Spiess, Philippe E

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare malignancy with limited therapeutic options in advanced and recurrent diseases. Advanced PSCC is typically managed with multimodal therapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation followed by surgery; however, durable responses remain uncommon, and outcomes after recurrence are poor. Cancer vaccines represent a promising immunotherapeutic strategy, as these treatments induce tumor-specific immunity and heightened immune surveillance against penile cancer cells. While therapeutic cancer vaccines have not yet demonstrated consistent clinical efficacy as monotherapy in PSCC, their integration with complementary immune-modulating approaches, particularly immune checkpoint blockade, represents a rational strategy to enhance antitumor immunity. This review summarizes the rationale for vaccine development in PSCC, with emphasis on HPV-derived antigens, neoantigens, and emerging tumor-associated targets. We examine major vaccine platforms, including viral-vector, peptide-based, nucleic acid, and dendritic cell-based approaches. We also discuss how spatial transcriptomics, single-cell RNA sequencing, artificial intelligence-assisted antigen prediction, and nanotechnology-enhanced delivery systems may support future personalized vaccine development. Overall, therapeutic vaccines remain investigational in PSCC but may become relevant within biomarker-driven, combination-based immunotherapy strategies.

Abstract Background Treatment options for penile squamous cell carcinoma are limited. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes and safety profiles of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods This retrospective study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2015 and 2022 across 24 centers in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Objective response rates were determined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Two-sided statistical tests were used for comparisons. Results Among 92 patients, 8 (8.7%) were Asian, 6 (6.5%) were Black, and 24 (29%) were Hispanic and/or Latinx. Median (interquartile range) age was 62 (53-70) years. In all, 83 (90%) had metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma, and 74 (80%) had received at least second-line treatment. Most patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy (n = 26 [28%]), combination nivolumab-ipilimumab with or without multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 23 [25%]), or nivolumab (n = 16 [17%]) or cemiplimab (n = 15 [16%]) monotherapies. Median overall and progression-free survival were 9.8 months (95% confidence interval = 7.7 to 12.8 months) and 3.2 months (95% confidence interval = 2.5 to 4.2 months), respectively. The objective response rate was 13% (n = 11/85) in the overall cohort and 35% (n = 7/20) in patients with lymph node–only metastases. Visceral metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or higher, and a higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were associated with worse overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 27 (29%) patients, and 9.8% (n = 9) of the events were grade 3 or higher. Conclusions Immune checkpoint inhibitors are active in a subset of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. Future translational studies are warranted to identify patients more likely to derive clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

We read with great interest the manuscript by Brassetti et al. recently published in your journal and hope it will encourage discussion and debate around the optimization of the surgical management of patients with penile cancer (PECa) [...]

Penile cancer is an extremely rare malignancy that accounts for approximately 1% of cancer deaths in the United States every year. While primary penile cancer can be managed surgically, advanced and metastatic forms of the disease require more aggressive management plans with systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Despite the meaningful response to systemic treatments, the 2-year progression-free survival and disease-specific survival have shown disappointing results. Therefore, there is a crucial need for alternative treatment options with more favorable outcomes and a lower toxicity profile. There are currently extensive studies of tumor molecular biology and clinical trials with targeted molecular therapies, such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. In this review, we will describe the penile cancer microenvironment, and summarize the rationale for immunotherapy in penile cancer patients.