Kindle, Brett J.

Latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TMA) injuries are increasingly recognized as significant sources of pain in overhead athletes, particularly pitchers. These injuries are challenging to diagnose clinically, and conventional MRI often lacks sufficient detail to fully evaluate them. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) offers dynamic, high‐resolution evaluation and may better characterize these injuries. This pictorial review illustrates the sonographic appearance of common LD and TMA injuries, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy, increase clinician familiarity with this region, and support future research in injury classification using ultrasound.

Ultrasound imaging is vital for musculoskeletal assessment due to its real‐time, high‐resolution capabilities and safety. While protocols exist for rotator cuff evaluation, comprehensive guidelines for imaging the latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles are lacking. This article fills this gap by presenting a detailed ultrasound protocol for these muscles, essential for shoulder stability and movement in overhead athletes. We review their anatomy, propose a standardized examination approach, and discuss clinical indications, aiming to improve diagnostic accuracy and management of these injuries.

BackgroundUltrasound (US)‐guided hip joint injections are commonly performed for patients with suspected or known intra‐articular hip pain. Lidocaine is a well‐established local anesthetic used prior to hip joint injections, but it is often associated with discomfort during infiltration. Bacteriostatic saline is an alternative local anesthetic that has been shown to be less painful during infiltration for superficial injections.ObjectiveTo compare infiltrative pain and anesthetic efficacy of bacteriostatic saline (0.9% benzyl alcohol) with a standard local anesthetic (buffered 1% lidocaine) used for local anesthesia prior to US‐guided intra‐articular hip corticosteroid injections.DesignDouble‐blinded, randomized controlled trial.SettingTertiary care medical center.ParticipantsSixty eight patients age 18‐80 (mean 54.8) years referred for US‐guided intra‐articular hip corticosteroid injections.InterventionPatients were randomized to receive a US‐guided hip joint corticosteroid injection using either bacteriostatic saline or buffered 1% lidocaine for preinjection local anesthesia.Main Outcome MeasuresVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain (0‐100) during local anesthetic infiltration as well as during the intra‐articular injection. Adverse events were also recorded.ResultsThere were no significant differences between bacteriostatic saline and buffered lidocaine with respect to pain during local anesthetic infiltration or during the subsequent intra‐articular injection. Pain VAS during local anesthetic infiltration was 13.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8, 18.5) in the bacteriostatic saline group and 14.0 (95% CI 9.4, 18.5) in the buffered 1% lidocaine group (P = .82). Furthermore, pain VAS during the intra‐articular injection was 20.7 (95% CI 14.1, 27.3) in the bacteriostatic saline group and 15.7 (95% CI 10.9, 20.3) in the buffered 1% lidocaine group (P = .57). No adverse events occurred.ConclusionsBacteriostatic saline is a safe and comparably effective alternative to buffered 1% lidocaine for local anesthesia before US‐guided hip joint injections and may be considered for subcutaneous/periarticular anesthesia during similar musculoskeletal procedures.