Gampa, Gautham

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is an incurable disease with few approved therapeutic interventions. Radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) remain the standards of care. The efficacy and optimal deployment schedule of the orally bioavailable small-molecule tumor checkpoint controller lisavanbulin alone, and in combination with, standards of care were assessed using a panel of IDH-wildtype GBM patient-derived xenografts. Methods Mice bearing intracranial tumors received lisavanbulin +/−RT +/−TMZ and followed for survival. Lisavanbulin concentrations in plasma and brain were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, while flow cytometry was used for cell cycle analysis. Results Lisavanbulin monotherapy showed significant benefit (P < .01) in 9 of 14 PDXs tested (median survival extension 9%-84%) and brain-to-plasma ratios of 1.3 and 1.6 at 2- and 6-hours postdose, respectively, validating previous data suggesting significant exposure in the brain. Prolonged lisavanbulin dosing from RT start until moribund was required for maximal benefit (GBM6: median survival lisavanbulin/RT 90 vs. RT alone 69 days, P = .0001; GBM150: lisavanbulin/RT 143 days vs. RT alone 73 days, P = .06). Similar observations were seen with RT/TMZ combinations (GBM39: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 502 days vs. RT/TMZ 249 days, P = .0001; GBM26: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 172 days vs. RT/TMZ 121 days, P = .04). Immunohistochemical analyses showed a significant increase in phospho-histone H3 with lisavanbulin treatment (P = .01). Conclusions Lisavanbulin demonstrated excellent brain penetration, significant extension of survival alone or in RT or RT/TMZ combinations, and was associated with mitotic arrest. These data provide a strong clinical rationale for testing lisavanbulin in combination with RT or RT/TMZ in GBM patients.

Abstract Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.

Abstract Lisavanbulin (LIS; BAL101553) is the prodrug of BAL27862, a microtubule-binding, tumor checkpoint controller and potential radiosensitizer. These studies evaluated optimal integration of LIS with standard of care radiation therapy (RT) and/or temozolomide (TMZ) using GBM PDX models. Distribution across the blood brain barrier was evaluated after a single 30 mg/kg oral LIS dose, and concentrations of the active metabolite BAL27862 were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Similar BAL27862 concentrations were detected in the brain (B) and plasma (P) at both two (B:P ratio 1.29) and six hours (B:P ratio 1.64) post-dose. An in vivo screen of LIS monotherapy across 14 orthotopic GBM PDX models showed significant survival benefit (p<0.01) in seven models (median survival extension 24-87%). Extending from these results, LIS was evaluated in several of the sensitive models in combination with RT +/- TMZ. Two MGMT unmethylated PDXs, GBM6 and GBM150, were treated with vehicle or two weeks of RT +/- LIS. LIS dosing during the RT dosing period did not significantly improve median survival in either line (GBM6 survival with RT 54 days vs RT/LIS 58 days, p=0.16; GBM150 RT 86 days vs RT/LIS 101 days, p=0.21). However, prolonged LIS dosing from the start of RT until mice reached a moribund state demonstrated added benefit (GBM6 median 90 days vs RT 69 days, p=0.0001; GBM150 median 143 days vs RT 73 days, p=0.06). In GBM6, prolonged LIS dosing also significantly extended survival when combined with 2 weeks of RT/TMZ (median 101 days vs 66 days, p<0.0001), while LIS alone or RT/TMZ resulted in similar median survivals (63 days vs 66 days, respectively; p=0.68). This same RT/TMZ/LIS benefit was not seen in the MGMT methylated GBM12. Subsequent experiments were performed to evaluate integration of prolonged LIS dosing with concurrent RT/TMZ followed by 3 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (‘Stupp’ regimen). In MGMT methylated GBM39, LIS alone did not significantly extend survival, but LIS addition to the Stupp regimen doubled median survival (Stupp 249 days vs Stupp/LIS 502 days, p=0.0001). GBM150 demonstrated equal benefit from LIS alone or Stupp regimen (median 118 days vs 123 days, p=0.49). Stupp/LIS showed no additional survival benefit (median 98 days, p=0.97). In a second MGMT unmethylated, TMZ-resistant GBM26 PDX, LIS alone or combined with the Stupp regimen provided significant survival benefit: median survival 53 days for vehicle vs. 80 days for LIS (p=0.0001), 114 days for RT only (p<0.0001), 147 days for RT/LIS (p=0.30 relative to RT), 121 days for ‘Stupp’ regimen alone (p=0.57 relative to RT), and 172 days for Stupp/LIS (p=0.04 relative to Stupp). A follow-up GBM39 study revealed a significant increase in the mitotic marker phospho-histone H3 with LIS treatment relative to vehicle-treated controls (p=0.01) while Ki67 levels were similar (p=0.15). This suggests that LIS induces a mitotic arrest associated with microtubule deregulation. Collectively, these data provide a strong rationale to evaluate lisavanbulin (BAL101553) with RT +/- TMZ in GBM and provided the basis for an ongoing Phase I clinical trial. Citation Format: Danielle M Burgenske, Ann C Mladek, Jenny L Pokorny, Heidi A Lane, Felix Bachmann, Rachael A Vaubel, Mark A Schroeder, Katrina K Bakken, Lihong He, Zeng Hu, Brett L Carlson, Surabhi Talele, Gautham Gampa, Matthew L Kosel, Paul A Decker, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, William F Elmquist, Jann Sarkaria. Modeling the clinical paradigm of lisavanbulin (BAL101553) deployment in patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of glioblastoma (GBM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C096. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-C096

Abstract Glioblastoma, the most common and lethal of brain tumors, is both highly invasive and proliferative. This allows tumor cells to infiltrate into regions of the brain with an intact blood brain barrier and be protected from effective therapeutics. Thus, an ideal glioblastoma therapy needs to target cellular components that drive both invasion and proliferation, with inhibitors that penetrate the blood brain barrier. The mitotic kinesin KIF11 meets these criteria and it can be targeted with ispinesib, a highly specific small molecule inhibitor. However, to be effective, ispinesib needs to cross the blood brain barrier and be retained within brain long enough to target glioblastoma cells when they are vulnerable, during mitosis.. We have examined the factors that affect distribution of ispinesib to both brain and glioblastoma. We find that delivery of ispinesib is limited by P-gp and Bcrp-mediated drug efflux at the blood brain barrier. Consequently, ispinesib levels are significantly lower in the infiltrative tumor margin relative to the tumor core, where the blood brain barrier is defective. We also show that elacridar—an inhibitor of the P-gp and Brcp efflux transporters—enhances delivery of ispinesib, and that co-administration of ispinesib with elacridar markedly slows tumor proliferation and prolongs survival in a mouse model of this disease. These results demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of combining a potentially ideal therapeutic with a compound that enhances brain retention of this therapeutic, and provides support for utilizing this approach in clinical investigations of KIF11 inhibitors in GBM.