Feldsien, Thomas M.

Abstract Purpose: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are targeted therapies with robust efficacy in solid cancers, and there is intense interest in using EGFR-specific ADCs to target EGFR-amplified glioblastoma (GBM). Given GBM’s molecular heterogeneity, the bystander activity of ADCs may be important for determining treatment efficacy. In this study, the activity and toxicity of two EGFR-targeted ADCs with similar auristatin toxins, Losatuxizumab vedotin (ABBV-221) and Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), were compared in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and normal murine brain following direct infusion by convection-enhanced delivery (CED). Experimental Design: EGFRviii-amplified and non-amplified GBM PDXs were used to determine in vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo efficacy, and bystander activities of ABBV-221 and Depatux-M. Nontumor-bearing mice were used to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity of ADCs using LC-MS/MS and immunohistochemistry. Results: CED improved intracranial efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-221 in three EGFRviii-amplified GBM PDX models (Median survival: 125 to >300 days vs. 20–49 days with isotype control AB095). Both ADCs had comparable in vitro and in vivo efficacy. However, neuronal toxicity and CD68+ microglia/macrophage infiltration were significantly higher in brains infused with ABBV-221 with the cell-permeable monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), compared with Depatux-M with the cell-impermeant monomethyl auristatin F. CED infusion of ABBV-221 into the brain or incubation of ABBV-221 with normal brain homogenate resulted in a significant release of MMAE, consistent with linker instability in the brain microenvironment. Conclusions: EGFR-targeting ADCs are promising therapeutic options for GBM when delivered intratumorally by CED. However, the linker and payload for the ADC must be carefully considered to maximize the therapeutic window.

Abstract Background EGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are highly effective against EGFR-amplified tumors, but poor distribution across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits their efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) when administered systemically. We studied whether convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse ADCs into orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Methods The efficacy of the EGFR-targeted ADCs depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) and Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. CED was performed in nontumor and tumor-bearing mice. Immunostaining was used to evaluate ADC distribution, pharmacodynamic effects, and normal cell toxicity. Results Dose-finding studies in orthotopic GBM6 identified single infusion of 2 μg Ser-T and 60 μg Depatux-M as safe and effective associated with extended survival prolongation (>300 days and 95 days, respectively). However, with serial infusions every 21 days, four Ser-T doses controlled tumor growth but was associated with lethal toxicity approximately 7 days after the final infusion. Limiting dosing to two infusions in GBM108 provided profound median survival extension of over 200 days. In contrast, four Depatux-M CED doses were well tolerated and significantly extended survival in both GBM6 (158 days) and GBM108 (310 days). In a toxicity analysis, Ser-T resulted in a profound loss in NeuN+ cells and markedly elevated GFAP staining, while Depatux-M was associated only with modest elevation in GFAP staining. Conclusion CED of Depatux-M is well tolerated and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, CED of Ser-T was associated with a much narrower therapeutic window.

Abstract Introduction: EGFR targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show promise as a novel treatment in a subset of glioblastoma (GBM). Two EGFR targeting ADCs include first generation Depatux-M, with an antimitotic toxin monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF), and ABBV-321, with a DNA crosslinking agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer (PBD) toxin. Due to the large molecular weight, poor drug distribution across the blood-brain barrier significantly limits the efficacy in EGFR-amplified GBM. We studied whether convection enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse these two EGFR-targeted ADCs in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFR-amplified GBM. Methods: The efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-321 was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in two EGFRviii-amplified PDXs (GBM6 and GBM108). Immunofluorescence staining was used to evaluate drug distribution along with pharmacodynamics of the ADCs. CED was performed by stereotactic placement of an infusion catheter in the same location as the original tumor implantation. Immunohistochemistry was used to explore mechanisms of normal cell toxicity. Results: Despite potent activity in vitro (high ng/ml IC50), systemic administration of either ADC conferred minimal extension in survival for either GBM6 or GBM108. In contrast, CED significantly enhanced ADC delivery to tumor and peri-tumoral regions and extended survival. In a pilot study in GBM6 with n=3 mice per group, a single CED infusion of 0.002mg ABBV-321 resulted in extended survival beyond 365 days for two mice, while other doses and placebo were associated with shorter median survival (0 mg - 39 days; 0.03 mg - 105 days; 0.3 mg - 49 days). In a subsequent trial evaluating serial infusions performed every 21 days, four infusions at 0.002 mg ABBV-321 resulted in lethal toxicity. In contrast, limiting ABBV-321 to only two serial CED infusions in GBM108 was associated with extended survival of more than 300 days vs. 53 days for AB095 antibody control infusion. In contrast, serial infusion with Depatux-M was much better tolerated. In a single infusion in GBM6, a 0.06 mg dose was well tolerated and associated with a 49-day extension in median survival. Further, four serial infusions at 0.06 mg given every 21 days in GBM6 and GBM108 was associated with 100 day and more than 250-day extension in survival as compared to AB095 antibody control infusion. To investigate the mechanism of toxicity, infusion of non-tumor bearing C57Bl6 mice with ABBV-321 resulted in a marked loss in NeuN staining and elevated CD68 and GFAP staining 7 days later; Depatux-M infusion was only associated with modest elevation in GFAP without loss of NeuN staining or elevated CD68-positive cells. Conclusion: Depatux-M is well tolerated when infused into normal brain and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, ABBV-321, with a distinct PBD toxin, had a much narrower therapeutic window when delivered by CED. Citation Format: Kendra A. Porath, Ann Mladek, Rachael A. Vaubel, Michael S. Regan, Sonia Jain, Danielle Burgenske, Katrina Bakken, Brett Carlson, Margaret Connors, Zeng Hu, Lihong He, Paul A. Decker, Gaspar Kitange, Shiv Gupta, Nathalie Y. Agar, Thomas M. Feldsien, Didier R. Lefebvre, Jann N. Sarkaria. Convection enhanced delivery of EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugates ABBV-321 and Depatux-M [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 334.