Baudhuin, Linnea M.

CYP2D6 duplication has important pharmacogenomic implications. Reflex testing with long-range PCR (LR-PCR) can resolve the genotype when a duplication and alleles with differing activity scores are detected. We evaluated whether visual inspection of plots from real-time-PCR-based targeted genotyping with copy number variation (CNV) detection could reliably determine the duplicated CYP2D6 allele. Six reviewers evaluated QuantStudio OpenArray CYP2D6 genotyping results and the TaqMan Genotyper plots for seventy-three well-characterized cases with three copies of CYP2D6 and two different alleles. Reviewers blinded to the final genotype visually assessed the plots to determine the duplicated allele or opt for reflex sequencing. Reviewers achieved 100% accuracy for cases with three CYP2D6 copies that they opted to report. Reviewers did not request reflex sequencing in 49–67 (67–92%) cases (and correctly identified the duplicated allele in each case); all remaining cases (6–24) were marked by at least one reviewer for reflex sequencing. In most cases with three copies of CYP2D6, the duplicated allele can be determined using a combination of targeted genotyping using real-time PCR with CNV detection without need for reflex sequencing. In ambiguous cases and those with >3 copies, LR-PCR and Sanger sequencing may still be necessary for determination of the duplicated allele.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Mayo Clinic Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology. Background Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Treatment of patients with elevated Lp(a) usually includes marked reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, there are uncertainties about whether all increases in Lp(a) are equivalent in there risk relationship. Purpose The aim of this investigation was to risk stratify patients with elevated Lp(a) mass [Lp(a)-M] based on Lp(a) cholesterol (Lp(a)-C) measurements. We assessed coronary artery disease (CAD) by coronary angiogram and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in a cohort of patients with elevated Lp(a) mass (≥30mg/dL) over a 15 year followup. Methods Electrophoretic and immunologic assays were used to measure Lp(a)-C and Lp(a)-M, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to test for association between Lp(a) and CAD in a cohort patients with elevated Lp(a)-M (≥30mg/dL). The relationship between Lp(a) and time to major cardiac events was evaluated using cox regression analysis. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analyses were used to identify optimal cutoff values for Lp(a)-M and C for predicting CAD in our model. Results We analyzed 179 patients with elevated Lp(a)-M. Cutoff values of 3.3mg/dL for Lp(a)-C and 42.1mg/dL for Lp(a)-M optimally predicted CAD in an ROC analysis. Of these patients, 84 were found to have Lp(a)-C < 3.3mg/dL (low Lp(a)-C), while 95 patients had Lp(a)-C levels ≥ 3.3mg/dL (high Lp(a)-C). High Lp(a)-C was associated with CAD identified on coronary angiography in univariate (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.18 – 4.00, p = 0.013) and multivariate (OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 1.64 – 6.89, p < 0.001) models controlling for traditional risk factors. In univariate analyses high Lp(a)-C was also associated with MACE (HR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.19 – 4.75, p = 0.01) while Lp(a)-M ≥ 42.1mg/dL (high Lp(a)-M) was not (HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 0.82 – 3.44, p = 0.15) (Table 1, Figure 1). Lp(a)-C remained significantly correlated with MACE after adjusting for traditional risk factors. When included in a model together, Lp(a)-C maintained its significance while Lp(a)-M failed to predict MACE, indicating that Lp(a)-C is a stronger predictor of MACE than Lp(a)-M. Conclusion This study demonstrates that patients with elevated Lp(a)-M and high Lp(a)-C are approximately 2.5 times more likely to encounter MACE over time when compared to patients with elevated Lp(a)-M and low Lp(a)-C. Our investigation suggests that Lp(a)-C can be used to risk stratify patients with elevated Lp(a)-M and identify those at higher risk.

AbstractPathogenic variants in COL1A1 and COL1A2 are involved in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and, rarely, Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome (EDS) subtypes and OI‐EDS overlap syndromes (OIEDS1 and OIEDS2, respectively). Here we describe a cohort of 34 individuals with likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants in COL1A1 and COL1A2, 15 of whom have potential OIEDS1 (n = 5) or OIEDS2 (n = 10). A predominant OI phenotype and COL1A1 frameshift variants are present in 4/5 cases with potential OIEDS1. On the other hand, 9/10 potential OIEDS2 cases have a predominant EDS phenotype, including four with an initial diagnosis of hypermobile EDS (hEDS). An additional case with a predominant EDS phenotype had a COL1A1 arginine‐to‐cysteine variant that was originally misclassified as a variant of uncertain significance despite this type of variant being associated with classical EDS with vascular fragility. Vascular/arterial fragility was observed in 4/15 individuals (including one individual with an original diagnosis of hEDS), which underscores the unique clinical surveillance and management needs in these patients. In comparison to previously described OIEDS1/2, we observed differentiating features that should be considered to refine currently proposed criteria for genetic testing in OIEDS, which will be beneficial for diagnosis and management. Additionally, these results highlight the importance of gene‐specific knowledge for informed variant classification and point to a potential genetic resolution (COL1A2) for some cases of clinically diagnosed hEDS.

