Back to Authors

Le, Jiayan

Mayo Clinic

University of Minnesota

Citations 3

Abstract B090: Radiation-induced oral mucositis to rapidly determine effective radiosensitizing dosing regimens for ATM and DNAPK inhibitors
Le, Jiayan, Ott, Lauren L. , Hu, Zeng , Carlson, Brett L. , Abraham, Jessica L., Decker, Paul A. , Kosel, Matthew , Eckel‐Passow, Jeanette E. , Elmquist, William F. , Zhong, Wei , Burgenske, Danielle M. , Garcia, D. , Zhang, Wenjuan , Rathi, Sneha , Bakken, Katrina K. , Mladek, Ann C. , Decker, Paul A. , Zhong, Wei, Sarkaria, Jann N.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | October 22, 2025 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 10_Supplement | Pages: B090-B090

10.1158/1535-7163.targ-25-b090 Get It

Abstract Failure to repair radiation (RT)-induced DNA damage results in cell lethality, and combined treatment with DNA repair inhibitors can markedly enhance tumor control achieved with radiation. These inhibitors also can potentiate acute RT toxicities by suppressing DNA repair. Capitalizing on this normal tissue radiosensitizing effect, we determined effective radiosensitizing dosing regimens in mice for the ATM inhibitor WSD0628 and the DNAPK inhibitor WNC0901 in mice. Drugs were administered via oral gavage prior to each RT dose, and RT was delivered using an anterior/posterior 225 kVp beam. In an initial iteration of this model, various combinations of WSD0628 and RT were administered to cohorts of mice (n=5/group) and body weight was followed for 2 weeks. The resulting data were modeled to define the total dose of radiation estimated to cause 50% of mice to lose >20% body weight (D50). There was an inverse relationship between the WSD0628 and D50 doses: 0 mg/kg WSD0628/24.0 Gy (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.5–24.7); 0.25 mg/kg/19.2 Gy (95% CI 16.7–21.8); 1 mg/kg/13.7 Gy (95% CI 13.2–14.2); 2.5 mg/kg/11.0 Gy (95% CI 10.5–11.5); 5 mg/kg/11.3 Gy (95% CI 6.7–15.9) and 7.5 mg/kg/7.8 Gy (95% CI 7.8–7.9). Histological review of tongues from animals treated with 15 Gy RT (5Gy x 3) + 7.5 mg/kg WSD0628 demonstrated epithelial denudation and acute inflammation consistent with oral mucositis, while these features were not seen with the same dose as RT alone. Similar WSD0628 doses were evaluated in combination with 8 Gy supratentorial RT (via lateral beams) in orthotopic GBM43 PDX tumors. By treatment arm, the median time to a moribund state was: sham (29 days (d)), RT (39d), 1 mg/kg (42d), 2.5 mg/kg (49d), 5 mg/kg (65d), and 10 mg/kg (123d, overall p<0.0001). A second mucositis model was used for evaluation of WNC0901. Cohorts of 5 mice/group were treated with a set dose of RT (4Gy x 3) to the oral cavity alone and in combination with various doses of WNC0901, and the fraction of mice with >20% weight loss within 2 weeks was determined. The results of this study are as follows: placebo (0 of 5 mice with >20% weight loss); 15 mg/kg (3 of 5 mice); 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg (5 of 5 mice). Based on these data, we defined 25 mg/kg WNC0901 as the minimally effective dose and predicted that 50 mg/kg would provide robust radiosensitization. Consistent with this prediction, co-treatment of B16 melanoma flank tumor xenografts with RT (8Gy x 1) and WNC0901 (50 mg/kg) more than doubled the median tumor control duration (median 42 [range 24-45] days; time from implantation for tumor to exceed 1500 mm3) as compared to RT alone (24 [13-30] days) or sham treatment (17 [13-17] days; overall p<0.0001). This study describes how a radiation-induced oral mucositis model can be used to identify effective radiosensitizing regimens faster and with fewer resources than relying on tumor control studies alone. Citation Format: Danielle Burgenske, Darwin Garcia, Jiayan Le, Wenjuan Zhang, Sneha Rathi, Katrina K. Bakken, Lauren L. Ott, Zeng Hu, Brett L. Carlson, Ann Mladek, Jessica L. Abraham, Paul A. Decker, Matthew L . Kosel, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, William F. Elmquist, Wei Zhong, Jann N. Sarkaria. Radiation-induced oral mucositis to rapidly determine effective radiosensitizing dosing regimens for ATM and DNAPK inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2025 Oct 22-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B090.
Abstract B028: Systemic and CNS distributional pharmacokinetics of WSD0628, a novel radiosensitizer: Implications for the treatment of brain tumors
Xue, Zhiyi , Oh, Ju‐Hee , Le, Jiayan, Sarkaria, Jann S., Elmquist, William F. , Rathi, Sneha , Mladek, Ann C. , Xue, Zhiyi, Zhang, Wenjuan , Zhang, Wenqiu

