Lee, Eunjung

Abstract Aims To assess the performance of an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) algorithm in identifying patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis (AS) in an Asian cohort from a tertiary care centre. Methods and results We identified a randomly selected patients ≥60 years old who underwent echocardiography and ECG within in 31 days between 2012 and 2021 at the Samsung Medical Center in Korea. Patients with previous cardiac surgery, prosthetic valves, or pacemakers were excluded. The AI-ECG model, originally developed and validated by Mayo Clinic in the USA, was applied without fine-tuning. Performance metrics, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, were calculated to compare AI-ECG predictions with TTE-confirmed AS status. Among 5425 patients, 1095 had moderate to severe AS, and 4330 age- and sex-matched patients without AS were included as controls. The AI-ECG model achieved an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84–0.87) in detecting moderate to severe AS. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 0.83, 0.65, 0.37, 0.94, and 68.29%, respectively. The model's performance was consistent across various age and sex subgroups, with sensitivity increasing in older patients. Conclusion The AI-ECG model developed in the USA demonstrated comparable performance in detecting moderate to severe AS in an Asian cohort compared with its original validation population. These findings highlight the potential utility of AI-ECG as a non-invasive screening tool for AS across diverse patient populations.

Abstract Aims To develop a deep learning model that: (i) utilizes transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) clips to detect left ventricular (LV) enlargement without being provided information regarding a patient’s sex and body size; and (ii) can be accurately applied to clips acquired using either standard comprehensive TTE or handheld cardiac ultrasound (HCU). Methods and results Using retrospective TTE data (training: 8722 patients; internal validation: 468 patients), we developed a deep learning model that estimates a patient’s end-diastolic LV volume (indexed to body surface area and normalized across the sexes), and then thresholds this estimate to perform the following classifications: (1) normally sized LV vs. ≥ mild LV enlargement; (2) normal/mildly enlarged LV vs. ≥ moderate LV enlargement. For retrospective datasets, the model showed strong performance in TTE across three geographically distinct locations (Minnesota and Wisconsin: 1082 patients, AUC = 0.925 and 0.953 for classifications 1 and 2, respectively; Arizona: 1475 patients, AUC = 0.935 and 0.969; and Florida: 1481 patients, AUC = 0.934 and 0.970). Additionally, performance was strong for both TTE and HCU clips collected from a prospective cohort of 410 patients who underwent HCU immediately following TTE (TTE: AUC = 0.925 and 0.971; HCU: AUC = 0.874 and 0.902, for classifications 1 and 2, respectively). Conclusion An automated deep learning model applied to TTE or HCU images accurately categorizes LV volumes. These results lay a foundation for future work aimed at optimizing clinical outcomes for heart failure patients by enabling early detection of LV enlargement across various point-of-care settings.

Background: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) predicts mortality in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. A novel artificial intelligence enhanced electrocardiogram (AIECG) algorithm can predict LVDD and mortality in general populations but has not been examined in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We aim to assess if LVDD by AI-ECG is associated with in-hospital and one-year mortality in CICU patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included consecutive unique adults admitted to the Mayo Clinic CICU from 2007 to 2018 with an admission AIECG, which AI assigned LVDD grade (0 to 3). Medial mitral E/e’ ratio >15 on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) defined elevated filling pressures. AIECG and TTE assessment of LVDD were used to assign patients to four groups based on TTE as gold standard: true and false negative, and true and false positive. In-hospital mortality was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. One-year survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards. Results: We included 11,868 patients (median age 69.5 years, 37.7% females); 48% had heart failure and 44% had acute coronary syndromes. AIECG LVDD grades were: grade 0 (normal), 33%; grade 1, 7%; grade 2, 39%; grade 3, 21%. In-hospital (adjusted OR) and one-year (adjusted HR) mortality increased in each higher AIECG LVDD grade (Figure A/B), before and after adjustment including TTE measurements. Patients with grade 2-3 LVDD by AIECG and medial mitral E/e’ ratio >15 by TTE (true positive) had the highest in-hospital (adjusted OR 2.5 [1.7-3.9]) and one-year (adjusted HR 1.9 [1.5-2.5]) mortality (Figure C/D), and mortality was elevated similarly in patients with either grade 2-3 LVDD by AIECG (false positive) or medial mitral E/e’ ratio >15 by TTE (false negative). Conclusions: The AIECG LVDD grade was strongly associated with in-hospital and one-year mortality in CICU patients, even after adjusting for clinical variables and TTE measurements. Patients with concordant AIECG and TTE for elevated filling pressures (true positive) were at highest risk.

