Friedman, Paul A.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and prognosis of right bundle branch block (RBBB) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are unknown. Hence, we sought to characterize the incidence of post-TAVR RBBB and determine associated risks of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and mortality. METHODS: All patients 18 years and above without preexisting RBBB or PPM who underwent TAVR at US Mayo Clinic sites and Mayo Clinic Health Systems from June 2010 to May 2021 were evaluated. Post-TAVR RBBB was defined as new-onset RBBB in the postimplantation period. The risks of PPM implantation (within 90 days) and mortality following TAVR were compared for patients with and without post-TAVR RBBB using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. The risks of PPM implantation (within 90 days) and mortality following TAVR were compared for patients with and without post-TAVR RBBB using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of 1992 patients, 15 (0.75%) experienced new RBBB post-TAVR. There was a higher degree of valve oversizing among patients with new RBBB post-TAVR versus those without (17.9% versus 10.0%; P =0.034). Ten patients (66.7%) with post-TAVR RBBB experienced high-grade atrioventricular block and underwent PPM implantation (median 1 day; Q1, 0.2 and Q3, 4), compared with 268/1977 (13.6%) without RBBB. Following propensity score adjustment for covariates (age, sex, balloon-expandable valve, annulus diameter, and valve oversizing), post-TAVR RBBB was significantly associated with PPM implantation (hazard ratio, 8.36 [95% CI, 4.19–16.7]; P <0.001). No statistically significant increase in mortality was seen with post-TAVR RBBB (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.33–2.11]; P =0.69), adjusting for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequent, post-TAVR RBBB was associated with elevated PPM implantation risk. The mechanisms for its development and its clinical prognosis require further study.

Background: Atrial septal defects (ASD) and ventricular septal defects (VSD) are among the most common forms of congenital heart disease (CHD). Early detection and intervention for these defects are crucial to prevent complications. Given advancements in AI technology, the development of AI-enabled ECG models for detecting these defects is of significant interest. Aims: This study aimed to create AI models using pediatric ECG data for the detection of ASD, VSD, and a combined model detecting either ASD or VSD. Methods: We analyzed a dataset of 7,795 pediatric patients from Mayo Clinic who had undergone echocardiography between 2002 and 2022, with corresponding 10-second, 12-lead surface ECGs taken within 14 days of echocardiography. This dataset included 259 patients with ASDs and 139 patients with VSDs (single or multiple). The control group was comprised of 7,397 patients without significant or complex CHD. For cases and controls, we included patients with all forms of electrocardiographic abnormalities and those with valvular lesions who had less than moderate stenosis or regurgitation. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and testing subsets to develop convolutional neural network (CNN) models for ASD, VSD, and either ASD or VSD detection. Results: Our ASD and VSD detection models achieved test AUCs of 0.82 (95% CI 0.76, 0.88) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.70, 0.90), respectively. Meanwhile, a combined model that detected either ASD or VSD demonstrated a test AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76, 0.86), sensitivity of 0.73, specificity of 0.76, PPV of 0.14, and NPV of 0.98 (Figure 1). Conclusions: AI-enabled ECG models demonstrate promising performance in detecting ASD and VSD in pediatric patients. A combined model that detects either ASD or VSD also shows robust results. Future research should focus on multi-center validation of these models, refining their diagnostic capacities, and investigating their potential for early intervention in CHDs.

Introduction: Left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD and RVSD respectively) contribute to considerable pediatric morbidity. Both LVSD and RVSD can occur in children before symptom onset, emphasizing the need for early detection. Existing deep-learning algorithms can identify LVSD in adults using 12-lead ECG; however, their efficacy in children is uncertain. Aims: We aimed to create a deep-learning model for LVSD and RVSD detection in pediatric patients using an AI-enabled ECG and compare novel pediatric models to a previously validated adult LVSD model. Methods: We identified 10,214 pediatric patients at the Mayo Clinic with a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and a 10-second, 12-lead surface ECG within 14 days of TTE, performed from 2002 -2022. Our cohort comprised the first TTE-ECG pair from each patient, totaling 138 with EF ≤ 35%, 312 with EF ≤ 50%, 482 with RVSD, and 9,567 without any LVSD or RVSD. The cohort was split into training, validation, and testing datasets to develop neural networks for systolic dysfunction detection. Results: The cohort was 52.3% male, with an average age of 10.3 years. Novel models generated in the pediatric cohort demonstrated excellent performance in systolic dysfunction detection (Figure 1). Pediatric models for EF ≤ 35% and EF ≤ 50% achieved test AUCs of 0.92 (95% CI 0.89, 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.85, 0.94) respectively. The RVSD model reached a test AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88, 0.94). A combined model for EF ≤ 35% or RVSD exhibited a test AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.87, 0.93), sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.82, PPV 0.20, and NPV 0.95. A combined model for EF ≤ 50% or RVSD exhibited a test AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85, 0.91). The previously validated adult data-derived model achieved an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83, 0.89) for EF ≤ 50% in children. Conclusions: AI-enabled ECGs demonstrate efficient detection of both LVSD and RVSD in pediatric patients. Future multi-site validation is needed to further establish the reliability of these models.

