Rathi, Sneha

Abstract Radiation is a cornerstone of glioblastoma (GBM) treatment, however, the majority of tumors progress within the radiation field due to inherent radiotherapy (RT) resistance. The integration of highly potent radiosensitizers, such as the ATM inhibitors AZD1390 or WSD0628, could reverse resistance and significantly improve local control of these tumors. However, the achievable brain tumor exposure of these inhibitors may be limited by drug exposure in skin and mucosa, leading to enhanced radiation toxicity. To support the clinical development of WSD0628, we developed pharmacokinetic (PK)-efficacy models to help interpret ongoing PK analyses. A model based on in vitro cell studies was based on the in vitro observations that 30 nM WSD0628 provided maximum ATM inhibition and the extent of radiosensitization was directly related to the duration of drug incubation after irradiation, up to a maximum of 24 hours. The unbound WSD0628 concentration, measured by rapid equilibrium dialysis, was 66% of the total concentration in cell culture media, and was used to define an optimal radiosensitizing target of 20 nM free WSD0628 for 4 to 24 hours. Previous PK analyses showed that the free, unbound fraction (fu) of WSD0628 in plasma and brain tumor tissue are 0.02 and 0.054, respectively, and the brain tumor-to-plasma ratio is 0.32 in GBM43 patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). From these data, a total drug level of 1160 nM in plasma is predicted to achieve unbound drug levels above the 20 nM WSD0628 target unbound concentration. To validate this prediction, parallel in vivo dose-ranging studies were performed in orthotopic PDXs. Mice with orthotopic GBM43 were randomized to treatment with RT (8 Gy x1) alone or in combination with a range of WSD0628 doses. RT combined with 0.25 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg WSD0628 had no impact on survival, compared to RT alone, while median survival increased by 1.3-fold for RT combined with 2.5 mg/kg, 1.7-fold with 5 mg/kg, and 3.2-fold with 10 mg/kg WSD0628. A similar dose-response was observed in an M12 melanoma brain metastasis PDX. Based on PK modeling of these drug doses, 2.5 mg/kg dosing will maintain total WSD0628 plasma levels above 1160 nM for 11.9 hours, 5 mg/kg for 23.6 hours, and 10 mg/kg for 40 hours. Taken together, we have developed a model to predict efficacious dosing of a brain tumor based on the free drug hypothesis, which allows integration of multiple aspects of in vitro modeling with measured drug levels in animal models to predict total plasma levels associated with robust sensitizing effects. Assuming similar tissue to plasma partitioning in human GBM, this model could be directly applied to interpret the ongoing Phase 1 PK analysis of WSD0628 in recurrent GBM. Citation Format: Ann Catherine Mladek, Juhee Oh, Sneha Rathi, Lily Liu, Danielle M. Burgenske, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina K. Bakken, Lauren L. Ott, Zeng Hu, Wei Zhong, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Modeling pharmacokinetics and efficacy of the ATM inhibitor WSD0628 in GBM and melanoma metastasis PDX models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 4629.

