burden and improve long-term survival outcomes.

Abstract Background Treatment options for penile squamous cell carcinoma are limited. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes and safety profiles of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods This retrospective study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2015 and 2022 across 24 centers in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Objective response rates were determined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Two-sided statistical tests were used for comparisons. Results Among 92 patients, 8 (8.7%) were Asian, 6 (6.5%) were Black, and 24 (29%) were Hispanic and/or Latinx. Median (interquartile range) age was 62 (53-70) years. In all, 83 (90%) had metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma, and 74 (80%) had received at least second-line treatment. Most patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy (n = 26 [28%]), combination nivolumab-ipilimumab with or without multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 23 [25%]), or nivolumab (n = 16 [17%]) or cemiplimab (n = 15 [16%]) monotherapies. Median overall and progression-free survival were 9.8 months (95% confidence interval = 7.7 to 12.8 months) and 3.2 months (95% confidence interval = 2.5 to 4.2 months), respectively. The objective response rate was 13% (n = 11/85) in the overall cohort and 35% (n = 7/20) in patients with lymph node–only metastases. Visceral metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or higher, and a higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were associated with worse overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 27 (29%) patients, and 9.8% (n = 9) of the events were grade 3 or higher. Conclusions Immune checkpoint inhibitors are active in a subset of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. Future translational studies are warranted to identify patients more likely to derive clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Aktuell wurde mit dem Tetrafecta-Score das erste Instrument zur Beurteilung der Behandlungsqualität in der chirurgischen Primärtherapie des Peniskarzinoms (PECa) publiziert. Eine externe wissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung mit den ihn definierenden Einzelkriterien steht bislang noch aus und bildet das Studienziel. Material und Methode Es wurde eine internationale Arbeitsgruppe bestehend aus 12 Urologen und einem Onkologen mit klinischer und akademisch-wissenschaftlicher Expertise auf dem Gebiet des Peniskarzinoms gegründet. In einem modifizierten vierstufigen Delphi-Prozess wurden unter Einbeziehung der Tetrafecta-Kriterien insgesamt 13 Kriterien für PECa-Patienten in den klinischen AJCC-Stadien 1–4 (T1–3N0–3, aber M0) definiert, von denen in einer geheimen Abstimmung jeder der Experten 5 auswählen musste, um dadurch einen individuellen Pentafecta-Score zu generieren. Anschließend wurde das Rating der Experten aggregiert ausgewertet und dadurch ein finaler Pentafecta-Score gebildet. Ergebnisse Keines der ursprünglichen Tetrafecta-Kriterien wurde in den finalen Pentafecta-Score übernommen, der sich aus den folgenden Kriterien zusammensetzt: 1.) Organerhalt, sofern immer möglich (≤T2), jedoch stets unter Wahrung eines negativen chirurgischen Schnittrandes, 2.) beidseitige inguinale Lymphadenektomie (ILAE) ab pT1G2N0, 3.) perioperative Chemotherapie sollte erfolgen, sofern durch die Leitlinien indiziert, 4.) ILAE sollte, sofern indiziert, in einem zeitlichen Abstand von maximal 3 Monaten zur Primärtumorresektion erfolgen und 5.) die behandelnde Klinik sollte im Minimum 15 chirurgische Primärtherapien bei PECa-Patienten durchführen. Nur 7 der 13 Experten (54%) zeigten eine starke Korrelation ihres individuellen mit dem finalen Pentafecta-Score (rsp >0.60). Schlussfolgerung Auf der Basis eines moderierten Abstimmungsprozesses unter internationalen PECa-Experten wurde ein Pentafecta-Score als Qualitätssicherungs-Instrument für die chirurgische Primärtherapie gebildet, der nun anhand von patientenrelevanten und patientenberichteten Endpunkten zu validieren ist.

We read with great interest the manuscript by Brassetti et al. recently published in your journal and hope it will encourage discussion and debate around the optimization of the surgical management of patients with penile cancer (PECa) [...]