Parrish, Karen E.

Abstract Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.

Abstract Glioblastoma, the most common and lethal of brain tumors, is both highly invasive and proliferative. This allows tumor cells to infiltrate into regions of the brain with an intact blood brain barrier and be protected from effective therapeutics. Thus, an ideal glioblastoma therapy needs to target cellular components that drive both invasion and proliferation, with inhibitors that penetrate the blood brain barrier. The mitotic kinesin KIF11 meets these criteria and it can be targeted with ispinesib, a highly specific small molecule inhibitor. However, to be effective, ispinesib needs to cross the blood brain barrier and be retained within brain long enough to target glioblastoma cells when they are vulnerable, during mitosis.. We have examined the factors that affect distribution of ispinesib to both brain and glioblastoma. We find that delivery of ispinesib is limited by P-gp and Bcrp-mediated drug efflux at the blood brain barrier. Consequently, ispinesib levels are significantly lower in the infiltrative tumor margin relative to the tumor core, where the blood brain barrier is defective. We also show that elacridar—an inhibitor of the P-gp and Brcp efflux transporters—enhances delivery of ispinesib, and that co-administration of ispinesib with elacridar markedly slows tumor proliferation and prolongs survival in a mouse model of this disease. These results demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of combining a potentially ideal therapeutic with a compound that enhances brain retention of this therapeutic, and provides support for utilizing this approach in clinical investigations of KIF11 inhibitors in GBM.

Abstract Controversy exists surrounding whether heterogeneous disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), as seen in glioblastoma (GBM), leads to adequate drug delivery sufficient for efficacy in GBM. This question is especially important when using potent, targeted agents that have a poor penetration across an intact BBB. Efficacy of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) inhibitor SAR405838 was tested in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of GBM. In vitro efficacy of SAR405838 was evaluated in PDX models with varying MDM2 expression and those with high (GBM108) and low (GBM102) expression were evaluated for flank and orthotopic efficacy. BBB permeability, evaluated using TexasRed-3 kDa dextran, was significantly increased in GBM108 through VEGFA overexpression. Drug delivery, MRI, and orthotopic survival were compared between BBB-intact (GBM108-vector) and BBB-disrupted (GBM108-VEGFA) models. MDM2-amplified PDX lines with high MDM2 expression were sensitive to SAR405838 in comparison with MDM2 control lines in both in vitro and heterotopic models. In contrast with profound efficacy observed in flank xenografts, SAR405838 was ineffective in orthotopic tumors. Although both GBM108-vector and GBM108-VEGFA readily imaged on MRI following gadolinium contrast administration, GBM108-VEGFA tumors had a significantly enhanced drug and gadolinium accumulation, as determined by MALDI-MSI. Enhanced drug delivery in GBM108-VEGFA translated into a marked improvement in orthotopic efficacy. This study clearly shows that limited drug distribution across a partially intact BBB may limit the efficacy of targeted agents in GBM. Brain penetration of targeted agents is a critical consideration in any precision medicine strategy for GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(9); 1893–901. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including talazoparib, potentiate temozolomide efficacy in multiple tumor types; however, talazoparib-mediated sensitization has not been evaluated in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) models. This study evaluates talazoparib ± temozolomide in clinically relevant GBM models. Talazoparib at 1–3 nmol/L sensitized T98G, U251, and GBM12 cells to temozolomide, and enhanced DNA damage signaling and G2–M arrest in vitro. In vivo cyclical therapy with talazoparib (0.15 mg/kg twice daily) combined with low-dose temozolomide (5 mg/kg daily) was well tolerated. This talazoparib/temozolomide regimen prolonged tumor stasis more than temozolomide alone in heterotopic GBM12 