Gupta, Shiv K.

Abstract Radioresistance of melanoma brain metastases limits the clinical utility of conventionally fractionated brain radiation in this disease, and strategies to improve radiation response could have significant clinical impact. The catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) is critical for repair of radiation-induced DNA damage, and inhibitors of this kinase can have potent effects on radiation sensitivity. In this study, the radiosensitizing effects of the DNA-PKcs inhibitor peposertib were evaluated in patient-derived xenografts of melanoma brain metastases (M12, M15, M27). In clonogenic survival assays, peposertib augmented radiation-induced killing of M12 cells at concentrations ≥100 nmol/L, and a minimum of 16 hours exposure allowed maximal sensitization. This information was integrated with pharmacokinetic modeling to define an optimal dosing regimen for peposertib of 125 mpk dosed just prior to and 7 hours after irradiation. Using this drug dosing regimen in combination with 2.5 Gy × 5 fractions of radiation, significant prolongation in median survival was observed in M12-eGFP (104%; P = 0.0015) and M15 (50%; P = 0.03), while more limited effects were seen in M27 (16%, P = 0.04). These data support the concept of developing peposertib as a radiosensitizer for brain metastases and provide a paradigm for integrating in vitro and pharmacokinetic data to define an optimal radiosensitizing regimen for potent DNA repair inhibitors.