Cancer Research | March 4, 2024 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 5_Supplement_1 | Pages: B028-B028

10.1158/1538-7445.brain23-b028 Get It

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and highly infiltrative brain tumor with poor prognosis. Radiation therapy induces DNA damage, and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways modulate resistance to radiation therapy. Inhibiting DDR pathways by targeting ATM, a key enzyme involved in the repair of DNA double strand breaks, leads to radiosensitization and enhances cytotoxicity. Clinical translation of radiosensitizers for GBM may be influenced by a lack of effective drug delivery across the blood brain barrier (BBB). The purpose of this study is to determine the key preclinical pharmacokinetic parameters and mechanisms that influence the CNS delivery of WSD0628, a novel ATM inhibitor. In vitro clonogenic survival assays using U251 GBM cells indicate that WSD0628 shows significant radiosensitization, with a >70% decrease in surviving colonies in the presence of 10nM or higher drug concentrations in combination with 2.5 to 10 Gy radiation as compared to radiation alone. We evaluated the systemic pharmacokinetics and CNS distribution of WSD0628 in FVB wild-type mice and FVB mice lacking Pgp and Bcrp (Mdr1a/b−/−Bcrp1−/−, triple knockout) after a 1, 5, 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV) or oral (PO) dose. Clearance decreased with increase in dose and a greater than dose proportional increase in exposure was observed. WSD0628 is rapidly absorbed and is bioavailable after oral administration. Tissue distribution coefficients were determined as the ratio of exposure in tissue to plasma (Kp = AUCtissue/AUCplasma). Kp,brain was 0.22 ± 0.05, and Kp, spinal cord was 0.30 ± 0.09 in the wild-type mice. For wild-type mice, Kp,uu,brain was 0.20 ± 0.05 and Kp,uu,spinal cord was 0.26 ± 0.08, determined by correcting for binding to CNS tissues and plasma. The brain distribution of WSD0628 was only modestly increased (1.4 times) in the triple knockout mice with Kp,brain of 0.32 ± 0.06 and Kp,spinal cord of 0.41 ± 0.08. Organ distribution of WSD0628 at steady-state was studied after intraperitoneal implantation of Alzet osmotic pumps primed to release WSD0628 at 7.5 ug/hr for 25 hours. Tissue distribution coefficients, determined by organ-to-plasma steady-state concentration ratios, were highest for liver and kidneys, followed by heart, lungs and CNS. Survival studies conducted in mice bearing orthotopic GBM patient derived xenografts show a significant improvement in survival in mice receiving a combination of WSD0628 and radiation as compared to radiation alone. In conclusion, WSD0628 is a robust radiosensitizer and has moderate brain penetration that is not limited by the efflux transporters Pgp and Bcrp. Based on preliminary efficacy studies in mice, WSD0628 shows potential for treatment of GBM tumors. Evaluations are underway to determine tumor free concentrations and quantification of corresponding biomarkers. Combining this knowledge of PK of WSD0628 with the dynamics of the targeted biological pathway will inform a PK-PD-efficacy model and predict effective dosage regimens for future preclinical and clinical trials. Citation Format: Sneha Rathi, Ann Mladek, Zhiyi Xue, Ju-Hee Oh, Wenjuan Zhang, Wenqiu Zhang, Jiayan Le, Jann S. Sarkaria, William F. Elmquist. Systemic and CNS distributional pharmacokinetics of WSD0628, a novel radiosensitizer: Implications for the treatment of brain tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Brain Cancer; 2023 Oct 19-22; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B028.
Abstract B023: CNS and systemic pharmacokinetics of antibody-drug conjugate payloads through convection-enhanced delivery
Griffith, Jessica I. , Le, Jiayan, Porath, Kendra A. , Elmquist, William F. , Jain, Sonia , Bakken, Katrina K. , Sarkaria, Jann N.