xenografts [median time to endpoint: 76 days versus 50 days temozolomide (P = 0.005), 11 days placebo (P < 0.001)]. However, talazoparib/temozolomide did not accentuate survival beyond that of temozolomide alone in corresponding orthotopic xenografts [median survival 37 vs. 30 days with temozolomide (P = 0.93), 14 days with placebo, P < 0.001]. Average brain and plasma talazoparib concentrations at 2 hours after a single dose (0.15 mg/kg) were 0.49 ± 0.07 ng/g and 25.5±4.1 ng/mL, respectively. The brain/plasma distribution of talazoparib in Bcrp−/− versus wild-type (WT) mice did not differ, whereas the brain/plasma ratio in Mdr1a/b−/− mice was higher than WT mice (0.23 vs. 0.02, P < 0.001). Consistent with the in vivo brain distribution, overexpression of MDR1 decreased talazoparib accumulation in MDCKII cells. These results indicate that talazoparib has significant MDR1 efflux liability that may restrict delivery across the blood–brain barrier, and this may explain the loss of talazoparib-mediated temozolomide sensitization in orthotopic versus heterotopic GBM xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2735–46. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Clinical data indicate that certain regions within glioblastoma (GBM) have a relatively intact blood-brain barrier (BBB), but controversy surrounds whether associated heterogeneous delivery may limit efficacy for otherwise highly active drugs with poor brain distribution. In this study, the efficacy of molecularly targeted therapies was compared in relevant GBM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models grown either as heterotopic or orthotopic tumors. The impact of further disrupting BBB integrity in non-responsive orthotopic tumors was evaluated by over-expressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and measuring drug distribution by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI). The brain:plasma ratio for five targeted agents was determined by LC-MSMS and treatment efficacy was evaluated in target-relevant GBM PDX lines: erlotinib (brain:plasma = 0.02 ± 0.02; efficacy tested in GBM6), palbociclib (brain:plasma = 0.06; efficacy tested in GBM22), AZD1775 (brain:plasma = 0.05; efficacy tested in GBM22), SAR405838 (brain:plasma = 0.01 ± 0.003; efficacy tested in GBM108), and AZD4547 (brain:plasma = 0.045 ± 0.02; efficacy tested in GBM150). Each of these drugs was effective in relevant GBM PDX flank tumor models with a 27% to 218% prolongation in the median time to exceed their pre-specified endpoint compared to placebo treatment (p≤0.02 for each drug). In contrast, none of these drugs were effective in prolonging survival in the same target-relevant orthotopic tumor models (-6% to 8% extension in median survival; p>0.05 for each drug). Consistent with partial and heterogeneous disruption of the BBB, MALDI-MSI of erlotinib, AZD1775 or SAR405838 distribution within orthotopic tumors demonstrated highly heterogeneous drug levels with large regions within each tumor approaching the low drug levels observed within surrounding normal brain. To further evaluate whether heterogenous drug distribution in orthotopic tumors could account for poor treatment efficacy, GBM108 was transduced with lentiviral constructs encoding for VEGF or empty vector (EV). While both GBM108-sublines were readily detectable with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the GBM108-VEGF tumors had a significantly more disrupted BBB, as evidenced by a more uniform and intense distribution of a brain-impenetrant TexasRed-dextran vascular marker. Similarly, the distribution of SAR405838, measured by MALDI-MSI, was markedly higher and more uniform in the GBM108-VEGF tumors when compared to the GBM108-EV tumors. Enhanced delivery of SAR405838 into orthotopic GBM108-VEGF models translated into a marked enhancement in treatment efficacy in comparison to GBM108-EV with a median survival prolongation of 37 vs. 4 days, respectively (p=0.0055). Collectively, these data highlight the importance of testing novel therapeutic agents in orthotopic tumor models and suggest that limited brain penetration for many molecules may significantly limit their efficacy in brain tumors that have a partially intact BBB. In the face of continued failure to develop effective targeted agents for GBM, these in vivo