Abstract Radiation therapy (RT) is an important non-surgical clinical treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastases, but inherent radio-resistance can limit the efficacy in many patients. The Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) protein critically regulates radiotherapy-mediated DNA damage repair pathways, and defects in this kinase can lead to profound radiosensitivity. In this study, the efficacy of the highly potent ATM inhibitor WSD0628 was evaluated in GBM and melanoma brain metastasis patient derived xenografts (PDXs). In short term explant cultures of three PDXs, WSD0628 robustly suppressed RT-induced autophosphorylation of ATM at serine 1981 and ATM-mediated phosphorylation of Chk2 at threonine-68 and KAP1 at serine-824, with maximal inhibition at 100 nM. Similarly, RT-induced gH2AX foci were significantly reduced when combined with WSD0628 in the GBM43 cells. Consistent with the importance of ATM in the DNA damage response after radiation, WSD0628 significantly increased the radiosensitivity of U251 cells in clonogenic survival assays (0nM vs. 30nM at 5Gy, p<0.01). To evaluate the optimal duration of drug exposure, WSD0628 was removed from U251 cells at various intervals following irradiation with 5 Gy. Using clonogenic survival as a readout, a 10-fold increase in cytotoxicity was observed with an 8 hour drug exposure, with progressively increasing cytotoxicity gains with exposures up to 24 hours. In vivo efficacy of WSD0628 was evaluated in multiple intracranial PDX models. In an initial dose-ranging study, robust radiosensitization was observed in GBM43 treated with 2 Gy x 5 fractions combined with 5 mg/kg WSD0628 (20 day survival extension) or 10mg/kg WSD0628 (39 day with 10 mg/kg; p<0.01 for both dose levels). Moreover, a single dose of 12.5 Gy combined with 10 mg/kg WSD0628 had profound impact on treatment efficacy in the melanoma brain metastasis M12 PDX: at 180 days post-treatment, all mice in the combination group were electively euthanized, while median survival for sham or RT alone was 17d and 49d, respectively. Histologic analysis identified large intracranial tumors in all sham and RT-only treated mice, but only a small accumulation of melanotic cells without obvious tumor in the combination-treated mice. Immunohistochemical staining of NeuN and GFAP in the combination-treated mice showed preserved neuronal density at the 180-post treatment timepoint and minimal reactive gliosis within the ‘tumor scar’. An ongoing study is comparing this single-fraction 12.5 Gy regimen to a 2.4 Gy x 10 fraction regimen alone or in combination with WSD0628. Collectively, this study demonstrates the potential for profound radiosensitizing effects of WSD0628 in combination without obvious neuronal toxicity and has provided the scientific rational for the first-in-man study of this combination in recurrent GBM (NCT05917145) at Mayo Clinic. Citation Format: Zhiyi Xue, Ann C. Mladek, Sneha Rathi, Danielle M. Burgenske, Shiv K. Gupta, Brett L. Carlson, Zeng Hu, Lauren L Ott, Katrina K. Bakken, Rachael A. Vaubel, William F Elmquist, Wei Zhong, Jann N Sarkaria. The radiosensitizing effects of the novel brain penetrant and potent ATM inhibitor WSD0628 in glioblastoma and melanoma patient derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A148.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive form of adult brain tumor and is an incurable disease due to primary and secondary resistance to therapy. We recently examined the candidate genes modulating temozolomide (TMZ) resistance using genome-wide shRNA screening in TMZ-resistant U251 (U251TMZ) model. We identified a total of 134 TMZ-resistant candidate genes, including Karyopherin A1 (KPNA1) and Exportin 1 (XPO1), the genes critical for nucleocytoplasmic (NC)-transport. Interestingly, XPO1 inhibitor Selinexor is an FDA-approved agent for refractory multiple myeloma, and there is an ongoing interest in evaluating Selinexor for GBM therapy. Therefore, we hypothesized that Selinexor is a promising drug for overcoming TMZ resistance. METHODS and RESULTS We conducted a series of experiments in vitro using Selinexor with and without TMZ. Selinexor and TMZ alone didn’t significantly block the growth of U251TMZ cells. In contrast, Selinexor significantly re-sensitized resistant U251TMZ cells to TMZ. Interestingly, MGMT-methylated GBM39 cells were sensitive to Selinexor alone, TMZ alone, and to combined Selinexor/TMZ treatment. Contrarily, MGMT-unmethylated GBM43 cells were only sensitive to combined Selinexor/TMZ treatment. These findings suggested that similar to TMZ, Selinexor sensitivity may be influenced by MGMT expression status, with MGMT expressing cells showing resistance. In line with this notion, re-expression of exogeneous MGMT blocked sensitivity of MGMT-methylated U251 cells to Selinexor and TMZ, but such inhibition was not observed in U251 expressing vector alone. Interestingly, the concentration-dependent experiments demonstrated that Selinexor can induce MGMT expression in unmethylated T98G, GBM6, GBM14, and GBM43 cells. Selinexor-induced MGMT expression was accompanied with increased phosphorylation of CREB protein. CONCLUSION These results suggest that Selinexor sensitivity alone and with TMZ may be limited to MGMT-methylated GBM cells and may increase MGMT expression in unmethylated cells through activation of PKA-CREB pathway. Future studies will evaluate how MGMT may impact the sensitivity of GBM cells to Selinexor.

Abstract Background EGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are highly effective against EGFR-amplified tumors, but poor distribution across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits their efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) when administered systemically. We studied whether convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse ADCs into orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Methods The efficacy of the EGFR-targeted ADCs depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) and Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. CED was performed in nontumor and tumor-bearing mice. Immunostaining was used to evaluate ADC distribution, pharmacodynamic effects, and normal cell toxicity. Results Dose-finding studies in orthotopic GBM6 identified single infusion of 2 μg Ser-T and 60 μg Depatux-M as safe and effective associated with extended survival prolongation (>300 days and 95 days, respectively). However, with serial infusions every 21 days, four Ser-T doses controlled tumor growth but was associated with lethal toxicity approximately 7 days after the final infusion. Limiting dosing to two infusions in GBM108 provided profound median survival extension of over 200 days. In contrast, four Depatux-M CED doses were well tolerated and significantly extended survival in both GBM6 (158 days) and GBM108 (310 days). In a toxicity analysis, Ser-T resulted in a profound loss in NeuN+ cells and markedly elevated GFAP staining, while Depatux-M was associated only with modest elevation in GFAP staining. Conclusion CED of Depatux-M is well tolerated and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, CED of Ser-T was associated with a much narrower therapeutic window.

