Back to Authors

Stewart, Tyler F.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-264X

Mayo Clinic

University of California San Diego

Citations 5

Real-world analysis of 2IR immune response score in histologic subtype urothelial carcinoma (hsUC).
Bilen, Mehmet Asım , Stewart, Tyler F. , McKay, Rana R. , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Geynisman, Daniel M., Smith, Norm, Brown, Jason R. , Adeyelu, Tolulope Tosin , Elliott, Andrew , Basu, Arnab , Li, Roger , Geynisman, Daniel M. , Barata, Pedro C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 4568-4568

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.4568 Get It

4568 Background: The 2IR immune response score was initially developed using bulk RNA sequencing of pre-treatment tissue from ImVigor 210 and CheckMate 275 trials, however these trials enrolled patients (pts) with pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC) histology. Patients with hsUC often exhibit worse response to immune checkpoint inibitors (ICI) than patients with pUC. Here, we evaluated the 2IR score as a prognostic or predictive biomarker in real-world pts with hsUC. Methods: Specimens from pts with pUC (n = 1677) and hsUC (n = 417) were profiled at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) using next generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA and RNA. HsUC histologies included majority ( > 50%) squamous (n = 340), sarcomatoid (n = 51), neuroendocrine (n = 20), and micropapillary (n = 6) component. 2IR was calculated by comparative RNA expression of 10 adaptive immune genes and 39 pro-tumorigenic genes. Tumors were classified as 2IR-Low (2IR ≤ -0.5), -Mid (-0.5 < 2IR < 0), and -High (2IR ≥ 0), as previously described (Wang et al., 2022). Spearman correlation analysis was utilized to compare 2IR with tumor mutation burden (TMB), interferon score (IFN) and the tumor microenvironment (TME) cell fractions estimated using quanTIseq. Clinical outcomes included real-world overall survival (rwOS) from ICI start to last contact and time on treatment (ToT) with pembrolizumab, obtained via matched insurance claims data and calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods, while Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by Cox proportional model. Results: For patients with hsUC, distribution of 2IR score was High 5.76%, Mid 33.3%, and Low 60.9%. Median 2IR score was significantly lower in squamous (-0.60, p < 0.0001) and sarcomatoid UC (-0.82, p < 0.0001) compared to pUC (-0.41) and significantly higher in neuroendocrine UC (-0.15, p = 0.003). Among patients with hsUC, median rwOS was significantly longer for patients with high/mid 2IR score compared to low 2IR score (25.3 [10.9-39.3] months vs. 8.7 [6.2-11.3] months; HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 – 0.78, p = 0.0017). ToT with pembrolizumab was also significantly longer for high/mid 2IR score compared to low 2IR score (3.0 [1.4-5.5] months vs. 2.1 [1.4-3.3] months; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-1.00, p = 0.0471). Similar to pUC, 2IR score in patients with squamous UC was positively associated with CD8 T cell infiltration (r = 0.39; p < 0.0001), IFN score (r = 0.41, p < 0.0001), and TMB (r = 0.20, p < 0.001) and negatively associated with M1 macrophage infiltration (r = -0.25, p < 0.0001). 2IR scores in hsUC correlated positively but not significantly with mutations in TP53 (Median: -0.59 vs -0.62, p = 0.067) and PIK3CA (Median: -0.56 vs -0.61, p = 0.172) and negatively with mutations in CDKN2A (Median: -0.67 vs -0.59, p = 0.052). Conclusions: In a real-world cohort of patients with hsUC, we show the 2IR score may be prognostic for rwOS and predictive for pembrolizumab ToT. Prospective studies are needed to further validate this biomarker for use in this population.
Final results of CORE-001: A phase-2, single arm study of cretostimogene grenadenorepvec in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with BCG-unresponsive, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with carcinoma in situ.
Shah, Paras , Stewart, Tyler F. , Bivalacqua, Trinity J. , Lamm, Donald L. , Meeks, Joshua J. , Uchio, Edward , Jacob, Joseph M , Dickstein, Rian J., Pearce, Shane M. , Li, Roger , Geynisman, Daniel M. , Burke, James M., Steinberg, Gary D.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 28, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 4601-4601

