Pankratz, V. Shane

Abstract Introduction: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), which is highly expressed in benign breast epithelium, is postulated to function as a tumor suppressor of breast cancer. Atypias of the breast increase the lifetime risk of breast cancer four-fold. However, little is known about ERβ expression in association with atypias or whether ERβ plays a role in mitigating breast cancer risk in high-risk individuals. We therefore undertook this study to examine the relationship of ERβ expression in atypias and adjacent normal lobules with the risk of subsequent breast cancer. Methods: We studied women in a well-characterized benign breast disease cohort with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) diagnosed from 1967 to 1991. Nuclear and cytoplasmic ERβ expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry in both the atypical hyperplasia epithelium (atypia) and background normal lobules for percent (scores 0-4 for <1%, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, >75%, respectively) and intensity (scores 0-3 for negative, weak, intermediate, strong, respectively) using a highly specific ERβ monoclonal antibody (PPG5/10). For nuclear staining, an ERβ sum score (percent + intensity, range 0-7) was created and grouped as low (0-2), moderate (3-5) or high (6-7). Competing risks regression was used to assess the association of ERβ expression with future breast cancer risk while also accounting for the competing risk of death from other causes. Results: 171 women, median age 56, were studied (79 ADH and 92 ALH). Median follow-up was 15 years overall, and 36 women developed breast cancer at a median of 13 years after their atypia biopsy. ERβ expression was lower in the atypia versus normal lobules whether evaluated by nuclear percent stained, nuclear intensity or cytoplasmic intensity (all p < 0.001). For nuclear staining specifically, ERβ expression in the atypia was low in 44 (26%), moderate in 117 (68%) and high in only 10 (6%) based on the sum score. In contrast, ERβ was higher in the normal lobules with a majority showing high expression (n = 96, 56%), moderate expression in 74 (43%) and low expression in only 1 (0.6%). Lower ERβ nuclear expression in the atypia was associated with increased breast cancer risk, whether evaluated by percent staining, intensity or sum score; the same was true for ERβ nuclear expression in the background normal lobules. Low ERβ expression in the atypia (sum score 0-2) was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of subsequent breast cancer compared to atypia with moderate-high expression (sum score 3-7), HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.02-3.8, p = 0.04. Lower ERβ expression in the normal lobules was also associated with an increased risk of future breast cancer: HR = 2.5 (95% CI: 1.3-5.1, p = 0.009) for low-moderate versus high expression. Conclusions: Increased ERβ expression in normal and atypical lobules was associated with a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer in our high-risk patient cohort. These data suggest that in women with atypical hyperplasia, ERβ expression is protective against the future development of breast cancer. ERβ may serve as a useful biomarker to further stratify breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease. Citation Format: Tina J. Hieken, Jodi M. Carter, John R. Hawse, IV, Tanya L. Hoskin, Marlene Frost, Lynn C. Hartmann, Derek C. Radisky, Daniel W. Visscher, Vernon S. Pankratz, Amy C. Degnim. ERβ expression and breast cancer risk prediction for women with atypias. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2014 Sep 27-Oct 1; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2015;8(10 Suppl): Abstract nr A03.