Abstract Background The determination of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and filling pressure in patients with significant (>moderate) mitral regurgitation (MR) poses a complex challenge. We recently validated an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) algorithm to detect LVDD and estimate LV filling pressures. Methods This retrospective study sought to examine the risk of all-cause mortality across AI-ECG LVDD grades. Patients from the AI-ECG LVDD study test cohort who underwent transthoracic echocardiography confirming significant MR and an ECG within fourteen days of each other at Mayo Clinic between 09/2001 and 06/2022 were included. LVDD status was determined based on the index ECG, and patients were categorized into groups representing normal diastolic function (NDF) or LVDD grades 1 (G1), 2 (G2), or 3 (G3). Results Of 4,019 patients with significant MR (mean age 69.8, 49.0% women), 1,175 (29.2%), 1,881 (46.8%), and 963 (24.0%) were classified by AI-ECG as NDF/G1-LVDD, G2-LVDD, and G3-LVDD, respectively. The median mitral effective regurgitant orifice area was 26 mm² (interquartile range 20-36 mm²). Over a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 1,636 (40.7%) patients died. In multivariable survival analysis adjusted for multiple risk factors, a worse AI-ECG LVDD grade was independently associated with an increased death risk [G2DD: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.98 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.63-2.40), G3DD: aHR 2.59 (95% CI 2.09-3.20)]. These findings were consistent when accounting for mitral valve intervention and among patients with >moderate MR or after mitral valve intervention. Conclusion In patients with significant MR, the grading of LVDD by AI-ECG is independently associated with all-cause mortality.

Abstract Aims Augmenting echocardiography with artificial intelligence would allow for automated assessment of routine parameters and identification of disease patterns not easily recognized otherwise. View classification is an essential first step before deep learning can be applied to the echocardiogram. Methods and results We trained two- and three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) using transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) studies obtained from 909 patients to classify nine view categories (10 269 videos). Transthoracic echocardiographic studies from 229 patients were used in internal validation (2582 videos). Convolutional neural networks were tested on 100 patients with comprehensive TTE studies (where the two examples chosen by CNNs as most likely to represent a view were evaluated) and 408 patients with five view categories obtained via point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The overall accuracy of the two-dimensional CNN was 96.8%, and the averaged area under the curve (AUC) was 0.997 on the comprehensive TTE testing set; these numbers were 98.4% and 0.998, respectively, on the POCUS set. For the three-dimensional CNN, the accuracy and AUC were 96.3% and 0.998 for full TTE studies and 95.0% and 0.996 on POCUS videos, respectively. The positive predictive value, which defined correctly identified predicted views, was higher with two-dimensional rather than three-dimensional networks, exceeding 93% in apical, short-axis aortic valve, and parasternal long-axis left ventricle views. Conclusion An automated view classifier utilizing CNNs was able to classify cardiac views obtained using TTE and POCUS with high accuracy. The view classifier will facilitate the application of deep learning to echocardiography.

