Romero, Joshua

Objective: Percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT) and ultrasonic debridement (UD) are minimally invasive interventions for the management of chronic tendinopathy. Despite their increasing use, no standardized, evidence-based rehabilitation guidelines currently exist to direct clinicians in post-procedural management. This systematic review aimed to characterize and synthesize reported rehabilitation protocols following PNT and UD for patellar, proximal hamstring, and gluteal tendinopathies. Design: Systematic Review Results: Twenty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, with patellar tendon procedures (n=13) being the most common, followed by gluteal (n=6), proximal hamstring (n=3), and multi-tendon protocols (n=5). Of the included studies, 21 (78%) utilized percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT) and six (22%) used ultrasound debridement or Tenex. Exercise restrictions were mandated in 19 studies (70%), while 12 (44%) provided a detailed, structured rehabilitation program, frequently emphasizing eccentric loading for patellar and hamstring tendons. Weight-bearing limitations were uncommon, appearing in only three studies (11%). Fifteen studies (56%) combined the procedure with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Pharmacological protocols also showed high variance, with NSAID restrictions ranging from 1 to 28 days and corticosteroid avoidance lasting between 10 days and one year. Overall, substantial variability remains regarding recommended activity progression, exercise initiation, and mechanical loading strategies across current research. Conclusion: PNT and UD appear effective for managing refractory tendinopathy, yet post-procedure rehabilitation guidelines remain inconsistent and supported by limited high-quality evidence. Future research should aim to identify key variables that guide individualized rehabilitation progressions, optimizing recovery timelines, and facilitating safe and efficient return to activity following PNT and UD procedures.

Objective: Orthobiologics are increasingly sought-after interventions in sports medicine for treatment of musculoskeletal injuries and conditions. Despite this trend, differences exist across sports medicine fellowship programs regarding foundational knowledge, educational curricula, and practical experience with orthobiologic therapies (eg, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, microfragmented adipose tissue). This represents an important educational gap for those training in sports medicine fellowships. To address this gap, an educational toolkit was envisioned with the sports medicine fellowship director and trainee in mind. Data Sources: Collective observations from physician experts in sports medicine education established the variations in curricula and expertise of graduating fellows. A literature review was conducted to source English-language peer reviewed articles from the online PubMed database. The scope of this project did not include an independent systematic analysis or statistical assessments. Main Results: An educational toolkit consisting of 12 adaptable modules was developed, each with a suggested reading list from the published literature. The modules may be rearranged to support each program's learning schedule. The information and lessons contained herein may be valuable to all healthcare providers interested in the evidence-based application of orthobiologics and insightful interpretation of related research. Conclusions: By implementing an educational toolkit, sports medicine fellowships may improve the quality of education on orthobiologics. This is intended to improve the knowledge and skill set of fellowship graduates, thus promoting the scientific, responsible use of orthobiologic interventions.

Latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TMA) injuries are increasingly recognized as significant sources of pain in overhead athletes, particularly pitchers. These injuries are challenging to diagnose clinically, and conventional MRI often lacks sufficient detail to fully evaluate them. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) offers dynamic, high‐resolution evaluation and may better characterize these injuries. This pictorial review illustrates the sonographic appearance of common LD and TMA injuries, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy, increase clinician familiarity with this region, and support future research in injury classification using ultrasound.

Abstract Hip pain is a common concern among athletes. With gluteal tendinopathy, femoroacetabular impingement, and osteoarthritis predominating sports medicine and musculoskeletal practices, less common etiologies may be overlooked. Complex pelvic anatomy and variable pain referral patterns may make identifying an accurate diagnosis challenging. Employing a systematic approach to evaluation and having a thorough understanding of hip region anatomy are essential. A potentially overlooked cause of anterolateral hip pain is iliotibial band origin tendinopathy. Patients often present with pain around the anterolateral hip and tenderness to palpation at the anterolateral iliac crest. While patients with iliotibial band origin tendinopathy usually respond to nonsurgical intervention, there is little literature to guide evaluation and treatment, highlighting a gap in the recognition of this condition. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the anatomy of the proximal iliotibial band origin, outline the clinical diagnosis and imaging findings of ITBOT, and summarize current treatment options.

Abstract The utilization of sports ultrasound in the clinical practice of sports medicine physicians is growing rapidly. Simultaneously, ultrasound is being increasingly implemented as a teaching tool in undergraduate medical education. However, a sports ultrasound curriculum for medical students has not been previously described. In this article, we describe methods as well as barriers to implementing a sports ultrasound curriculum at the medical school level. Recommended content for the curriculum also is discussed. While educational goals and resources will vary among institutions, this article may serve as a general roadmap for the creation of a successful curriculum.

OBJECTIVE Conventional spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) have demonstrated efficacy in individuals with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). However, a subgroup of patients may become refractory to the effects of conventional waveforms over time. The objective of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the current literature on the use of novel waveform spinal cord stimulation for the management of FBSS refractory to conventional SCSs. METHODS A comprehensive electronic search of the literature published in electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus, was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The outcomes of interest were reduction in back pain and/or leg pain after conversion from conventional to novel SCSs. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. The strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. RESULTS A total of 6 studies with 137 patients with FBSS were identified. Studies were published between 2013 and 2021. The mean ± SD age of the pooled patient sample was 55 ± 10.5 years. All patients who underwent treatment with conventional SCSs were identified. Two studies evaluated the efficacy of high-density spinal cord stimulation, 3 studies evaluated burst spinal cord stimulation, and 1 study assessed multimodal waveforms. The mean difference in back pain scores after conversion from a standard SCS to a novel waveform SCS was 2.55 (95% CI 1.59–4.08), demonstrating a significant reduction in back pain after conversion to novel stimulation. The authors also performed a subgroup analysis to compare burst stimulation to tonic waveforms. In this analysis, the authors found no significant difference in the average reductions in back pain between the 2 groups (p = 0.534).The authors found an I2 statistic equivalent to 98.47% in the meta-regression model used to assess the effect of follow-up duration on study outcome; this value implied that the variability in the data can be attributed to the remaining between-study heterogeneity. The overall certainty was moderate, with a high risk of bias across studies. CONCLUSIONS Rescue therapy with novel waveform spinal cord stimulation is a potential option for pain reduction in patients who become refractory to conventional SCSs. Conversion to novel waveform SCSs may potentially mitigate expenses and complications.