Background: Enlargement or dilation of the left ventricle (LV) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and is an established precursor of ventricular dysfunction and heart failure in almost all major cardiovascular conditions. Although there are existing artificial intelligence frameworks that make use of deep learning to detect LV enlargement, many entail LV segmentation, which can be error-prone especially for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) images. Goal: To develop a fully end-to-end deep learning framework that takes as input either transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) or POCUS 2D image clips, and classifies directly (i.e., without first segmenting the LV) whether a patient has an enlarged LV. Methods: Using a sample of retrospective TTE data enriched for LV enlargement (out of 13,868 patients total, 3,351 had an enlarged LV defined using sex-specific guideline-directed criteria), we trained a classifier that takes as input apical 2-chamber and parasternal long axis videos, and provides as output a binary label denoting whether a patient has an enlarged LV. Then, we evaluated the trained model using a holdout testing dataset of retrospective TTE data (2,087 patients) as well as data from a prospective cohort of 428 patients from whom TTE and POCUS were collected simultaneously. Results: For the retrospective TTE testing dataset, the AUC was 0.851 (95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.830-871). For the prospective cohort, the model performed comparably for both TTE and POCUS video clips (TTE: AUC of 0.865, 95% CI of 0.823-0.906; POCUS: AUC of 0.840, 95% CI of 0.797-0.883). Conclusions: The current deep learning model performed comparably well for both TTE and POCUS echocardiograms. We regard these results as a proof-of-concept of the potential utility of this model in helping point-of-care clinicians make decisions regarding whether patients should receive further evaluation for LV enlargement and associated conditions.

Introduction: Artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) enables early and efficient detection of cardiovascular disease. The technical and clinical impact of different approaches to designing ECG-AI remains under-explored. We consider left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and examine the impact of disease-specific labeling of minority etiologies of left ventricular wall thickening- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) - on ECG-AI performance. Hypothesis: ECG-AI designed to detect HCM or CA outperforms ECG-AI broadly trained to identify LVH due to differences in attention to key ECG features associated with HCM or CA. Methods: Independent neural networks were trained to identify HCM, CA, and LVH. HCM and CA patients were identified using the full depth of EHR data and validated via clinician adjudication (N = 3,025 and 4,251 patients, respectively). Moderate and severe LVH patients (N = 98,144) were identified using echocardiogram results and international LVH criteria. We compared the ability of disease-specific ECG-AI vs. LVH ECG-AI to detect HCM (or CA) by examining model performance within each of the three test sets. Results: 52.6% of HCM patients and 49.5% of CA patients met LVH criteria. Within the HCM test set, the AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the HCM ECG-AI were 0.94, 0.88, 0.85, and 60%, respectively, whereas the same for LVH ECG-AI were 0.83, 0.83, 0.64, and 37%. Within the CA test set, CA ECG-AI achieved AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of 0.94, 0.81, 0.91, and 69%, respectively, whereas the same for LVH ECG-AI were 0.75, 0.73, 0.68, and 31%. ECGs positive for HCM exhibited higher P wave area, QRS deflection and R wave amplitude compared to LVH-positive ECGs (Cohen's D > 0.75). ECGs positive for CA exhibited lower R wave amplitude/area, QRS deflection and QRS areas (Cohen's D > 0.6). Conclusion: Models trained using carefully labeled HCM or CA identify distinct signals associated with the diseases, resulting in improved disease discrimination compared to a model trained to identify echocardiographic left ventricular thickening. Labeling choices should be communicated transparently to clinicians to ensure safe and effective use of ECG-AI.

Introduction: Cardiotoxicity is a serious side effect of anthracycline treatment, most commonly manifesting as a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on cardiac imaging. Cost-effective alternatives to cardiac imaging are currently not available. Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed to detect a reduced LVEF from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) in the general population. Hypothesis: AI-ECG model can detect a reduced LVEF after anthracycline therapy (i.e. cardiotoxicity). Methods: We included an unbiased oncological population of 989 female breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy. Average follow-up time was 9.83±4.2 years. Patients with incomplete transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) data, HER-2-directed therapy, significant comorbidities, upfront metastatic disease, second primary malignancy or pre-existing cardiovascular disease were excluded from the analyses. Patients with LVEF decline for reasons other than anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity were also excluded. Primary readout was the diagnostic performance of AI-ECG by area under the curve (AUC) for various levels of LVEF <50%. Results: Using 1,877 ECGs from 703 unique patients, the AI-ECG model detected an LVEF <50% and ≤35% after anthracycline therapy with an AUC of 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. Conclusions: These data support the use of AI-ECG for cardiomyopathy (cardiotoxicity) screening after anthracycline-based chemotherapy. This technology could serve as a gatekeeper to more costly testing and could enable patients to monitor themselves over long periods of time.