Allers, Teresa M.

Abstract Introduction: The immune microenvironment of the breast is critical in the development and progression of breast cancer. By analyzing the immune components of breast tissues from patients at varying degrees of breast cancer risk, we may gain enhanced understanding of breast cancer risk and mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Methods: We compared the immune cell composition in breast lobules of age-matched patients with normal and benign breast disease (BBD) at progressively lower breast cancer risk: 1) 18 women with germline mutations in (BRCA1/2); 2) women at intermediate risk (BBD), and 3) women at normal risk (Komen Tissue Bank- (KTB)). We performed immunohistochemical stains for T lymphocytes (CD4, CD8); dendritic cells (CD11c); B lymphocytes (CD20) and macrophages (CD68) and quantitated immune cell densities in up to 10 representative lobules per sample. Results: The median age of all groups was 43.8 years (range: 34-67). BRCA carriers and BBD patients had a higher percentage of fibrocystic lobules (50% fibrocystic) compared to KTB samples (15% fibrocystic), p<0.001. BRCA carriers had significantly higher densities of CD4, CD8, CD11c, and CD68 positive immune cells compared to KTB donor breast tissues, see Table. Compared with BBD patients, mutation carriers had higher densities of CD8+ cells and suggestively higher CD4+ cells, with similar results for other markers assessed. Conclusions: Preliminarily, these data showed that benign prophylactic breast tissues from BRCA mutation carriers contain increased numbers of several immune cell types versus tissues from patients at lower breast cancer risk, including BBD patients and research tissue donors. Further investigation is needed to confirm and expand these findings in relation to breast cancer risk. Table: Pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum p-values comparing immune cell densities in breast lobules from women with BRCA germline mutations, vs BBD and KTB groups. All Lobules BRCA BBD KTB BRCA vs BBD BRCA vs KTB Median Median Median p-value p-value (IQR) (IQR) (IQR) CD4+, cells/mm2 116.3 63.8 17.7 0.08 <0.001 (46.4-183.6) (25.0-121.1) (13.3-40.6) CD8+, cells/mm2 354.4 200 150.9 0.01 <0.001 (285.5-473.2) (118.9-385) (110.1-225.0) CD11c+, % pp 3.5 3.4 0.4 0.66 <0.001 (1.9-6.8) (1.6-4.7) (0-0.6) CD20+, cells/mm2 6.2 16.7 0 0.16 0.65 (0-25.4) (0-58.3) (0-20.8) CD68, cells/mm2 237.5 219 57.8 0.99 <0.001 (122.9-281.8) (75.0-459.4) (29.2-100.0) IQR - Interquartile Range pp - pixel positive Citation Format: Joshua W. Ogony, Tanya L. Hoskin, Melody L. Stallings Mann, Stacey J. Winham, Rushin Brahmbhatt, Muhammad Asad Arshad, Alvaro Pena Jimenez, Teresa M. Allers, Mark E. Sherrman, Daniel W. Visscher, Derek C. Radisky, Amy C. Degnim. Immune biomarkers in breast tissues of patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, benign breast disease, and normal tissue donors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5947.

Abstract Background: Women with benign breast disease (BBD) are at increased risk of breast cancer (BC). Classic studies based on film-based mammographic screening and pathology diagnosis of surgical biopsies conducted in the 1980s established a hierarchy of increasing BC risk: non-proliferative (NP) BBD, proliferative BBD without atypia (PDWA) and atypical hyperplasia (AH). Given changes in epidemiological BC risk factors and introduction of percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) in mid-1990s, and later, digital mammography, we hypothesized that the patient characteristics and relative frequency of BBD diagnoses have changed over time. Accordingly, we performed a longitudinal analysis of the frequency of patient characteristics and BBD diagnoses in the Mayo BBD cohort. Methods: Utilizing the Mayo Clinic Surgical and Pathology Indices, women ages 18 to 85 who had a BBD biopsy between 1/1/67 and 12/31/13 were identified. Breast pathologists reviewed biopsies masked to diagnoses of incident BC diagnosed in follow-up. Demographic characteristics and BC events were obtained by query of institutional data sources and participant surveys. Trends were evaluated for the following eras: 1: pre-mammogram (1967-1981), 2: pre-CNB (1982-1992), 3: CNB Transition (1993-2001), and 4: CNB (2002-2013). Demographics were formally compared across eras using chi-square tests for categorical variables and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) for continuous variables. Results: From 1967-2013, the cohort includes 19,582 unique women with BBD. The frequency of CNB increased from eras 1-4: 0.04%, 0.6%, 51.3 %, and 88.9%, respectively. Mean age at BBD diagnosis was younger in era 1 (48.0 years) vs eras 2-4 (53.2, 52.0, and 51.8, respectively, p<0.001). The percentage of biopsies diagnosed as PDWA increased from era 1-4 (25.7%, 34.3%, 35.2%, 46.2%, p<0.001), as did the percentage with AH (2.4%, 5.1%, 8.6%, 12.3%, p<0.001). Over eras 1-4, the percentages of women with a strong family history of BC increased (9.9%, 12.7%, 17.1%, and 29.0%, p<0.001) as did mean BMI (24.8, 26.4, 27.4, and 28.6, p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 10.9 years, 1,719 breast cancers have developed, with increasing proportion of noninvasive (DCIS-only) disease across eras 1-4: 15.0%, 21.1%, 21.2%, and 33.2%, p< 0.001. Conclusions: Analysis of this large, single institution BBD cohort for the 46 year period 1967-2013 demonstrates that BC risk factors among BBD patients has changed over time, with subjects demonstrating increasing age, BMI, and family history, and that the percentages of BBD classified as PDWA and AH have increased. Impact on BC risk will be further investigated. Citation Format: Amy Degnim, Karthik Ghosh, Jodi M Carter, Robert A Vierkant, Matthew R Jensen, Stacey J Winham, Tanya L Hoskin, Marlene Frost, Teresa M Allers, Denise L Gehling, Mindy J Kern, Laura M Pacheco-Spann, Celine M Vachon, Derek C Radisky, Daniel W Visscher, Mark E Sherman. Benign breast disease: Temporal trends from 1967 to 2013 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-11.