Abstract Failure to repair radiation (RT)-induced DNA damage results in cell lethality, and combined treatment with DNA repair inhibitors can markedly enhance tumor control achieved with radiation. These inhibitors also can potentiate acute RT toxicities by suppressing DNA repair. Capitalizing on this normal tissue radiosensitizing effect, we determined effective radiosensitizing dosing regimens in mice for the ATM inhibitor WSD0628 and the DNAPK inhibitor WNC0901 in mice. Drugs were administered via oral gavage prior to each RT dose, and RT was delivered using an anterior/posterior 225 kVp beam. In an initial iteration of this model, various combinations of WSD0628 and RT were administered to cohorts of mice (n=5/group) and body weight was followed for 2 weeks. The resulting data were modeled to define the total dose of radiation estimated to cause 50% of mice to lose >20% body weight (D50). There was an inverse relationship between the WSD0628 and D50 doses: 0 mg/kg WSD0628/24.0 Gy (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.5–24.7); 0.25 mg/kg/19.2 Gy (95% CI 16.7–21.8); 1 mg/kg/13.7 Gy (95% CI 13.2–14.2); 2.5 mg/kg/11.0 Gy (95% CI 10.5–11.5); 5 mg/kg/11.3 Gy (95% CI 6.7–15.9) and 7.5 mg/kg/7.8 Gy (95% CI 7.8–7.9). Histological review of tongues from animals treated with 15 Gy RT (5Gy x 3) + 7.5 mg/kg WSD0628 demonstrated epithelial denudation and acute inflammation consistent with oral mucositis, while these features were not seen with the same dose as RT alone. Similar WSD0628 doses were evaluated in combination with 8 Gy supratentorial RT (via lateral beams) in orthotopic GBM43 PDX tumors. By treatment arm, the median time to a moribund state was: sham (29 days (d)), RT (39d), 1 mg/kg (42d), 2.5 mg/kg (49d), 5 mg/kg (65d), and 10 mg/kg (123d, overall p<0.0001). A second mucositis model was used for evaluation of WNC0901. Cohorts of 5 mice/group were treated with a set dose of RT (4Gy x 3) to the oral cavity alone and in combination with various doses of WNC0901, and the fraction of mice with >20% weight loss within 2 weeks was determined. The results of this study are as follows: placebo (0 of 5 mice with >20% weight loss); 15 mg/kg (3 of 5 mice); 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg (5 of 5 mice). Based on these data, we defined 25 mg/kg WNC0901 as the minimally effective dose and predicted that 50 mg/kg would provide robust radiosensitization. Consistent with this prediction, co-treatment of B16 melanoma flank tumor xenografts with RT (8Gy x 1) and WNC0901 (50 mg/kg) more than doubled the median tumor control duration (median 42 [range 24-45] days; time from implantation for tumor to exceed 1500 mm3) as compared to RT alone (24 [13-30] days) or sham treatment (17 [13-17] days; overall p<0.0001). This study describes how a radiation-induced oral mucositis model can be used to identify effective radiosensitizing regimens faster and with fewer resources than relying on tumor control studies alone. Citation Format: Danielle Burgenske, Darwin Garcia, Jiayan Le, Wenjuan Zhang, Sneha Rathi, Katrina K. Bakken, Lauren L. Ott, Zeng Hu, Brett L. Carlson, Ann Mladek, Jessica L. Abraham, Paul A. Decker, Matthew L . Kosel, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, William F. Elmquist, Wei Zhong, Jann N. Sarkaria. Radiation-induced oral mucositis to rapidly determine effective radiosensitizing dosing regimens for ATM and DNAPK inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2025 Oct 22-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B090.

Abstract Background The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein coordinates the cellular response to therapeutic radiation, and ATM inhibitors can potentially enhance the efficacy of radiation in otherwise radiation-resistant tumors. Methods The small molecule ATM kinase inhibitor WSD0628 was specifically designed for enhanced distribution across the blood-brain barrier to more effectively treat glioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastases in combination with radiation therapy (RT). GBM and brain metastasis patient-derived xenograft models were used to understand target inhibition, radiosensitization, inhibition of the DNA damage response, and in vivo efficacy. Results Initial in vitro characterization of WSD0628 demonstrates a high level of selectivity across kinase families, limited aldehyde oxidase liability, and low risk of hERG interactions. Consistent with a central role for ATM in radiation response, WSD0628 blocked radiation-induced signaling and enhanced radiosensitivity in U251 glioma cells and brain tumor PDXs GBM120 and M12. In comparison to control or RT alone in orthotopic PDXs, the combination of WSD0628 with RT markedly prolonged median survival—GBM12 (19, 55, and 408 days, respectively); GBM43 (26, 44, and 143 days, respectively); GBM120 (51, 89, and 231 days, respectively); M12 (17, 39, and 190 days, respectively). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic testing after treatment in orthotopic GBM43 tumors showed inhibitory levels of WSD0628 and a reduction of γH2AX foci in the combination-treated tumors. Conclusions Collectively, these results suggest a promising role for WSD0628 in combination with RT in brain tumors and provide the rationale for an ongoing Phase 0/1A clinical trial testing this combination in recurrent GBM.