Abstract Purpose: Mammographic breast density is an established and strong risk factor for breast cancer. Recently, a number of common genetic susceptibility loci have been identified as risk factors for breast cancer. We present the first report on the relative contribution of 76 validated breast cancer susceptibility loci, in the context of a polygenic risk score (PRS), to the breast density and breast cancer association. We also examine whether the PRS improves prediction of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) 5-year risk model above and beyond breast density and clinical factors included in the model. Methods: The study population included 1643 cases and 2397 controls from three independent epidemiologic studies: the Mayo Mammography Health Study (MMHS), the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Study (MCBCS), and the Bavarian Breast Cancer Cases and Control Study (BBCC). Data collected on patients in each of the studies included clinical risk factor, BI-RADS breast density [a) almost entirely fat; b) scattered fibroglandular densities; c) heterogeneously dense; and d) extremely dense] and genotypes for the 76 breast cancer susceptibility loci known at the time of the study. We formed a PRS from the reported per-SNP odds ratios (OR) for 76 known breast cancer susceptibility loci, and evaluated whether BI-RADS density and the PRS were independent risk factors for breast cancer, when adjusted for age, 1/BMI and study. We also incorporated the PRS (OR) into the BCSC 5-year risk model and estimated 5-year risk for the MMHS nested case-control study of 339 invasive cases, 765 controls. Results: BI-RADS density (p<0.0001) and PRS (p<0.0001) were independent risk factors for breast cancer that together showed greater discrimination of risk (AUC=0.69) than density (AUC=0.66; ΔAUC=0.029) or PRS score alone (AUC=0.68; ΔAUC=0.013; p<0.001). Relative to those with scattered fibroglandular densities and average (2nd quartile) PRS, women with extremely dense breasts and in the highest PRS quartile, had a 2.7 fold (95%CI: 1.7-4.1) increased risk of breast cancer, while those with fatty breasts and in the lowest PRS quartile had a reduced risk (OR=0.30, 95%CI: 0.18-0.51). Incorporation of the PRS into the BCSC risk model improved discrimination (ΔAUC=0.031, p=0.001), for a net reclassification improvement of 20% (95%CI: 11%-28%), split equally among cases (9%) and controls (11%). Conclusion: BI-RADS density and the PRS are both important risk factors for breast cancer that can be included in breast cancer risk models to improve prediction of this disease. Using these models to identify high and low-risk risk groups will facilitate improved tailored screening and primary prevention interventions. Citation Format: Celine M. Vachon, V. Shane Pankratz, Christopher G. Scott, Lothar Haeberle, Elad Ziv, Matthew R. Jensen, Kathleen R. Brandt, Dana H. Whaley, Janet E. Olson, Katharina Heusinger, Carolin C. Hack, Sebastian M. Jud, Matthias W. Beckmann, Jeffrey A. Tice, Kristen S. Purrington, Thomas A. Sellers, Karla Kerlikowske, Peter A. Fasching, Fergus J. Couch. The contribution of common breast cancer susceptibility loci to the breast density and breast cancer association and the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) risk model. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 940. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-940

Abstract Introduction: Histologic characteristics of nonmalignant breast tissues (epithelial proliferation and involution) are associated with future breast cancer (BC) risk. We evaluated immune infiltration (lobulitis) in benign breast lobules and its association with features of BC risk. Methods: We analyzed archived nonmalignant breast tissue samples from 81 women in age-matched groups of varying cancer risk: 27 with benign breast disease (BBD) who later developed BC (cases), 27 with BBD without subsequent BC (controls), and 27 normal women without clinical breast disease from the Komen Tissue Bank at Indiana University (KTB). Up to 10 lobules in each sample were characterized by H&E for lobulitis, involution (none, partial, complete), and fibrocystic (FC) status (normal, nonproliferative, proliferative). Lobulitis was defined by H&E staining as lymphocyte nuclei in the intralobular stroma at low magnification and between adjacent acini at high magnification. Data was analyzed by mixed effects logistic regression. Results: Median age was 57 years (range 37-70). Among 81 breast tissue samples, 750 lobules were evaluated: 249 in BBD Cases, 265 in BBD Controls, and 236 in KTB donors. 