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.4601 Get It

4601 Background: Cretostimogene grenadenorepvec is a type-5 oncolytic adenovirus designed to selectively replicate in bladder cancer cells with alterations in the retinoblastoma pathway. Additionally, the virus is engineered to express the GM-CSF transgene, resulting in a potent oncolytic immunotherapy mode of action. Cretostimogene monotherapy recently received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Fast Track and Breakthrough Therapy Designations (BTD) in the BCG-Unresponsive, High-Risk, non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer with Carcinoma in Situ (BCG-UR HR NMIBC with CIS) indication with a Complete Response (CR) at any time rate of 76%. This phase-2 study assessed the potential synergy between intravesical cretostimogene and pembrolizumab in patients with BCG-UR, HR NMIBC, with CIS, with or without Ta/T1 tumors. This combination has also received BTD from the FDA. Methods: 35 pts were treated with cretostimogene (1x1012 viral particles) in combination with pembrolizumab at a dose of 400 mg IV q6 weeks. Cretostimogene induction was given as 6 weekly intravesical instillations followed by 3 weekly maintenance doses at months 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18. Pts with persistent CIS or high-grade Ta tumors at the 3mo assessment were eligible for re-induction. Pembrolizumab was administered for up to 24mo. Response assessments included cystoscopy, urine cytology, cross-sectional imaging, and mandatory bladder mapping biopsies at 12mo. The primary endpoint was CR at 12mo. Secondary endpoints included CR at any time, duration of response (DOR), CR at 24mo, cystectomy-free survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included analyses of baseline viral receptor expression, free E2F levels, PD-L1 status, urinary cytokine panels and measures of viral replication. Results: 30/35 pts are evaluable per protocol for the primary endpoint. Five pts discontinued prior to the 12mo time point. The CR rate in the Intention to Treat (ITT) population at 12mo and any time, was 57% (20/35) (95% CI 40-73%) and 83% (29/35) (95% CI 66-93%), respectively. Median DOR has not been reached but exceeds 21mo. The current CR rate in the ITT population at 24mo is 46% (16/35) (95% CI 29-63%). Three pts have yet to reach the 24mo time point. Cystectomy-free survival at 21mo is 80%. Complete data on the ITT and evaluable patient cohorts will be presented. Analyses of treatment-related adverse events (AE) are consistent with the individual agents and demonstrate no synergistic toxicity. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of cretostimogene plus pembrolizumab for treatment of BCG-UR, HR NMIBC with CIS demonstrates best-in-class CR and DOR compared to current FDA-approved therapies, with an acceptable AE profile. Further investigation of this promising combination therapy is warranted and may serve to address a considerable unmet need. Clinical trial information: NCT04387461 .
Response and outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in patients (pts) with urothelial carcinoma (UC) and subtype histology (SH).
Talukder, Rafee , Hobeika, Charbel, Johnson, Jeffrey S. , Castaneda, D.H. Marmolejo , Zakopoulou, Roubini , Hui, Gavin , Buznego, Lucía Andrea Alonso , Stewart, Tyler F. , Grivas, Petros , Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia , Makrakis, Dimitrios , Diamantopoulos, Leonidas Nikolaos , Jindal, Tanya , Nguyen, Charles B. , Hobeika, Charbel S. , Thomas, Vinay Mathew , Korolewicz, James , Barata, Pedro C. , Brown, Jason R. , Epstein, Ilana Bensussen , Khaki, Ali Raza

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 28, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 4580-4580