results highlight the importance of re-evaluating the dogma in neuro-oncology that the BBB is fully disrupted in GBM and, therefore, drug delivery across the BBB is not a major factor limiting treatment efficacy. Citation Format: Jann N. Sarkaria, David Calligaris, Daniel Ma, Karen Parrish, Ann C. Mladek, Janice Laramy, Minjee Kim, Shuangling Zhang, Mark Schroeder, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina Bakken, Aaron Johnson, Nathalie Agar, William Elmquist. The critical importance of the blood-brain barrier in modulating the response to otherwise highly effective targeted therapies in patient-derived orthotopic glioblastoma xenografts. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr B25.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Talazoparib (TAL) is a potent poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that robustly enhances in vitro sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) in several tumor models. We assessed the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of TAL combined with TMZ in glioblastoma (GBM) models. METHODS: Established glioma cell lines (T98G, U251) and the GBM12 patient derived xenograft (PDX) line were treated in vitro with TAL (1-10 nM) ± TMZ (2-300 μM). Antitumor efficacy was assessed with CyQUANT, clonogenic and primary neurosphere assays; cell cycle analysis with flow cytometry; DNA damage signaling with phospho-specific western blots for pKap1, pChk1, pChk2 and fluorescent immunocytochemistry for γH2AX and replication protein A foci. Brain and plasma concentrations of TAL in wild-type (WT), Mdr1a/b(-/-), Bcrp(-/-) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) knockout (KO) mice were assessed with LC-MS/MS. The tolerability of TAL (0.05 - 0.30 mg/kg/day orally, divided twice daily (div. bid)) and TMZ (5-50 mg/kg/day orally) was tested in athymic nude mice. Subsequently, in vivo combination TAL/TMZ efficacy was assessed with survival analyses in intracranial and flank GBM12 PDX models. RESULTS: TAL 1-3 nM sensitizes the TMZ resistant T98G glioma cell line to TMZ at high TMZ concentrations (30-300 μM) and is associated with G2 cell cycle arrest and enhanced DNA damage signaling. TAL 1-3 nM also enhances the cytotoxic efficacy of lower concentrations of TMZ (10-30 μM) in the TMZ sensitive U251 cell line. At least 3 nM TAL is required to enhance the in vitro efficacy of low TMZ concentrations (2-10 μM) in the TMZ sensitive GBM12 PDX line. PK studies in non-tumor bearing WT FVB mice treated with a single dose of TAL 0.15 mg/kg revealed mean brain and plasma concentrations of 0.49 ng/g (1.3 nM) and 25.5 ng/ml (67.1 nM) respectively at 2 hours. The mean brain/plasma ratio at 2 hours was unchanged in Bcrp(-/-) KO mice compared to WT mice (1.2% vs. 2.0%), but was significantly increased in Mdr1a/b(-/-) KO mice (22.8%) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) KO mice (23.9%). Standard doses of TMZ (50 mg/kg/day, days 1-5) combined with low doses of TAL (0.05 mg/kg/day, div. bid) were toxic in nude mice. Higher doses of TAL (0.30 mg/kg/day, div. bid) required substantial TMZ dose reductions (5 mg/kg/day, days 1-5) for tolerability. The addition of TAL (0.30 mg/kg/day, div. bid) to low-dose TMZ (5 mg/kg/day) prolonged tumor stasis in flank GBM12 xenografts (median time to endpoint 76 vs. 50 days, p = 0.005). However this regimen was ineffective in intracranial GBM12 xenografts (median survival 37 vs. 30 days, p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: TAL is a potent PARP inhibitor that enhances the efficacy of TMZ in both in vitro GBM models and flank GBM12 PDX models, but not in the corresponding GBM12 intracranial xenografts. This lack of intracranial efficacy is associated with limited brain distribution due to active efflux mediated by Mdr1 at the blood-brain barrier. Citation Format: Sani H. Kizilbash, Kenneth Chang, Shiv K. Gupta, Ryo Kawashima, Karen Parrish, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina K. Bakken, Mark A. Schroeder, Gaspar J. Kitange, Paul A. Decker, Yuqiao Shen, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Talazoparib enhances low-dose temozolomide efficacy in flank glioblastoma models, but intracranial efficacy is constrained by limited brain distribution. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 340.

