Roden, Dan M.

Abstract Aims SCN5A-E1784K (c.5350G>A) is the most common variant associated with the long QT (LQTS) and Brugada syndromes (BrS). It can manifest variably as LQTS, BrS, and/or conduction disorders. This presents a challenge for risk stratification. We aimed to describe clinical and ECG characteristics and identify risk markers that associate with arrhythmic events. Methods and results We undertook a retrospective observational multicentre study of a large cohort of 231 subjects with SCN5A-E1784K from Europe, USA, and Japan. Comprehensive demographic and clinical data, including initial presentation ECG and follow-up, were collected. ‘Lethal events’ were defined as sudden death, non-fatal cardiac arrest, and documented sustained VT or VF. ‘Cardiac events’ were defined as arrhythmic syncope plus any lethal events. Clinical characteristics and ECG parameters corrected for age were investigated for association with lethal and/or cardiac events. Fourteen (6%) subjects experienced a lethal event and 45 (19%) a cardiac event. PR interval and QRS duration were associated with lethal and cardiac events. In multivariable models, both PR interval and QRS duration were associated with lethal events, but only QRS duration was associated with cardiac events. Only age-corrected QRS (rQRS) was associated with lethal and cardiac event-free survival from birth after correction for multiple testing. Conclusion Ventricular myocardial conduction appears likely to play a role in the risk of arrhythmic events in patients with SCN5A-E1784K. This provides an important opportunity for the personalization of management and has the potential to guide preventative therapies.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of multiple decision aid strategies in promoting high quality shared decision making for prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Design Cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting Six academic medical centers in the United States. Participants Patient participants were aged ≥18 with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation, at risk for stroke (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥1 for men, ≥2 for women), and scheduled for a clinical appointment to discuss stroke prevention strategies. Participating clinicians were those who manage stroke prevention strategies for participating patients. Intervention Patients were randomized to use a patient decision aid or usual care; clinicians were randomized to use an encounter decision aid or usual care with all participating patients. Main outcome measures Primary outcome measures were quality of shared decision making measured by OPTION12, knowledge of atrial fibrillation and its management, and decisional conflict. Results 1117 participants across six sites were included in the analysis. Compared with usual care, the combined use of both the patient decision aid and the encounter decision aid improved the quality of shared decision making (adjusted mean difference 12.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.0 to 16.2; P<0.001), improved patients’ knowledge (odds ratio 1.68 (95% CI 1.35 to 2.09; P<0.001), and reduced patients’ decisional conflict (adjusted mean difference −6.3 (95% CI −9.6 to −3.1; P<0.001). Statistically significant improvements were also observed with the encounter decision aid alone versus usual care for all three outcomes and with the patient decision aid alone versus usual care for quality of shared decision making and knowledge. No important differences were observed in treatment choices for stroke prevention or in participants’ satisfaction. No statistically significant difference in the length of visit across study groups was detected. Conclusion Patients who received any decision aid (encounter decision aid, patient decision aid, or both) had lower decisional conflict, better shared decision making, and greater knowledge than those receiving no decision aid, except for the effect of the patient decision aid on decisional conflict, which did not reach statistical significance. The study establishes that use of either pre-visit or in-visit decision aids individually or in combination is advantageous compared with usual care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04357288 .

Background: Guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) making decisions regarding anticoagulation for stroke prevention. Decision support tools (e.g., Decision Aids [DAs]) facilitate SDM. However, little research has compared the effectiveness of the two most common types of DAs: (1) encounter decision aid (EDA) and (2) pre-encounter patient decision aid (PDA). Our study assessed the comparative effectiveness of PDAs and EDAs on SDM during AF clinical encounters where stroke prevention strategies were discussed. Research Question: Do decision aids (PDA or EDA), alone or in combination, improve patients’ AF decision-making experience compared to usual care? Methods: A cluster randomized multi-center trial in patients with AF comparing usual care (no DA) vs. one DA (EDA or PDA) or both DAs. Clinicians and patients were randomized independently into 4 study arms. Clinicians were randomized to use or not use the EDA for all study visits, and patients were randomized to use or not use the PDA. Co-primary outcome domains were: (1) quality of SDM (2) patient knowledge, and (3) decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes included: (1) treatment choice, (2) treatment initiation, and (3) treatment persistence. Patient characteristics were assessed. We will present comparisons of the randomized DAs on the co-primary and secondary outcomes and subgroup analyses. Results: Between December 2020-July 2023, investigators in 6 U.S. healthcare systems enrolled 1117 patients (mean (M) age 69, 63% male, 89% White) and 107 clinicians. Compared to usual care (no DA, M=31.6), SDM was better in patients receiving PDA (M=35.4) and EDA (44.5) alone or together (M=43.7; p’s<0.001). Knowledge about AF was greatest for those receiving both DAs or the PDA alone (84% accurate responses for PDA and both vs 76% with no DA, p<0.001), followed closely by the EDA alone (82%, p=0.003). Finally, both DAs (M=19.5) and EDA alone (M=20.0) had better decisional conflict scores compared to usual care (M=25.8; p’s<0.001). We will present analyses that assess the impact of DAs on secondary outcomes and interactions with DA, patient, and clinical characteristics across each outcome. Conclusions: In one of the first randomized trials examining the comparative effectiveness of EDAs and PDAs on SDM in clinical medicine, both PDAs and EDAs improved shared decision-making, decisional conflict, and knowledge compared to patients receiving usual care.

