Zhou, Zhongxing

Abstract This article provides an overview of deep-learning–based techniques in CT image reconstruction and processing (referred to as “DLR”), covering technical implementations, performance evaluation, radiation dose reduction, and future perspectives. DLR methods can be categorized into projection-space, projection-to-image-space, image-space, and various hybrid techniques, with applications such as noise reduction, artefact correction, and spatial resolution enhancement. Performance evaluations include phantom-based studies, patient image-based studies, and virtual imaging trials. These evaluation studies demonstrated that DLR can effectively reduce image noise while preserving an image texture like in traditional filtered-backprojection (FBP) images, although the extent of radiation dose reduction varies widely depending on the study and the specific diagnostic task. Challenges remain in low-contrast lesion detection and characterization, where dose reduction may still be less than 50% compared to traditional reconstruction methods. Additionally, the potential for DLR methods to generate false structures or “hallucinations,” especially at low radiation doses, emphasizes the need for effective monitoring and mitigation strategies from both technical and clinical perspectives. Quantitative, accurate, and efficient evaluation techniques, such as virtual image trial-based methods, can be explored to help optimize these algorithms for reducing radiation dose and enhancing diagnostic performance.

Objectives: To determine the feasibility of reduced-dose chest computed tomographic angiography (CTA) with convolutional neural network (CNN) denoising for detecting pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (pAVMs) in children with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (cwHHT). Methods: Fifteen cwHHT underwent a chest CTA (ie, a controlled “study” dose). Noise was inserted to simulate a quarter dose (QD) exam. Images were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR) and our self-trained CNN denoising model. For each case, 3 sets of images were created: study dose (SD)+IR, QD+IR, and QD+CNN. Two thoracic radiologists independently scored each set to assess quality, spatial resolution, artifacts, and the presence of pAVMs using 4-level ordinal scales. Quantitative assessments of image quality were performed using contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) with comparisons made between the experimental conditions. Results: Thirteen of the 15 patients recruited with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (mean age: 9.3±4.5 y) were positive for pAVM by transthoracic contrast echocardiography. The sensitivities using QD+CNN were 0.85 and 1.00 for readers 1 and 2, respectively. This was compared with 0.69 and 0.84 using QD+IR versus 0.85 and 0.92 for SD+IR. Inter-reader agreement for pAVM detection utilizing QD+CNN was moderate and resulted in kappa=0.59 ( P =0.012). The subjective assessments for QD+CNN were comparable to the SD technique. Regression analysis of reader scores revealed improved quality in QD+CNN versus QD+IR ( P =0.001). Similarly, the QD+CNN condition demonstrated the highest CNRs. Conclusions: Reduced-dose chest CTA with CNN denoising provides a level of sensitivity comparable to standard dose CTA and high CNRs for the detection of pAVMs in cwHHT.

Abstract Objectives To develop a volume of interest (VOI) imaging technique in multi-detector-row helical CT to reduce radiation dose or improve image quality within the VOI. Methods A deep-learning method based on a residual U-Net architecture, named VOI-Net, was developed to correct truncation artifacts in VOI helical CT. Three patient cases, a chest CT of interstitial lung disease and 2 abdominopelvic CT of liver tumour, were used for evaluation through simulation. Results VOI-Net effectively corrected truncation artifacts (root mean square error [RMSE] of 5.97 ± 2.98 Hounsfield Units [HU] for chest, 3.12 ± 1.93 HU, and 3.71 ± 1.87 HU for liver). Radiation dose was reduced by 71% without sacrificing image quality within a 10-cm diameter VOI, compared to a full scan field of view (FOV) of 50 cm. With the same total energy deposited as in a full FOV scan, image quality within the VOI matched that at 350% higher radiation dose. A radiologist confirmed improved lesion conspicuity and visibility of small linear reticulations associated with ground-glass opacity and liver tumour. Conclusions Focusing radiation on the VOI and using VOI-Net in a helical scan, total radiation can be reduced or higher image quality equivalent to those at higher doses in standard full FOV scan can be achieved within the VOI. Advances in knowledge A targeted helical VOI imaging technique enabled by a deep-learning-based artifact correction method improves image quality within the VOI without increasing radiation dose.