Abstract Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is a result of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles becoming trapped in arterial walls and forming plaques which ultimately restrict blood-flow. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) are highly correlated measures of plaque-causing LDL particles. Both have been shown to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE). ApoB is also carried on remnant lipoproteins (RLP). RLP-cholesterol (RLP-C) is increasingly appreciated as a MACE risk-factor. This study aimed to define discordances between apoB and LDL-C in a large data set from a clinical reference laboratory. We then applied this definition to evaluate which measure predicted the risk of MACE in a patient cohort referred for coronary angiography with >10 years follow-up. LDL-C was measured by beta-quantification and RLP-C was defined as total cholesterol – LDL-C – HDL-C. Apo B discordance relative to LDL-C was determined by linear regression in a discovery cohort (n=17,203) using beta quantification. Discordance was defined by quartiles of the residual-apoB (expected–actual); discordant-low (<25th percentile), concordant (25th to 75th percentile) and discordant-high (>75th percentile). Associations with prevalence and incident of MACE were evaluated by odds-ratio and logistic regression. Risk of MACE was calculated based on the apoB-discordance and reported MACE events by several years follow up in a separate cohort (n=501). In the discovery cohort, age ranged from 18-95 years, 51% were female and mean (±SD) lipid values were: ApoB: 100.4 ± 30.0mg/dl, LDL-C: 121.7 ± 47.9mg/dl, and RLP-C: 17.2 ± 26.9mg/dl. Expected-apoB was described by the formula: (LDL-c X 0.6278 + 24.07, R=0.88). Residual-apoB (discordance) ranged from -1037 to 581.2 with a mean 0.01±18.6, and notably increased with triglyceride concentration (rho=0.65) and with RLP-C (rho=0.64), but was minimally influenced by apoB (rho=0.35) and LDL-C (rho=0.009) (p<0.001 all cases). In the clinical follow-up cohort, age ranged from 26-77 years, 42% were female, 64% were current/former smokers, and 28% were on lipid-lowering therapy. Mean (±SD) lipids were: apoB: 97.8 ± 20.9mg/dl, LDL-C: 124.6 ± 36.6mg/dl, and RLP-C: 34.9 ± 25.6mg/dl. Serum triglycerides among subjects discordant-low apoB, concordant and discordant-high apoB were 148mg/dL, 157mg/dL and 238mg/dL, respectively; similarly for RLP-C. A total of 192 events occurred during a mean of 9 years follow-up. Subjects with discordantly elevated apoB had a significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to those with concordant values (47% vs. 36%, p=0.03). There was no difference in MACE for subjects with discordantly low apoB (35% vs. 36%). These data support previous reports of an association between apoB and LDL-C and the superior performance of apoB when discordantly elevated. Our data expand on previous studies by applying an externally defined threshold for discordant-apoB. Our data indicate that triglycerides, RLP-C are associated with discordances and MACE.

Introduction: Elevated plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), but the strength of the association and whether it is independent of other risk factors remains controversial. Differences in prospective studies may be partially explained by variability in methods used to measure Lp(a). Methods: We utilized two different analytical methods (electrophoretic and immunologic) to measure Lp(a) and determine the predictive value of Llp(a) in assessing angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) and association with major adverse events in 500 patients. Results: In univariate analyses, median Lp(a) cholesterol and Lp(a) mass were significantly associated with angiographic CAD. In a multivariable model, Lp(a) cholesterol remained a significant correlate of CAD (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.31, P = 0.009) while Lp(a) mass was not (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.95-1.47, P = 0.14). Additionally, on multivariable analysis, the presence of a detectable amount of Lp(a) cholesterol (> or =2.5 mg/dL) was more strongly correlated with CAD than HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL, and, along withLp(a) cholesterol, was strongly correlated with major adverse events (OR 2.08 95% CI 1.22-3.56, P = 0.007 and OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.42, P = 0.012, respectively). Conclusions: Lp(a) cholesterol measured electrophoretically is independently correlated with angiographic CAD and presence of major adverse events, and may be used as an alternative or supplement to Lp(a) mass analysis.