Abstract Ataxia Telangiectasia–mutated (ATM) inhibitors are being developed as radiosensitizers to improve the antitumor effects of radiotherapy, but ATM inhibition can also radiosensitize normal tissues. Therefore, understanding the elevated risk of normal tissue toxicities is critical for radiosensitizer development. This study focused on modeling the relationship between acute mucosal toxicity, radiation dose, fractionation schedule, and radiosensitizer exposure. The ATM inhibitor WSD0628 was combined with single or fractionated doses of radiation delivered to the oral cavity or esophagus of Friend Leukemia virus B (FVB) mice. The potentiation by WSD0628 was quantified by a sensitizer enhancement ratio (SER), which describes the changes in radiation tolerance for radiation combined with WSD0628 relative to radiation-only regimens. WSD0628 profoundly enhanced radiation-induced acute oral and esophageal toxicities. For oral mucosal toxicity, the enhancement by WSD0628 with 3 fractions of radiation resulted in an SER ranging from 1.3 (0.25 mg/kg) to 3.1 (7.5 mg/kg). For the 7.5 mg/kg combination, the SER increased with increasing number of fractions from 2.2 (1 fraction) to 4.3 (7 fractions) for oral toxicity and from 2.2 (1 fraction) to 3.6 (3 fractions) for esophageal toxicity, which reflects a loss of the normal tissue sparing benefit of fractionated radiation. These findings were used to develop a modified biologically effective dose model to determine alternative radiation schedules with or without WSD0628 that result in similar levels of toxicity. Successful radiosensitizer dose escalation to a maximally effective therapeutic dose will require careful deliberation of tumor site and reduction of radiation dose volume limits for organs at risk.

Abstract Purpose: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are targeted therapies with robust efficacy in solid cancers, and there is intense interest in using EGFR-specific ADCs to target EGFR-amplified glioblastoma (GBM). Given GBM’s molecular heterogeneity, the bystander activity of ADCs may be important for determining treatment efficacy. In this study, the activity and toxicity of two EGFR-targeted ADCs with similar auristatin toxins, Losatuxizumab vedotin (ABBV-221) and Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), were compared in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and normal murine brain following direct infusion by convection-enhanced delivery (CED). Experimental Design: EGFRviii-amplified and non-amplified GBM PDXs were used to determine in vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo efficacy, and bystander activities of ABBV-221 and Depatux-M. Nontumor-bearing mice were used to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity of ADCs using LC-MS/MS and immunohistochemistry. Results: CED improved intracranial efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-221 in three EGFRviii-amplified GBM PDX models (Median survival: 125 to >300 days vs. 20–49 days with isotype control AB095). Both ADCs had comparable in vitro and in vivo efficacy. However, neuronal toxicity and CD68+ microglia/macrophage infiltration were significantly higher in brains infused with ABBV-221 with the cell-permeable monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), compared with Depatux-M with the cell-impermeant monomethyl auristatin F. CED infusion of ABBV-221 into the brain or incubation of ABBV-221 with normal brain homogenate resulted in a significant release of MMAE, consistent with linker instability in the brain microenvironment. Conclusions: EGFR-targeting ADCs are promising therapeutic options for GBM when delivered intratumorally by CED. However, the linker and payload for the ADC must be carefully considered to maximize the therapeutic window.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and highly infiltrative brain tumor with poor prognosis. Radiation therapy induces DNA damage, and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways modulate resistance to radiation therapy. Inhibiting DDR pathways by targeting ATM, a key enzyme involved in the repair of DNA double strand breaks, leads to radiosensitization and enhances cytotoxicity. Clinical translation of radiosensitizers for GBM may be influenced by a lack of effective drug delivery across the blood brain barrier (BBB). The purpose of this study is to determine the key preclinical pharmacokinetic parameters and mechanisms that influence the CNS delivery of WSD0628, a novel ATM inhibitor. In vitro clonogenic survival assays using U251 GBM cells indicate that WSD0628 shows significant radiosensitization, with a >70% decrease in surviving colonies in the presence of 10nM or higher drug concentrations in combination with 2.5 to 10 Gy radiation as compared to radiation alone. We evaluated the systemic pharmacokinetics and CNS distribution of WSD0628 in FVB wild-type mice and FVB mice lacking Pgp and Bcrp (Mdr1a/b−/−Bcrp1−/−, triple knockout) after a 1, 5, 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV) or oral (PO) dose. Clearance decreased with increase in dose and a greater than dose proportional increase in exposure was observed. WSD0628 is rapidly absorbed and is bioavailable after oral administration. Tissue distribution coefficients were determined as the ratio of exposure in tissue to plasma (Kp = AUCtissue/AUCplasma). Kp,brain was 0.22 ± 0.05, and Kp, spinal cord was 0.30 ± 0.09 in the wild-type mice. For wild-type mice, Kp,uu,brain was 0.20 ± 0.05 and Kp,uu,spinal cord was 0.26 ± 0.08, determined by correcting for binding to CNS tissues and plasma. The brain distribution of WSD0628 was only modestly increased (1.4 times) in the triple knockout mice with Kp,brain of 0.32 ± 0.06 and Kp,spinal cord of 0.41 ± 0.08. Organ distribution of WSD0628 at steady-state was studied after intraperitoneal implantation of Alzet osmotic pumps primed to release WSD0628 at 7.5 ug/hr for 25 hours. Tissue distribution coefficients, determined by organ-to-plasma steady-state concentration ratios, were highest for liver and kidneys, followed by heart, lungs and CNS. Survival studies conducted in mice bearing orthotopic GBM patient derived xenografts show a significant improvement in survival in mice receiving a combination of WSD0628 and radiation as compared to radiation alone. In conclusion, WSD0628 is a robust radiosensitizer and has moderate brain penetration that is not limited by the efflux transporters Pgp and Bcrp. Based on preliminary efficacy studies in mice, WSD0628 shows potential for treatment of GBM tumors. Evaluations are underway to determine tumor free concentrations and quantification of corresponding biomarkers. Combining this knowledge of PK of WSD0628 with the dynamics of the targeted biological pathway will inform a PK-PD-efficacy model and predict effective dosage regimens for future preclinical and clinical trials. Citation Format: Sneha Rathi, Ann Mladek, Zhiyi Xue, Ju-Hee Oh, Wenjuan Zhang, Wenqiu Zhang, Jiayan Le, Jann S. Sarkaria, William F. Elmquist. Systemic and CNS distributional pharmacokinetics of WSD0628, a novel radiosensitizer: Implications for the treatment of brain tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Brain Cancer; 2023 Oct 19-22; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B028.