Cancer Research | March 4, 2024 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 5_Supplement_1 | Pages: B023-B023

10.1158/1538-7445.brain23-b023 Get It

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors and accounts for more than 60% of primary brain tumors in adults [1]. While chemotherapy is a frequently employed treatment for GBM, its lack of specificity towards tumor cells leads to toxicity in healthy tissues. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a prevalent targeted-drug delivery strategy that may enhance the therapeutic window. ADC development for GBM has progressed in recent years, yet recent clinical trials have thus far failed to demonstrate drug efficacy [2]. This is likely attributed to poor brain penetration and heterogeneous drug distribution within GBM [3]. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is an invasive delivery method that can achieve direct administration of therapeutics to brain tumors and potentially could be used to enhance the delivery and efficacy of ADCs. This study investigates the CNS and systemic pharmacokinetics and distribution of similar payload molecules following CED administration of two GBM-targeting ADCs, ABBV-221 and ABT-414. The ADC payloads are monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF), respectively, and both are potent anti-tubulin toxins commonly used as warheads for ADCs. Both ADCs and free MMAE were administered as single doses to FVB mice via CED infusion or intraperitoneal (IP) injection. Plasma and brain samples were collected over 24 hours for ABBV-221 and 96 hours for ABT-414, and unconjugated payload molecules were quantified via LC-MS/MS analysis. The results showed that free (i.e., not bound to the targeting antibody) MMAE has a significantly higher exposure in brain compared to plasma when delivered via CED, and exposure in the right hemisphere was 10-fold higher than the left hemisphere, as the site of CED infusion was located in the right hemisphere for all trials. Similar results for MMAE payload were observed after the CED of ABBV-221. Systemic administration of ABBV-221 resulted in a nearly 100-fold decrease in unconjugated MMAE concentration in brain, indicating the poor brain penetration of the ADC. Similarly, following the CED of ABT-414, unconjugated payload concentration was the highest in right anterior brain among all brain regions, and plasma concentration was below the limit of quantification. Systemic injection of ABT-414 resulted in non-quantifiable payload concentrations in either brain or plasma samples. Taking these results as a whole, this study demonstrated significantly enhanced brain distribution of payload molecules from GBM-targeting ADCs following CED compared to systemic administration. The consistent payload delivery pattern observed in both ADCs further supports the potential of CED as an effective drug delivery method for the treatment of GBM. These findings highlight the promise of CED as a means to address the limitations of conventional chemotherapy and improve therapeutic outcomes in GBM treatment. 1. Sarkaria JN et al. Neuro Oncol. 2018; 20:184–91. 2. Lassman AB et al. Neuro Oncol. 2023; 25:339–50. 3. Marin B-M, et al. Neuro Oncol. 2021; 23:2042–53. Citation Format: Jessica I. Griffith, Jiayan Le, Kendra A. Porath, Sonia Jain, Katrina K. Bakken, Jann N. Sarkaria, William F. Elmquist. CNS and systemic pharmacokinetics of antibody-drug conjugate payloads through convection-enhanced delivery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Brain Cancer; 2023 Oct 19-22; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B023.