Abstract PARP inhibition can enhance the efficacy of temozolomide and prolong survival in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) xenografts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib with temozolomide and to correlate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies with efficacy in patient-derived GBM xenograft models. The combination of rucaparib with temozolomide was highly effective in vitro in short-term explant cultures derived from GBM12, and, similarly, the combination of rucaparib and temozolomide (dosed for 5 days every 28 days for 3 cycles) significantly prolonged the time to tumor regrowth by 40% in heterotopic xenografts. In contrast, the addition of rucaparib had no impact on the efficacy of temozolomide in GBM12 or GBM39 orthotopic models. Using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) II cells stably expressing murine BCRP1 or human MDR1, cell accumulation studies demonstrated that rucaparib is transported by both transporters. Consistent with the influence of these efflux pumps on central nervous system drug distribution, Mdr1a/b−/−Bcrp1−/− knockout mice had a significantly higher brain to plasma ratio for rucaparib (1.61 ± 0.25) than wild-type mice (0.11 ± 0.08). A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation after a single dose confirmed limited accumulation of rucaparib in the brain is associated with substantial residual PARP enzymatic activity. Similarly, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric imaging demonstrated significantly enhanced accumulation of drug in flank tumor compared with normal brain or orthotopic tumors. Collectively, these results suggest that limited drug delivery into brain tumors may significantly limit the efficacy of rucaparib combined with temozolomide in GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(12); 2735–43. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults and is associated with a poor prognosis. Progress in developing effective therapies for this disease is significantly limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which limits the delivery of many anti-cancer agents to infiltrative tumor cells. In addition to physical barriers, such as tight junctions, the efflux proteins bcrp and P-gp in the BBB limit the brain distribution of numerous anti-cancer agents. Palbociclib (PD0332991) is a potent Cdk4/6 inhibitor which has shown remarkable efficacy in treating peripheral (non-brain) tumors. The Cdk4 pathway is dysregulated in approximately 75% of GBM; most commonly, the pathway is hyperactivated through the homozygous deletion of p16 (52%), amplification of Cdk4 (18%), or amplification of Cdk6 (1%). The purpose of this study is to define the role of the efflux transporters P-gp and bcrp in the brain distribution of palbociclib and to examine if an intact BBB limits efficacy. Palbociclib brain distribution studies were performed in FVB wild-type, P-gp knockout (PKO; Mdr1a/b(-/-)), bcrp knockout (BKO; Bcrp1(-/-)), and triple knockout (TKO; Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp1(-/-)) mice after an oral dose (10mg/kg). The concentrations of palbociclib from all distribution studies were determined by a sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS assay. Survival studies were conducted in patient-derived primary GBM xenograft models in athymic nu/nu mice. The brain exposure of palbociclib (AUCbrain-to-AUCplasma ratio) was ∼ 33.5, 3.2, and 150-fold higher as compared to WT mice (WT: .044; PKO: 1.34; BKO: 0.13; TKO: 6.24). Further, the steady-state brain-to-plasma ratio (B/P) of palbociclib after a constant intra-peritoneal infusion of 10 µg/hr for 48hrs was ∼120-fold higher in the TKO mice than the WT mice [WT: (0.21 ± 0.07); PKO: (2.48 ± .13); BKO: (0.43 ± 0.12); TKO: (26.5 ± 5.4) p < 0.0001]. Inhibition of P-gp and bcrp with elacridar (10 mg/kg IP) resulted in a marked increase in palbociclib brain distribution [control B/P (0.06 ± 0.02); elacridar treatment (2.0 ± 1.4)]. For survival studies, palbociclib was dosed at 150 mg/kg/day continuously. Consistent with limited brain penetration, palbociclib did not improve the median survival of an orthotopic GBM xenograft model. In contrast, treatment of GBM22 xenografts grown as flank tumors resulted in profound efficacy with a 70 day prolongation in the time for tumor volume to reach 1000mm3. These data suggest the clinical paradigm of a potent anti-cancer agent (for instance, palbociclib) used in the treatment of peripheral disease is less effective in the treatment of brain tumors due to the BBB and active efflux by P-gp and bcrp. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):C81. Citation Format: Karen E. Parrish, Jenny L. Pokorny, Rajendar K. Mittapalli, Katrina Bakken, Jann N. Sarkaria, William F. Elmquist. BBB efflux pump activity limits brain penetration of palbociclib (PD0332991) in glioblastoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C81.