Sears, Samuel F.

ABSTRACT Introduction Etripamil is a fast‐acting intranasally self‐administered calcium‐channel blocker developed for termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). Prior studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy of etripamil for PSVT termination following an initial medically supervised test dose during sinus rhythm. NODE‐303 is an open‐label, single‐arm study that evaluated etripamil for multiple, at‐home PSVT episodes, without test dose before first use. Methods Patients applied an ECG monitor at symptom onset and self‐administered etripamil (70 mg) if a vagal maneuver was unsuccessful. ECG monitoring occurred for ≥ 1 h following study drug administration. A repeat 70‐mg dose was introduced during the study for symptoms persisting 10 min after the first dose. Safety measures included treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and ECG arrhythmia‐surveillance. Efficacy measures were captured for PSVT termination during treatment of each of the multiple episodes. Results 1054 perceived PSVT episodes were etripamil‐treated in 503 of 1116 patients enrolled. TEAEs within 24 h were mostly mild or moderate and localized: 30.2% of patients experienced nasal discomfort, nasal congestion (13.9%), rhinorrhea (13.1%), epistaxis (7.4%). TEAE frequencies decreased across multiple PSVT episodes and were similar for single versus repeat doses. For first PSVT episodes, 70.5% of patients converted to sinus rhythm by 60 min post etripamil (median time to conversion = 18.3 min [14.2–25.6]). Conversion in earlier episodes was consistently predictive of conversion in subsequent episodes. Conclusions Etripamil nasal spray self‐administered in a real‐world setting was well tolerated, effective, and had a consistent safety profile as a single‐ or repeat‐dose regimen across multiple PSVT episodes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04072835

Abstract Background Etripamil nasal spray (NS) is a fast-acting, self-administered calcium-channel blocker in development for the conversion of AV-nodal dependent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) in a medically unsupervised setting. Prior studies show favorable safety and efficacy in converting single episodes of PSVT to sinus rhythm (SR). Purpose In NODE-303, patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments assessed quality of life (QoL) over multiple etripamil-treated episodes of PSVT. Methods NODE-303 was an event-driven, multi-center, open-label Phase 3 study in North and South American patients with documented PSVT that evaluated the safety and efficacy of etripamil in PSVT termination, over multiple episodes and without the need for prior test dosing. Enrolled patients who perceived PSVT symptoms applied an ambulatory ECG cardiac monitoring system (CMS), performed a pre-trained vagal maneuver and, if symptoms persisted, self-administered etripamil NS 70 mg. A study amendment allowed a repeat dose (etripamil NS, 70 mg) if symptoms persisted 10 min after the first dose. Each patient could self-treat up to 4 episodes. Safety was assessed through adverse events, clinical data, and ECG CMS recordings. The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM; validated for acute episodic assessments) and other PROs were administered, and healthcare utilization data were acquired. Patients completed PROs at baseline (BL), monthly, and per PSVT episode, which collected information on symptoms, episode characteristics, rescue medications, and emergency room visits. Additional PROs were the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results There were higher proportions of patients reporting mild, minimal or no disease severity, every 6 months, than at BL; extremely severe, severe, and moderate disease severity was reported by smaller proportions of patients than at BL, though incomplete surveys at later visits may limit this analysis. Anxiety and stress about future PSVT episodes were consistently reduced from BL. Measures of treatment satisfaction, effectiveness, and convenience were consistent across multiple episodes, and were at levels considered favorable for the TSQM instrument (Table 1). Rates of emergency-room visits and hospital admissions across multiple, treated PSVT episodes were similar to those observed in trials assessing single episodes (Table 2). The BIPQ, CAQ or SF-36 had no notable changes from BL. Conclusions Etripamil self-administration was associated with patient-reported improvements in degree of disease severity, decreased anxiety and stress over future PSVT episodes, and levels of treatment satisfaction, effectiveness, and convenience considered favorable for respective PRO instrument. Using a symptom-prompted, self-administered treatment for PSVT could potentially improve QoL measures and reduce healthcare resource utilization.

Abstract Introduction The pivotal study of the extravascular implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (EV ICD) recently demonstrated primary efficacy and safety endpoints comparable to previous ICD systems. Patient experience with this novel device has not been reported. The current study examined the standardized patient‐reported outcome (PRO) metrics of quality of life (QOL) and patient acceptance of the device. Methods The EV ICD Pivotal Study was a prospective, single‐arm, nonrandomized, global, premarket approval trial. Patients completed the 12‐Item Short Form Survey (SF‐12) QOL surveys at baseline and at 6 months following implant. Additionally, patients completed the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) QOL survey at 6 months. Results From baseline to 6 months, patients within the EV ICD Pivotal Study ( n = 247) reported statistically significant SF‐12 improvements in physical QOL (45.4 ± 9.4 vs. 46.8 ± 9.1 respectively, p = .020) and no changes in mental QOL (49.3 ± 10.4 vs. 50.5 ± 9.7, p = .061). No differences were noted by sex, atrial fibrillation, or the experience of ICD shock. EV ICD patients reported better total FPAS patient acceptance of their ICD than TV‐ICD or S‐ICD patients using historical norms comparisons (80.4 ± 15.7 vs. 70.2 ± 17.8, p < .0001 for S‐ICD and 73.0 ± 17.4, p = .004 for TV‐ICD). Conclusion The initial PROs for EV ICD patients indicated that patients had improvements in physical QOL from baseline to 6‐month follow‐up and markedly better overall acceptance of their ICD compared to a previous study with S‐ICD and TV‐ICD data. These initial results suggest that the EV ICD is evaluated positively by patients.

Shared decision making (SDM) has been advocated to improve patient care, patient decision acceptance, patient-provider communication, patient motivation, adherence, and patient reported outcomes. Documentation of SDM is endorsed in several society guidelines and is a condition of reimbursement for selected cardiovascular and cardiac arrhythmia procedures. However, many clinicians argue that SDM already occurs with clinical encounter discussions or the process of obtaining informed consent and note the additional imposed workload of using and documenting decision aids without validated tools or evidence that they improve clinical outcomes. In reality, SDM is a process and can be done without decision tools, although the process may be variable. Also, SDM advocates counter that the low-risk process of SDM need not be held to the high bar of demonstrating clinical benefit and that increasing the quality of decision making should be sufficient. Our review leverages a multidisciplinary group of experts in cardiology, cardiac electrophysiology, epidemiology, and SDM, as well as a patient advocate. Our goal is to examine and assess SDM methodology, tools, and available evidence on outcomes in patients with heart rhythm disorders to help determine the value of SDM, assess its possible impact on electrophysiological procedures and cardiac arrhythmia management, better inform regulatory requirements, and identify gaps in knowledge and future needs.