Abstract Introduction: EGFR targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show promise as a novel treatment in a subset of glioblastoma (GBM). Two EGFR targeting ADCs include first generation Depatux-M, with an antimitotic toxin monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF), and ABBV-321, with a DNA crosslinking agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer (PBD) toxin. Due to the large molecular weight, poor drug distribution across the blood-brain barrier significantly limits the efficacy in EGFR-amplified GBM. We studied whether convection enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse these two EGFR-targeted ADCs in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFR-amplified GBM. Methods: The efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-321 was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in two EGFRviii-amplified PDXs (GBM6 and GBM108). Immunofluorescence staining was used to evaluate drug distribution along with pharmacodynamics of the ADCs. CED was performed by stereotactic placement of an infusion catheter in the same location as the original tumor implantation. Immunohistochemistry was used to explore mechanisms of normal cell toxicity. Results: Despite potent activity in vitro (high ng/ml IC50), systemic administration of either ADC conferred minimal extension in survival for either GBM6 or GBM108. In contrast, CED significantly enhanced ADC delivery to tumor and peri-tumoral regions and extended survival. In a pilot study in GBM6 with n=3 mice per group, a single CED infusion of 0.002mg ABBV-321 resulted in extended survival beyond 365 days for two mice, while other doses and placebo were associated with shorter median survival (0 mg - 39 days; 0.03 mg - 105 days; 0.3 mg - 49 days). In a subsequent trial evaluating serial infusions performed every 21 days, four infusions at 0.002 mg ABBV-321 resulted in lethal toxicity. In contrast, limiting ABBV-321 to only two serial CED infusions in GBM108 was associated with extended survival of more than 300 days vs. 53 days for AB095 antibody control infusion. In contrast, serial infusion with Depatux-M was much better tolerated. In a single infusion in GBM6, a 0.06 mg dose was well tolerated and associated with a 49-day extension in median survival. Further, four serial infusions at 0.06 mg given every 21 days in GBM6 and GBM108 was associated with 100 day and more than 250-day extension in survival as compared to AB095 antibody control infusion. To investigate the mechanism of toxicity, infusion of non-tumor bearing C57Bl6 mice with ABBV-321 resulted in a marked loss in NeuN staining and elevated CD68 and GFAP staining 7 days later; Depatux-M infusion was only associated with modest elevation in GFAP without loss of NeuN staining or elevated CD68-positive cells. Conclusion: Depatux-M is well tolerated when infused into normal brain and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, ABBV-321, with a distinct PBD toxin, had a much narrower therapeutic window when delivered by CED. Citation Format: Kendra A. Porath, Ann Mladek, Rachael A. Vaubel, Michael S. Regan, Sonia Jain, Danielle Burgenske, Katrina Bakken, Brett Carlson, Margaret Connors, Zeng Hu, Lihong He, Paul A. Decker, Gaspar Kitange, Shiv Gupta, Nathalie Y. Agar, Thomas M. Feldsien, Didier R. Lefebvre, Jann N. Sarkaria. Convection enhanced delivery of EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugates ABBV-321 and Depatux-M [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 334.

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a key signaling protein for integrin mediated cell migration. Auto phosphorylation of FAK at tyrosine‐397 is induced upon integrin activation, which then serves as a high affinity binding site for src tyrosine kinase forming a FAK‐src complex. Fak‐Src complex is a potent regulator of subsequent downstream signaling for enhanced cell migration. Using stable lines of SW480 colon carcinoma cells expressing integrin subunit α9, we explored the importance of the FAK‐Src complex in α9β1‐dependent cell migration. We found that ligand binding of α9β1 rapidly activated src tyrosine kinase; with concomitant tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK, p130Cas and Erk MAP kinase; inhibition of src tyrosine kinase or ErkMAP kinase activity decreased α9β1‐dependent cell migration. Surprisingly, activated α9β1 induced phosphorylation of iNOS resulting in NO production and associated NO‐mediated cell migration. Src tyrosine kinase appeared to signal upstream of iNOS, Erk, FAK and p130Cas as its inhibition blocked α9β1‐dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of these molecules. FAK binding to src was however not required for integrin α9β1 induced cell migration; and FAK inhibition (by siRNA) did not alter integrin α9β1 induced src activation and phosphorylation of Erk, p130Cas, iNOS. Analysis of Chinese Hamester Overian cells that expressed intact or mutant forms of integrin α9‐subunit showed that the α9‐cytoplasmic domain was critical for α9β1 induced src tyrosine kinase activation, downstream signaling events and ultimately cell migration. Taken together these results suggest that src, in a FAK independent manner, serves as a key early signaling protein for α9β1‐dependent cell migration; it is activated at the α9 ‐cytoplasmic domain and subsequently initiates multiple signaling intermediates, including NO, to induce cell migration.

