Kim, Minjee

Abstract Non-genotoxic reactivation of p53 by MDM2 inhibitors represents a promising therapeutic strategy for tumors with wild-type TP53, particularly tumors harboring MDM2 amplification. MDM2 controls p53 levels by targeting it for degradation, while disruption of the MDM2-p53 interaction causes rapid accumulation of p53 and activation of the p53 pathway. We examined the efficacy of the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor KRT-232, alone and in combination with radiation therapy (RT), in MDM2-amplified and/or p53 wildtype patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, glioblastoma PDX explant cultures showed sensitivity to KRT-232, both tumors with MDM2 amplification (GBM108 and G148) and non-amplified but TP53-wildtype lines (GBM10, GBM14, and GBM39), with IC50s ranging from 300-800 nM in FBS culture conditions. A TP53 p.F270C mutant PDX (GBM43) was inherently resistant, with IC50 >3000 nM. In the MDM2-amplified GBM108 line, KRT-232 led to a robust (5-6 fold) induction of p53-target genes p21, PUMA, and NOXA, with initiation of both apoptosis and senescence. Expression of p21 and PUMA was greater with KRT-232 in combination with RT (25-35 fold induction), while stable knock-down of p53 in GBM108 led to complete resistance to KRT-232. In contrast, GBM10 showed lower induction of p21 and PUMA (2-3 fold) and was more resistant to KRT-232. In an orthotopic GBM108 xenograft model, treatment with KRT-232 +/- RT for one week extended survival from 22 days (placebo) to 46 days (KRT-232 alone); combination KRT-232 + RT further extended survival (77 days) over RT alone (31 days). KRT-232 is an effective treatment in a subset of glioblastoma pre-clinical models alone and in combination with RT. Further studies are underway to understand the mechanisms conferring innate sensitivity or resistance to KRT-232.

Abstract Clinical data indicate that certain regions within glioblastoma (GBM) have a relatively intact blood-brain barrier (BBB), but controversy surrounds whether associated heterogeneous delivery may limit efficacy for otherwise highly active drugs with poor brain distribution. In this study, the efficacy of molecularly targeted therapies was compared in relevant GBM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models grown either as heterotopic or orthotopic tumors. The impact of further disrupting BBB integrity in non-responsive orthotopic tumors was evaluated by over-expressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and measuring drug distribution by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI). The brain:plasma ratio for five targeted agents was determined by LC-MSMS and treatment efficacy was evaluated in target-relevant GBM PDX lines: erlotinib (brain:plasma = 0.02 ± 0.02; efficacy tested in GBM6), palbociclib (brain:plasma = 0.06; efficacy tested in GBM22), AZD1775 (brain:plasma = 0.05; efficacy tested in GBM22), SAR405838 (brain:plasma = 0.01 ± 0.003; efficacy tested in GBM108), and AZD4547 (brain:plasma = 0.045 ± 0.02; efficacy tested in GBM150). Each of these drugs was effective in relevant GBM PDX flank tumor models with a 27% to 218% prolongation in the median time to exceed their pre-specified endpoint compared to placebo treatment (p≤0.02 for each drug). In contrast, none of these drugs were effective in prolonging survival in the same target-relevant orthotopic tumor models (-6% to 8% extension in median survival; p>0.05 for each drug). Consistent with partial and heterogeneous disruption of the BBB, MALDI-MSI of erlotinib, AZD1775 or SAR405838 distribution within orthotopic tumors demonstrated highly heterogeneous drug levels with large regions within each tumor approaching the low drug levels observed within surrounding normal brain. To further evaluate whether heterogenous drug distribution in orthotopic tumors could account for poor treatment efficacy, GBM108 was transduced with lentiviral constructs encoding for VEGF or empty vector (EV). While both GBM108-sublines were readily detectable with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the GBM108-VEGF tumors had a significantly more disrupted BBB, as evidenced by a more uniform and intense distribution of a brain-impenetrant TexasRed-dextran vascular marker. Similarly, the distribution of SAR405838, measured by MALDI-MSI, was markedly higher and more uniform in the GBM108-VEGF tumors when compared to the GBM108-EV tumors. Enhanced delivery of SAR405838 into orthotopic GBM108-VEGF models translated into a marked enhancement in treatment efficacy in comparison to GBM108-EV with a median survival prolongation of 37 vs. 4 days, respectively (p=0.0055). Collectively, these data highlight the importance of testing novel therapeutic agents in orthotopic tumor models and suggest that limited brain penetration for many molecules may significantly limit their efficacy in brain tumors that have a partially intact BBB. In the face of continued failure to develop effective targeted agents for GBM, these in vivo results highlight the importance of re-evaluating the dogma in neuro-oncology that the BBB is fully disrupted in GBM and, therefore, drug delivery across the BBB is not a major factor limiting treatment efficacy. Citation Format: Jann N. Sarkaria, David Calligaris, Daniel Ma, Karen Parrish, Ann C. Mladek, Janice Laramy, Minjee Kim, Shuangling Zhang, Mark Schroeder, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina Bakken, Aaron Johnson, Nathalie Agar, William Elmquist. The critical importance of the blood-brain barrier in modulating the response to otherwise highly effective targeted therapies in patient-derived orthotopic glioblastoma xenografts. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr B25.