Abstract Radiation therapy (RT) is an important non-surgical clinical treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastases, but inherent radio-resistance can limit the efficacy in many patients. The Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) protein critically regulates radiotherapy-mediated DNA damage repair pathways, and defects in this kinase can lead to profound radiosensitivity. In this study, the efficacy of the highly potent ATM inhibitor WSD0628 was evaluated in GBM and melanoma brain metastasis patient derived xenografts (PDXs). In short term explant cultures of three PDXs, WSD0628 robustly suppressed RT-induced autophosphorylation of ATM at serine 1981 and ATM-mediated phosphorylation of Chk2 at threonine-68 and KAP1 at serine-824, with maximal inhibition at 100 nM. Similarly, RT-induced gH2AX foci were significantly reduced when combined with WSD0628 in the GBM43 cells. Consistent with the importance of ATM in the DNA damage response after radiation, WSD0628 significantly increased the radiosensitivity of U251 cells in clonogenic survival assays (0nM vs. 30nM at 5Gy, p<0.01). To evaluate the optimal duration of drug exposure, WSD0628 was removed from U251 cells at various intervals following irradiation with 5 Gy. Using clonogenic survival as a readout, a 10-fold increase in cytotoxicity was observed with an 8 hour drug exposure, with progressively increasing cytotoxicity gains with exposures up to 24 hours. In vivo efficacy of WSD0628 was evaluated in multiple intracranial PDX models. In an initial dose-ranging study, robust radiosensitization was observed in GBM43 treated with 2 Gy x 5 fractions combined with 5 mg/kg WSD0628 (20 day survival extension) or 10mg/kg WSD0628 (39 day with 10 mg/kg; p<0.01 for both dose levels). Moreover, a single dose of 12.5 Gy combined with 10 mg/kg WSD0628 had profound impact on treatment efficacy in the melanoma brain metastasis M12 PDX: at 180 days post-treatment, all mice in the combination group were electively euthanized, while median survival for sham or RT alone was 17d and 49d, respectively. Histologic analysis identified large intracranial tumors in all sham and RT-only treated mice, but only a small accumulation of melanotic cells without obvious tumor in the combination-treated mice. Immunohistochemical staining of NeuN and GFAP in the combination-treated mice showed preserved neuronal density at the 180-post treatment timepoint and minimal reactive gliosis within the ‘tumor scar’. An ongoing study is comparing this single-fraction 12.5 Gy regimen to a 2.4 Gy x 10 fraction regimen alone or in combination with WSD0628. Collectively, this study demonstrates the potential for profound radiosensitizing effects of WSD0628 in combination without obvious neuronal toxicity and has provided the scientific rational for the first-in-man study of this combination in recurrent GBM (NCT05917145) at Mayo Clinic. Citation Format: Zhiyi Xue, Ann C. Mladek, Sneha Rathi, Danielle M. Burgenske, Shiv K. Gupta, Brett L. Carlson, Zeng Hu, Lauren L Ott, Katrina K. Bakken, Rachael A. Vaubel, William F Elmquist, Wei Zhong, Jann N Sarkaria. The radiosensitizing effects of the novel brain penetrant and potent ATM inhibitor WSD0628 in glioblastoma and melanoma patient derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A148.