Beta‐1 integrins are important mediators of cell migration but may do so through different signaling mechanisms. However, c‐src‐activation seems to be a key signaling intermediate. Nitric oxide (NO) synthesis is another novel molecule that modulates cell migration, which may be utilized during integrin mediated cell migration. We used α9 expressing SW480 colon carcinoma cells, to explore a role for src and NO in α9β1 mediated‐cell migration. We found that α9β1‐ligation leads to c‐Src phosphorylation (Tyr‐416) and Erk MAP kinase phosphorylation; phospho‐c‐src was maximum at 5 min, and phospho‐Erk maxima was at 20min. Pre‐treated cells with src and Erk kinase inhibitors, PP1 and PD98059, inhibited α9‐dependent cell motility. c‐src appeared to signal upstream of Erk since inhibition of c‐Src‐kinase blocked Erk phosphorylation. Furthermore, α9β1‐ligation enhanced NO synthesis through activation of inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS), which was constitutively expressed in SW480 cells. Using the NO specific inhibitor L‐NAME, α9β1‐dependent cell migration was blocked. Also, enhanced iNOS phosphorylation and NO production were src kinase (but not Erk) dependent. These results suggest a novel signaling pathway for α9β1‐induced cell migration through c‐src kinase activation of iNOS and subsequent NO production.

Abstract Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important. Methods PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics. Results Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment. Conclusions Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.

Abstract Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.

Abstract Non-genotoxic reactivation of p53 by MDM2 inhibitors represents a promising therapeutic strategy for tumors with wild-type TP53, particularly tumors harboring MDM2 amplification. MDM2 controls p53 levels by targeting it for degradation, while disruption of the MDM2-p53 interaction causes rapid accumulation of p53 and activation of the p53 pathway. We examined the efficacy of the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor KRT-232, alone and in combination with radiation therapy (RT), in MDM2-amplified and/or p53 wildtype patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, glioblastoma PDX explant cultures showed sensitivity to KRT-232, both tumors with MDM2 amplification (GBM108 and G148) and non-amplified but TP53-wildtype lines (GBM10, GBM14, and GBM39), with IC50s ranging from 300-800 nM in FBS culture conditions. A TP53 p.F270C mutant PDX (GBM43) was inherently resistant, with IC50 >3000 nM. In the MDM2-amplified GBM108 line, KRT-232 led to a robust (5-6 fold) induction of p53-target genes p21, PUMA, and NOXA, with initiation of both apoptosis and senescence. Expression of p21 and PUMA was greater with KRT-232 in combination with RT (25-35 fold induction), while stable knock-down of p53 in GBM108 led to complete resistance to KRT-232. In contrast, GBM10 showed lower induction of p21 and PUMA (2-3 fold) and was more resistant to KRT-232. In an orthotopic GBM108 xenograft model, treatment with KRT-232 +/- RT for one week extended survival from 22 days (placebo) to 46 days (KRT-232 alone); combination KRT-232 + RT further extended survival (77 days) over RT alone (31 days). KRT-232 is an effective treatment in a subset of glioblastoma pre-clinical models alone and in combination with RT. Further studies are underway to understand the mechanisms conferring innate sensitivity or resistance to KRT-232.