56% of lobules were normal and 44% were FC, with 87% of FC lobules occurring in BBD samples. Lobulitis was present in 44% of lobules and varied according to subject age and individual lobule features. Younger women were more likely to have lobulitis (p=0.002); among women <50 the median proportion of lobules with lobulitis was 50%, versus 30% among women 50+. Lobulitis was less frequent in lobules with complete involution (37%) compared to partial (74%) or no involution (84%), p<0.0001. Lobulitis was common in normal lobules (52%) and decreased with increasing epithelial abnormality-39% of nonproliferative lobules and 27% of proliferative lobules (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis including all 3 variables, all 3 remained significantly associated with lobulitis: age (p=0.03), proliferation (p<0.0001), and involution (p=0.0001). Lobules with lobulitis were less frequent in groups of women with increased breast cancer risk-55% of lobules in normal KTB samples, 43% in BBD controls, and 35% in BBD cases (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Lobulitis is common in normal and benign breast tissue lobules but varies with age, involution status, and epithelial abnormality. Further work is needed to understand the role of immune infiltrates in breast cancer risk. Citation Format: Rushin D. Brahmbhatt, Daniel W. Visscher, Tanya L. Hoskin, Derek C. Radisky, Linda M. Murphy, Melody L. Stallings Mann, Erin Miller, Vernon S. Pankratz, Lynn C. Hartmann, Marlene H. Frost, Amy C. Degnim. Immune infiltration of normal and benign breast lobules varies in breast tissues based on cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1652. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1652

Abstract Background: Mammographic breast density (MBD) reflects the proportion of fibroglandular tissue in the breast, and is an established risk factor for breast cancer. Benign breast disease (BBD) is also a known risk factor for breast cancer. We previously showed an association between lobular involution (physiologic atrophy) and MBD in a large cohort study of women with BBD. We performed a comprehensive evaluation of the association of histologic features of BBD with MBD. Methods: The Mayo BBD cohort includes women, 18 to 85 years, who were diagnosed with BBD at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN between 01/01/1967 and 12/31/1991. For this study, we included women who had a mammogram within 6 months of BBD diagnosis, and diagnosed with BBD between 1985 and 1991 when parenchymal pattern of breast density was clinically recorded. Risk factor information such as age, and body mass index (BMI) was collected from medical records. Parenchymal pattern, assessed clinically and previously used in multiple studies of MBD and risk, classified breast density based on extent and type of density, into four categories: N1 (non-dense, no ducts visible); P1 (ductal prominence occupying <25% breast); P2 (prominent ductal pattern occupying >25% of the breast; DY (homogenous plaque-like areas of density). All assessments of benign breast tissue were performed by expert breast pathologists blinded to both MBD and BBD reports. Histologic characteristics included overall impression (non-proliferative disease (NPD), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), and atypical hyperplasia (AH)), proportion of normal lobules that were involuted (no (0%), partial (1 to 74%), or complete (≥75%)), type of AH (ADH or ALH), ductal and lobular hyperplasia, calcifications, sclerosing adenosis, columnar alteration, cyst, fibroadenoma, marked fibrosis, intra-ductal papilloma, radial scar (number and size), duct ectasia, and mucocele like tumors. Associations of parenchymal pattern with BBD characteristics were examined using multicategorical nominal logistic regression models. We first examined associations after adjustment for age and BMI. All variables statistically significant (p<0.05) in these models were then simultaneously included in a fully-adjusted model. Results: Of 2,257 women in the study, 14% were <40 years old, 52.7% between 40- 59 years, and 32.9% were ≥60 years. In this sample, 55.2% of women had NPD, 36% had PDWA, and AH in 8.8%. MBD was classified as N1 in 21.8%, P1 in 12.6%, P2 in 23.7% and DY in 41.9%. Age- and BMI-adjusted analyses showed that there was an association of parenchymal pattern with overall impression, lobular involution, ductal hyperplasia, sclerosing adenosis, columnar alteration, cyst, duct ectasia and fibrosis. Multivariate analyses found that women of younger age (p<0.001) and with lower BMI (p<0.001), presence of fibrosis (p<0.001) and no involution (p=0.016) were more likely to have P2 or DY parenchymal pattern than women without those characteristics. Conclusion: Among women with benign breast disease, higher MBD is associated with younger age, lower BMI, fibrosis, and lack of lobular involution. These findings, concordant with other studies of MBD, provide insight into underlying mechanisms by which MBD and BBD contribute to breast cancer risk. Citation Format: Karthik Ghosh, Robert A Vierkant, Ryan D Frank, Daniel W Visscher, Vernon S Pankratz, Christopher G Scott, Derek C Radisky, Marlene H Frost, Lynn C Hartmann, Amy C Degnim, Celine M Vachon. Association between mammographic breast density and histologic features of benign breast disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-14.

