Back to Authors

Karnes, Jeffrey R

Mayo Clinic

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Citations 4

In‐field prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy and salvage radiation
Martin, Austin , Britton, Cameron J. , Fadel, Anthony , Ahmed, Mohamed E., Sharma, Vidit , Mynderse, Lance A. , Lomas, Derek J. , Woodrum, David A. , Frendl, Daniel M. , Karnes, Jeffrey , Tollefson, Matthew K. , Kwon, Eugene D., Andrews, Jack R. , Fadel, Anthony , Davis, Brian J. , Mynderse, Lance, Lomas, Derek , Woodrum, David, Karnes, Jeffrey R, Mahmoud, Ahmed , Childs, Daniel S. , Johnson, Geoffrey B.

BJU International | November 30, 2024 | Volume: 135 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 668-674

10.1111/bju.16598 Get It

Objective To define the natural history, patterns of recurrence and treatment modalities for local prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT), and to investigate factors that could predict metastasis‐free survival (MFS) in this unique patient population. Methods We queried a prospectively maintained PCa registry to identify men developing in‐field recurrence (IFR) following RP and RT from 2008 to 2021 at a single institution. IFR was defined as biopsy‐proven recurrent PCa or the presence of persistent positron emission tomography‐avid lesions in the prior radiation field without evidence of metastasis. Cox regression was conducted to determine predictors of MFS. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to calculate MFS, cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) for patients in three primary therapy categories: cryoablation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, and surveillance. Results Of 4575 patients from our registry, 108 (2.3%) with IFR were identified. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to IFR from salvage treatment was 78 (50–126) months. A total of 29 patients (26%) were managed with cryoablation, 23 (21%) with ADT, and 28 (25%) with surveillance. The median (IQR) follow‐up was 76 (48–100) months. There were no statistically significant differences in MFS ( P = 0.67) or OS ( P = 0.07) among the three primary treatment cohorts. Patients treated with ADT or cryoablation had longer CSS compared to patients managed with surveillance ( P = 0.047). Conclusions We found that IFR may present years after completion of primary treatment for PCa. While curative management strategies may be attempted, local and distant metastatic recurrence is common and often requires systemic therapy.
18F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Zattoni, Fabio , Incerti, Elena , Moro, Fabrizio , Moschini, Marco , Picchio, Maria , Fallanca, Federico , Briganti, Alberto , Gallina, Andrea , Schiavina, Riccardo , Brunocilla, Eugenio, Rambaldi, Ilaria, Lowe, Val J. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey, Evangelista, Laura , Gallina, Andrea , Karnes, Jeffrey R, Evangelista, Laura , Moschini, Marco , Zattoni, Fabio , Castellucci, Paolo , Panareo, Stefano , Fanti, Stefano

Cancers | May 21, 2019 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 700

10.3390/cancers11050700 Get It

Objectives: To evaluate the ability of 18F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to predict survivorship of patients with bladder cancer (BC) and/or upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC). Materials: Data from patients who underwent FDG PET/CT for suspicion of recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively collected in a multicenter study. Disease management after the introduction of FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic algorithm was assessed in all patients. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were computed for survival assessment. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of recurrence and death, for BC, UUTC, and concomitant BC and UUTC. Results: Data from 286 patients were collected. Of these, 212 had a history of BC, 38 of UUTC and 36 of concomitant BC and UUTC. Patient management was changed in 114/286 (40%) UC patients with the inclusion of FDG PET/CT, particularly in those with BC, reaching 74% (n = 90/122). After a mean follow-up period of 21 months (Interquartile range: 4–28 mo.), 136 patients (47.4%) had recurrence/progression of disease. Moreover, 131 subjects (45.6%) died. At Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with BC and positive PET/CT had a worse overall survival than those with a negative scan (log-rank < 0.001). Furthermore, a negative PET/CT scan was associated with a lower recurrence rate than a positive examination, independently from the primary tumor site. At multivariate analysis, in patients with BC and UUTC, a positive FDG PET/CT resulted an independent predictor of disease-free and overall survival (p < 0,01). Conclusions: FDG PET/CT has the potential to change patient management, particularly for patients with BC. Furthermore, it can be considered a valid survival prediction tool after primary treatment in patients with recurrent UC. However, a firm recommendation cannot be made yet. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings.
Editorial Comment
Karnes, Jeffrey , Karnes, Jeffrey R

Journal of Urology | March 28, 2014 | Volume: 192 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 110-111

10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.068 Get It