Borg‐Stein, Joanne

Objective: Orthobiologics are increasingly sought-after interventions in sports medicine for treatment of musculoskeletal injuries and conditions. Despite this trend, differences exist across sports medicine fellowship programs regarding foundational knowledge, educational curricula, and practical experience with orthobiologic therapies (eg, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, microfragmented adipose tissue). This represents an important educational gap for those training in sports medicine fellowships. To address this gap, an educational toolkit was envisioned with the sports medicine fellowship director and trainee in mind. Data Sources: Collective observations from physician experts in sports medicine education established the variations in curricula and expertise of graduating fellows. A literature review was conducted to source English-language peer reviewed articles from the online PubMed database. The scope of this project did not include an independent systematic analysis or statistical assessments. Main Results: An educational toolkit consisting of 12 adaptable modules was developed, each with a suggested reading list from the published literature. The modules may be rearranged to support each program's learning schedule. The information and lessons contained herein may be valuable to all healthcare providers interested in the evidence-based application of orthobiologics and insightful interpretation of related research. Conclusions: By implementing an educational toolkit, sports medicine fellowships may improve the quality of education on orthobiologics. This is intended to improve the knowledge and skill set of fellowship graduates, thus promoting the scientific, responsible use of orthobiologic interventions.

Objectives While extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may be an efficacious adjunctive treatment option for musculoskeletal injuries, current research is limited by significant heterogeneity within treatment protocols. This study aims to establish international expert consensus recommendations on ESWT terminology, parameters, procedural considerations, contraindications and side effects in the application of ESWT to sports injuries. Methods A systematic literature search was performed on the use of ESWT for musculoskeletal and sports medicine injuries to identify potential panellists, followed by the development of a steering committee-led questionnaire. A three-stage, modified Delphi questionnaire was provided to a panel of 41 international clinical and research experts across 13 countries. Panellists had the opportunity to suggest edits to existing statements or recommend additional statements in Round 1. Consensus was defined as≥75% agreement. Results All 41 panellists completed Rounds 1, 2 and 3. Consensus was reached on 69/118 statements (58.5%), including recommendations on terminology and fundamental concepts, indications for use, procedural aspects for tendinopathy and bone pathologies, treatment correlations with imaging, periprocedural and postprocedural considerations, absolute and relative contraindications and potential side effects. Of the 49 statements that did not reach consensus, 17/49 (34.7%) were related to procedural aspects of bone pathology. Conclusion This international panel presents recommendations on ESWT terminology, indications and treatment considerations to guide ESWT use and decision-making by sports medicine clinicians. While our panel supported the use of ESWT in the treatment of bone pathologies, certain procedural aspects of ESWT specific to these injuries did not reach consensus and require further investigation.

Abstract: Many sports medicine physicians are currently considering introducing regenerative medicine into their practice. Regenerative medicine and the subclassification of orthobiologics are a complicated topic and have produced widely varying opinions. Although there is concern by government regulators, clinicians, scientists, patient advocacy organizations, and the media regarding the use of regenerative medicine products, there is also excitement about the potential benefits with growing evidence that certain regenerative medicine products are safe and potentially efficacious in treating musculoskeletal conditions. Sports medicine physicians would benefit from decision-making guidance about whether to introduce orthobiologics into their practice and how to do it responsibly. The purpose of this position statement is to provide sports medicine physicians with information regarding regenerative medicine terminology, a brief review of basic science and clinical studies within the subclassification of orthobiologics, regulatory considerations, and best practices for introducing regenerative medicine into clinical practice. This information will help sports medicine physicians make informed and responsible decisions about the role of regenerative medicine and orthobiologics in their practice.