Ito, Saki

ImportanceThe frequency and clinical importance of structural valve deterioration (SVD) in patients undergoing self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgery is poorly understood.ObjectiveTo evaluate the 5-year incidence, clinical outcomes, and predictors of hemodynamic SVD in patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI or surgery.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis post hoc analysis pooled data from the CoreValve US High Risk Pivotal (n = 615) and SURTAVI (n = 1484) randomized clinical trials (RCTs); it was supplemented by the CoreValve Extreme Risk Pivotal trial (n = 485) and CoreValve Continued Access Study (n = 2178). Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate or increased risk of 30-day surgical mortality were included. Data were collected from December 2010 to June 2016, and data were analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.InterventionsPatients were randomized to self-expanding TAVI or surgery in the RCTs or underwent self-expanding TAVI for clinical indications in the nonrandomized studies.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was the incidence of SVD through 5 years (from the RCTs). Factors associated with SVD and its association with clinical outcomes were evaluated for the pooled RCT and non-RCT population. SVD was defined as (1) an increase in mean gradient of 10 mm Hg or greater from discharge or at 30 days to last echocardiography with a final mean gradient of 20 mm Hg or greater or (2) new-onset moderate or severe intraprosthetic aortic regurgitation or an increase of 1 grade or more.ResultsOf 4762 included patients, 2605 (54.7%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 82.1 (7.4) years. A total of 2099 RCT patients, including 1128 who received TAVI and 971 who received surgery, and 2663 non-RCT patients who received TAVI were included. The cumulative incidence of SVD treating death as a competing risk was lower in patients undergoing TAVI than surgery (TAVI, 2.20%; surgery, 4.38%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .004). This lower risk was most pronounced in patients with smaller annuli (23 mm diameter or smaller; TAVI, 1.32%; surgery, 5.84%; HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.73; P = .02). SVD was associated with increased 5-year all-cause mortality (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.46-2.82; P < .001), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.20-2.90; P = .006), and valve disease or worsening heart failure hospitalizations (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.23-3.84; P = .008). Predictors of SVD were developed from multivariate analysis.Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found a lower rate of SVD in patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI vs surgery at 5 years. Doppler echocardiography was a valuable tool to detect SVD, which was associated with worse clinical outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01240902, NCT01586910, and NCT01531374

Abstract Aims To evaluate the benefit of speckle tracking radial strain imaging (STRSI)-guided left ventricular (LV) lead (LVL) positioning in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients (pts) with ischaemic cardiomyopathy with CRT indication. Methods and results We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were enrolled in nine centres with 2:1 randomization into two groups (guided vs. control). Patients underwent STRSI to identify the optimal LV position from six LV segments at midventricular level. Implantation via STRSI was attempted for recommended segment in the guided group only. Follow-up included echocardiography (6 months) and clinical evaluation (6 and 12 months). The primary endpoint was comparison % reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months with baseline. Secondary endpoints included hospitalizations for heart failure and death, and improvement in additional echocardiographic measurements and quality of life score. A total of 172 patients (115 guided vs. 57 control) were enrolled. In the guided group, 60% of the implanted LV leads were adjudicated to be successfully located at the recommended segment, whereas in the control group 44% reached the best STRSI determined segment. There was no difference between the groups in any of the primary or secondary endpoints at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion Our findings suggest that echo-guided implantation of an LV lead using STRSI does not improve the clinical or echocardiographic response compared with conventional implantation.

AbstractObjectivesThe Evolut R FORWARD study confirmed safety and effectivenesss of the Evolut R THV in routine clinical practice out to 1 year. Herein, we report the final 3‐year clinical follow up of the FORWARD study.BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a proven alternative to surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Long‐term clinical outcome data with the Evolut R platform are scarce.MethodsFORWARD is a prospective multicenter observational study that evaluated the Evolut R system in routine clinical practice at 53 centres. Eligible patients had symptomatic native aortic valve stenosis or failed surgical aortic bioprosthesis and elevated operative risk per Heart‐Team assessment. TAVR was attempted in 1039 patients.ResultsMean age was 81.8 ± 6.2 years, 64.9% were women, STS score was 5.5 ± 4.5% and 34.2% were frail. Rates of all‐cause mortality and disabling stroke were 24.8% and 4.8% at 3 years. Early need for a new pacemaker implantation after TAVR (all‐cause mortality: with new PPI; 21.0% vs. without; 22.8%, p = 0.55) and the presence of > trace paravalvular regurgitation (all‐cause mortality: no or trace; 22.0% vs. ≥ mild; 25.5%, p = 0.29) did not affect survival. Between 1 and 3 years incidence rates of valve related intervention, endocarditis and clinically relevant valve thrombosis were low.ConclusionsThe Evolut R valve maintained a favorable safety profile through 3 years in routine clinical practice. Rates of transcatheter heart valve‐related adverse events were low.