Abstract Introduction: Current models to predict breast cancer risk do not differentiate risk for estrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative breast cancer (BC), despite growing evidence that these tumors are biologically very different. We hypothesized that women with ER+ BC cancers have different clinical risk factors and histologic findings on prior benign breast biopsies than those with ER- BC. Methods: After IRB approval, we examined associations of age at benign biopsy and histologic features of the benign biopsy with ER status of incident BCs within the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort. Benign biopsy slides were reviewed for extent of lobular involution and degree of epithelial proliferation by a single breast pathologist blinded to BC events. Invasive BCs occurring within 15 years after benign biopsy were classified as ER+ if ER staining was >1%. BC case-only associations with ER status were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Full-cohort hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of ER-specific subtypes were estimated using Cox proportion hazards regression. Results: Among 13,410 women undergoing a benign breast biopsy from 1967-2001, 656 invasive BCs (459 ER+, 106 ER, 106 unknown) occurred within 15 years. Women who developed ER+ and ER- BCs were similar in age at the time of their prior benign breast biopsy (p=0.34). Although benign biopsies in women who later developed ER+ BC were more likely to show complete involution (23% vs 15% for ER- BC), this was not statistically significant (p=0.06). However, the degree of epithelial proliferation was significantly associated with ER status of later BCs (p=0.001), with ER+ BCs more likely than ER- BCs to have had a prior biopsy with atypical hyperplasia (16% vs 8%), and ER+ BCs less likely than ER- BCs to have had a prior biopsy with proliferative disease without atypia (33% vs 52%); this association remained after multivariate adjustment (p=0.003). We further pursued the association of epithelial proliferation with differential risk of ER+ and ER- BC in our overall cohort of 13,410 women (Table 1). Compared to women with non-proliferative disease, women with proliferative disease +/- atypia had ∼2-fold hazard ratios for ER- BC, whereas hazard ratios for ER+ BC were higher in women with atypical hyperplasia (∼4-fold) compared to proliferative disease. Hazard Ratio of ER+ and ER- BC within 15 years of BBD based upon degree of epithelial proliferation at benign biopsyCancer TypeGroupNN EventsHazard Ratio (95% CI)p-valueInvasive ER- ≤15 yearsNP8478421.00 (ref)<0.0001 PD4229542.63 (1.76, 3.93) AH70382.60 (1.22, 5.54) Invasive ER+ ≤15 yearsNP84782321.00 (ref)<0.0001 PD42291511.33 (1.09, 1.64) AH703744.41 (3.39, 5.73) NP=nonproliferative disease, PD=proliferative disease without atypia; AH=atypical hyperplasia Conclusion: ER+ and ER- breast cancers appear to have different features on prior benign breast biopsy, with atypical hyperplasia showing increased risk for both types of breast cancer, but a greater risk for ER+ tumors. Citation Format: Amy C Degnim, Derek C Radisky, Robert A Vierkant, Ryan D Frank, Marlene H Frost, Vernon S Pankratz, Celine M Vachon, Tanya L Hoskin, Julie M Cunningham, Chen Wang, Jean-Pierre Kocher, Teresa M Allers, Joanne L Johnson, Tina J Hieken, Karthik Ghosh, Lynn C Hartmann, Daniel W Visscher. Histologic features of benign breast biopsy tissue and association with ER positive and ER negative breast cancer in the Mayo BBD cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-06.

