Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary brain tumor in adults, remains uniformly fatal due to the lack of effective targeted therapies for this aggressive malignancy. Genomic amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) occurs in 40-60% of primary GBM. Half of all EGFR-amplified cases of GBM also harbor EGFRvIII, a constitutively active, truncated variant of EGFR. The incidence of EGFR alterations in GBM makes inhibition of EGFR/EGFRvIII an attractive therapeutic approach. Depatuxizumab mafodotin (ABT-414) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of ABT-806, a mAB against EGFR, and a cytotoxic payload (monomethyl auristatin F). ABT-414 therapy initially showed promising results as an EGFRvIII therapy in vivo and in vitro; however, ABT414 failed to provide a survival benefit in phase I/II clinical trials, potentially due to therapeutic resistance. In this study, we seek to investigate the mechanisms of resistance to ABT-414 by performing whole exome, transcriptome and single cell RNA seq on ABT-414 resistant GBM PDX tumors. Our data showed an enrichment of mutations unique to the ABT-414 resistant tumors, including a point mutation (S466I) in TEK/TIE2 transmembrane angiopoietin receptor. In vitro expression of TEK S466I in GBM cells showed an increase in activation of ERK and STAT3 and increased TEK/TIE2 immunoprecipitation with EGFR compared to the wild-type TEK receptor. Furthermore, gene ontology analysis reveals that ABT-414-treated flank tumors exhibit increased activation of extracellular matrix organization and CNS developmental processes compared to flank tumors in the control treatment groups. ABT-414-treated tumors also demonstrate increased expression of inhibitor of differentiation (ID)1 and ID3, associated with stem-like phenotype in glioblastoma. Taken together, our data indicate that resistance to ABT-414 is mediated by both de novo mutations not detected in the parent tumor and adaptive dysregulation of pathways which may lead to dedifferentiation and therapeutic resistance.
Multimodal platform for assessing drug distribution and response in clinical trials
Abstract Background Response to targeted therapy varies between patients for largely unknown reasons. Here, we developed and applied an integrative platform using mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), phosphoproteomics, and multiplexed tissue imaging for mapping drug distribution, target engagement, and adaptive response to gain insights into heterogeneous response to therapy. Methods Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines of glioblastoma were treated with adavosertib, a Wee1 inhibitor, and tissue drug distribution was measured with MALDI-MSI. Phosphoproteomics was measured in the same tumors to identify biomarkers of drug target engagement and cellular adaptive response. Multiplexed tissue imaging was performed on sister sections to evaluate spatial co-localization of drug and cellular response. The integrated platform was then applied on clinical specimens from glioblastoma patients enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial. Results PDX tumors exposed to different doses of adavosertib revealed intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity of drug distribution and integration of the heterogeneous drug distribution with phosphoproteomics and multiplexed tissue imaging revealed new markers of molecular response to adavosertib. Analysis of paired clinical specimens from patients enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial informed the translational potential of the identified biomarkers in studying patient’s response to adavosertib. Conclusions The multimodal platform identified a signature of drug efficacy and patient-specific adaptive responses applicable to preclinical and clinical drug development. The information generated by the approach may inform mechanisms of success and failure in future early phase clinical trials, providing information for optimizing clinical trial design and guiding future application into clinical practice.
Heterogeneous delivery across the blood-brain barrier limits the efficacy of an EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugate in glioblastoma
Abstract Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important. Methods PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics. Results Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment. Conclusions Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.
Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of a Broad Panel of Patient-Derived Xenografts Reflects the Diversity of Glioblastoma
Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma is the most frequent and lethal primary brain tumor. Development of novel therapies relies on the availability of relevant preclinical models. We have established a panel of 96 glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and undertaken its genomic and phenotypic characterization. Experimental Design: PDXs were established from glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (n = 93), glioblastoma, IDH-mutant (n = 2), diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant (n = 1), and both primary (n = 60) and recurrent (n = 34) tumors. Tumor growth rates, histopathology, and treatment response were characterized. Integrated molecular profiling was performed by whole-exome sequencing (WES, n = 83), RNA-sequencing (n = 68), and genome-wide methylation profiling (n = 76). WES data from 24 patient tumors was compared with derivative models. Results: PDXs recapitulate many key phenotypic and molecular features of patient tumors. Orthotopic PDXs show characteristic tumor morphology and invasion patterns, but largely lack microvascular proliferation and necrosis. PDXs capture common and rare molecular drivers, including alterations of TERT, EGFR, PTEN, TP53, BRAF, and IDH1, most at frequencies comparable with human glioblastoma. However, PDGFRA amplification was absent. RNA-sequencing and genome-wide methylation profiling demonstrated broad representation of glioblastoma molecular subtypes. MGMT promoter methylation correlated with increased survival in response to temozolomide. WES of 24 matched patient tumors showed preservation of most genetic driver alterations, including EGFR amplification. However, in four patient–PDX pairs, driver alterations were gained or lost on engraftment, consistent with clonal selection. Conclusions: Our PDX panel captures the molecular heterogeneity of glioblastoma and recapitulates many salient genetic and phenotypic features. All models and genomic data are openly available to investigators.
