Yu, Alice

Objectives To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) using a large, well‐curated multi‐institutional database. Patients and Methods This study was a multi‐institutional retrospective analysis conducted by the UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN), combining data from 2276 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at seven high‐volume tertiary care centres in the United States. The UCAN data were analysed to evaluate the impact of response to NAC on survival outcomes in patients with UTUC. Results A total of 378 patients in the UCAN database underwent NAC. On final surgical pathology, 101 patients (26.8%) had ≤ypT1N0 disease and were defined as NAC treatment responders. Patients who responded to NAC had significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) compared to non‐responders. At 5 years post‐surgery, 81.5% of responders were alive compared to 59.8% of non‐responders. The median OS and PFS times among non‐responders were 7.0 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6–9.7) and 6.0 years (95% CI 4.6–9.3) respectively, while the median OS and PFS were not reached among responders. Limitations of this study include its retrospective design, heterogeneity in chemotherapy regimens, and the absence of clearly defined patient selection criteria for treatment. Conclusion These data suggest that NAC can play a pivotal role in the treatment of well‐selected UTUC patients who respond positively. Non‐responders had clearly inferior outcomes. More work is needed to find predictors of response which can improve patient selection.

Objectives To assess the safety profile of antegrade mitomycin gel instillation through a percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCNT) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with the aim of decreasing morbidity associated with therapy. Patients and Methods Patients undergoing antegrade administration of mitomycin gel via PCNT were retrospectively included for analysis from four tertiary referral centres between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was safety profile, as graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Post‐therapy disease burden was assessed by primary disease evaluation (PDE) via ureteroscopy. Results Thirty‐two patients received at least one dose of mitomycin gel via PCNT for UTUC, 29 of whom completed induction and underwent PDE. Thirteen patients (41%) had residual tumour present prior to induction therapy. At a median of 15.0 months following first dose of induction therapy, ureteric stenosis occurred in three patients (9%), all of whom were treated without later recurrence or chronic stenosis. Other adverse events included fatigue (27%), flank pain (19%), urinary tract infection (12%), sepsis (8%) and haematuria (8%). No patients had impaired renal function during follow‐up and there were no treatment‐related deaths. Seventeen patients (59%) had no evidence of disease at PDE and have not experienced recurrence at a median follow‐up of 13.0 months post induction. Conclusions Administration of mitomycin gel via a PCNT offers a low rate of ureteric stenosis, demonstrates a favourable safety profile, and is administered without general anaesthesia.