Introduction: Accurate stroke volume (SV) calculation is critical for calculating aortic valve area by echocardiography. 2D-Doppler estimation of SV (SV 2D ) assumes uniform blood flow velocities through the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). Non-uniform flow through the LVOT, appreciated as spectral broadening of the LVOT Doppler signal, could result in inaccurate SV calculation. Hypothesis: Increased spectral broadening in the LVOT will result in overestimation of SV by the SV 2D method compared to 3D volumetric assessment of SV (SV 3D ). Methods: Fifty-one consecutive patients with aortic stenosis underwent comprehensive 2D-TTE and assessment of SV 3D . Patients with ≥ moderate mitral or aortic regurgitation were excluded. An LVOT pulse-wave Doppler signal with > 0.4 m/s difference between outer and inner edge of velocity spectral display (at time of peak velocity) was considered non-uniform flow (i.e., spectral broadening). Results: Spectral broadening was present in 33% of the cohort. These patients were commonly female with smaller ventricles and higher ejection fraction. Spectral broadening was associated with a significant overestimation of SV on Doppler-based measurements (101±20 ml vs 78±15 mL, SV 2D vs SV 3D , respectively; r=0.83, p<0.0001); such differences were not seen in patients with uniform flow velocities (82±15 vs 79±14 mL, r=0.83, p=0.03). Patient characteristics by spectral broadening are shown in table 1. Conclusion: In aortic stenosis patients with non-uniform flow, Doppler-based methods overestimated SV by 29.5% on average (maximum 64%) when compared to 3D methods. This results in a proportional increase in calculated valve area despite a similar mean gradient between groups. Substituting SV 3D resulted in similar SV, valve area, and mean gradient between uniform and non-uniform groups. When spectral broadening >0.40 cm/s is present, 3D volumetric assessment of SV should be considered for accurate estimation of aortic valve area.

Objective: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), the development of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction adversely affects the natural history and is associated with poor outcomes following aortic valve replacement. However, the timing and possible reasons for transition from preserved to impaired LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with AS have not been described. The aim of this study was to describe the time course of development of LV dysfunction and associated conditions in patients with severe AS. Methods & Results: Between 1/1/2009 and 12/31/2012, 667 (19%) of 3528 patients with severe AS (aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2) identified from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN Echocardiographic Laboratory database; had LVEF ≤50%. Of those 667 patients, 263 (39%) had previous echocardiograms (median: 71.6 months, 25 IQR: 36.3, 75:118.2) before the development of severe AS, allowing an assessment of change in LVEF over time. Among these 263 patients, 8 (3%) had dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), 225 (86%) had ischemic heart disease (IHD), 5 (2%) had other significant valve disease, and 25 (10%) had no concomitant heart disease before the development of severe AS. The evolution of development of reduced LVEF at several time points is shown in the Figure. The initial LVEF was 34±12 % in DCM patients, 51±13% in IHD patients and 61±9 % in AS patients without other heart diseases (p<0.001, ANOVA). Patients with AS alone or AS+DCM/IHD showed a gradual decline in LVEF before AS became severe, and a more rapid decline in LVEF once the AVA reached ≤ 1 cm2. Conclusion: In patients with severe AS, a majority of the patients (86%) with reduced EF had ischemic heart disease. Although there was a gradual decline in LVEF before development of severe AS, the decline was more rapid after AS became severe in almost all patients regardless of associated cardiac condition. More frequent monitoring may be indicated in AS patients especially when AVA reaches 1cm2 and concomitant IHD.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at high surgical risk. We investigated the impact of TAVR on left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function using conventional echocardiography parameters. Methods and results: A total of 202 consecutive patients (age 80.6±8.0 years, aortic valve area 0.80±0.16cm 2 ) who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic between 2008 and 2013 were included in the study. LV ejection fraction (EF) and RV systolic function including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC) and, systolic excursion velocity (S’) were compared before (median 33.5 days) and after TAVR procedure (median 30 days). Patients who underwent pacemaker implantation after TAVR were excluded. LV EF significantly improved following TAVR (55.3±12.6% pre vs 58.5±11.1% post; p<0.05). In contrast, RV systolic function significantly decreased after TAVR (pre vs post; TAPSE: 18.8±6.3 mm vs 17.4±6.3 mm, FAC: 42.6±9.8% vs 37.3±8.2%; S’: 10.7±2.6 cm/s vs 10.2±2.6 cm/s; p<0.05 for all). Stratifying RV functional change by TAVR approach site, patients undergoing trans-femoral TAVR (n=100) showed RV deterioration only by FAC (see Table). In contrast, RV systolic dysfunction was more prominent in trans-apical approach group (n=87) with significant decline in all parameters of RV systolic function (see Table). Conclusion: TAVR is associated with early enhancement in LV systolic function. However, there is evidence of worsening RV function in a significant number of patients. Further studies are necessary to determine whether this deterioration in RV function is related to anatomic access site or to other factors, and to evaluate its prognostic significance.