DRES-12. QUANTIFYING INDIVIDUALIZED ABT-414 SENSITIVITY AND BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER PENETRANCE FROM SERIAL IMAGING OF PATIENT-DERIVED XENOGRAFTS MODELS OF GLIOBLASTOMA
Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor, known for its poor prognosis. Due to its diffuse invasiveness into normal-appearing brain, localized treatments such as surgical resection and radiotherapy are typically supplemented with chemotherapy. However, to reach invading tumor cells, such antineoplastic drugs must cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). That is, while angiogenesis induces BBB breakdown in dense tumor regions, the BBB remains rather intact for invading GBM cells. As a result, it is unclear whether BBB-impermeable drugs are delivered at a sufficient level to be effective. METHODS In order to study heterogeneity in BBB breakdown, experiments were conducted using both flank and intracranial patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) treated with the EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody drug conjugate, depatuxizumab mafodotin (ABT-414). Time-series bioluminescence imaging (BLI) data was used to develop a differential equation model of tumor growth for three PDX cell lines. Data from untreated PDXs, both in flank and intracranially, were used to parameterize tumor proliferation rates. Flank PDX data were used to parameterize individual sensitivity to ABT-414, whereas intracranial PDX data were used to determine the proportion of drug exposed to the tumor. RESULTS Each PDX line differed in response to the study drug ABT-414. As expected, such heterogeneous responses can primarily be attributed to differences in both drug sensitivity and the proportion of drug that reached the tumor. Notably, the estimated proportion of drug that reached the tumor was highest in the PDX line with the longest survival times, despite also having higher estimates of resistance. This suggests that PDXs with greater overall BBB breakdown may respond better to this agent. CONCLUSIONS Although more cell lines are needed to validate our approach, parameterizing this model for PDXs gives valuable insight into the extent of BBB breakdown in patient GBMs and may aid in determining optimal therapies for individual patients.
Automatic 3D Nonlinear Registration of Mass Spectrometry Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data
CADD-57. THE EFFICACY OF THERAPY WITH ABT-414, AN EGFR-TARGETING ADC, IS POTENTIALLY ALTERED BY HETEROZYGOUS DELETION OF THE ENDOCYTIC TRAFFICKING REGULATOR RBSN
Abstract Background: Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of firefly luciferase expressing cells is widely used for analysis of growth, metastasis and drug response in tumor xenografts. D-luciferin, a commonly used luciferase substrate, has limited brain distribution that may undermine BLI for intracranial xenografts. The synthetic luciferin cyclic alkylamino-luciferin (CycLuc1) is a purported brain penetrant luciferase substrate not yet tested in intracranial xenografts. We compared BLI with CycLuc1 and D-luciferin in a glioblastoma (GBM) xenograft model. Methods: GBM6 cells were lentivirally transduced to express LUC2=tdTomato fusion protein. In vivo BLI were performed in orthotopic and heterotopic xenografts established in athymic nude mice. Concentrations of D-luciferin and CycLuc1 were measured by LC-MS/MS. Results: In a dose-response analysis, CycLuc1 at 5 mg/kg provided robust and reproducible imaging; however, an increased photon flux was observed with 10 mg/kg, while escalation to 15 or 20 mg/kg provided marginal additional gains in photon flux. In comparison of CycLuc1 (5 or 25 mg/kg) and D-luciferin (30 or 150 mg/kg, respectively) with serial, crossover BLI at both dose levels, CycLuc1 resulted in less variability and significantly higher photon flux as compared to D-luciferin in GBM6 intracranial xenografts (15 days after implantation). On average BLI with 25 mg/kg CycLuc1 resulted in ~8 fold greater photon flux from these early-stage xenografts as compared to 150 mg/kg D-luciferin (2.9±0.6x106 vs. 3.3±2.8x105 p/sec/cm2, p<0.001). Interestingly, bioluminescence emission with CycLuc1 and D-luciferin was comparable in xenografts imaged 28 days after implantation. In samples harvested after last imaging session, there was no significant difference in substrate distribution in intracranial tumors (tumor to plasma ratios for CycLuc1 and D-luciferin were 0.012 ± 0.020 and 0.012 ± 0.015, respectively; p=0.89). These results suggest that intracranial tumors at early stage may comprise relatively intact blood-brain barrier, which is disrupted at later stage. Consistent with notion that suboptimal delivery may interfere with D-luciferin mediated BLI in intracranial xenografts, photon flux in heterotopic tumors with D-luciferin or CycLuc1 was comparable (4.9±4.6x108 vs. 1.3±0.8x108 p/sec/cm2, p=0.10). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that CycLuc1 may be a superior BLI substrate as compared to D-luciferin for monitoring tumor growth of intracranial GBM xenografts. Citation Format: Shiv K. Gupta, Minjee Kim, Bianca-Maria Marin, Lihong He, Katelyn Swanson, Tuma Tuma, Brett L. Carlson, Mark A. Schroeder, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Synthetic luciferin, CycLuc1, improves bioluminescence imaging for intracranial glioblastoma xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4112.