Abstract The treatment of brain tumors using chemo- and radio-sensitizers may be limited by a lack of effective drug delivery. Radiation and some cytotoxic therapies induce DNA damage, and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways modulate resistance to effective chemo-radiation therapy. Inhibiting DDR pathways by targeting ATM leads to sensitization and enhances cytotoxicity. The purpose of this study is to determine the key pre-clinical pharmacokinetic parameters and mechanisms that influence the CNS delivery of WSD0628, a novel ATM inhibitor. Pharmacokinetics and CNS distribution studies were conducted in FVB wild-type mice following intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) dosing (5 mg/kg). Plasma, brain, and spinal cord samples were harvested after dosing and drug concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS. The free fraction of WSD0628 was measured in plasma, brain, and spinal cord using rapid equilibrium dialysis. Our results indicate that WSD0628 has a half-life of 4.11 hrs and a high oral bioavailability (0.95). The brain partition coefficient (AUCbrain/AUCplasma, i.e., Kp, brain) is 0.05 and 0.11 after IV and PO dosing, respectively. The free fraction in plasma is 2.01 ± 0.02 % and in brain it is 1.22 ± 0.40 %. The unbound brain partition coefficient (Kpuu brain) is 0.03 and 0.06 after IV and PO dosing, respectively. The differential binding to plasma and brain tissues results in a relatively low Kpuu, a key parameter describing brain penetrability. These data show that WSD0628, a highly potent inhibitor of ATM, reached sufficient concentrations in brain after a single dose of 5 mg/kg to engage ATM over the desired time frame and elicit a response after DNA damage by chemo-radiotherapy. WSD0628 shows promising potential and further evaluations are underway to determine if efflux transporters at the BBB limit its brain distribution.

AbstractBrain tumours have a poor prognosis and lack effective treatments. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) represents a major hurdle to drug delivery to brain tumours. In some locations in the tumour, the BBB may be disrupted to form the blood–brain tumour barrier (BBTB). This leaky BBTB enables diagnosis of brain tumours by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; however, this disruption is heterogeneous throughout the tumour. Thus, relying on the disrupted BBTB for achieving effective drug concentrations in brain tumours has met with little clinical success. Because of this, it would be beneficial to design drugs and drug delivery strategies to overcome the ‘normal’ BBB to effectively treat the brain tumours. In this review, we discuss the role of BBB/BBTB in brain tumour diagnosis and treatment highlighting the heterogeneity of the BBTB. We also discuss various strategies to improve drug delivery across the BBB/BBTB to treat both primary and metastatic brain tumours. Recognizing that the BBB represents a critical determinant of drug efficacy in central nervous system tumours will allow a more rapid translation from basic science to clinical application. A more complete understanding of the factors, such as BBB–limited drug delivery, that have hindered progress in treating both primary and metastatic brain tumours, is necessary to develop more effective therapies.

Effective treatments for brain tumors remain one of the most urgent and unmet needs in modern oncology. This is due not only to the presence of the neurovascular unit/blood–brain barrier (NVU/BBB) but also to the heterogeneity of barrier alteration in the case of brain tumors, which results in what is referred to as the blood–tumor barrier (BTB). Herein, we discuss this heterogeneity, how it contributes to the failure of novel pharmaceutical treatment strategies, and why a “whole brain” approach to the treatment of brain tumors might be beneficial. We discuss various methods by which these obstacles might be overcome and assess how these strategies are progressing in the clinic. We believe that by approaching brain tumor treatment from this perspective, a new paradigm for drug delivery to brain tumors might be established.