Abstract Aims Early detection of aortic stenosis (AS) is becoming increasingly important with a better outcome after aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic severe AS patients and a poor outcome in moderate AS. We aimed to develop artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) using a convolutional neural network to identify patients with moderate to severe AS. Methods and results Between 1989 and 2019, 258 607 adults [mean age 63 ± 16.3 years; women 122 790 (48%)] with an echocardiography and an ECG performed within 180 days were identified from the Mayo Clinic database. Moderate to severe AS by echocardiography was present in 9723 (3.7%) patients. Artificial intelligence training was performed in 129 788 (50%), validation in 25 893 (10%), and testing in 102 926 (40%) randomly selected subjects. In the test group, the AI-ECG labelled 3833 (3.7%) patients as positive with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 78%, 74%, and 74%, respectively. The sensitivity increased and the specificity decreased as age increased. Women had lower sensitivity but higher specificity compared with men at any age groups. The model performance increased when age and sex were added to the model (AUC 0.87), which further increased to 0.90 in patients without hypertension. Patients with false-positive AI-ECGs had twice the risk for developing moderate or severe AS in 15 years compared with true negative AI-ECGs (hazard ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.90–2.50). Conclusion An AI-ECG can identify patients with moderate or severe AS and may serve as a powerful screening tool for AS in the community.

Background: Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, its prognostic value in patients with moderate aortic stenosis remains unknown. Methods: Patients diagnosed with moderate aortic stenosis (1.0< aortic valve area ≤1.5 cm 2 ) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were identified. GLS was assessed by 2-dimensional strain imaging using speckle-tracking method. All-cause mortality was assessed according to the median GLS value. Results: Two hundred eighty-seven patients were included (median age 76 years; 47% male). Mean aortic valve area was 1.25 cm 2 , left ventricular ejection fraction 62%, and median GLS −15.2%. During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, there were 103 deaths (36%). Mortality was higher in patients with GLS>−15.2% (hazard ratio 2.62 [95% CI 1.69–4.06]) compared with patients with GLS ≤−15.2% even after adjusting for confounders. Mortality rates at 1, 3, 5 years were 21%, 35%, 48%, respectively, in patients with GLS >−15.2%, and 6%, 15%, 19% in those with GLS ≤−15.2%. Even among those with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥60%, GLS discriminated higher-risk patients ( P =0.0003). During follow-up, 106 (37%) patients underwent aortic valve replacement with median waiting-time of 2.4 years, and their survival was better than patients without aortic valve replacement. Among those patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, prognosis was still worse in patients with GLS >−15.2% ( P =0.04). Mortality rates at 1, 3, 5 years were 2%, 10%, 20%, respectively, in patients with GLS >-15.2% and 2%, 5%, 6% in those with GLS ≤−15.2%. Conclusions: Impaired GLS in moderate aortic stenosis patients is associated with higher mortality rates even among those undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Abstract Background Currently data on the risk stratification of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) are very limited. Method Patients diagnosed with moderate AS in 2012 (aortic valve area [AVA]: >1 and ≤1.5cm2) were identified. Patients were stratifying by LV diastolic function (normal vs high filling pressure), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50 vs <50%) and stroke volume index (SVI ≥35 vs <35 ml/m2). High filling pressure was defined as average E/e' ≥14 or septal E/e' ≥11 when atrial fibrillation was present. The prognosis was compared to age- and sex-matched general population. Results 898 patients were included (age 74 years, 58% male, AVA 1.25 cm2). During a median follow-up of 2.9 years, there were 346 deaths. In patients with moderate AS, mortality was higher than expected (P<0.001, Fig 1A). LV high filling pressure, LVEF<50% and SVI<35ml/m2 were present in 416 (55%), 140 (17%) and 81 (9%) patients, respectively. Those with normal filling pressure had similar prognosis when compared to controls (Fig 1C, P=0.35); whereas mortality rates remained higher than reference even when LVEF≥50% or SVI≥35ml/m2 (Fig 1E, 1G, P<0.001). Amongst all groups, mortality rates were the highest in patients with LVEF <50% or SVI <35 ml/m2 (Fig 1D, 1F, P<0.001); mortality ratios were 3.78 (95% CI 3.01–4.67) and 6.91 (95% CI 5.13–9.11), respectively. Noteworthy, high filling pressure allowed further risk stratification when LVEF or SVI was preserved (Fig 2, P<0.001). Figures 1 & 2 Conclusions Patients with moderate AS showed poor survival. A clinical trial examining role of aortic valve replacement would be beneficial not only in patients with reduced LVEF or SVI but also in those with high LV filling pressures.