Abstract Background: Guidelines recommend germline mutation testing of breast cancer predisposition genes in triple negative (TN) breast cancer cases with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer or when diagnosed under age 60. However, the prevalence of mutations in these genes among TN cases unselected for family history of breast or ovarian cancer is not known. Methods: To assess the frequency of mutations in 16 predisposition genes in TN cases we screened a large cohort of TN patients (n=1824) unselected for family history of breast or ovarian cancer from 12 centers and 824 study matched unaffected controls for mutations using a panel-based sequencing approach. Results: Deleterious mutations were identified in 15% of TN patients: 8.5% had BRCA1, 2.7% had BRCA2, and 3.6% had mutations in 12 other genes. Mutations in non-BRCA1/2 genes encoding proteins implicated in homologous recombination repair of DNA double strand breaks were detected at the same frequency as in breast cancer families. TN cases with mutations had high-grade tumors and were diagnosed at an earlier age than non-mutated cases. However, 10% of TN cases diagnosed at ≥60 years and 5% with no family history of cancer were also found to carry mutations. Inactivating mutations in non-BRCA1/2 predisposition genes were associated with moderate to high risks of TN breast cancer. Conclusions: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines support clinical genetic testing of breast cancer predisposition genes in 95% of TN breast cancer patients carrying mutations in susceptibility genes. In contrast, National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines in the U.K. do not support genetic testing of a substantial proportion of TN patients with predisposing alleles. Frequency tables for inherited mutations in known predisposition genes based on age of diagnosis and family history of cancer will allow for selection of TN patients most likely to carry mutations in the predisposition genes. Citation Format: Fergus J Couch, Steven N Hart, Priyanka Sharma, Amanda Ewart Toland, Penelope Miron, Janet E Olson, Andrew Godwin, Vernon S Pankratz, Curtis Olswold, Seth Slettedahl, Lucia Guidugli, Matthias W Beckmann, Brigitte Rack, Arif B Ekici, Irene Konstantopoulou, Florentia Fostira, George Fountzilas, Liisa M Pelttari, Song Yao, Judy Garber, Angela Cox, Hiltrud Brauch, Christine Ambrosone, Heli Nevanlinna, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Susan L Slager, Celine M Vachon, Diana M Eccles, Peter A Fasching. Triple-negative breast cancer: Frequency of inherited mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-03.

Abstract Introduction: We recently reported the percentage of mammographic density (MD) to be a breast cancer risk factor across tumor characteristics and age groups. Yet, we noted stronger associations for tumors of large size and positive lymph nodes across all ages, and ER-negative status among women ages <55 years, suggesting high MD may play an important role in tumor aggressiveness, especially in younger women. We extend this initial study to investigate whether these associations with aggressive disease are due to the underlying associations of absolute dense or non-dense area, or both, with breast cancer risk. Methods: Data were pooled from six studies including 3517 women with invasive breast cancer and 8558 without. Dense area and non-dense area were assessed from digitized film-screen mammograms using a computer-assisted threshold technique. We standardized dense and non-dense area measurements made within each study and categorized into quartiles based on the control distribution for pooled analyses. We used polytomous logistic regression to calculate breast cancer odds according to tumor type, histopathological characteristics, and receptor (ER, PR) status by age (<55, 55-64, and ≥65 years), adjusting for continuous age, body mass index, and study site. Results: Absolute dense area was associated with increased breast cancer risk [odds ratios (ORs) Q1 vs Q2: 0.67, Q3 vs Q2: 1.25, Q4 vs Q2: 1.62] and non-dense area was associated with decreased breast cancer risk (ORs: Q1 vs Q2: 1.44, Q3 vs Q2: 0.89, Q4 vs Q2: 0.71) overall and across all age groups. Positive associations for absolute dense area were observed across all invasive tumor characteristics. Stronger associations were noted for larger