Kruse, Ryan C.

Abstract Adipose‐derived cellular therapies (AD‐CTs) are increasingly used in orthopedics, yet the field lacks a standardized framework for classifying these heterogeneous products. Although prior efforts have standardized platelet‐rich plasma and bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells, AD preparations remain inconsistently defined and poorly characterized. AD‐CTs encompass a range of products including enzymatically derived stromal vascular fraction, culture‐expanded adipose‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells (AD‐MSCs), and mechanically processed adipose tissue (AD‐MPT),each with distinct regulatory, cellular, and structural profiles. Unlike stromal vascular fraction and AD‐MSCs, which can be quantified using conventional assays, the intact extracellular matrix in AD‐MPTs complicates objective characterization. This paper introduces the Mechanical Processing (Harvesting) of Adipose Tissue classification system as a novel framework for standardizing the reporting of AD‐MPT harvesting and processing techniques that provides a structured approach to nomenclature and reporting. The system aims to enhance study comparability, facilitate research replication, and support the responsible advancement of adipose‐based therapies in musculoskeletal medicine.

Objective: Orthobiologics are increasingly sought-after interventions in sports medicine for treatment of musculoskeletal injuries and conditions. Despite this trend, differences exist across sports medicine fellowship programs regarding foundational knowledge, educational curricula, and practical experience with orthobiologic therapies (eg, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, microfragmented adipose tissue). This represents an important educational gap for those training in sports medicine fellowships. To address this gap, an educational toolkit was envisioned with the sports medicine fellowship director and trainee in mind. Data Sources: Collective observations from physician experts in sports medicine education established the variations in curricula and expertise of graduating fellows. A literature review was conducted to source English-language peer reviewed articles from the online PubMed database. The scope of this project did not include an independent systematic analysis or statistical assessments. Main Results: An educational toolkit consisting of 12 adaptable modules was developed, each with a suggested reading list from the published literature. The modules may be rearranged to support each program's learning schedule. The information and lessons contained herein may be valuable to all healthcare providers interested in the evidence-based application of orthobiologics and insightful interpretation of related research. Conclusions: By implementing an educational toolkit, sports medicine fellowships may improve the quality of education on orthobiologics. This is intended to improve the knowledge and skill set of fellowship graduates, thus promoting the scientific, responsible use of orthobiologic interventions.

Abstract Hip pain is a common concern among athletes. With gluteal tendinopathy, femoroacetabular impingement, and osteoarthritis predominating sports medicine and musculoskeletal practices, less common etiologies may be overlooked. Complex pelvic anatomy and variable pain referral patterns may make identifying an accurate diagnosis challenging. Employing a systematic approach to evaluation and having a thorough understanding of hip region anatomy are essential. A potentially overlooked cause of anterolateral hip pain is iliotibial band origin tendinopathy. Patients often present with pain around the anterolateral hip and tenderness to palpation at the anterolateral iliac crest. While patients with iliotibial band origin tendinopathy usually respond to nonsurgical intervention, there is little literature to guide evaluation and treatment, highlighting a gap in the recognition of this condition. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the anatomy of the proximal iliotibial band origin, outline the clinical diagnosis and imaging findings of ITBOT, and summarize current treatment options.

The adductor magnus ischiocondylar origin (AM‐IO) tendon has often been described as a third proximal hamstring tendon due to its common origin on the ischial tuberosity as well as similar function. Prior studies have described the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the AM‐IO; however, its appearance on ultrasound has not been well‐detailed. The purpose of our study is to describe the sonographic appearance of the AM‐IO and provide a structured scanning protocol for complete evaluation of the tendon.