AbstractBackgroundThe first commercially available photon‐counting‐detector CT (PCD‐CT) has been introduced for clinical use. However, its spectral performance on single‐ and dual‐contrast imaging tasks has not been comprehensively assessed.PurposeTo evaluate the spectral imaging performance of a clinical PCD‐CT system for single‐contrast material [iodine (I) or gadolinium (Gd)] and dual‐contrast materials (I and Gd) in comparison with a dual‐source dual‐energy CT (DS‐DECT).MethodsIodine (5, 10, and 15 mg/mL) and gadolinium (3.3, 6.6, and 9.9 mg/mL) samples, and their mixtures (I/Gd: 5/3.3 and 10/6.6 mg/mL) were prepared and placed in two torso‐shaped water phantoms (lateral dimensions: 30 and 40 cm). These phantoms were scanned on a PCD‐CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) at 90, 120, and 140 kV. The same phantoms were scanned on a DS‐DECT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens) with 70/Sn150, 80/Sn150, 90/Sn150, and 100/Sn150 kV. The radiation dose levels were matched [volume CT dose index (CTDIvol): 10 mGy for the 30 cm phantom and 20 mGy for the 40 cm phantom] across all tube voltage settings and between scanners. Two‐material decomposition (I/water or Gd/water) was performed on iodine or gadolinium samples, and three‐material decomposition (I/Gd/water) on both individual samples and mixtures. On each decomposed image, mean mass concentration (± standard deviation) was measured in circular region‐of‐interests placed on the contrast samples. Root‐mean‐square‐error (RMSE) values of iodine and gadolinium concentrations were reported based on the measurements across all contrast samples and repeated on 10 consecutive slices.ResultsFor all material decomposition tasks on the DS‐DECT, the kV pairs with greater spectral separation (70/Sn150 kV and 80/Sn150 kV) yielded lower RMSE values than other DS‐DECT and PCD‐CT alternatives. Specifically, for the optimal 70/Sn150 kV, RMSE values were 1.2 ± 0.1 mg/mL (I) for I/water material decomposition, 1.0 ± 0.1 mg/mL (Gd) for Gd/water material decomposition, and 4.5 ± 0.2 mg/mL (I) and 3.7 ± 0.2 mg/mL (Gd), respectively, for I/Gd/water material decomposition. On the PCD‐CT, the optimal tube voltages were 120 or 140 kV for I/water decomposition with RMSE values of 2.0 ± 0.1 mg/mL (I). For Gd/water decomposition on PCD‐CT, the optimal tube voltage was 140 kV with gadolinium RMSE values of 1.5 ± 0.1 mg/mL (Gd), with the 90 kV setting on PCD‐CT generating higher RMSE values for gadolinium concentration compared to all DS‐DECT and PCD‐CT alternatives. For three material decomposition, both imaging modalities demonstrated substantially higher RMSE values for iodine and gadolinium, with 90 kV being the optimal tube potential for Gd/I quantitation on PCD‐CT [5.4 ± 0.3 mg/mL (I) and 3.9 ± 0.2 mg/mL (Gd)], and DS‐DECT at 100/Sn150 kV having larger RMSE values for both materials compared to the alternatives for either modality.ConclusionOptimal tube voltage for material decomposition on the clinical PCD‐CT is task‐dependent but inferior to DS‐DECT using 70/Sn150 kV or 80/Sn150 kV in two‐material decomposition for single‐contrast imaging (iodine/water or gadolinium/water). Three material decomposition (iodine/gadolinium/water) in dual‐contrast imaging yields substantially higher RMSE for both imaging platforms.