tumors across all ages (p-trend <0.01). Among women <55 years, stronger associations were observed for ER+ vs ER- [p-heterogeneity (het) = 0.02] and PR+ vs PR- tumors (p-het = 0.02). Non-dense area was inversely associated with all tumor characteristics evaluated except for tumors <1.1 cm, for which no association was present. The inverse association was stronger for larger tumors, particularly for women <55 years (p-trend <0.01). Also among women <55 years, a stronger inverse association with non-dense area was observed for ER- vs. ER+ tumors (p-het = 0.02). Conclusion: These results suggest the strong association we previously observed of high percent MD and ER-negative disease in women <55 years could be explained by the low amount of non-dense area in these women. Further research is warranted to clarify the possible differential associations of absolute dense and non-dense area on breast cancer risk according to tumor characteristics. Citation Format: Kimberly A. Bertrand, Christopher G. Scott, Rulla M. Tamimi, Matthew R. Jensen, V. Shane Pankratz, Aaron Norman, John Shepherd, Yunn-Yi Chen, Karla Kerlikowske, Celine M. Vachon. Dense and non-dense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3279. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3279

Abstract Recent studies have shown that associations between common genetic variation and gene expression in breast tumors provide insight into the functional mechanisms underlying breast cancer risk loci. However, the relationship between genetic variation, gene expression, and risk of triple negative (TN) breast cancer remains largely unexplored. We performed a genome-wide expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis of TN breast cancer using 668 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded TN tumors from the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC) to identify novel genes relevant to TN breast cancer risk and to further explore the biology underlying known TN risk loci. Cis-eQTLs were defined as correlations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and expression of genes within 1Mb, and trans-eQTLs were defined as the remainder of all SNP-gene correlations. In a genome-wide analysis, we identified 68,012 cis-eQTLs, representing correlations between 42,193 SNPs and 2,092 genes that were significant at a 10% false discovery rate (FDR). We also identified 70 trans-eQTLs across two unique genes at the same FDR threshold. Five cis-eQTLs involved SNPs previously associated with TN breast cancer risk (p<5.0x10-5) in 3,700 TN cases and 4,700 controls from the TNBCC. Three of these, located on chromosomes 5p (cis-eQTL p=4.8x10-34; risk p=1.1x10-7), 7p (cis-eQTL p=6.1x10-10; risk p=1.3x10-7), and 17q (cis-eQTL p=1.8x10-15; risk p=2.9x10-7), have previously been reported in public databases of normal tissue. The remaining two TN breast cancer cis-eQTLs, located on chromosomes 8q (cis-eQTL p=6.3x10-6, risk p=8.3x10-6) and 14q (cis-eQTL p=3.1x10-6, risk p=1.2x10-5), have not been reported as eQTLs in other tissues. In addition, 12 of 25 known TN breast cancer risk loci (PEX14, MDM4, 2q31.1, ESR1, 11q13.1, 11q24.3, 12p13.1, PTHLH, NTN4, 12q24, 19p13.1, MLK1), contained at least one significant cis-eQTL. In summary, we have identified five cis-eQTLs that may identify novel risk loci for TN breast cancer. Citation Format: Kristen S. Purrington, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Jane Carpenter, Heli Nevanlinna, Angela Cox, Gianluca Severi, Christine Ambrosone, Amanda Ewart Toland, Andrew K. Godwin, Hiltrud Brauch, Peter A. Fasching, Penelope Miron, Jenny Chang-Claude, Nicholas G. Martin, Grant W. Montgomery, Vessela Kristensen, Hoda Anton-Culver, Paul Goodfellow, Janet E. Olson, Hugues Sicotte, Naresh Prodduturi, Daniel W. Visscher, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, S. Keith Anderson, Seth Slettedahl, Curtis Olswold, Xianshu Wang, V. Shane Pankratz, Susan Slager, Wei Zheng, Arto Mannermaa, Ute Hamann, Diana M. Eccles, Celine M. Vachon, Fergus J. Couch. Expression quantitative trait locus analysis of triple negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3266. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3266

Abstract Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P < 10−5). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk. Cancer Res; 75(12); 2457–67. ©2015 AACR.