Background: Enlargement or dilation of the left ventricle (LV) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and is an established precursor of ventricular dysfunction and heart failure in almost all major cardiovascular conditions. Although there are existing artificial intelligence frameworks that make use of deep learning to detect LV enlargement, many entail LV segmentation, which can be error-prone especially for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) images. Goal: To develop a fully end-to-end deep learning framework that takes as input either transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) or POCUS 2D image clips, and classifies directly (i.e., without first segmenting the LV) whether a patient has an enlarged LV. Methods: Using a sample of retrospective TTE data enriched for LV enlargement (out of 13,868 patients total, 3,351 had an enlarged LV defined using sex-specific guideline-directed criteria), we trained a classifier that takes as input apical 2-chamber and parasternal long axis videos, and provides as output a binary label denoting whether a patient has an enlarged LV. Then, we evaluated the trained model using a holdout testing dataset of retrospective TTE data (2,087 patients) as well as data from a prospective cohort of 428 patients from whom TTE and POCUS were collected simultaneously. Results: For the retrospective TTE testing dataset, the AUC was 0.851 (95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.830-871). For the prospective cohort, the model performed comparably for both TTE and POCUS video clips (TTE: AUC of 0.865, 95% CI of 0.823-0.906; POCUS: AUC of 0.840, 95% CI of 0.797-0.883). Conclusions: The current deep learning model performed comparably well for both TTE and POCUS echocardiograms. We regard these results as a proof-of-concept of the potential utility of this model in helping point-of-care clinicians make decisions regarding whether patients should receive further evaluation for LV enlargement and associated conditions.

Background: Recently, our team developed an end-to-end artificial intelligence (AI) framework that can successfully estimate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from echocardiogram videos. However, this framework requires specific views (A2C and PLAX), and cannot estimate LVEF for studies from which these views are missing. Goal: To develop a deep learning model to estimate LVEF from any type and number of echocardiogram video(s). Methods: We built a deep learning model for B-mode echocardiogram videos of the left ventricle (A2C, A3C, A4C, or PLAX views), using retrospective transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) data. The model was evaluated with two test datasets: one with random valid (i.e., showing the left ventricle) views, and one with preselected views (both having 433 patients). Later, the model was tested with a prospective patient cohort that had both TTE and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) data collected simultaneously (393 patients). Results: On the retrospective TTE test set, we observed excellent performance (five random valid views per study: RMSE of 6.87% and Pearson correlation (PC) of 0.82 on LVEF estimation, and an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: of 0.94-0.98) on low LVEF classification (<=40%); preselected views: RMSE of 6.75%, PC of 0.83, and an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98)). For both TTE and POCUS data from the prospective cohort, we also observed strong performance (TTE: RMSE of 5.62%, PC of 0.87, and an AUC of 0.97; POCUS: RMSE of 6.12%, PC of 0.84, and an AUC of 0.96). For the prospective test sets as well as for the retrospective TTE test set with preselected views, results reflect the estimated LVEF average of A2C, A3C, A4C, and PLAX videos from each patient. Conclusions: For both TTE and POCUS data, the current model showed strong performance which was comparable to that of our previously established view-specific model. Alongside this comparable performance, the current model surpasses our previous model in terms of flexibility, as it isn't dependent on view classification and allows a broader selection in terms of the number and types of videos per study or patient. This innovative approach could prove particularly beneficial in point-of-care situations in which it may not be feasible to obtain high-quality, view-specific videos.

Introduction: Left ventricular diastolic function and filling pressure (FP) can be assessed by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Recently, a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled ECG has proven to be effective in identifying increased FP determined by echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function. Aims: We aimed to compare a prognostic value of AI-ECG determination of FP compared to echocardiography and catheterization. Methods: This study included 4,213 patients who had a transthoracic echocardiogram and ECG within 30 days before hemodynamic cardiac catheterization. Increased FP was defined as pulmonary artery wedge pressure >15 mmHg by catheterization and grade 2 or 3 diastolic dysfunction by echocardiography based on diastolic function guidelines. Increased FP by ECG was identified using previously developed AI-ECG. AI-ECG performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curve. We assessed the risk of all-cause mortality using Kaplan-Meier estimate and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: AI-ECG had AUCs of 0.8 and 0.7 for predicting increased FP determined by echocardiography and catheterization, respectively. Death was observed in 2,776 (34%) patients over a median follow-up of 7.7 years (IQR 7.1, 8.3). Survival of patients with normal and increased FP by AI-ECG, Echocardiography, and catheterization are shown in Figure 1a. Concordant diagnoses of normal and increased FP by AI-ECG and catheterization or echocardiography had the highest and lowest survival rates, respectively. When FP by AI-ECG was discordant, survival was better predicted by AI-ECG compared to echocardiography and catheterization (Figure 1b). Conclusion: AI-ECG for FP has a potential to discriminate prognosis further compared to FP determined by echocardiography or catheterization.