Simultaneous dual-contrast imaging of iodine and bismuth has shown promise in prior phantom and animal studies utilizing spectral CT. However, it is noted that in previous studies, Pepto-Bismol has frequently been employed as the source of bismuth, exceeding the recommended levels for human subjects. This investigation sought to assess the feasibility of visually differentiating and precisely quantifying low-concentration bismuth using clinical dual-source photon-counting CT (PCCT) in a scenario involving both iodinated and bismuth-based contrast materials. Four bismuth samples (0.6, 1.3, 2.5, and 5.1 mg/mL) were prepared using Pepto-Bismol, alongside three iodine rods (1, 2, and 5 mg/mL), inserted into multi-energy CT phantoms with three different sizes, and scanned on a PCCT system at three tube potentials (120, 140, and Sn140 kV). A generic image-based three-material decomposition method generated iodine and bismuth maps, with mean mass concentrations and noise levels measured. The root-mean-square errors for iodine and bismuth determined the optimal tube potential. The tube potential of 140 kV demonstrated optimal quantification performance when both iodine and bismuth were considered. Distinct differentiation of iodine rods with all three concentrations and bismuth samples with mass concentrations ≥ 1.3 mg/mL was observed across all phantom sizes at the optimal kV setting.

AbstractBackgroundDeep‐learning‐based image reconstruction and noise reduction methods (DLIR) have been increasingly deployed in clinical CT. Accurate image quality assessment of these methods is challenging as the performance measured using physical phantoms may not represent the true performance of DLIR in patients since DLIR is trained mostly on patient images.PurposeIn this work, we aim to develop a patient‐data‐based virtual imaging trial framework and, as a first application, use it to measure the spatial resolution properties of a DLIR method.MethodsThe patient‐data‐based virtual imaging trial framework consists of five steps: (1) insertion of lesions into projection domain data using the acquisition geometry of the patient exam to simulate different lesion characteristics; (2) insertion of noise into projection domain data using a realistic photon statistical model of the CT system to simulate different dose levels; (3) creation of DLIR‐processed images from projection or image data; (4) creation of ensembles of DLIR‐processed patient images from a large number of noise and lesion realizations; and (5) evaluation of image quality using ensemble DLIR images. This framework was applied to measure the spatial resolution of a ResNet based deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) trained on patient images. Lesions in a cylindrical shape and different contrast levels (−500, −100, −50, −20, −10 HU) were inserted to the lower right lobe of the liver in a patient case. Multiple dose levels were simulated (50%, 25%, 12.5%). Each lesion and dose condition had 600 noise realizations. Multiple reconstruction and denoising methods were used on all the noise realizations, including the original filtered‐backprojection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (IR), and the DCNN method with three different strength setting (DCNN‐weak, DCNN‐medium, and DCNN‐strong). Mean lesion signal was calculated by performing ensemble averaging of all the noise realizations for each lesion and dose condition and then subtracting the lesion‐present images from the lesion absent images. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) both in‐plane and along the z‐axis were calculated based on the mean lesion signals. The standard deviations of MTFs at each condition were estimated with bootstrapping: randomly sampling (with replacement) all the DLIR/FBP/IR images from the ensemble data (600 samples) at each condition. The impact of varying lesion contrast, dose levels, and denoising strengths were evaluated. Statistical analysis with paired t‐test was used to compare the z‐axis and in‐plane spatial resolution of five algorithms for five different contrasts and three dose levels.ResultsThe in‐plane and z‐axis spatial resolution degradation of DCNN becomes more severe as the contrast or radiation dose decreased, or DCNN denoising strength increased. In comparison with FBP, a 59.5% and 4.1% reduction of in‐plane and z‐axis MTF (in terms of spatial frequencies at 50% MTF), respectively, was observed at low contrast (−10 HU) for DCNN with the highest denoising strength at 25% routine dose level. When the dose level reduces from 50% to 12.5% of routine dose, the in‐plane and z‐axis MTFs reduces from 92.1% to 76.3%, and from 98.9% to 95.5%, respectively, at contrast of −100 HU, using FBP as the reference. For most conditions of contrasts and dose levels, significant differences were found among the five algorithms, with the following relationship in both in‐plane and cross‐plane spatial resolution: FBP > DCNN‐Weak > IR > DCNN‐Medium > DCNN‐Strong. The spatial resolution difference among algorithms decreases at higher contrast or dose levels.ConclusionsA patient‐data‐based virtual imaging trial framework was developed and applied to measuring the spatial resolution properties of a DCNN noise reduction method at different contrast and dose levels using real patient data. As with other non‐linear image reconstruction and post‐processing techniques, the evaluated DCNN method degraded the in‐plane and z‐axis spatial resolution at lower contrast levels, lower radiation dose, and higher denoising strength.