Precision medicine, which among other aspects includes an individual's genomic data in diagnosis and management, has become the standard‐of‐care for Mendelian cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, early identification and management of asymptomatic patients with potentially lethal and manageable Mendelian CVD through screening, which is the promise of precision health, remains an unsolved challenge. The reduced costs of genomic sequencing have enabled the creation of biobanks containing in‐depth genetic and health information, which have facilitated the understanding of genetic variation, penetrance, and expressivity, moving us closer to the genotype‐first screening of asymptomatic individuals for Mendelian CVD. This approach could transform health care by diagnostic refinement and facilitating prevention or therapeutic interventions. Yet, potential benefits must be weighed against the potential risks, which include evolving variant pathogenicity assertion or identification of variants with low disease penetrance; costly, stressful, and inappropriate diagnostic evaluations; negative psychological impact; disqualification for employment or of competitive sports; and denial of insurance. Furthermore, the natural history of Mendelian CVD is often unpredictable, making identification of those who will benefit from preventive measures a priority. Currently, there is insufficient evidence that population‐based genetic screening for Mendelian CVD can reduce adverse outcomes at a reasonable cost to an extent that outweighs the harms of true‐positive and false‐positive results. Besides technical, clinical, and financial burdens, ethical and legal aspects pose unprecedented challenges. This review highlights key developments in the field of genotype‐first approaches to Mendelian CVD and summarizes challenges with potential solutions that can pave the way for implementing this approach for clinical care.

BACKGROUND: Long QT syndrome is a lethal arrhythmia syndrome, frequently caused by rare loss-of-function variants in the potassium channel encoded by KCNH2 . Variant classification is difficult, often because of lack of functional data. Moreover, variant-based risk stratification is also complicated by heterogenous clinical data and incomplete penetrance. Here we sought to test whether variant-specific information, primarily from high-throughput functional assays, could improve both classification and cardiac event risk stratification in a large, harmonized cohort of KCNH2 missense variant heterozygotes. METHODS: We quantified cell-surface trafficking of 18 796 variants in KCNH2 using a multiplexed assay of variant effect (MAVE). We recorded KCNH2 current density for 533 variants by automated patch clamping. We calibrated the strength of evidence of MAVE data according to ClinGen guidelines. We deeply phenotyped 1458 patients with KCNH2 missense variants, including QTc, cardiac event history, and mortality. We correlated variant functional data and Bayesian long QT syndrome penetrance estimates with cohort phenotypes and assessed hazard ratios for cardiac events. RESULTS: Variant MAVE trafficking scores and automated patch clamping peak tail currents were highly correlated (Spearman rank-order ρ=0.69; n=433). The MAVE data were found to provide up to pathogenic very strong evidence for severe loss-of-function variants. In the cohort, both functional assays and Bayesian long QT syndrome penetrance estimates were significantly predictive of cardiac events when independently modeled with patient sex and corrected QT interval (QTc); however, MAVE data became nonsignificant when peak tail current and penetrance estimates were also available. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for 20-year event outcomes based on patient-specific sex and QTc (area under the curve, 0.80 [0.76–0.83]) was improved with prospectively available penetrance scores conditioned on MAVE (area under the curve, 0.86 [0.83–0.89]) or attainable automated patch clamping peak tail current data (area under the curve, 0.84 [0.81–0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput KCNH2 variant MAVE data meaningfully contribute to variant classification at scale, whereas long QT syndrome penetrance estimates and automated patch clamping peak tail current measurements meaningfully contribute to risk stratification of cardiac events in patients with heterozygous KCNH2 missense variants.

Abstract Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a globally prevalent cardiac arrhythmia with significant genetic underpinnings, as highlighted by recent large-scale genetic studies. A prominent clinical and genetic overlap exists between AF, heritable ventricular cardiomyopathies, and arrhythmia syndromes, underlining the potential of AF as an early indicator of severe ventricular disease in younger individuals. Indeed, several recent studies have demonstrated meaningful yields of rare pathogenic variants among early-onset AF patients (∼4%–11%), most notably for cardiomyopathy genes in which rare variants are considered clinically actionable. Genetic testing thus presents a promising opportunity to identify monogenetic defects linked to AF and inherited cardiac conditions, such as cardiomyopathy, and may contribute to prognosis and management in early-onset AF patients. A first step towards recognizing this monogenic contribution was taken with the Class IIb recommendation for genetic testing in AF patients aged 45 years or younger by the 2023 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for AF. By identifying pathogenic genetic variants known to underlie inherited cardiomyopathies and arrhythmia syndromes, a personalized care pathway can be developed, encompassing more tailored screening, cascade testing, and potentially genotype-informed prognosis and preventive measures. However, this can only be ensured by frameworks that are developed and supported by all stakeholders. Ambiguity in test results such as variants of uncertain significance remain a major challenge and as many as ∼60% of people with early-onset AF might carry such variants. Patient education (including pretest counselling), training of genetic teams, selection of high-confidence genes, and careful reporting are strategies to mitigate this. Further challenges to implementation include financial barriers, insurability issues, workforce limitations, and the need for standardized definitions in a fast-moving field. Moreover, the prevailing genetic evidence largely rests on European descent populations, underscoring the need for diverse research cohorts and international collaboration. Embracing these challenges and the potential of genetic testing may improve AF care. However, further research—mechanistic, translational, and clinical—is urgently needed.