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.4580 Get It

4580 Background: ICIs are used for UC in different settings. Most cases have pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) but about a third have UC mixed with SH. We examined pts with UC treated with ICI and hypothesized that outcomes would not differ between PUC and mixed with SH. Methods: We retrospectively included pts with PUC and any SH component treated with ICI as adjuvant, 1st line [1L] upfront, maintenance avelumab [mAV], ≥2nd line [2+L] therapy; pts were divided by SH type. Pts with multiple SH were included as separate group. We excluded pts with pure non-UC histology and pts treated with neoadjuvant ICI. We calculated overall response rate (ORR), median overall, progression-free and disease-free survival [mOS, mPFS, mDFS] using KM method from ICI start. Analysis was stratified by therapy line; multivariable models were adjusted by Khaki factors for 1L/upfront, mAV and Bellmunt factors for 2+L; reference group was PUC. We used descriptive statistics for small subsets. Results: We included 1525 pts from 26 sites; n=752 1L, n=609 2+L; 76% men, 80% White, 69% smoking history, 80% lower urinary tract primary, 28% SH. Median f/u time from 1L ICI start 24 months (mo): mPFS was 3 (95%CI 2.8-3.2) mo for PUC (n=340), 3 (95%CI 2-4) mo for squamous (n=60) (HR=1, [95%CI 0.7-1.4]), 2 (95%CI 1.4-3.2) mo for micropapillary (n=36) (HR=1.3 [95% 0.9-2]) and 4 (3.5-4.5) mo for ≥2 SH (n=20) (HR=0.9 [95%CI 0.6-1.5]). Median f/u time from 2+L ICI start 26 mo: mPFS was 3 (95%CI 2.4-3.2) mo for PUC (n=264), 4 (95%CI 2-5) mo for squamous (n=33) (HR=0.8, [95%CI 0.6-1.2]), 3 (95%CI 1.6-3.7) mo for micropapillary (n=17) (HR=0.9 [95% 0.6-1.7]) and 3 (2.5-3.1) mo for ≥2 SH (n=10) (HR=1.2 [95%CI 0.6-2.2]); Table shows ORR/OS data. Data on adjuvant and mAV settings will also be presented. Conclusions: We found no significant survival difference between PUC and SH. ORR was numerically higher with sarcomatoid SH and ≥2 SH in the 1L upfront setting. Limitations: retrospective design, small sample size in a few subsets, lack of randomization and central scan/path (% SH) review, selection bias, unmeasured confounders. [Table: see text]
Bladder Cancer, Version 3.2024
Flaig, Thomas W. , Abern, Michael, Agarwal, Neeraj , Bangs, Rick , Buyyounouski, Mark K. , Chang, Paul, Friedlander, Terence W. , Greenberg, Richard E. , Guru, Khurshid A. , Herr, Harry W., Hoffman‐Censits, Jean , Kaimakliotis, Hristos Z. , Kishan, Amar U. , Kundu, Shilajit , Lele, Subodh M. , Mamtani, Ronac , Michalski, Jeff M., Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Patterson, Anthony, Peyton, Charles C. , Preston, Mark A. , Sexton, Wade J. , Stewart, Tyler F. , Sundi, Debasish , Tollefson, Matthew K. , Wright, Jonathan L. , Cassara, Carly J., Gurski, Lisa A., Tollefson, Matthew, Spiess, Philippe E. , Agarwal, Neeraj , Chan, Kevin , Chang, Sam S. , Chang, Paul, Mian, Omar Y. , Parikh, Mamta , Plimack, Elizabeth R. , Richards, Kyle A. , Siefker-Radtke, Arlene Odelia , Tward, Jonathan D.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | May 16, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 216-225