Abstract Introduction: Current models to predict breast cancer risk do not differentiate risk for estrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative breast cancer (BC), despite growing evidence that these tumors are biologically very different. We hypothesized that women with ER+ BC cancers have different clinical risk factors and histologic findings on prior benign breast biopsies than those with ER- BC. Methods: After IRB approval, we examined associations of age at benign biopsy and histologic features of the benign biopsy with ER status of incident BCs within the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort. Benign biopsy slides were reviewed for extent of lobular involution and degree of epithelial proliferation by a single breast pathologist blinded to BC events. Invasive BCs occurring within 15 years after benign biopsy were classified as ER+ if ER staining was >1%. BC case-only associations with ER status were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Full-cohort hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of ER-specific subtypes were estimated using Cox proportion hazards regression. Results: Among 13,410 women undergoing a benign breast biopsy from 1967-2001, 656 invasive BCs (459 ER+, 106 ER, 106 unknown) occurred within 15 years. Women who developed ER+ and ER- BCs were similar in age at the time of their prior benign breast biopsy (p=0.34). Although benign biopsies in women who later developed ER+ BC were more likely to show complete involution (23% vs 15% for ER- BC), this was not statistically significant (p=0.06). However, the degree of epithelial proliferation was significantly associated with ER status of later BCs (p=0.001), with ER+ BCs more likely than ER- BCs to have had a prior biopsy with atypical hyperplasia (16% vs 8%), and ER+ BCs less likely than ER- BCs to have had a prior biopsy with proliferative disease without atypia (33% vs 52%); this association remained after multivariate adjustment (p=0.003). We further pursued the association of epithelial proliferation with differential risk of ER+ and ER- BC in our overall cohort of 13,410 women (Table 1). Compared to women with non-proliferative disease, women with proliferative disease +/- atypia had ∼2-fold hazard ratios for ER- BC, whereas hazard ratios for ER+ BC were higher in women with atypical hyperplasia (∼4-fold) compared to proliferative disease. Hazard Ratio of ER+ and ER- BC within 15 years of BBD based upon degree of epithelial proliferation at benign biopsyCancer TypeGroupNN EventsHazard Ratio (95% CI)p-valueInvasive ER- ≤15 yearsNP8478421.00 (ref)<0.0001 PD4229542.63 (1.76, 3.93) AH70382.60 (1.22, 5.54) Invasive ER+ ≤15 yearsNP84782321.00 (ref)<0.0001 PD42291511.33 (1.09, 1.64) AH703744.41 (3.39, 5.73) NP=nonproliferative disease, PD=proliferative disease without atypia; AH=atypical hyperplasia Conclusion: ER+ and ER- breast cancers appear to have different features on prior benign breast biopsy, with atypical hyperplasia showing increased risk for both types of breast cancer, but a greater risk for ER+ tumors. Citation Format: Amy C Degnim, Derek C Radisky, Robert A Vierkant, Ryan D Frank, Marlene H Frost, Vernon S Pankratz, Celine M Vachon, Tanya L Hoskin, Julie M Cunningham, Chen Wang, Jean-Pierre Kocher, Teresa M Allers, Joanne L Johnson, Tina J Hieken, Karthik Ghosh, Lynn C Hartmann, Daniel W Visscher. Histologic features of benign breast biopsy tissue and association with ER positive and ER negative breast cancer in the Mayo BBD cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-06.