AbstractBackgroundObjective and quantitative evaluation for low‐contrast detectability that correlates with human observer performance is lacking for routine CT quality control testing. Channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) is considered a strong candidate to fill the need but has long been deemed impractical to implement due to its requirement of a large number of repeated scans in order to provide accurate and precise estimates of index of detectability (d’). In our previous work, we optimized a CHO model observer on the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom and achieved accurate measurement of d’ with only 1–3 repeat scans.PurposeIn this work, we aim to validate the repeatability of the proposed CHO‐based low‐contrast evaluation on four scanner models using the ACR CT accreditation phantom.MethodsThe repeatability test was performed on four different scanners from two major CT manufacturers: Siemens Force and Alpha; Canon Prism and Prime SP. An ACR CT phantom was scanned 10 times, each time after repositioning of the phantom. For each repositioning, 3 repeated scans were acquired at 24, 12, and 6 mGy on all four scanner models. CHO was applied at the measured dose levels for different low‐contrast object sizes (4–6 mm). The CHO was also applied to images created using deep learning‐based reconstructions on Canon Prism and to four different scan/reconstruction modes on the Siemens Alpha, a photon‐counting‐detector (PCD)‐CT. The repeatability was evaluated by the probability that a measurement would fall within the ±15% tolerance (P<15%).ResultsWith the CHO setting optimized for the ACR phantom and the use of 3 repeated scans and 9 non‐overlapping slices per scan, the CHO measurement could provide high repeatability with P<15% of 98.8%–99.9% at 12 mGy with IR reconstruction on all four scanners. On scanner A, P<15% were 91.5%–99.9% at the three dose levels and for all three object sizes while the numbers were 93.6%–99.998% on scanner B. P<15% were 96.5%–97.2% for the two deep learning reconstructions and 97.0%–99.97% for the four scan/reconstruction modes on the PCD‐CT.ConclusionThe CHO provided highly repeatable measurements with over 95% probability that a CHO measurement would lie within the ±15% tolerance for most of the dose levels and object sizes on the ACR phantom. The repeatability was maintained when the CHO was applied to images created with a commercial deep learning‐based reconstruction and various scan/reconstruction modes on a PCD‐CT. This study demonstrates that practical implementation of CHO for routine quality control and performance evaluation is feasible.

Background and Purpose Recent introduction of photon counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) scanners into clinical practice further improve CT angiography (CTA) depiction of orbital arterial vasculature compared to conventional energy integrating detector (EID) CT scanners. PCD-CTA of the orbit can provide a detailed arterial roadmap of the orbit which can de diagnostic on its own or serve as a helpful planning adjunct for both diagnostic and therapeutic catheter-based angiography of the orbit. Methods For this review, EID and PCD-CT imaging was obtained in 28 volunteers. The volume CT dose index was closely matched. A dual-energy scanning protocol was used on EID-CT. An ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan mode was used on PCD-CT. Images were reconstructed at 0.6 mm slice thickness using a closely matched medium-sharp standard resolution (SR) kernel. High-resolution (HR) images with the sharpest quantitative kernel were also reconstructed on PCD-CT at the thinnest slice thickness of 0.2 mm. A denoising algorithm was applied to the HR image series. Results The imaging description of the orbital vascular anatomy presented in this work was derived from these patients’ PCD-CTA images in combination with review of the literature. We found that orbital arterial anatomy is much better depicted with PCD-CTA, and this work can serve primarily as an imaging atlas of the normal orbital vascular anatomy. Conclusion With recent advances in technology, arterial anatomy of the orbit is much better depicted with PCD-CTA as opposed to EID-CTA. Current orbital PCD-CTA technology approaches the necessary resolution threshold for reliable evaluation of central retinal artery occlusion.