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0024 Get It

Bladder cancer, the sixth most common cancer in the United States, is most commonly of the urothelial carcinoma histologic subtype. The clinical spectrum of bladder cancer is divided into 3 categories that differ in prognosis, management, and therapeutic aims: (1) non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC); (2) muscle invasive, nonmetastatic disease; and (3) metastatic bladder cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer, including changes in the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours: Urinary and Male Genital Tumours and how the NCCN Guidelines aligned with these updates; new and emerging treatment options for bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)–unresponsive NMIBC; and updates to systemic therapy recommendations for advanced or metastatic disease.
Role of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI).
Talukder, Rafee , Patgunarajah, Ubenthira, Miletić, Marija , Johnson, Jeffrey S. , Hui, Gavin , Buznego, Lucía Alonso , Castaneda, D.H. Marmolejo , Stewart, Tyler F. , Gupta, Shilpa , Grivas, Petros , Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia , Makrakis, Dimitrios , Diamantopoulos, Leonidas Nikolaos , Thomas, Vinay Mathew , Jindal, Tanya , Brown, Jason R. , Miletic, Marija, Morales‐Barrera, Rafael , Nguyen, Charles B. , Barata, Pedro C. , Khaki, Ali Raza

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 654-654

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.654 Get It

654 Background: MSI and TMB correlate with ICI efficacy. We assessed the association between TMB and MSI with outcomes in pts with aUC treated with anti-PD1/L1 in a ‘real-world’ cohort. We hypothesize that pts with high TMB and MSI-high (H) have better outcomes with ICI. Methods: In this retrospective study we included pts from 13 sites treated with ICI for aUC. We calculated overall response rate (ORR), median overall and progression-free survival (mOS, mPFS) using KM method from ICI start. TMB and MSI were assessed by NGS. TMB was analyzed as dichotomous (≥10 vs <10 mut/Mb) and continuous variable. The analysis was stratified by therapy line (1L/upfront, 2+L). Multivariable models were adjusted by Khaki factors for 1L/upfront and Bellmunt factors for 2+L. We separately analyzed pts on maintenance avelumab (mAV). MSI is reported with descriptive statistics only. Results: 342 pts were treated with ICI 1L/upfront or 2+L (69% pure UC, median age at ICI start 69, 77% men, 90% White, 16% upper tract primary, 12% liver metastases [mets], 78% ECOG PS 0-1). Median f/u from ICI start was 34 months (mo). ORR was 36% (95%CI 26-46%) in pts with TMB≥10 vs 30% (95%CI 23-36%) with TMB<10 (OR=1.4 [95%CI 0.8-2.5] p=0.3). ORR was 75% (6/8) in pts with MSI-H and 30% (60/200) with MSI stable (MSI-S). mPFS was similar between TMB≥10 and <10 groups (6 vs 4 mo; HR=0.88 [95%CI 0.61-1.26] p=0.48) and between MSI-H and MSI-S (5 mo). mOS was numerically longer (not significant) in pts with TMB≥10 vs TMB<10: 25 vs 21 mo; (HR=0.7 [95%CI 0.50-1.09] p=0.12) and with MSI-H and MSI-S (NR and 20 mo). A significant association was found between TMB (continuous variable) and OS (HR=0.97 [95%CI 0.95-0.99] p=0.01). TMB analyses by therapy line are shown in Table. In the 1L/upfront setting (N=144), ORR 71% (5/7) vs 33% (45/135), mPFS 5 and 4 mo, mOS NR and 22 mo for MSI-H and MSI-S, respectively. Pts on mAV (n=77) were 77% men, 92% White, 16% upper primary, 13% liver mets, 84% ECOG PS 0-1 with median f/u 15 mo from avelumab start; mOS was NR for MSI-H and 24 mo for MSI-S; mPFS was 4 mo for both groups. Of 3 pts on mAV with MSI-H: 1 CR, 2 SD; of 58 pts with MSI-S: 4CR, 4PR, 24 SD, 21 PD, 5 unknown. Conclusions: MSI-H had numerically higher ORR and higher TMB was associated with longer OS with ICI, but further validation is needed. Limitations: retrospective design, small sample size for MSI-H cases, lack of randomization and central scan review, selection/confounding. [Table: see text]