Abstract Background: Women with benign breast disease (BBD) have increased breast cancer risk, and histologic features of the lesion stratify individual risk. We hypothesized that the concentration and type of terminal duct lobular units in BBD tissue is associated with future breast cancer risk. Methods: A nested case-control series of 770 breast cancer cases and 1273 age- and year of biopsy-matched controls was identified within a cohort of 13,647 women with BBD from 1967-2001 (median follow-up 15.3 years). One representative H&E slide from each biopsy was reviewed by a single pathologist, who recorded total # of lobules present, and # of fibrocystic lobules (total and # with epithelial proliferation). Samples were also evaluated for lobular involution and primary BBD histology. Lobule density (LD) was calculated as # of lobules/cm2 in each tissue section. Breast cancer associations with LD's (total, fibrocystic, proliferative) were examined with conditional logistic regression. Odds ratios are reported per 1 SD increase in LD. Results: Each LD measure was significantly associated with involution and primary BBD histology (p<0.0001 for each). Fibrocystic (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.28) and proliferative (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61) LD were each associated with case status (p≤0.001) but total LD did not reach significance (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.0-1.20; p=0.06). LD associations were somewhat attenuated after adjusting for involution (total OR 1.04 p=0.41; fibrocystic OR 1.13 p=0.02; proliferative OR 1.28 p=0.002) and primary BBD histology (total OR 1.04 p=0.49; fibrocystic OR 1.08 p=0.15; proliferative OR 1.18 p=0.07). Conclusions: The density of proliferative lobules in benign breast biopsy tissue is related to other BBD histologic features but may provide additional breast cancer risk stratification among women with proliferative BBD. Additional research will more fully evaluate the ability of this promising novel measure to predict breast cancer risk. Lobule Density Measures (lobules per square cm) All values are Medians Total Lobule Density Fibrocystic Lobule Density Proliferative Lobule Density Overall 17.5 4.5 0.7 Cases 18.1 4.9 1.3 Controls 17.0 4.2 0.4 Primary BBD Histology Nonproliferative disease 16 3.3 0 Proliferative disease 18.6 5.8 2.7 Atypical hyperplasia 20.9 6.2 3.3 Involution Category None 28.7 5.3 1.0 Partial 19.0 5 1.2 Complete 8.5 2.1 0 Citation Format: Amy C. Degnim, Lynn C. Hartmann, Tanya L. Hoskin, Marlene H. Frost, V Shane Pankratz, Derek C. Radisky, Lorelle L. Benetti, Celine M. Vachon, Teresa M. Allers, Robert A. Vierkant, Daniel W. Visscher. Density of breast lobules in benign breast tissue and association with future breast cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 155. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-155

Abstract Background: Epithelial proliferation in benign breast disease (BBD) is a well-established biomarker of breast cancer risk, and BBD tissues can be used as a platform to assess other biomarkers for breast cancer risk. Lobular involution (the degree of age-related atrophy in lobules) is a new biomarker, with greater degrees of involution associated with lower breast cancer risk. Successful application of tissue biomarkers of risk to breast tissues from normal women would be valuable for risk prediction in the general population. We hypothesized that normal breast tissue samples would differ from BBD tissues in these histologic features of breast cancer risk, with less epithelial proliferation but a similar degree of involution compared to BBD tissues. Methods: Core biopsy samples from the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort Study were compared to core biopsy samples of normal breast tissue obtained from the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Tissue Bank at IU Simon Cancer Center (KTB), a unique resource of breast tissue from donor women without any known breast abnormalities. All core biopsies were assessed histologically by a single breast pathologist for degree of epithelial proliferation (classified as non-proliferative, proliferative without atypia, or atypical hyperplasia) and extent of lobular involution (classified as none, 1-24%, 25-74%, or >75% of lobules). Data were analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression. Results: Overall, 318 Mayo BBD and 303 normal (KTB) core breast biopsy samples were evaluated. As anticipated, significantly less epithelial proliferation was present in normal samples compared to BBD samples. Proliferative disease occurred in 9/303 (3%) of normals versus 79/318 (25%) of BBD, and atypical hyperplasia was seen in 2/303 (0.7%) of normal samples versus 24/318 (8%) of BBD core biopsies, p < 0.0001. This difference remained significant after adjusting for age (which was greater overall in the BBD samples). Complete involution was more frequent in normal compared to BBD tissues, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The age-adjusted odds ratio of complete involution in normal versus BBD tissues was 1.46 (95% CI 0.98-2.17, p = 0.06), suggesting a possible delay or failure of involution in women with BBD. Conclusions: Histologic features of normal breast tissues are different from those of BBD tissues, with less epithelial proliferation and more lobular involution, consistent with a lower risk of breast cancer expected for women with normal breast tissue compared to those with benign breast disease. Normal breast tissues are a valuable and distinct resource that should be considered for biomarker validation studies. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(12 Suppl):B23.