Huelster, Heather L.

Objectives To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) using a large, well‐curated multi‐institutional database. Patients and Methods This study was a multi‐institutional retrospective analysis conducted by the UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN), combining data from 2276 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at seven high‐volume tertiary care centres in the United States. The UCAN data were analysed to evaluate the impact of response to NAC on survival outcomes in patients with UTUC. Results A total of 378 patients in the UCAN database underwent NAC. On final surgical pathology, 101 patients (26.8%) had ≤ypT1N0 disease and were defined as NAC treatment responders. Patients who responded to NAC had significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) compared to non‐responders. At 5 years post‐surgery, 81.5% of responders were alive compared to 59.8% of non‐responders. The median OS and PFS times among non‐responders were 7.0 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6–9.7) and 6.0 years (95% CI 4.6–9.3) respectively, while the median OS and PFS were not reached among responders. Limitations of this study include its retrospective design, heterogeneity in chemotherapy regimens, and the absence of clearly defined patient selection criteria for treatment. Conclusion These data suggest that NAC can play a pivotal role in the treatment of well‐selected UTUC patients who respond positively. Non‐responders had clearly inferior outcomes. More work is needed to find predictors of response which can improve patient selection.

Background Ensuring representative data accrual in clinical trials is important to safeguard the generalizability of results and to minimize disparities in care. This study's goal was to evaluate differences in gender representation in trials leading to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cancer drug approvals. Methods An observational study was conducted from January 2014 to April 2019 using PubMed and the National Institutes of Health trials registry for primary trial reports. The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and US Census were consulted for national cancer incidence. The outcome was an enrollment incidence disparity (EID), which was calculated as the difference between male and female trial enrollment and national incidence, with positive values representing male overrepresentation. Results There were 149 clinical trials with 59,988 participants—60.3% and 39.7% were male and female, respectively—leading to 127 oncology drug approvals. The US incidence rates were 55.4% for men versus 44.6% for women. Gender representation varied by specific tumor type. Most notably, women were underrepresented in thyroid cancer (EID, +27.4%), whereas men were underrepresented in soft tissue cancer (EID, –26.1%). Overall, women were underrepresented when compared with expected incidence (EID, +4.9%; 42% of trials). Conclusions For many specific tumor types, women are underrepresented in clinical trials leading to FDA oncology drug approvals. It is critical to better align clinical trial cohort demographics and the populations to which these data will be extrapolated. Lay Summary This study assesses whether gender disparities exist in clinical trials leading to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cancer drug approvals. From January 2014 to April 2019, 149 clinical trials leading to FDA oncology drug approvals showed 60.3% and 39.7% of the enrollees were male and female, respectively. Gender representation varied by specific tumor when compared with the expected incidence rate of cancer in the United States, although women were more often underrepresented. Increased efforts are needed with regard to ensuring equitable representation in oncology clinical trials.