Although there is consensus on the management of patients with Brugada Syndrome with high risk for sudden cardiac arrest, asymptomatic or intermediate-risk patients present clinical management challenges. This document explores the management opinions of experts throughout the world for patients with Brugada Syndrome who do not fit guideline recommendations. Four real-world clinical scenarios were presented with commentary from small expert groups for each case. All authors voted on case-specific questions to evaluate the level of consensus among the entire group in nuanced diagnostic and management decisions relevant to each case. Points of agreement, points of controversy, and gaps in knowledge are highlighted.

Introduction: Relatively little is known about outcomes following return of secondary findings detected in large scale sequencing projects. We assessed 1-year outcomes following return of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in phase III of the eMERGE network (2015-2019). Methods: Adult participants (n=18,544) at 7 sites were enrolled in a prospective cohort study to study the clinical impact of returning results from targeted sequencing of 68 actionable genes, including LDLR , APOB , and PCSK9 . Process, intermediate, and/or clinical outcomes within 1-year after return of results (RoR) were ascertained by electronic health record (EHR) review. A process outcome was defined as referral to a specialist or ordering new tests, including lipid profile and screening tests for coronary heart disease. An intermediate outcome was defined as new diagnosis of FH or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. A clinical outcome was defined as initiation or change in lipid-lowering medication. The primary outcomes were a new diagnosis of FH and modification of lipid lowering therapy. Results: Results were returned to 134 individuals, and data for 119 participants were available for the outcomes analysis. Process (86%), intermediate (49%), and/or clinical (26%) outcomes occurred in 92% of participants. Process outcomes included 72% with new tests ordered and 61% referred to a specialist. Before RoR, 86.5% of individuals with FH associated P/LP variants had a diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia but only 17.6% had a diagnosis of FH; 89% were on a statin but only 58% were on a high intensity statin. Following RoR, 44% (52/119) received a new diagnosis of FH. Lipid lowering treatment was modified in 26% (31/119), including initiation of a statin in 5%, increasing statin dose in 13%, and adding ezetimibe or a PCSK9 inhibitor in 12.6%. Conclusions: In a multisite cohort of EHR-linked biobanks, monogenic FH was underdiagnosed (only 17.6% had a specific diagnosis) and undertreated (only 58% were on a high intensity statin); 44% of participants received a new diagnosis of FH and 26% had lipid lowering treatment modified after RoR. These results highlight the clinical utility of returning FH variants in EHR-linked biobanks.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): National Institute of Health Research St George's, University of London Background SCN5A-E1784K (c.5350G&gt;A) is the most common variant associated with the LQT3 long QT syndrome (LQTS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS). It exhibits incomplete penetrance and can manifest variably as a mixed clinical phenotype of LQTS, BrS and/or conduction disorders (1-4). This presents a challenge for risk stratification and optimal management. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and risk markers in a large, well characterised international cohort of SCN5A-E1784K subjects and identify demographic and/or ECG parameters associated with event free survival. Methods Comprehensive clinical data, including initial presentation and follow-up data, were collected from SCN5A-E1784K subjects. Outcome ‘events’ included sudden death, aborted cardiac arrest, and documented VF or VT or arrhythmic syncope. ‘Lethal events’ included sudden death, aborted cardiac arrest or documented VF or VT. Associations between clinical characteristics and event free survival were investigated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results SCN5A-E1784K subjects (n=231) were recruited from 16 centres. Median follow up was 24.9 years (15.2 - 43.3) and 45 individuals (19%) experienced an event. Lethal events were observed in 14 subjects (6%). Figure 1 shows event (A) and lethal event (B) free survival in SCN5A-E1784K subjects. Higher QRS duration (corrected for age) was associated with shorter event-free interval. QRS duration was the only characteristic associated with increased risk with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.04 or 1.05 per ms for events and lethal events, respectively. The observed survival for events and lethal events for QRS tertiles are shown in Figure 2. Discussion Ventricular myocardial conduction, as evidenced by QRS duration, appears to play a role in the risk of arrhythmic events in patients with SCN5A-E1784K. Corrected QT interval and BrS phenotype were, however, not associated with risk. This provides an important opportunity for the personalisation of risk stratification of these patients, whose management can otherwise be very challenging. Figures