Context Musculoskeletal (MSK) diagnostic ultrasound (US) is increasingly being utilized by physicians to evaluate athletes in outpatient clinics, on the sidelines, and in athletic training facilities. Having a thorough understanding of MSK US will help athletic trainers (ATs) better assist physicians who perform MSK US. Objective To determine if a longitudinal 6-month MSK anatomy and US course would increase ATs’ ability to acquire, label, and optimize US images of normal structures and improve their overall confidence in assisting with performing US and to determine if demographic factors, work-related factors, or higher self-reported confidence was associated with better performance. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Academic institution. Other Participants Seventeen ATs working with sports medicine physicians at 3 institutions. Interventions Longitudinal 6-month MSK anatomy and US course. Main Outcome Measures Ultrasound image scores (normal structures scored on a 5-point scale) were assessed precourse, during the course, and postcourse. Scores were compared across time points for the assessed body regions (knee, ankle/foot, shoulder, elbow/wrist/hand, and hip). Associations with demographic factors, US experience, and AT self-reported confidence were explored. Results Seventeen ATs completed the course. There was a significant difference among the average overall precourse (average: 1.34/5, range: 0/5 to 4.23/5), during-course (average = 3.53/5; range, 2.6/5 to 4.37/5), and postcourse (average = 3.83/5; range, 2.33/5 to 4.67/5) image scores [χ2(2) = 24.47, P < .001]. There was a significant positive correlation between the numbers of days (rs[17] = 0.62, P = .01) and hours (rs[17] = 0.55, P = .02) per week that the AT spent observing or performing US scanning and the postcourse overall image scores. The ATs’ confidence in identifying structures when they scan and postcourse overall image scores were marginally correlated but not significant (rs[17] = 0.47, P = .06). Conclusions A comprehensive longitudinal MSK diagnostic US course may have resulted in significant improvements in an AT’s ability to acquire, label, and optimize US images of normal MSK structures that are commonly injured by active persons.

Abstract The utilization of sports ultrasound in the clinical practice of sports medicine physicians is growing rapidly. Simultaneously, ultrasound is being increasingly implemented as a teaching tool in undergraduate medical education. However, a sports ultrasound curriculum for medical students has not been previously described. In this article, we describe methods as well as barriers to implementing a sports ultrasound curriculum at the medical school level. Recommended content for the curriculum also is discussed. While educational goals and resources will vary among institutions, this article may serve as a general roadmap for the creation of a successful curriculum.

BackgroundUltrasound (US)‐guided hip joint injections are commonly performed for patients with suspected or known intra‐articular hip pain. Lidocaine is a well‐established local anesthetic used prior to hip joint injections, but it is often associated with discomfort during infiltration. Bacteriostatic saline is an alternative local anesthetic that has been shown to be less painful during infiltration for superficial injections.ObjectiveTo compare infiltrative pain and anesthetic efficacy of bacteriostatic saline (0.9% benzyl alcohol) with a standard local anesthetic (buffered 1% lidocaine) used for local anesthesia prior to US‐guided intra‐articular hip corticosteroid injections.DesignDouble‐blinded, randomized controlled trial.SettingTertiary care medical center.ParticipantsSixty eight patients age 18‐80 (mean 54.8) years referred for US‐guided intra‐articular hip corticosteroid injections.InterventionPatients were randomized to receive a US‐guided hip joint corticosteroid injection using either bacteriostatic saline or buffered 1% lidocaine for preinjection local anesthesia.Main Outcome MeasuresVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain (0‐100) during local anesthetic infiltration as well as during the intra‐articular injection. Adverse events were also recorded.ResultsThere were no significant differences between bacteriostatic saline and buffered lidocaine with respect to pain during local anesthetic infiltration or during the subsequent intra‐articular injection. Pain VAS during local anesthetic infiltration was 13.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8, 18.5) in the bacteriostatic saline group and 14.0 (95% CI 9.4, 18.5) in the buffered 1% lidocaine group (P = .82). Furthermore, pain VAS during the intra‐articular injection was 20.7 (95% CI 14.1, 27.3) in the bacteriostatic saline group and 15.7 (95% CI 10.9, 20.3) in the buffered 1% lidocaine group (P = .57). No adverse events occurred.ConclusionsBacteriostatic saline is a safe and comparably effective alternative to buffered 1% lidocaine for local anesthesia before US‐guided hip joint injections and may be considered for subcutaneous/periarticular anesthesia during similar musculoskeletal procedures.